Nancy2 wrote:

> Stu, I only see one recipe from you over in rec.food.recipes. Since you
> post recipes with no discussion, why not send them to rec.food recipes
> instead of posting them here, or post in both places?

The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Nancy2 wrote:
>
> > Stu, I only see one recipe from you over in rec.food.recipes. Since you
> > post recipes with no discussion, why not send them to rec.food recipes
> > instead of posting them here, or post in both places?
>
> The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.
>
> Bob

Why not? It is on topic! And nobody criticizes anyone else that
"shills" Their blogs or albums.

What is the difference please???

Personally, I love Stu's website. He has done a very, very good job and
you should promote it!

Please bother to take the time to peruse it before you condemn it. You
may just change your mind. ;-)

I have taken note that he has kept it out of his sig most of the time
lately, and I've found it to be annoying as I like to check the weekly
video now and then. He's been cool in that he e-mails me to let me know
of an update.

It's ok to be wrong now and then Bob! :-) I learned to live with that
long ago. Stu produces a really good, fun and useful food website.
Please consider giving credit where credit is due?

Please?

And no, Stu is not paying me....... <g>
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

Om wrote:

>> The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.
>
> Why not? It is on topic! And nobody criticizes anyone else that
> "shills" Their blogs or albums.
>
> What is the difference please???

Must be that the moderators think Stu is an asshole, then. What other
explanation could there be?

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> >> The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.
> >
> > Why not? It is on topic! And nobody criticizes anyone else that
> > "shills" Their blogs or albums.
> >
> > What is the difference please???
>
> Must be that the moderators think Stu is an asshole, then. What other
> explanation could there be?
>
> Bob

This is not a moderated list.
And I don't think that Stu is an asshole. Not at all.

Have you even bothered to visit his site?
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

Om wrote:

>>>> The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.
>>>
>>> Why not? It is on topic! And nobody criticizes anyone else that
>>> "shills" Their blogs or albums.
>>>
>>> What is the difference please???
>>
>> Must be that the moderators think Stu is an asshole, then. What other
>> explanation could there be?
>>
>
> This is not a moderated list.

I clearly wrote "RFR moderators," did I not? RFR *is* a moderated list.
Nancy2 asked why Stu didn't post his unsolicited untried undiscussed
"recipes" on RFR. You seem to have jumped into the discussion without even
reading what I wrote.



> And I don't think that Stu is an asshole. Not at all.
>
> Have you even bothered to visit his site?

Yes, of course. I've even quoted passages from it for the benefit of our
foodbanter.com readers.

Bob

Stu wrote:

>> The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.
>
> Harsh words coming from you, Mr.Perfect

You're much too kind. I've never claimed to be perfect. I've never even
claimed to be omniscient. About the only claims I'm willing to make are that
I'm a pretty good speller and a pretty good cook -- and you can't make
*either* of those claims, can you?

Thank you for the compliment.

Bob

Stu-pid wrote:

>>>> The RFR moderators don't allow Stu to shill his web site.
>>>
>>> Harsh words coming from you, Mr.Perfect
>>
>> You're much too kind. I've never claimed to be perfect. I've never even
>> claimed to be omniscient. About the only claims I'm willing to make are
>> that I'm a pretty good speller and a pretty good cook -- and you can't
>> make *either* of those claims, can you?
>
>
> Actually Bob, you know nothing about me other than I'm in Canada.
> You're flapping your gums making assumptions, which is your
> usual modus operandi.

I know you're a crappy cook because you post crappy recipes and then make
clumsy attempts to defend them.

I know you're a crappy speller because I can *see* your crappy spelling,
just like everybody else in this forum can.

Need any more instructions on how to draw OBVIOUS conclusions, Stu-pid?

Bob

Stu wrote:
>
> How old do recipes get before they're of no use? Never.

How old do disgusting recipes get before they stop being disgusting?

Stu wrote:
>
> Have you tried any of the recipes Bryan,
> if not you're in no position to point fingers.

You obviously haven't tried many or perhaps even
all of the recipes you post. You post crap just
to pimp your sorry web site.

On Fri, 07 May 2010 11:19:56 -0500, zxcvbob >
wrote:

> I haven't paged down through the whole file, but for the most part
> that looks pretty good. You've cherry-picked the whole humongous file
> for dubious ingredients, but if you don't like "egg substitute" or
> "low-calorie margarine", just use eggs or butter.
>
> For the most part, I don't need recipes for breakfast foods -- what I
> need is ideas, then I can cook without a recipe. This file
> accomplishes that, so thanks for posting it even tho' that is not what
> you intended.

The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
attack those who do.

--
Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

On Fri, 07 May 2010 13:51:02 -0700, Mark Thorson >
wrote:

> Stu wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried any of the recipes Bryan,
> > if not you're in no position to point fingers.
>
> You obviously haven't tried many or perhaps even
> all of the recipes you post. You post crap just
> to pimp your sorry web site.

Kill file him if it's that big of a problem for you.

--
Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

sf wrote:

> The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> attack those who do.

Bullshit. I am one of those regulars who browbeat Stu on a regular basis,
and I post plenty of recipes. But you fail to note that this is a cooking
DISCUSSION group. The recipes I post are usually after I've posted about
some meal I cooked, and someone asks for the recipe. That's how this group
is SUPPOSED to work. It's not just blanket posting of unsolicited untried
(and often obviously crappy) recipes. That's what rec.food.recipes is for.
If that's what you want, I suggest you go there instead of here.

Bob

Stu wrote:

> Wholly christ man, how do you get through doorways with that inflated
> head of yours? BTW Recreational Food Cooking, it's supposed to be fun
> and the ones who continually shit on peoples posts( you know who you
> are) take all the fun out of this newsgroup.

So you're posting the crappy recipes as a series of *jokes*, then? And your
site www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca is just a gag?

If so, I've completely misread you!

Bob

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Stu wrote:
>
>> Wholly christ man, how do you get through doorways with that inflated
>> head of yours? BTW Recreational Food Cooking, it's supposed to be fun
>> and the ones who continually shit on peoples posts( you know who you
>> are) take all the fun out of this newsgroup.
>
> So you're posting the crappy recipes as a series of *jokes*, then? And
> your site www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca is just a gag?
>
> If so, I've completely misread you!
>



Umm, that link doesn't work. (not sure if you mistyped it, or if
the server is down)

Bob

On May 7, 5:05 pm, sf > wrote:
>
> The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> attack those who do.
>
I don't agree. There are plenty of recipes posted and discussed in
this group. It isn't that Stu himself is browbeaten, it's that his
recipe collection has nothing to recommend it. It's no better than
all those random things that come up if you google for a recipe. No
point of view, no discrimination, no expertise, nothing to be
learned. -aem

zxcvbob wrote:

>> you're posting the crappy recipes as a series of *jokes*, then? And
>> your site www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca is just a gag?
>>
>> If so, I've completely misread you!
>
> Umm, that link doesn't work. (not sure if you mistyped it, or if
> the server is down)

It only works if you're a desperate virgin in search of shitty food.

Bob

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote:
>
>>> you're posting the crappy recipes as a series of *jokes*, then? And
>>> your site www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca is just a gag?
>>>
>>> If so, I've completely misread you!
>>
>> Umm, that link doesn't work. (not sure if you mistyped it, or if the
>> server is down)
>
> It only works if you're a desperate virgin in search of shitty food.
>
> Bob


I'll click anything. ;-)

Bob

On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:25:35 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> > The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> > it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> > posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> > attack those who do.
>
> Bullshit. I am one of those regulars who browbeat Stu on a regular basis,
> and I post plenty of recipes. But you fail to note that this is a cooking
> DISCUSSION group. The recipes I post are usually after I've posted about
> some meal I cooked, and someone asks for the recipe. That's how this group
> is SUPPOSED to work. It's not just blanket posting of unsolicited untried
> (and often obviously crappy) recipes. That's what rec.food.recipes is for.
> If that's what you want, I suggest you go there instead of here.
>

If you think posting a recipe only after it has been requested is true
to the spirit of rfc, you've got a screw loose. People complain about
the lack of recipes here Stu posts them. If you don't like it, kill
him.

I will say it again: It's no wonder people don't post recipes here.
They don't want to be attacked by you or your twin over a simple
little recipe. It's easier just not to bother. You're a bully as is
your buddy Food Snob.

--
Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

sf wrote:

> If you think posting a recipe only after it has been requested is true to
> the spirit of rfc, you've got a screw loose. People complain about the
> lack of recipes here Stu posts them. If you don't like it, kill him.

So how many of Stu's recipes have you ACTUALLY TRIED?

As for the "spirit of rfc" have you ever ACTUALLY READ the FAQ? If you'd
been around when rfc split off from rfr, maybe you'd have more of a clue
about what the "spirit of rfc" is as compared the "spirit of rfr". But
until you read and understand that FAQ (sections 9.1 and 9.2 in particular),
you'd be better off not spouting off about it, because you seem utterly
clueless about the differences between the two groups. Posting a recipe with
no discussion is completely contrary to the concept behind rfc.



> I will say it again: It's no wonder people don't post recipes here.
> They don't want to be attacked by you or your twin over a simple
> little recipe. It's easier just not to bother. You're a bully as is
> your buddy Food Snob.

How many recipes or cooking ideas have YOU posted here in the last month?
You're a hypocrite bordering on trolldom, just like your buddy projectile
vomit chick.

Bob

On Fri, 7 May 2010 21:38:38 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> > If you think posting a recipe only after it has been requested is true to
> > the spirit of rfc, you've got a screw loose. People complain about the
> > lack of recipes here Stu posts them. If you don't like it, kill him.
>
> So how many of Stu's recipes have you ACTUALLY TRIED?

I don't even read most of them and complain about fewer than that.
Try your kill file, you'll be happier.
>
> As for the "spirit of rfc" have you ever ACTUALLY READ the FAQ? If you'd
> been around when rfc split off from rfr, maybe you'd have more of a clue
> about what the "spirit of rfc" is as compared the "spirit of rfr". But
> until you read and understand that FAQ (sections 9.1 and 9.2 in particular),
> you'd be better off not spouting off about it, because you seem utterly
> clueless about the differences between the two groups. Posting a recipe with
> no discussion is completely contrary to the concept behind rfc.
>
You and your buddies from the stone age can sit around the campfire
slapping each other on the back and taking turns reading chapters in
the FAQ.
>
>
> > I will say it again: It's no wonder people don't post recipes here.
> > They don't want to be attacked by you or your twin over a simple
> > little recipe. It's easier just not to bother. You're a bully as is
> > your buddy Food Snob.
>
> How many recipes or cooking ideas have YOU posted here in the last month?
> You're a hypocrite bordering on trolldom, just like your buddy projectile
> vomit chick.

A look in the mirror will show you the real hypocrite... and a
loudmouthed bully.

--
Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

sf wrote:

>> So how many of Stu's recipes have you ACTUALLY TRIED?
>
> I don't even read most of them and complain about fewer than that.
> Try your kill file, you'll be happier.

So you're defending Stu's posts, even though you don't read them? And you
defend his "recipes" even though you haven't tried ANY OF THEM? Hypocritical
much?



>> As for the "spirit of rfc" have you ever ACTUALLY READ the FAQ? If you'd
>> been around when rfc split off from rfr, maybe you'd have more of a clue
>> about what the "spirit of rfc" is as compared the "spirit of rfr". But
>> until you read and understand that FAQ (sections 9.1 and 9.2 in
>> particular), you'd be better off not spouting off about it, because you
>> seem utterly clueless about the differences between the two groups.
>> Posting a recipe with no discussion is completely contrary to the concept
>> behind rfc.
>>
> You and your buddies from the stone age can sit around the campfire
> slapping each other on the back and taking turns reading chapters in
> the FAQ.

So you refer to the "spirit of rfc" in one post and in the very next post
admit that YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT IT IS? Hypocritical much? Where do you
think the "spirit of rfc" is DEFINED, hypocrite?



>>> I will say it again: It's no wonder people don't post recipes here.
>>> They don't want to be attacked by you or your twin over a simple
>>> little recipe. It's easier just not to bother. You're a bully as is
>>> your buddy Food Snob.
>>
>> How many recipes or cooking ideas have YOU posted here in the last month?
>> You're a hypocrite bordering on trolldom, just like your buddy projectile
>> vomit chick.
>
> A look in the mirror will show you the real hypocrite... and a
> loudmouthed bully.

So you clamor for recipes while posting none? Hypocritical much?
You try to take me to task for taking Stu to task for shitty posts?
Hypocritical much? And aren't YOU trying to bully ME? (Unsuccessfully, of
course...)

You sanctimonious judgmental hypocritical bullying harpy! It's a good thing
I know that you're REALLY not the way you post!

ObFood: Lin made wine-braised chicken legs with green beans tonight. Would
have been good with polenta, but Lin doesn't like polenta.

Bob

"zxcvbob" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>> Stu wrote:
>>
>>> Wholly christ man, how do you get through doorways with that inflated
>>> head of yours? BTW Recreational Food Cooking, it's supposed to be fun
>>> and the ones who continually shit on peoples posts( you know who you
>>> are) take all the fun out of this newsgroup.
>>
>> So you're posting the crappy recipes as a series of *jokes*, then? And
>> your site www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca is just a gag?
>>
>> If so, I've completely misread you!
>>
>
>
>
> Umm, that link doesn't work. (not sure if you mistyped it, or if the
> server is down)
>
> Bob

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 07 May 2010 11:19:56 -0500, zxcvbob >
> wrote:
>
>> I haven't paged down through the whole file, but for the most part
>> that looks pretty good. You've cherry-picked the whole humongous file
>> for dubious ingredients, but if you don't like "egg substitute" or
>> "low-calorie margarine", just use eggs or butter.
>>
>> For the most part, I don't need recipes for breakfast foods -- what I
>> need is ideas, then I can cook without a recipe. This file
>> accomplishes that, so thanks for posting it even tho' that is not what
>> you intended.
>
> The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> attack those who do.
>

Mr. Pid sucks ass.

In article >,
sf > wrote:

> On Fri, 07 May 2010 11:19:56 -0500, zxcvbob >
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't paged down through the whole file, but for the most part
> > that looks pretty good. You've cherry-picked the whole humongous file
> > for dubious ingredients, but if you don't like "egg substitute" or
> > "low-calorie margarine", just use eggs or butter.
> >
> > For the most part, I don't need recipes for breakfast foods -- what I
> > need is ideas, then I can cook without a recipe. This file
> > accomplishes that, so thanks for posting it even tho' that is not what
> > you intended.
>
> The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> attack those who do.

I really don't get why they try to trash Stu's site. It's really very
good. Better than a lot of sites.

I wish he'd Blog it tho'. ;-) It could be entertaining...

I guess they are bored and have to justify their existence or something.
<shrugs>
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> sf wrote:
>
> > The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> > it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> > posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> > attack those who do.
>
> Bullshit. I am one of those regulars who browbeat Stu on a regular basis,
> and I post plenty of recipes. But you fail to note that this is a cooking
> DISCUSSION group. The recipes I post are usually after I've posted about
> some meal I cooked, and someone asks for the recipe. That's how this group
> is SUPPOSED to work. It's not just blanket posting of unsolicited untried
> (and often obviously crappy) recipes. That's what rec.food.recipes is for.
> If that's what you want, I suggest you go there instead of here.
>
> Bob

So who made you moderator babe? Even your wife admits that you enjoy
playing the asshole sometimes. ;-) You do crap like this for personal
entertainment.

Trust me that many don't find it useful...

I only read your posts because you do post some interesting recipes and
ideas now and then. The critical posts are just plain f-ing BORING and
detract from your useful content.

Some of the recipe ideas you post are amazing, but I wish you'd post
pics that more could access. I totally refuse to do facebook or myspace!
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

In article
>,
aem > wrote:

> On May 7, 5:05 pm, sf > wrote:
> >
> > The way Stu is continuously brow beaten by a couple of regulars here,
> > it's no wonder people don't/won't post recipes. Notice how those
> > posters don't post many/any recipes themselves, but don't hesitate to
> > attack those who do.
> >
> I don't agree. There are plenty of recipes posted and discussed in
> this group. It isn't that Stu himself is browbeaten, it's that his
> recipe collection has nothing to recommend it. It's no better than
> all those random things that come up if you google for a recipe. No
> point of view, no discrimination, no expertise, nothing to be
> learned. -aem

I disagree... I consider myself to be a good enough cook to choose
ingredients. If there are some I disagree with, I'll leave them out or
substitute. Anyone incapable of doing that has no right to call
themselves a cook. <g>

He offers plenty of good ideas and concepts. You are better than this
aem! Why are you being a snob?
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

In article >,
zxcvbob > wrote:

> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> > zxcvbob wrote:
> >
> >>> you're posting the crappy recipes as a series of *jokes*, then? And
> >>> your site www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca is just a gag?
> >>>
> >>> If so, I've completely misread you!
> >>
> >> Umm, that link doesn't work. (not sure if you mistyped it, or if the
> >> server is down)
> >
> > It only works if you're a desperate virgin in search of shitty food.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> I'll click anything. ;-)
>
> Bob

<snork> ;-)
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

In article
>,
Food Snob® > wrote:

> > Well where to start... it's all true, and cooking isn't just the
> > making of fancy dishes. You do realize Bryan that a great deal of
> > the working poor in America live below the poverty line, and eat meals
> > like the ones on the website.
>
> Haha. Your defense is that your website is aimed at poor folks with
> low standards? That's priceless. You should put that on the
> homepage.
>
> --Bryan

Grow up Bryan...
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

In article >,
"Jinx Minx" > wrote:

> > Well where to start... it's all true, and cooking isn't just the
> > making of fancy dishes. You do realize Bryan that a great deal of
> > the working poor in America live below the poverty line, and eat meals
> > like the ones on the website. Have you tried any of the recipes Bryan,
> > if not you're in no position to point fingers.
> >
> > But then pricks will be pricks.
>
> Which is quite ironic, since most of those ingredient substitutes are far
> more expensive than their original counterparts. Cooking with those
> products has absolutely nothing to do with being part of the "working poor".
>
> Jinx

You have obviously never been the "lucky" recipient of boxes from the
local food bank... Lots of the stuff gets donated as few buy it. ;-)
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

In article >,
Mark Thorson > wrote:

> Stu wrote:
> >
> > How old do recipes get before they're of no use? Never.
>
> How old do disgusting recipes get before they stop being disgusting?

Hey, if you don't like 'em, don't cook 'em!
You have no right to judge the personal tastes of others!

NEVER!

My dad tried to make me feel guilty over not liking certain foods when I
was growing up, so I tended to be judgmental too early on.

If I have learned nothing else on this list since I started posting in
1996 is to freakin' RESPECT the tastes and culinary ideas of others!

If I don't like it, I don't cook it! But if YOU like it, go for it!

I'm always open to new ideas, ingredients and combinations. Right now
I'm fixin' to stock up on Indian ingredients, including pre-prepared
ginger paste and garlic paste, and Garam Masala.

You can tell I'm getting bored.... <G>

There is a nice selection of Indian spices and ingredients at Fiesta
market in Austin and I'll be stationed there for at least three more
weeks in Blood Bank training at my new job.
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine

In article >,
Mark Thorson > wrote:

> Stu wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried any of the recipes Bryan,
> > if not you're in no position to point fingers.
>
> You obviously haven't tried many or perhaps even
> all of the recipes you post. You post crap just
> to pimp your sorry web site.

So where the hell is YOUR website to compare Mark? You have no idea how
much work building and maintaining one is.

Until you have a basis of comparison, STFU!

Put up or shut up.

I freakin' DARE YOU TO TRY IT!!!
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine

Om wrote:

>> But you fail to note that this is a cooking DISCUSSION group. The recipes
>> I post are usually after I've posted about some meal I cooked, and
>> someone asks for the recipe. That's how this group is SUPPOSED to work.
>> It's not just blanket posting of unsolicited untried (and often obviously
>> crappy) recipes. That's what rec.food.recipes is for. If that's what you
>> want, I suggest you go there instead of here.
>>
>
> So who made you moderator babe? Even your wife admits that you enjoy
> playing the asshole sometimes. ;-) You do crap like this for personal
> entertainment.
>
> Trust me that many don't find it useful...
>
> I only read your posts because you do post some interesting recipes and
> ideas now and then. The critical posts are just plain f-ing BORING and
> detract from your useful content.
>
> Some of the recipe ideas you post are amazing, but I wish you'd post
> pics that more could access. I totally refuse to do facebook or myspace!


Who made YOU moderator? Hypocrite.

Bob

Om wrote:

> You are better than this aem! Why are you being a snob?

Maybe the better question would be why you have chosen to be an apologist
for Stu and Sheldon. There's no way it's really the cooking tips.

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> >> But you fail to note that this is a cooking DISCUSSION group. The recipes
> >> I post are usually after I've posted about some meal I cooked, and
> >> someone asks for the recipe. That's how this group is SUPPOSED to work.
> >> It's not just blanket posting of unsolicited untried (and often obviously
> >> crappy) recipes. That's what rec.food.recipes is for. If that's what you
> >> want, I suggest you go there instead of here.
> >>
> >
> > So who made you moderator babe? Even your wife admits that you enjoy
> > playing the asshole sometimes. ;-) You do crap like this for personal
> > entertainment.
> >
> > Trust me that many don't find it useful...
> >
> > I only read your posts because you do post some interesting recipes and
> > ideas now and then. The critical posts are just plain f-ing BORING and
> > detract from your useful content.
> >
> > Some of the recipe ideas you post are amazing, but I wish you'd post
> > pics that more could access. I totally refuse to do facebook or myspace!
>
>
> Who made YOU moderator? Hypocrite.
>
> Bob

I'm not trying to moderate. Just exercising my First Amendment rights.
;-)

You are welcome to do so also, and I've the right to disagree and state
that you are being an asshole!
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

Om wrote:

> I'm not trying to moderate. Just exercising my First Amendment rights.
> ;-)
>
> You are welcome to do so also, and I've the right to disagree and state
> that you are being an asshole!

Once again with your double-standard hypocrisy. Why can't you accept MY
First Amendment rights?

Under the argument YOU JUST BROUGHT FORTH, I have the right to say whatever
I want to say about Stu and his shitty site. You are certainly entitled to
disagree, but you're not simply disagreeing. What you are actually TRYING to
do is get me to stop pointing out the shortcomings of
www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca: You're trying to moderate, in other
words. You are a hypocrite, for that reason.

I also have the right to state that in choosing to ally yourself with
scumbags like Stu-pid and clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz, you are
being a complete scumbag!

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> > You are better than this aem! Why are you being a snob?
>
> Maybe the better question would be why you have chosen to be an apologist
> for Stu and Sheldon. There's no way it's really the cooking tips.
>
> Bob

I've posted my share. ;-)
Have you even bothered to visit my Picassa albums? Most of them are food
pics. I've yet to read your critique.

This weeks food has all been efforts at using the leftovers from last
weekend's BBQ. I smoked turkey thighs, chicken hindquarters and breast,
all rubbed with a commercial salt free Fajita seasoning mix made by
Fiesta brand.

A lot of the turkey was taken to work and eaten as is, re-warmed in the
microwave.

The chicken hindquarters were picked apart and made into chicken salad,
most of it served in Romain lettuce boats. The chicken mix included dill
pickle relish, minced black olives, fine chopped celery and a bit of
dill weed and lime based mayo.

The split breasts were deboned and the bones were fed to the dogs. The
meat was used to make spring rolls with fine sliced Romaine lettuce,
fine sliced fresh Basil leaf and a 50/50 mix of Balsamic vinegar and
Olive oil.

I did that with some of the smoked turkey thighs too.

Since the thigh bones were oak and mesquite smoked, they are in the
freezer awaiting combination with some smoked beef rib bones. Those will
be made in to stock and used to cook some split peas sometime soon.

In the meantime, I have an overabundance of eggs to use up, so may turn
some of that smoked meat into a quiche, with some finely chopped carrots
and broccoli and zucchini I also have on hand with swiss cheese.

Now, why don't you have a food blog or website, hypocrite? ;-)
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

Om wrote:

> Now, why don't you have a food blog or website, hypocrite? ;-)

It's not hypocrisy to criticize a web site without having a web site of your
own. What *would* be hypocrisy would be if I *did* have a web site which had
nothing but stolen recipes on it and I criticized someone else for doing
exactly the same thing I was doing. But that's not happening, is it?

Please make yourself better acquainted with the definition of hypocrisy;
you're using the term ignorantly even while practicing the concept so
prominently.

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to moderate. Just exercising my First Amendment rights.
> > ;-)
> >
> > You are welcome to do so also, and I've the right to disagree and state
> > that you are being an asshole!
>
> Once again with your double-standard hypocrisy. Why can't you accept MY
> First Amendment rights?

I think I just did.
And I am also free to disagree! ;-)
And yes, I am having fun and have no qualms about admitting it.

>
> Under the argument YOU JUST BROUGHT FORTH, I have the right to say whatever
> I want to say about Stu and his shitty site.

Yes, you do. And I am also free to call you an asshole. <g>

> You are certainly entitled to
> disagree, but you're not simply disagreeing. What you are actually TRYING to
> do is get me to stop pointing out the shortcomings of
> www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca: You're trying to moderate, in other
> words. You are a hypocrite, for that reason.

As are you dear...
This disagreement is cyclical.

Are we having fun yet?

>
> I also have the right to state that in choosing to ally yourself with
> scumbags like Stu-pid and clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz, you are
> being a complete scumbag!
>
> Bob

<shrugs> If that is what you wish to believe, that is your right.

And I have the right to say that you are being an asshole.
As for Katz, we are not discussing him right now.
That is a totally separate argument.

Few people here have called ME a bad cook (or you either for that
matter) so I'm sure we can at least agree on that.

You have taken it into your head for some oddball reason to hate Stu'.
I have to wonder if you are anti-capitalist but as far as I can see,
Stu' is not making money off of his website so is not spamming.

I accuse you of being un-American for being so mean. He has a right to
capitalize on his extensive knowledge of American lifestyles and cooking
in general if he can, but he is overlooking a lot of internet marketing
opportunities that I have personally spent a lot of money learning about.

Who are you to deny him that right and try to cut him down?

I once again challenge you to put up YOUR OWN personal cooking website
to compete.

Can you do so or are you too lazy?
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> > Now, why don't you have a food blog or website, hypocrite? ;-)
>
> It's not hypocrisy to criticize a web site without having a web site of your
> own. What *would* be hypocrisy would be if I *did* have a web site which had
> nothing but stolen recipes on it and I criticized someone else for doing
> exactly the same thing I was doing. But that's not happening, is it?

Nope! That's because you are too chickenshit and lazy to put up your own
cooking website, even tho' you have plenty of material to do so.

>
> Please make yourself better acquainted with the definition of hypocrisy;
> you're using the term ignorantly even while practicing the concept so
> prominently.
>
> Bob

<snork> Right...

See above.
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

Om wrote:

> you are too chickenshit and lazy to put up your own cooking website, even
> tho' you have plenty of material to do so.

The criticisms I level at www.shittyfoodfordesperatevirgins.ca have nothing
to do with the structure of the site. I criticize the CONTENT of the site,
as posted by Stu-pid on RFC. The site can be the prettiest one on the entire
world-wide web, but shitty recipes are still shitty recipes. I don't post
shitty recipes on RFC, and when Stu-pid does so I feel free to point out how
shitty they are. I am criticizing RECIPES. They just happen to be all
collected on that one ****ed-up site.

Bob