Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?

Is he off on a Cool Whip bender?

--Bryan

Bryan wrote:

> Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>
> Is he off on a Cool Whip bender?

Probably attending a Boy Scout Jamboree with a truckload of candy and a
camera.

Bob

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
...
> Bryan wrote:
>
>> Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>>
>> Is he off on a Cool Whip bender?
>
> Probably attending a Boy Scout Jamboree with a truckload of candy and a
> camera.
>
> Bob
C'mon, Bob, give him just a little credit. It's CUB Scouts for Stu.

In article
>,
Food Snob® > wrote:

> Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?

Many times. Many times.

After Stu unloaded his threat, he didn't post for a short while. Some
people thought it was odd that he stopped posting. Well, no, that's
what the attorneys always say. That told *me* that maybe he really did
it. Then he started posting again! And things that he really shouldn't
have posted.

So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Dan Abel wrote:
>
> In article
> >,
> Food Snob® > wrote:
>
> > Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>
> Many times. Many times.
>
> After Stu unloaded his threat, he didn't post for a short while. Some
> people thought it was odd that he stopped posting. Well, no, that's
> what the attorneys always say. That told *me* that maybe he really did
> it. Then he started posting again! And things that he really shouldn't
> have posted.
>
> So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
> just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.

Any bets on when he resumes posting? I'll take July 4.

Mark Thorson wrote:
>
>>
>> So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
>> just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.
>
> Any bets on when he resumes posting? I'll take July 4.

I will have to check my filter log, or wait until someone caters to his
cries for attention and replies to him.

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> He's probably just not posting out of embarrassment. Maybe he
> finally did wise up. The last post I saw from him was his defense
> about his stolen pictures on his web site. Soon after that,
> nada-zilch.

I tried looking for that post and didn't find it.
I looked at his most recent postings and didn't
see it. All I saw was the usual crap from Stu.

On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:52:36 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>Mark Thorson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
>>> just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.
>>
>> Any bets on when he resumes posting? I'll take July 4.
>
>I will have to check my filter log, or wait until someone caters to his
>cries for attention and replies to him.

That's about it Dave. He made it about a week before landing in the
bozo bin.

Lou

In article
>,
Dan Abel > wrote:

> In article
> >,
> Food Snob® > wrote:
>
> > Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>
> Many times. Many times.
>
> After Stu unloaded his threat, he didn't post for a short while. Some
> people thought it was odd that he stopped posting. Well, no, that's
> what the attorneys always say. That told *me* that maybe he really did
> it. Then he started posting again! And things that he really shouldn't
> have posted.
>
> So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
> just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.

Only thyme will tell... ;-)
--
Peace! Om

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
*Only Irish *coffee provides in a single glass all four *essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar *and fat. --Alex Levine

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:37:52 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:56:01 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
>
>> In article
>> >,
>> Food Snob® > wrote:
>>
>>> Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>>
>> Many times. Many times.
>>
>> After Stu unloaded his threat, he didn't post for a short while. Some
>> people thought it was odd that he stopped posting. Well, no, that's
>> what the attorneys always say. That told *me* that maybe he really did
>> it. Then he started posting again! And things that he really shouldn't
>> have posted.
>>
>> So now he has stopped again. I don't know what that means, but maybe,
>> just maybe, he is listening to his attorney.
>
> He doesn't have an attorney (you actually believe that?). At
> least not for Usenet he doesn't. He may have a defense lawyer
> with all the copyrighted materials on his website.
>
> He's probably just not posting out of embarrassment. Maybe he
> finally did wise up. The last post I saw from him was his defense
> about his stolen pictures on his web site. Soon after that,
> nada-zilch.
>
> -sw

i suppose that's possible, but the idea of stu either wising up or being
embarrassed seems an unlikely one.

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:37:52 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> > He's probably just not posting out of embarrassment. Maybe he
> > finally did wise up. The last post I saw from him was his defense
> > about his stolen pictures on his web site. Soon after that,
> > nada-zilch.
>
> i suppose that's possible, but the idea of stu either wising up or being
> embarrassed seems an unlikely one.

So what's your theory? Drunken stupor? Bad oysters?
Cub scout convention?

Mark wrote:

>> the idea of stu either wising up or being embarrassed seems an unlikely
>> one.
>
> So what's your theory? Drunken stupor? Bad oysters?
> Cub scout convention?

Maybe he's on his way to Iraq! He's GOT to warn the Iraq Strategic
Partnership Office that there's an Intenet mocker working in their purview.
Otherwise, who knows what might happen?

Bob

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:


[deleted confusing attributions]

> >> the idea of stu either wising up or being embarrassed seems an unlikely
> >> one.

> Maybe he's on his way to Iraq! He's GOT to warn the Iraq Strategic
> Partnership Office that there's an Intenet mocker working in their purview.
> Otherwise, who knows what might happen?


Tell me it's not true, Bob, that you wouldn't do such a thing as...

MOCK YOUR EMPLOYER'S INTERNET!!!

:-)

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Dan wrote:

>> Maybe he's on his way to Iraq! He's GOT to warn the Iraq Strategic
>> Partnership Office that there's an Intenet mocker working in their
>> purview.
>> Otherwise, who knows what might happen?
>
> Tell me it's not true, Bob, that you wouldn't do such a thing as...
>
> MOCK YOUR EMPLOYER'S INTERNET!!!
>
> :-)

Well, my employer's Internet at this facility *deserves* to be mocked. After
being connected for six hours, I've received 1700 packets. It took four
minutes just to download your post!

I did consider other phrases, but "Internet mocker" seemed less cumbersome
than "person who participates in online forums and laughs mockingly at a
thick-witted British Columbian plagiarist for his stupidity, ineptitude,
illiteracy, and the shittiness of his web site, then introduces the term
'butt-hurt' to describe the pompous, sullen, and impotent responses."

Bob

On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 01:16:15 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>Dan wrote:
>
>>> Maybe he's on his way to Iraq! He's GOT to warn the Iraq Strategic
>>> Partnership Office that there's an Intenet mocker working in their
>>> purview.
>>> Otherwise, who knows what might happen?
>>
>> Tell me it's not true, Bob, that you wouldn't do such a thing as...
>>
>> MOCK YOUR EMPLOYER'S INTERNET!!!
>>
>> :-)
>
>Well, my employer's Internet at this facility *deserves* to be mocked. After
>being connected for six hours, I've received 1700 packets. It took four
>minutes just to download your post!

Welcome to my world Bob!
The joys of satellite Internet...

On Jul 4, 3:16*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
>
>
> I did consider other phrases, but "Internet mocker" seemed less cumbersome
> than "person who participates in online forums and laughs mockingly at a
> thick-witted British Columbian plagiarist for his stupidity, ineptitude,
> illiteracy, and the shittiness of his web site, then introduces the term
> 'butt-hurt' to describe the pompous, sullen, and impotent responses."

I thought he was from Ontario. Of course, I had less "need to know,"
given that I'm not a "defendant."
>
> Bob

--Bryan

Bryan wrote:

>> I did consider other phrases, but "Internet mocker" seemed less
>> cumbersome than "person who participates in online forums and laughs
>> mockingly at a thick-witted British Columbian plagiarist for his
>> stupidity, ineptitude, illiteracy, and the shittiness of his web site,
>> then introduces the term 'butt-hurt' to describe the pompous, sullen, and
>> impotent responses."
>
> I thought he was from Ontario. Of course, I had less "need to know,"
> given that I'm not a "defendant."

You may be right -- which means there's a British Columbian guy who could
file a lawsuit against me now!

Bob

On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:32:11 -0700, Mark Thorson wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:37:52 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>> He's probably just not posting out of embarrassment. Maybe he
>>> finally did wise up. The last post I saw from him was his defense
>>> about his stolen pictures on his web site. Soon after that,
>>> nada-zilch.
>>
>> i suppose that's possible, but the idea of stu either wising up or being
>> embarrassed seems an unlikely one.
>
> So what's your theory? Drunken stupor? Bad oysters?
> Cub scout convention?

maybe his attorney broke his fingers.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 20:14:30 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Mark wrote:
>
>>> the idea of stu either wising up or being embarrassed seems an unlikely
>>> one.
>>
>> So what's your theory? Drunken stupor? Bad oysters?
>> Cub scout convention?
>
> Maybe he's on his way to Iraq! He's GOT to warn the Iraq Strategic
> Partnership Office that there's an Intenet mocker working in their purview.
> Otherwise, who knows what might happen?
>
> Bob

i hear they're always interested in IEDs (Improvised Electronic Derision).

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 04:02:16 -0700 (PDT), Food Snob® wrote:

> On Jul 4, 3:16*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I did consider other phrases, but "Internet mocker" seemed less cumbersome
>> than "person who participates in online forums and laughs mockingly at a
>> thick-witted British Columbian plagiarist for his stupidity, ineptitude,
>> illiteracy, and the shittiness of his web site, then introduces the term
>> 'butt-hurt' to describe the pompous, sullen, and impotent responses."
>
> I thought he was from Ontario. Of course, I had less "need to know,"
> given that I'm not a "defendant."
>>

stu's lawyers are preparing to subpoena us all as material witnesses.

blake

In article >,
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:

> Bryan wrote:
>
> > Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
> >
> > Is he off on a Cool Whip bender?

ROTFL!
>
> Probably attending a Boy Scout Jamboree with a truckload of candy and a
> camera.
>
> Bob

<cough> Reminded me of NPR's Car Talk program on Saturday morning * an
"insider's list" of book titles rejected by the publishers of children's
books. "Grandpa Gets A Casket." "The Little Boy Who Died From Eating
All His Vegetables." "The Kids' Guide to Hitchhiking." "Strangers Have
the Best Candy."

--
Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
On June 25, celebrating 65 years of joy and wonder. I got the joy
while everyone else wondered.

"Melba's Jammin'" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:
>
>> Bryan wrote:
>>
>> > Did his "attorney" advise him to stay off the NG?
>> >
>> > Is he off on a Cool Whip bender?
>
> ROTFL!
>>
>> Probably attending a Boy Scout Jamboree with a truckload of candy and a
>> camera.
>>
>> Bob
>
> <cough> Reminded me of NPR's Car Talk program on Saturday morning * an
> "insider's list" of book titles rejected by the publishers of children's
> books. "Grandpa Gets A Casket." "The Little Boy Who Died From Eating
> All His Vegetables." "The Kids' Guide to Hitchhiking." "Strangers Have
> the Best Candy."
> --
> Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ

My favorite, from waaaay back, is "A Child's Garden of Phallic Symbols".

Fleece