Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:46:31 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:33:21 -0500, Sqwertz > > wrote: > >>On Fri, 28 May 2010 09:43:03 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote: >> >>> If you can't tell then you should use the cheap stuff. It is >>> surprising someone with a Q site likes kingsford. >> >>Really. Smoking with Kingsford is practically unheard of. Except >>on FoodTV. > > And Kingsford commercials. > >>I just bought some Stubbs briquettes (the new breed of 100% wood >>and maybe some starch binder). $6.99 for 20lbs. It's easier to >>work with than lump. > > I've never heard of it. Lump's pretty easy to find here. There are a bunch of brands of lump charcoal now. They are made with pulverized lump with a natural starch binder. All the advantages of lump, plus consistent-sized pieces, no sparking, usually costs less, and.. it works great. Rancher is the one I usually shill for: http://www.originalcharcoal.com/products.asp -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 May 2010 12:20:08 -0400, blake murphy wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:46:31 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote: > >> I've never heard of it. Lump's pretty easy to find here. > > they stock it at the local (md) whole foods, for whatever that's worth. Whole food is co-branded Cowboy Lump. Not many professionals would use it since there have been horrible quality control problems. Like - some of the stuff not being wood in there, but plastic, and tar, and coal, and metal,... Once you ruin a cookout with that once, you'll never go back. -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 May 2010 13:42:03 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:54:27 -0500, Sqwertz > > wrote: > >>On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:10:49 -0500, Default User wrote: >> >>> One of the local supermarkets is advertising Full Circle lump for $4 a bag >>> (8.8 lbs). Not too bad, I'll probably pick up some, even though I'm not that >>> low. >> >>8.8lbs means it's mostly likely Cowboy brand "lump", rebranded. >>But this time it appears that this is actual wood from Arkansas, >>not floor scrapings. > > I lost interest in cowboy when they were such asholes about the > rebates 7-8 yers ago. I lost interest in them when I had discovered piece of plastic and a piece of railroad tie - after I was halfway through my smoke and added that to the pit, ruining my food and my pit. Never again. -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:19:03 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >On Sat, 29 May 2010 13:42:03 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:54:27 -0500, Sqwertz >> > wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:10:49 -0500, Default User wrote: >>> >>>> One of the local supermarkets is advertising Full Circle lump for $4 a bag >>>> (8.8 lbs). Not too bad, I'll probably pick up some, even though I'm not that >>>> low. >>> >>>8.8lbs means it's mostly likely Cowboy brand "lump", rebranded. >>>But this time it appears that this is actual wood from Arkansas, >>>not floor scrapings. >> >> I lost interest in cowboy when they were such asholes about the >> rebates 7-8 yers ago. > >I lost interest in them when I had discovered piece of plastic and >a piece of railroad tie - after I was halfway through my smoke and >added that to the pit, ruining my food and my pit. Good grief. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:14:51 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 12:20:08 -0400, blake murphy wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 09:46:31 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote: >> >>> I've never heard of it. Lump's pretty easy to find here. >> >> they stock it at the local (md) whole foods, for whatever that's worth. > > Whole food is co-branded Cowboy Lump. Not many professionals > would use it since there have been horrible quality control > problems. Like - some of the stuff not being wood in there, but > plastic, and tar, and coal, and metal,... > > Once you ruin a cookout with that once, you'll never go back. > > -sw when i wrote that comment, i was referring to stubb's briquettes, whatever they're made of. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:10:49 -0500, Default User wrote: > >> One of the local supermarkets is advertising Full Circle lump for $4 a >> bag >> (8.8 lbs). Not too bad, I'll probably pick up some, even though I'm not >> that >> low. > > 8.8lbs means it's mostly likely Cowboy brand "lump", rebranded. > But this time it appears that this is actual wood from Arkansas, > not floor scrapings. I had the same trepidation when I saw it, but The Naked Whiz gave it a pretty solid review. http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpdatabase/lumpbag77.htm They speculate that it's produced by Royal Oak. Brian |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:27:55 -0400, blake murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:14:51 -0500, Sqwertz wrote: > >>> they stock it at the local (md) whole foods, for whatever that's worth. >> >> Whole food is co-branded Cowboy Lump. Not many professionals >> would use it since there have been horrible quality control >> problems. Like - some of the stuff not being wood in there, but >> plastic, and tar, and coal, and metal,... >> >> Once you ruin a cookout with that once, you'll never go back. >> >> -sw > > when i wrote that comment, i was referring to stubb's briquettes, whatever > they're made of. I thought you were referring to Whole Foods brand of lump. That was the last noun in what you were responding to :-) -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:12:13 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
> There are a bunch of brands of lump charcoal now. I'm referring to Lump charcoal BRIQUETTES. > They are made > with pulverized lump with a natural starch binder. All the > advantages of lump, plus consistent-sized pieces, no sparking, > usually costs less, and.. it works great. > > Rancher is the one I usually shill for: > > http://www.originalcharcoal.com/products.asp > > -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:31:04 -0500, Default User wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:10:49 -0500, Default User wrote: >> >>> One of the local supermarkets is advertising Full Circle lump for $4 a >>> bag >>> (8.8 lbs). Not too bad, I'll probably pick up some, even though I'm not >>> that >>> low. >> >> 8.8lbs means it's mostly likely Cowboy brand "lump", rebranded. >> But this time it appears that this is actual wood from Arkansas, >> not floor scrapings. > > I had the same trepidation when I saw it, but The Naked Whiz gave it a > pretty solid review. > > http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpdatabase/lumpbag77.htm > > They speculate that it's produced by Royal Oak. I saw that and did some background on the two companies and they have no relation to Royal Oak. -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 23:18:05 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:27:55 -0400, blake murphy wrote: > >> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:14:51 -0500, Sqwertz wrote: >> >>>> they stock it at the local (md) whole foods, for whatever that's worth. >>> >>> Whole food is co-branded Cowboy Lump. Not many professionals >>> would use it since there have been horrible quality control >>> problems. Like - some of the stuff not being wood in there, but >>> plastic, and tar, and coal, and metal,... >>> >>> Once you ruin a cookout with that once, you'll never go back. >>> >>> -sw >> >> when i wrote that comment, i was referring to stubb's briquettes, whatever >> they're made of. > > I thought you were referring to Whole Foods brand of lump. That > was the last noun in what you were responding to :-) > > -sw poorly worded on my part. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:31:04 -0500, Default User wrote: > >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:10:49 -0500, Default User wrote: >>> >>>> One of the local supermarkets is advertising Full Circle lump >>> 8.8lbs means it's mostly likely Cowboy brand "lump", rebranded. >> I had the same trepidation when I saw it, but The Naked Whiz gave it a >> pretty solid review. >> >> http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpdatabase/lumpbag77.htm >> >> They speculate that it's produced by Royal Oak. > > I saw that and did some background on the two companies and they > have no relation to Royal Oak. Ah. At any rate, it's pretty decent. Local True Value stores carry a brand called Fire King that I also use. <http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpdatabase/lumpbag57.htm> Brian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
kingsford commercial | Barbecue | |||
40LB Kingsford for $9.97 | Barbecue | |||
Kingsford or ? | Barbecue | |||
Kingsford lump | Barbecue | |||
which briquettes, if not kingsford? | Barbecue |