It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm

A man suspected of attempting to detonate a car bomb in New York City
has been arrested.

Faisal Shahzad, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, is accused of driving
the explosives-laden car into Times Square on Saturday evening.

He is due to appear in court in Manhattan later.

US Attorney General Eric Holder said Mr Shahzad was arrested at John F
Kennedy Airport attempting to board a flight to Dubai.

On May 4, 2:15*pm, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm
>
> A man suspected of attempting to detonate a car bomb in New York City
> has been arrested.
>
> Faisal Shahzad, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, is accused of driving
> the explosives-laden car into Times Square on Saturday evening.
>
> He is due to appear in court in Manhattan later.
>
> US Attorney General Eric Holder said Mr Shahzad was arrested at John F
> Kennedy Airport attempting to board a flight to Dubai.

....he seems to have misread the part where he blows himself up...

On May 4, 7:52*am, Pope Bennydickedus >
wrote:
> On May 4, 2:15*pm, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>
> > It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm
>
> > A man suspected of attempting to detonate a car bomb in New York City
> > has been arrested.
>
> > Faisal Shahzad, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, is accused of driving
> > the explosives-laden car into Times Square on Saturday evening.
>
> > He is due to appear in court in Manhattan later.
>
> > US Attorney General Eric Holder said Mr Shahzad was arrested at John F
> > Kennedy Airport attempting to board a flight to Dubai.
>
> ...he seems to have misread the part where he blows himself up...

I heard he was a pretty good cook.

On Tue, 04 May 2010 17:22:43 +0200, abelard >
wrote:

>On Tue, 4 May 2010 12:15:22 +0000 (UTC), "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
>can't be...pelosi reckons it's the tea parties
>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm

Well, Pakistanis are known for holding tea parties and drinking large
quantities of tea.

On May 4, 8:15*am, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!

Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
one in the media will say it.

On Tue, 04 May 2010 13:15:22 +0100, Ted Furlow > wrote:

>
>
> It was a Paki.

There has been a trial? That was quick!

On Tue, 4 May 2010 12:15:22 +0000 (UTC), "Ted Furlow" > wrote:

>
>
>It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm
>
>A man suspected of attempting to detonate a car bomb in New York City
>has been arrested.
>
>Faisal Shahzad, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, is accused of driving
>the explosives-laden car into Times Square on Saturday evening.
>
>He is due to appear in court in Manhattan later.
>
>US Attorney General Eric Holder said Mr Shahzad was arrested at John F
>Kennedy Airport attempting to board a flight to Dubai.

Being reported now: Shazad has admitted to it and tells interrogators
that he got his bomb-making instructions in Pakistan.

FACE

FACE > posted
>Being reported now: Shazad has admitted to it and tells interrogators
>that he got his bomb-making instructions in Pakistan.
>

Must be true then. Couldn't possibly be in anyone's interests to lie to
the press. Especially the intelligence services. We know they always
tell the truth. It's in their charters.

--
Les
Criticising the government is not illegal, but often on investigation turns out
to be linked to serious offences.

On 04/05/10 21:03, FACE wrote:

> Being reported now: Shazad has admitted to it and tells interrogators
> that he got his bomb-making instructions in Pakistan.

So how come British and US soldiers keep getting blown to bits by
Afghans with less resources than the average boy scout and this
character, with the resources of a major Western country at his
disposal, and one with few controls on the public purchasing the
materials necessary to make improvised explosives, couldn't even manage
a 'phut...'...

The Pakistanis say he's a graduate of a Taliban training camp is
Peshwar, it sounds more like he's a graduate of the Islamabad branch of
Toys-Are-Us...

--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

On May 4, 1:03*pm, FACE > wrote:
> On Tue, 4 May 2010 12:15:22 +0000 (UTC), "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>
> >It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm
>
> >A man suspected of attempting to detonate a car bomb in New York City
> >has been arrested.
>
> >Faisal Shahzad, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, is accused of driving
> >the explosives-laden car into Times Square on Saturday evening.
>
> >He is due to appear in court in Manhattan later.
>
> >US Attorney General Eric Holder said Mr Shahzad was arrested at John F
> >Kennedy Airport attempting to board a flight to Dubai.
>
> Being reported now: Shazad has admitted to it and tells interrogators
> that he got his bomb-making instructions in Pakistan.
>
> FACE

No wonder it didn't go off.

On 04/05/10 23:15, Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On May 4, 1:03 pm, > wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 May 2010 12:15:22 +0000 (UTC), "Ted > wrote:
>>
>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8658888.stm
>>
>>> A man suspected of attempting to detonate a car bomb in New York City
>>> has been arrested.
>>
>>> Faisal Shahzad, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, is accused of driving
>>> the explosives-laden car into Times Square on Saturday evening.
>>
>>> He is due to appear in court in Manhattan later.
>>
>>> US Attorney General Eric Holder said Mr Shahzad was arrested at John F
>>> Kennedy Airport attempting to board a flight to Dubai.
>>
>> Being reported now: Shazad has admitted to it and tells interrogators
>> that he got his bomb-making instructions in Pakistan.
>>
>> FACE
>
> No wonder it didn't go off.

He's a graduate of a Taliban training camp and now we hear that his
dad's a retired Pakistani army officer.

Anyone else smell something a bit odd here?


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

On 2010-05-04 11:25:40 -0700, Mr. Bill said:

> On May 4, 8:15*am, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
> one in the media will say it.

Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?
Or the Muslim Terrorists that bombed the WTC--Why don't they call them
Saudi Terrorists?

It's only been a day since he was caught. I assume Fox has already
hammered the word "Muslim Terrorist" for 53 hours by that time.

Perhaps they're waiting to find if the rationale was Talibani Jihadist,
Pakistani Nationalist, Americani Disgruntlist or something even more
hip!
--
-- Beware the delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets.

On May 5, 1:25*pm, Juan Anonly > wrote:

> > Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
> > one in the media will say it.
>
> Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?

Short memory syndrome.....CBS, NBS and ABS repeatedly referred to
McVeigh as a Christan Terrorist.

"Juan Anonly" > wrote in message
news:2010050510252519278-nobody@nowherecom...
> On 2010-05-04 11:25:40 -0700, Mr. Bill said:
>
>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>
>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>> one in the media will say it.
>
> Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"? Or
> the Muslim Terrorists that bombed the WTC--Why don't they call them Saudi
> Terrorists?
>
> It's only been a day since he was caught. I assume Fox has already
> hammered the word "Muslim Terrorist" for 53 hours by that time.
>
> Perhaps they're waiting to find if the rationale was Talibani Jihadist,
> Pakistani Nationalist, Americani Disgruntlist or something even more hip!
> --
> -- Beware the delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets.
>

Alas, Americans are misconstruing Muslim Terrorist and Terrorist as the same
thing.
I still think that the 'insurgents' are going to **** of the wrong
government, who will promptly nuke them. Else they are going to nuke Israel
and start WWIII.
Then Taliban and Nazi will be equally 'dirty' words. And just as extinct as
a major force.

On 2010-05-05 11:54:38 -0700, Mr. Bill said:

> On May 5, 1:25*pm, Juan Anonly > wrote:
>
>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
>>> one in the media will say it.
>>
>> Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?
>
> Short memory syndrome.....CBS, NBS and ABS repeatedly referred to
> McVeigh as a Christan Terrorist.

And that's just lies and misinformation syndrome.

I see you're just trolling in rec.food.cooking to spread the political
Fox ideology of Fear and Loathing (tm), so I figure horse shit is your
only intent.
--
-- Beware the delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets.

Juan Anonly wrote:
>
> Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?
> Or the Muslim Terrorists that bombed the WTC--Why don't they call them
> Saudi Terrorists?

Depends on which they you mean. I've heard all of those terms at one
time or another.

> Perhaps they're waiting to find if the rationale was Talibani Jihadist,
> Pakistani Nationalist, Americani Disgruntlist or something even more
> hip!

On the news this morning they showed a picture of his house that had
been foreclosed. It would be double plus ungood for this to become a
general cause for suspicion.

On the news they also showed the sign of the company he worked at.
Ajilon is a large IT consultant company. They used to be top 50 in the
field but I haven't checked their size lately. I'm an IT consultant at
a smaller company in the field. We IT consultants tend to travel a lot.

In article <2010050510252519278-nobody@nowherecom>,
Juan Anonly > wrote:
>Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?

Maybe because he was an atheist? (His last words, IIRC, were
a quote from the poem "Invictus."

>It's only been a day since he was caught. I assume Fox has already
>hammered the word "Muslim Terrorist" for 53 hours by that time.

I wouldn't know. I never watch Fox.

--
Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

On Wed, 5 May 2010 10:25:25 -0700, Juan Anonly >
wrote:

>On 2010-05-04 11:25:40 -0700, Mr. Bill said:
>
>> On May 4, 8:15*am, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>
>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>> one in the media will say it.
>
>Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?

Post any mainstream report where the atheist McVeigh said that any of
his actions were for a "God".

You are a fool.

>Or the Muslim Terrorists that bombed the WTC--Why don't they call them
>Saudi Terrorists?

They were doing it for Islam, not Saudi Arabia, shit-for-brains.

FACE

>
>It's only been a day since he was caught. I assume Fox has already
>hammered the word "Muslim Terrorist" for 53 hours by that time.
>
>Perhaps they're waiting to find if the rationale was Talibani Jihadist,
>Pakistani Nationalist, Americani Disgruntlist or something even more
>hip!

On 2010-05-05 14:46:06 -0700, FACE said:

>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>>> one in the media will say it.
>>
>> Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?
>
> Post any mainstream report where the atheist McVeigh said that any of
> his actions were for a "God".

Post any report (mainstream or otherwise) in which Faisal Shazad said
that any of his actions were for Islam.
--
-- Beware the delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets.

On May 4, 1:25*pm, "Mr. Bill" > wrote:
> On May 4, 8:15*am, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>
> > It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
> one in the media will say it.


Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? Islamic
would also be a bad choice of words. Islamist would be fine, because
he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.

But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? Even
this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
warriors": http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057

Do you think there is some possibility that "the media" is trying to
be even handed?

Even more ridiculous is the fact that Eric Robert Rudolph was given a
life sentence, when there is no question that any Muslim who committed
the same act would have been given death. The parallels between
Rudolph's case and that of Islamists is strking. Why didn't the Bush
Administration insist on the death penalty for this terrorist.
Because he was THEIR terrorist. He shared many values with hardcore
"Christianist" voters, who tend to strongly support Republicans. You
have any other explanation? Why didn't they use Guantanamo-style
interrogations to try to find the folks who hid him? You can't
answer that, can you?

--Bryan

On May 5, 1:54*pm, "Mr. Bill" > wrote:
> On May 5, 1:25*pm, Juan Anonly > wrote:
>
> > > Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
> > > one in the media will say it.
>
> > Yeah! And why don't they call Timothy McVeigh a "Christian Terrorist"?
>
> Short memory syndrome.....CBS, NBS and ABS *repeatedly referred to
> McVeigh as a Christan Terrorist.

Find me something to support that claim. You can't.

--Bryan

On May 6, 6:57*am, Food Snob® > wrote:
> On May 4, 1:25*pm, "Mr. Bill" > wrote:
>
> > On May 4, 8:15*am, "Ted Furlow" > wrote:
>
> > > It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> > Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
> > one in the media will say it.
>
> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? *Islamic
> would also be a bad choice of words. *Islamist would be fine, because
> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
>
> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? *Even
> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057

Quote from the website above:

"...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
rebellion against the Federal government."

That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?

John Kuthe...

On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
> On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > wrote:
>> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > wrote:
>>
>>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > wrote:
>>
>>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>
>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>>> one in the media will say it.
>>
>> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? Islamic
>> would also be a bad choice of words. Islamist would be fine, because
>> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
>> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
>> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
>>
>> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
>> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? Even
>> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
>> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
>
> Quote from the website above:
>
> "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
> rebellion against the Federal government."
>
> That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
> little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
> war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
>
> John Kuthe...
>

The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show

On May 6, 7:58*am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax >
wrote:
> On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > *wrote:
> >> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > *wrote:
>
> >>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > *wrote:
>
> >>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>
> >>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
> >>> one in the media will say it.
>
> >> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? *Islamic
> >> would also be a bad choice of words. *Islamist would be fine, because
> >> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
> >> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
> >> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
>
> >> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
> >> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? *Even
> >> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
> >> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
>
> > Quote from the website above:
>
> > "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
> > rebellion against the Federal government."
>
> > That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
> > little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
> > war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
>
> > John Kuthe...
>
> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK

Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,

John Kuthe...

On 06/05/2010 14:33, John Kuthe wrote:
> On May 6, 7:58 am, Dirk Bruere at >
> wrote:
>> On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > wrote:
>>>> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > wrote:
>>
>>>>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>
>>>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>>>>> one in the media will say it.
>>
>>>> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? Islamic
>>>> would also be a bad choice of words. Islamist would be fine, because
>>>> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
>>>> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
>>>> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
>>
>>>> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
>>>> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? Even
>>>> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
>>>> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
>>
>>> Quote from the website above:
>>
>>> "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
>>> rebellion against the Federal government."
>>
>>> That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
>>> little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
>>> war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>>
>> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK
>
> Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,

The Taliban did not attack the USA.
You are confusing them with Al Quaida.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show

John Kuthe wrote:
> On May 6, 7:58 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax >
> wrote:
>> On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > wrote:
>>>> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > wrote:
>>>>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > wrote:
>>>>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? No
>>>>> one in the media will say it.
>>>> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? Islamic
>>>> would also be a bad choice of words. Islamist would be fine, because
>>>> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
>>>> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
>>>> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
>>>> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
>>>> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? Even
>>>> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
>>>> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
>>> Quote from the website above:
>>> "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
>>> rebellion against the Federal government."
>>> That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
>>> little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
>>> war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
>>> John Kuthe...
>> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK
>
> Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,
>
> John Kuthe...
The us military is not doing so great against stone age weapons in the
middle east atm ?

atec7 wrote on Thu, 06 May 2010 23:53:51 +1000:

> John Kuthe wrote:
>> On May 6, 7:58 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
>> > wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > wrote:
>>>>> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > wrote:
>>>>>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > wrote:
>>>>>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
>>>>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim
>>>>>> Terrorist"? No one in the media will say it.
>>>>> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian
>>>>> Terrorist? Islamic would also be a bad choice of words. Islamist
>>>>> would be fine, because he is likely associated
>>>>> with the movement that aims to create Sunni Muslim
>>>>> theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries,
>>>>> possibly even doing away with those borders in favorite of
>>>>> one giant caliphate. But again, why wouldn't we call
>>>>> McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist? Why don't we refer to the
>>>>> Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? Even this Wiccan site doesn't
>>>>> go that far, instead calling them "Christian
>>>>> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
>>>> Quote from the website above:
>>>> "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively
>>>> promoting rebellion against the Federal government." That
>>>> is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything
>>>> this puny little "militia group" has with their camo and
>>>> their little infantry war games! How could they ever expect
>>>> to be victorious? John Kuthe...
>>> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK
>>
>> Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,
>>
>> John Kuthe...
> The us military is not doing so great against stone age
> weapons in the middle east atm ?

Rockets, car bombs, landmines and machine guns are so Neanderthal :-)
How did they ever go extinct?
--

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

On May 6, 8:53*am, atec7 7 <""atec77\"@ hotmail.com"> wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:
> > On May 6, 7:58 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax >
> > wrote:
> >> On 06/05/2010 13:46, John Kuthe wrote:
>
> >>> On May 6, 6:57 am, Food > *wrote:
> >>>> On May 4, 1:25 pm, "Mr. > *wrote:
> >>>>> On May 4, 8:15 am, "Ted > *wrote:
> >>>>>> It was a Paki. Surprised? I'm not!
> >>>>> Why is everyone tap dancing around the words "Muslim Terrorist"? *No
> >>>>> one in the media will say it.
> >>>> Why isn't Timothy McVeigh referred to as Christian Terrorist? *Islamic
> >>>> would also be a bad choice of words. *Islamist would be fine, because
> >>>> he is likely associated with the movement that aims to create Sunni
> >>>> Muslim theocracies in many of the Muslim dominated countries, possibly
> >>>> even doing away with those borders in favorite of one giant caliphate.
> >>>> But again, why wouldn't we call McVeigh a *Christainist* terrorist?
> >>>> Why don't we refer to the Hutaree as Christainist terrorists? *Even
> >>>> this Wiccan site doesn't go that far, instead calling them "Christian
> >>>> warriors":http://thewatch.wicasta.com/?p=1057
> >>> Quote from the website above:
> >>> "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
> >>> rebellion against the Federal government."
> >>> That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
> >>> little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
> >>> war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
> >>> John Kuthe...
> >> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK
>
> > Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,
>
> > John Kuthe...
>
> The us military is not doing so great against stone age weapons in the
> middle east atm ?

I wasn't aware that they had improvised explosive devices in the stone
age.

--Bryan

"John Kuthe" > wrote
>> > Quote from the website above:
>>
>> > "...a militia group has armed themselves and is actively promoting
>> > rebellion against the Federal government."
>>
>> > That is so funny! The U.S. Military so far out-guns anything this puny
>> > little "militia group" has with their camo and their little infantry
>> > war games! How could they ever expect to be victorious?
>>
>> > John Kuthe...
>>
>> The Taliban, with less, seems to be doing OK
>
> Uh, yeah RIGHT! One notable attack (911) and a lot of noise,
>
> John Kuthe...

Get back to us when we have the Taliban and Al Quida eliminated. Should not
take much to knock out those puny forces.