Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During World War I action in 1915, the Australian and New Zealand military
attempted to take control of the Gallipoli peninsula in Turkey. After eight months of losing battles and more than eleven thousand ANZAC troops killed, Australia and New Zealand withdrew their troops from Turkish soil. Eventually, more-competent forces (from Russia) conducted a successful campaign against the Turks, which effectively ended the Ottoman Empire. Wikipedia states: "The campaign is often referred to for its successful stealthy retreat." Oh, BRAVO, boys, on your "successful stealthy retreat"! Kudos for sneaking away SO BLOODY WELL! Naturally, this stinging defeat taught the ANZAC military exactly what it was good for (parades and drills), so a national holiday has been established to celebrate this gaining of perspective. Anzac Day is just over a week away, and Jon has invited hordes of people who will be coming and going over the course of the day. Since the party population will be so fluid, I have decided to offer a buffet. The first food setting will be at 10:30 AM, and food service will conclude at 9:30 PM. We expect to have anywhere from 8 to 50 guests, with the peak hours expected to be from 3:00 PM to 8:00 PM. The first table will contain: - Brandied fruit compote with creme anglaise - Devilled eggs with beetroot-juice "caviar" - Assorted charcuterie with hard rolls, pickles, and papaya mustard - Smoked salmon with dill sauce and capers - Tossed salad with assorted salad dressings At 11:00 AM, the following will be added: - Broccoli & cauliflower salad - Cucumber-melon salad with celery and feta - Wine-poached pears - Boiled prawns with passionfruit-ponzu dipping sauce - A wedge of Bruny Island C2 cheese, pickled grapes, and crackers Every half hour afterward, any wilting or perishable items will be cleared away, and new items will be set out. The 11:30 AM additions will be: - Lamb kofta with mint-yogurt sauce and pita rounds - Assorted olives - A fresh tossed salad - Pumpkin rissoles with pomegranate-pistachio chutney - Eggplant-walnut salad The noon additions will be: - Scallop sausages - Tandoori-style chicken - Roasted capsicum stuffed with cheese, rice and toasted almonds - Pan-cooked carrots and fennel - Pavlova with mango and peach The 12:30 PM additions will be: - Beetroot with spinach and sieved hard-boiled egg - Chilled leek-avocado soup - Crisp potato cakes with a variety of condiments - Mushroom-lentil curry pasties - Banana cream slice The 1:00 PM additions will be: - Quiche with onions and bacon - Banana-leaf-steamed barramundi with sweet soy dipping sauce - Poached lobster with lime butter - Rockmelon with prosciutto - Mangosteen tart The 1:30 PM additions will be: - Braised pork shoulder with apple-butter barbeque sauce - Buttered turnips - Buttered peas - Sweetcorn-coated crabcakes - Honeydew chunks with powdered honey The 2:00 PM additions will be: - Caprese salad - Caponata with rustic bread - Potato gnocchi with braised short-rib ragout - Slow-roasted onions with balsamic vinegar - Panna cotta with plums The 2:30 PM additions will be: - Noodle pancake with stir-fried prawns and lettuce (Thank you, RFC!) - Jasmine rice - Chicken glazed with five-spice and tamarillo - Spicy pork belly with cloves and garlic - Mongolian lamb chops - Chinese broccoli with beef - Stir-fried vegetables - Vegetable-chicken spring rolls - Flatbread with curried duck For the peak hours I mentioned, I naturally want the food to be inspired by Turkish and Russian cuisines (in which I include Georgian and Ukrainian cuisines). The 3:00 PM additions will be: - Shakshuka - Iskender kebab - Farfalle with lamb, eggplant, dill, tomato, and yogurt - Spinach pide - Baklava The 3:30 additions will be: - Bulgur-stuffed squash - Carrot salad with yogurt - Shredded chicken in walnut sauce - Lamb's brain salad - Saffron pudding The 4:00 PM additions will be: - Potato borek - Spinach borek - Hummus and red capsicum dip with grilled pita bread - Stuffed eggplant - Stuffed grape leaves The 4:30 PM additions will be: - Ezme Salata (finely chopped vegetables with spices and nuts) - Feta borek with tomato dipping sauce - Fried squid with yogurt-pickle sauce - Vegetable guvec (casserole) - Kunefe (shredded pastry wrapped around sweetened cheese and baked) The 5:00 PM additions will be: - Pirzola (Turkish lamb chops) with lemon-olive sauce - Sucuk (a spicy Turkish sausage) with mashed potatoes - Arnavut cigeri (liver with onions and mixed herbs) - Chicken breast with smoked eggplant sauce - Baked rice pudding with cinnamon The 5:30 PM additions will be: - Ukrainian borscht (which doesn't contain beetroot) - Smoked sturgeon - Chicken Kiev - Apple salad with eggs and peas - Mushrooms stuffed with chicken, cheese, and spiced with nutmeg The 6:00 PM additions will be: - Carp stuffed with buckwheat and mushrooms - Ham in pastry - Lobio (green beans with vegetables and sour cream) - Potato pie - Baba with cherry syrup and custard The 6:30 PM additions will be: - Radish salad - Buckwheat kasha with liver - Hard-boiled eggs with horseradish sauce - Abzhorka (beet-carrot salad with onions and mayonnaise) - Herring with fried potatoes The 7:00 PM additions will be: - Koulibiac (salmon baked in brioche with eggs and veloute) - Baked pirohy with sauerkraut - Cabbage soup - Red beans with carrots, onions, and prunes - Barley pilaf The 7:30 PM additions will be: - Vegetable stew with dill and parsley - Osetra caviar with blini - Beef Stroganoff with mustard - Crepes with khalva (walnuts and cinnamon in thick syrup) - Plum sambouk (thick mousse) The 8:00 PM additions will be: - Beef tongue sandwiches - Kangaroo steak Diane - A fresh tossed salad - Tomato salad with kalamata olives and orange vinaigrette - Chocolate-raspberry bon-bons The 8:30 PM additions will be: - Mushroom vareniki (dumplings) with sour cream and greens - Potato, beetroot, and carrot salad - Bacon with creamy parsnip puree - Lime flan The 9:00 PM additions will be: - Shiraz-Roquefort gougere - Persimmon pudding with cinnamon-allspice cream - Nutella wontons with orange sherbet - Quince paste with Manchego cheese and almond crackers - Brie baked in pastry with roasted grapes and figs The 9:30 PM additions will be: - Coffee punch with orange peel, brandy, and burnt sugar - Toffee-coated candied sweet potato - Flourless chocolate cake with red wine syrup - Wattle seed madeleines - Peach tiramisu At the end of the evening I will be thoroughly, thoroughly knickered, no doubt about it! But it's all for "The Lads," isn't it, and won't they just stand a little more erect because of it? -- Malingering fraudulent dole-bludgers should be publicly flogged to death. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Julana Benaroon" > wrote in message ... > So, you want a medal? Argus |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Julana Benaroon" > wrote in message ... (snipped for the sake of sanity...) Marvelous satire; I love the inclusion of Turkish and Russian cuisines. Beautifully set out. You are a legend in your own time. pavane |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/04/10 18:47, Peter Lucarse-clone wrote:
[ Snip trolling ] [ Snip recipes ] You know the aussie & NZ forces were under direct british command for gallipoli, right? And that it was the british command that ordered them there, and to keep charging, right? At least look up your facts before you try to make fun of them - it just makes you look like an idiot. Go back to your bridge, troll. You still tell terrible jokes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benji Z-Man wrote:
> You know the aussie & NZ forces were under direct british command for > gallipoli, right? And that it was the british command that ordered them > there, and to keep charging, right? Right and right, I did know those things. You seem to believe that those facts somehow refute what I wrote, but it's unclear exactly why you think that. It was Winston Churchill who had overall command of the campaign. The fact that Churchill had success when he commanded real British troops seems to indicate that the ANZAC forces lacked mettle. Could be lack of training, or it could be ANZAC genetic inferiority (remember the lowbrow criminal breeding stock from which arose the white Australian population!), but Churchill's leadership was hardly the cause for the failure. The Russian success against the Turks indicates equally clearly that the Turks were not invincible -- but both the Turks and the Russians were obviously better at soldiering than the ANZAC troops. Thank you for participating in the discussion! I say, where do you personally stand on the issue of dole fraud? What punishment do you consider appropriate for someone who fraudulently claims to have become disabled while in service, and who collects a pension because of that fraud? -- Pillory the malingerer! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter's sockpuppet wrote:
> So, you want a medal? > Argus Reading what I wrote, I realize I should have been a bit more clear. I am not cooking all that food. There are actually eight people who will at one time or another be in charge of the kitchen. This is what I will be cooking for Anzac Day: 10:30 AM - Brandied fruit compote with creme anglaise - Devilled eggs with beetroot-juice "caviar" - Assorted charcuterie with hard rolls, pickles, and papaya mustard - Smoked salmon with dill sauce and capers - Tossed salad with assorted salad dressings Noon - Scallop sausages - Tandoori-style chicken - Roasted capsicum stuffed with cheese, rice and toasted almonds - Pan-cooked carrots and fennel - Pavlova with mango and peach 9:00 PM - Shiraz-Roquefort gougere - Persimmon pudding with cinnamon-allspice cream - Nutella wontons with orange sherbet - Quince paste with Manchego cheese and almond crackers - Brie baked in pastry with roasted grapes and figs 9:30 PM - Coffee punch with orange peel, brandy, and burnt sugar - Toffee-coated candied sweet potato - Flourless chocolate cake with red wine syrup - Wattle seed madeleines - Peach tiramisu The rest of the time I will be fetching, carrying, and prepping for others who have generously offered to assist in the food preparation. (We are fortunate and grateful to have two very gifted cooks instructing us in how to prepare the Turkish and Russian dishes. We also have a skilled Chinese cook and a woman who is expert in Italian cooking.) Astute readers would have noticed the distinct changes in cooking styles between some of the offerings, but maybe it was a bit too subtle for you to discern. Will you be skydiving that day? As they say in show business, break a leg! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benji Z-Man wrote:
> On 17/04/10 18:47, Peter Lucarse-clone wrote: > [ Snip trolling ] > [ Snip recipes ] > > You know the aussie & NZ forces were under direct british command for > gallipoli, right? And that it was the british command that ordered them > there, and to keep charging, right? At least look up your facts before > you try to make fun of them - it just makes you look like an idiot. > > Go back to your bridge, troll. You still tell terrible jokes. If you ignore that pratt we wont see it's week and insipid net casts Thanks |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/04/10 23:22, atec7 7 > wrote:
> If you ignore that pratt we wont see it's week and insipid net casts > Thanks ^ NB, Lucarse uses a fake ID to post up on here. Which is very easy to get around, just create a new account. Which is why I smell the same odor - starting out with direct attacks at Aussies just before their big military day smells like troll odor. Hence they need to get back to their bridge. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/04/10 16:24, Julana Benaroon wrote:
[ Snip more trolling] > I say, where do you personally stand on the issue of dole fraud? What > punishment do you consider appropriate for someone who fraudulently claims > to have become disabled while in service, and who collects a pension > because of that fraud? > Starting a new thread for that. First non-troll post you've made in here so far. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benji Z-Man wrote:
> ^ NB, Lucarse uses a fake ID to post up on here. Which is very easy to > get around, just create a new account. > > Which is why I smell the same odor - starting out with direct attacks at > Aussies just before their big military day smells like troll odor. > > Hence they need to get back to their bridge. "Starting out"? I've been posting here for seven months, dolt! -- "Close the gap!" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22/04/10 09:49, Julana Benaroon wrote:
> "Starting out"? I've been posting here for seven months, dolt! Odd. I usually can smell trolls early on in the piece. You must have a ventilated litter tray there. =P |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benji Z-Man wrote:
> Odd. I usually can smell trolls early on in the piece. You must have a > ventilated litter tray there. =P Trolls? I merely believe in accuracy. Are you claiming that Anzac Day is not a commemoration of the Gallipoli campaign, or are you claiming that the Gallipoli campaign was a military success? If neither one, then exactly what did I write that you think is trolling? Or is it just your typical white Aussie male offence-as-defence mechanism at work? -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22/04/10 16:46, Julana Benaroon wrote:
> Trolls? I merely believe in accuracy. Are you claiming that Anzac Day is > not a commemoration of the Gallipoli campaign, or are you claiming that > the Gallipoli campaign was a military success? Despite the thread, I won't keep feeding you. Your posts, intended at being offensive or at least inflammatory, are neither accurate nor in the spirit of what the day commemorates. Gallipoli was not a success - but the men who went there gave it their best shot they could - penned down from all sides, unable to retreat, given minimal reinforcements and the least equipment they could be provided with - the ANZAC forces received shipments months after the British did on their boats, just outside of artillery range. We went there on British orders, as part of the British commonwealth. We followed British orders on where to land, despite it being the wrong location. And your comments about how the Russians did what the Aussies couldn't is flawed - they also came from the complete opposite direction. I have been to Gallipoli, and you can see that it was no Normandy. And you should see how much effort the allies needed to pass that hurdle. So, you are a troll. Your post is insulting, inaccurate, and ignorant. I will put you on ignore after this, but I had hoped you would be able to at least look at war history before you make some commentary on it. Incidentally - nice attempt at a racist stab there, troll. Get back to your bridge. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/04/10 18:47, Julana Benaroon wrote:
[ Snip ] Hang on. Isn't it against eternal-september.org's terms of use to post a false email? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benji Z-Man wrote:
>> Trolls? I merely believe in accuracy. Are you claiming that Anzac Day is >> not a commemoration of the Gallipoli campaign, or are you claiming that >> the Gallipoli campaign was a military success? > > Despite the thread, I won't keep feeding you. Your posts, intended at > being offensive or at least inflammatory, are neither accurate nor in the > spirit of what the day commemorates. > > Gallipoli was not a success - but the men who went there gave it their > best shot they could - penned down from all sides, unable to retreat, > given minimal reinforcements and the least equipment they could be > provided with - the ANZAC forces received shipments months after the > British did on their boats, just outside of artillery range. > > We went there on British orders, as part of the British commonwealth. We > followed British orders on where to land, despite it being the wrong > location. And your comments about how the Russians did what the Aussies > couldn't is flawed - they also came from the complete opposite direction. > > I have been to Gallipoli, and you can see that it was no Normandy. And you > should see how much effort the allies needed to pass that hurdle. > > So, you are a troll. Your post is insulting, inaccurate, and ignorant. You have not pointed out a single inaccuracy in what I wrote. You merely whined, "Well, it was a tough job we were given, so we deserve to celebrate the effort we put forth, even though it was a complete military failure which we blame on the Brits -- because we certainly can't blame OURSELVES, can we?" Since you mention the "spirit of the day," I will say that the spirit of the day SHOULD be one of grief for the fallen, who died because they were not up to the task they were given. But instead I see thousands of families flocking to the beaches and picnic grounds for a party. My husband sells intoxicants to white people like you, and this is one of the most profitable days of the year for him. > I will put you on ignore after this, but I had hoped you would be able to > at least look at war history before you make some commentary on it. Then it would seem that I have the last word after all, when I say that you have shown nothing but blind chauvinistic jingoism. Enjoy your Dead Incompetent Soldier Day! -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/22/2010 11:33 PM, Julana Benaroon wrote:
> Benji Z-Man wrote: > >>> Trolls? I merely believe in accuracy. Are you claiming that Anzac Day is >>> not a commemoration of the Gallipoli campaign, or are you claiming that >>> the Gallipoli campaign was a military success? >> >> Despite the thread, I won't keep feeding you. Your posts, intended at >> being offensive or at least inflammatory, are neither accurate nor in the >> spirit of what the day commemorates. >> >> Gallipoli was not a success - but the men who went there gave it their >> best shot they could - penned down from all sides, unable to retreat, >> given minimal reinforcements and the least equipment they could be >> provided with - the ANZAC forces received shipments months after the >> British did on their boats, just outside of artillery range. >> >> We went there on British orders, as part of the British commonwealth. We >> followed British orders on where to land, despite it being the wrong >> location. And your comments about how the Russians did what the Aussies >> couldn't is flawed - they also came from the complete opposite direction. >> >> I have been to Gallipoli, and you can see that it was no Normandy. And >> you >> should see how much effort the allies needed to pass that hurdle. >> >> So, you are a troll. Your post is insulting, inaccurate, and ignorant. > > You have not pointed out a single inaccuracy in what I wrote. You merely > whined, "Well, it was a tough job we were given, so we deserve to celebrate > the effort we put forth, even though it was a complete military failure > which we blame on the Brits -- because we certainly can't blame OURSELVES, > can we?" > > Since you mention the "spirit of the day," I will say that the spirit of > the > day SHOULD be one of grief for the fallen, who died because they were > not up > to the task they were given. But instead I see thousands of families > flocking to the beaches and picnic grounds for a party. My husband sells > intoxicants to white people like you, and this is one of the most > profitable > days of the year for him. > > >> I will put you on ignore after this, but I had hoped you would be able to >> at least look at war history before you make some commentary on it. > > Then it would seem that I have the last word after all, when I say that you > have shown nothing but blind chauvinistic jingoism. Enjoy your Dead > Incompetent Soldier Day! I'm not Australian or New Zealander or from any part of the British Commonwealth, but having read your initial post I think you're an asshole. <plonk> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"J. Clarke" > wrote: > On 4/22/2010 11:33 PM, Julana Benaroon wrote: > > Then it would seem that I have the last word after all, when I say that you > > have shown nothing but blind chauvinistic jingoism. Enjoy your Dead > > Incompetent Soldier Day! > > I'm not Australian or New Zealander or from any part of the British > Commonwealth, but having read your initial post I think you're an asshole. > > <plonk> Julana Benaroon is one of the more interesting trolls on the group. According to Google, "Julana Benaroon" are both aboriginal names. The Email address is . OK. Troll. But interesting. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/04/10 03:57, Dan Abel wrote:
> In >, > "J. > wrote: > >> On 4/22/2010 11:33 PM, Julana Benaroon wrote: > >>> Then it would seem that I have the last word after all, when I say that you >>> have shown nothing but blind chauvinistic jingoism. Enjoy your Dead >>> Incompetent Soldier Day! >> >> I'm not Australian or New Zealander or from any part of the British >> Commonwealth, but having read your initial post I think you're an asshole. >> >> <plonk> > > Julana Benaroon is one of the more interesting trolls on the group. > According to Google, "Julana Benaroon" are both aboriginal names. The > Email address is . OK. Troll. But > interesting. > Also in the source: complaints should be sent to eternal-september.org - where one of the terms of use is that if you're using e-s.org as a newsgroup moderator, you need to have "invalid" on any fake emails you're distributing... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
> Julana Benaroon is one of the more interesting trolls on the group. > According to Google, "Julana Benaroon" are both aboriginal names. The > Email address is . OK. Troll. But > interesting. Julana also claims to be a woman, but "Julana" is a man's name. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benji Z-Man wrote:
>> Julana Benaroon is one of the more interesting trolls on the group. >> According to Google, "Julana Benaroon" are both aboriginal names. The >> Email address is . OK. Troll. But >> interesting. >> > > Also in the source: complaints should be sent to eternal-september.org - > where one of the terms of use is that if you're using e-s.org as a > newsgroup moderator, you need to have "invalid" on any fake emails you're > distributing... As far as I can tell, Julana isn't moderating any newsgroups. Do you have information which indicates she is? Regarding the second part of your passage, has anybody here received any e-mails from Julana, fake or otherwise? If Julana is neither moderating nor e-mailing, what makes the information germane to this case? Looking at the eternal-september.org terms of use, I see this: "The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" SHOULD be yours (i.e. you should be entitled to use it) and SHOULD be valid (= should not bounce because of invalidity). Using addresses and name space of other people without their consent is prohibited." My interpretation of that paragraph is that eternal-september.org prohibits using "addresses and name space of other people," but merely frowns upon fake information in the "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" fields -- so using fake information in those fields is not a violation of the terms. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/04/10 12:06, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Looking at the eternal-september.org terms of use, I see this: > > "The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" > SHOULD be yours (i.e. you should be entitled to use it) and SHOULD be > valid (= should not bounce because of invalidity). Using addresses and > name space of other people without their consent is prohibited." > > My interpretation of that paragraph is that eternal-september.org > prohibits using "addresses and name space of other people," but merely > frowns upon fake information in the "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:" > fields -- so using fake information in those fields is not a violation > of the terms. I'd say otherwise, based off the same phrase. (sic) "The addresses should be yours. You should not use addresses that are invalid. You should not use addresses or names of other people without their prior consent". And apologies about "moderator" - it was early in the day, and I didn't catch the typo being corrected by my spellchecker. Should have been "interface". |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> Dan Abel > wrote in
> : > >> In article >, >> "J. Clarke" > wrote: >> >>> On 4/22/2010 11:33 PM, Julana Benaroon wrote: >> >>> > Then it would seem that I have the last word after all, when I say >>> > that you have shown nothing but blind chauvinistic jingoism. Enjoy >>> > your Dead Incompetent Soldier Day! >>> >>> I'm not Australian or New Zealander or from any part of the British >>> Commonwealth, but having read your initial post I think you're an >>> asshole. >>> >>> <plonk> >> >> Julana Benaroon is one of the more interesting trolls on the group. >> According to Google, "Julana Benaroon" are both aboriginal names. The >> Email address is . OK. Troll. But >> interesting. >> The only interesting troll, is a dead troll. At the 'base'...... each and every troll is a stalker of sorts. Most are stalking a particular person. To give them any credence, or credit, is akin to saying you're Ok with what, in real life, would be a criminal offence. The gutless little turds that commit these "interesting" offences will soon be out of business, and fronting courts to answer for their actions, as countries around the world start coming into line on cyber bullying/stalking. So do everyone a favour, and killfile the gutless little turd. Peter in Brisbane Australia -- _________ Peter in Brisbane Australia |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter hoped for state intervention:
> At the 'base'...... each and every troll is a stalker of sorts. > > Most are stalking a particular person. You don't know what stalking really is, do you? People throw the term around again and again, but it has a REAL MEANING, and what you're seeing is not even CLOSE to being stalking. As far as a "particular person," I think that Julana's given e-mail address ) shows why you've *really* got your panties in a twist. > The gutless little turds that commit these "interesting" offences will > soon be out of business, and fronting courts to answer for their > actions, as countries around the world start coming into line on cyber > bullying/stalking. LOL. You mean your fictional SAS training didn't prepare you for anything like this? Or did you wash out before they got to that part of the training? Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Peter hoped for state intervention: > >> At the 'base'...... each and every troll is a stalker of sorts. >> >> Most are stalking a particular person. > > You don't know what stalking really is, do you? People throw the term > around again and again, but it has a REAL MEANING, and what you're seeing > is not even CLOSE to being stalking. Thank you all for your interest in my posts! The gathering turned out to be only a mild success: Rather than the roughly 350 people estimated, we only ended up serving about 320. Some of my dishes were crowd favorites! The guests very much enjoyed the devilled eggs with beetroot-juice "caviar", the Nutella wontons with orange sherbet, and the peach tiramisu. For my part, I was impressed by the work of some of the other cooks. The carp stuffed with buckwheat and mushrooms was beautifully presented, and the shredded chicken in walnut sauce was different than anything I'd had previously. I hope you all observed ANZAC day in whatever fashion you find appropriate. >> The gutless little turds that commit these "interesting" offences will >> soon be out of business, and fronting courts to answer for their >> actions, as countries around the world start coming into line on cyber >> bullying/stalking. > > LOL. You mean your fictional SAS training didn't prepare you for anything > like this? Or did you wash out before they got to that part of the > training? At heart, Peter is a "gutless little turd" himself. He "retired" from the military at quite a young age, feigning an injury, and has collected a fraudulent pension ever since. He still likes the smell of a soldier, though...and where do you suppose he puts his nose to savor it? -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anzac Day | Preserving | |||
Anzac biscuits | General Cooking | |||
Anzac Day | Barbecue | |||
ANZAC Day piss up! | General Cooking | |||
REC: ANZAC biscuits. | General Cooking |