Janet wrote:

>> Janet and I have no great online friendship.
>
> Just because you left me and the triplets for that pole dancer doesn't
> mean we can't be friends here.

Are you sure they're OUR triplets? I don't think they look very much like
you.

Bob

On Jul 14, 6:47*pm, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 11:21*am, "Giusi" > wrote:
>
> > "Manda Ruby" > ha scritto nel messaggio
>
> > > Similar post? When did I say that. *That's what I >meant by "logical
> > > resoning ability" about some >people, I mean *lack of*.
>
> > And there, Mandy, is why people bend over backward to help you out. *You are
> > so unfailingly polite and grateful for the attention we waste on you. *The
> > praise you lavish on the other posters here is boundless. *I bet if we ever
> > award a Miss Congeniality cup it's yours.
>
> If you track down *systematically* to what kind of posts I re-act like
> this, you'll understand, I think, I hope. There're some people who are
> sneakily rude but they are not blunt like I do and so I, not they,
> appear uncongenial. * The way I respond to this kind of illogical
> posts that are antagonistic is *the most effective way to respond,
> i.e. short and effective cus I wasn't going to waste time to explain
> how illogical the posts was when someone was being clearly
> antagonistic like that nancy retard's posts.

With such a winning attitude and personality, it's very odd that
prospective employers aren't lining up at your door!

N.

On Jul 14, 6:24*pm, Janet Baraclough >
wrote:
> The message >
> from Manda Ruby > contains these words:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 13, 10:52*am, Janet Baraclough >
> > wrote:
> > > The message
> > > >
> > > from "Catmandy (Sheryl)" > contains these words:
>
> > > >>> On Jul 12, 9:09*pm, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> > > >>>>*This is for a job interview at a college (for adjunct Chemistry
> > > >>>>teaching that I do on the side sometimes).
> > > > You should dress for the interview as if you already have the job.
>
> > > * *See above. According to Muddlerabid *she does already have a
> > > similar job.
>
> > > * *Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar
> > > post;
> > * Similar post? When did I say that.
>
> * * *Look up there /\. * "This is for a job interview at a college (for
> adjunct Chemistry *teaching THAT I DO ON THE SIDE SOMETIMES)."
>
> > That's what I meant by "logical
> > resoning ability" about some people, I mean *lack of*.
>
> * * *If you already *teach adjunct Chemistry, that is a SIMILAR TEACHING
> POST to the one you are applying for.
>
> * * *In the English-speaking world, we refer to academic teaching jobs
> as posts. I thought a professor would know that.
>
> * * Janet- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, it's not so much here in the U.S. - I rarely hear "post" used in
reference to a teaching position.

N.

>
>I am sure that you see
> them as a sceretary or something other than a graduate chemistry
> student or a lab tech research employee. *Their expectation on you
> would NOT be the same as graduate chemistry student or a lab tech
> research employee, not that you'd understand.
>

Nobody cares enough to try and impress you. I was just stating the
facts. Actually, I see deans, department heads and faculty. What's
your problem?

N.

On Jul 14, 8:56*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:
> > Give it up already. Your comment doesn't count. *You ARE a retard.
>
> > Why don't you go fuclk yourself if you don;t have anythign better to
> > do?
>
> OK, *I* am Manda Ruby. *Just another one of my many multiple sock
> puppets. *I give up. *Game over. *Move along. *Nothing more to see
> here.
>
> -sw

Too funny.... ;-)

N.

That clueless obviously doesn't even
> understand that having Chemiustry degree doesn't automatically make
> one an intellectual.
>


....as you have so aptly proven.

N.

On Jul 14, 9:53*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> amandaF wrote:
> >> According to Muddlerabid she does already have a similar job.
>
> >> Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar post;
>
> > Similar post? When did I say that.
>
> The word "post" has several meanings. Janet wasn't using the word "post" in
> the sense of "sending to a newsgroup". By "post" Janet meant "job." She's
> saying that you already have a job similar to the job for which you were
> being interviewed. That being the case, you must have been interviewed
> before being hired for that job.
>
> Bob

I wonder if MR realizes that in these times, prospective employers
routinely check out prospective employees by finding them on the Web
in various places, and can easily see how someone reacts to others'
comments and how literate they are....

N.

On Jul 15, 8:24*am, Janet Baraclough >
wrote:
> The message
> >
> from Nancy2 > contains these words:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 9:53*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
> > wrote:
> > > amandaF wrote:
> > > >> According to Muddlerabid she does already have a similar job.
>
> > > >> Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a
> > > >> similar post;
>
> > > > Similar post? When did I say that.
>
> > > The word "post" has several meanings. Janet wasn't using the word
> > > "post" in
> > > the sense of "sending to a newsgroup". By "post" Janet meant "job." She's
> > > saying that you already have a job similar to the job for which you were
> > > being interviewed. That being the case, you must have been interviewed
> > > before being hired for that job.
>
> > > Bob
> > I wonder if *MR realizes that in these times, prospective employers
> > routinely check out prospective employees by finding them on the Web
> > in various places, and can easily see how someone reacts to others'
> > comments and how literate they are....
>
> * *Nope; she thinks they will be too busy looking at the candidates shoes.
>
> * *Janet- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

LOL. Good one.... ;-)

N.

On Jul 15, 8:41*am, Janet Baraclough >
wrote:
> The message
> >
> from Nancy2 > contains these words:
>
> > On Jul 14, 6:24*pm, Janet Baraclough >
>
> ** *Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar post;
>
> > > > * Similar post? When did I say that.
> > > * * *In the English-speaking world, we refer to academic teaching jobs
> > > as posts. I thought a professor would know that.
>
> > > * * Janet- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
> > Well, it's not so much here in the U.S. - I rarely hear "post" used in
> > reference to a teaching position.
>
> * *In the US, do *they *teach the comprehension skill of reading for
> context? *Pick the likeliest definition:
>
> * *"she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar (usenet
> message) (fence support) (job)"
>
> * *:-)
>
> * * Janet

I don't have a problem with the word "post," I just rarely hear it
referring to a teaching position out here in fly-over country.
Undoubtedly, that's my problem. Usually, I hear, "I have a new
teaching job." LOL.

N.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:33:19 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:


>I don't have a problem with the word "post," I just rarely hear it
>referring to a teaching position out here in fly-over country.
>Undoubtedly, that's my problem. Usually, I hear, "I have a new
>teaching job." LOL.

It's young corporate jargon and I hate it. Every word is used to make
something more desirable. Who wants a job when you can have a post.
My favorite is opportunity. Who wants to apply for a job when you can
be a candidate for an opportunity?

Gimmie a break. It's a freekin JOB!

Lou

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:58:41 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:

> On Jul 14, 1:17*pm, Nancy2 > wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 2:02*pm, Michel Boucher > wrote:
>>
>>> Manda Ruby > wrote
>>> s.com:
>>
>>> > That doesn't mean the a professor or adjunct professor in
>>> > Chemistry can get away going to the interview with a tennis
>>> > shoe.
>>
>>> Why not? *Do they mix formulae with their feet? *I fail to see the
>>> reasoning.
>>
>>> --
>>
>> Well, see, Michel, she said "with A tennis shoe." *One really might
>> wonder if someone showed up at an interview with only one shoe
>> on....
>>
>> (P.S., reasoning is a foreign concept for her.)
>>
>> N.
>
> It is very clear that Nancy feels some soft of inadequacy and feels
> the need to act like she's been doing in this thread. You're barking
> at the wrong person. All you're acheiving is getting my wrath aimed at
> you and I am good with words, rude words, when I am ****ed off. But I
> can't waste too much time on it and so I'll just use one word that
> starts with "r" in the future. Comprande?

'good with words'? is that a joke?

blake

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:35:39 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 wrote:

>>
>>I am sure that you see
>> them as a sceretary or something other than a graduate chemistry
>> student or a lab tech research employee. *Their expectation on you
>> would NOT be the same as graduate chemistry student or a lab tech
>> research employee, not that you'd understand.
>>
>
> Nobody cares enough to try and impress you. I was just stating the
> facts. Actually, I see deans, department heads and faculty. What's
> your problem?
>
> N.

i think there's more than one.

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:56:56 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:
>
>> Give it up already. Your comment doesn't count. You ARE a retard.
>>
>> Why don't you go fuclk yourself if you don;t have anythign better to
>> do?
>
> OK, *I* am Manda Ruby. Just another one of my many multiple sock
> puppets. I give up. Game over. Move along. Nothing more to see
> here.
>
> -sw

bullshit. you couldn't pretend to be that screwy.

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:57:22 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> amandaF wrote:
>
>> Chemists, Chemical Engineers and lab techs wear jeans filled with holes
>> (ftrom acid) or stains covered with white lab coats but they cannot go to
>> interview wearing anything but skirt suit or pant suit (if female) or
>> suit (if males).
>
> Wait a minute... Now you're the EXPERT on interview attire? Then why did you
> start this thread?
>
> Bob

and in a food group, no less.

your pal,
blake

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:58:42 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:

> On Jul 14, 8:51*pm, nfw > wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:28:09 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>>>On Jul 14, 7:57*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
>>>wrote:
>>>> amandaF wrote:
>>>> > Chemists, Chemical Engineers and lab techs wear jeans filled with holes
>>>> > (ftrom acid) or stains covered with white lab coats but they cannot go to
>>>> > interview wearing anything butskirtsuitor pantsuit(if female) *or
>>>> >suit(if males).
>>
>>>> Wait a minute... Now you're the EXPERT on interview attire? Then why did you
>>>> start this thread?
>>
>>>> Bob
>>
>>>Are you trying to prove which list you belong to? * Did I ever ask
>>>about attire? *I asked specifically about the heel styles of two pumps
>>>an asked specifically to those who had enough knowledge on a specific
>>>setting to give the opinion. I wasn't asking for the non sense like
>>>"What's more important was the intellectual ability. Blah.blah ..blah
>>>like the one by retard Nancy. That clueless obviously doesn't even
>>>understand that having Chemiustry degree doesn't automatically make
>>>one an intellectual.
>>
>>> Shaking my head. That's what malking about some people in rfc.
>>
>> Well you have problems even with the simplest of spelling, I'm sure
>> yur chamistary techin is a thing to comprehend.

> Typical response when cannot face facts. YOU ARE A RETARD too.

ohnoes!!! manda, who can't spell and seems to have difficulty thinking
(given her other idiotic questions) called you a 'RETARD'!! (the all-caps
passages mark her as being 'good with words.')

blake

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:47:01 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:

> On Jul 14, 11:21*am, "Giusi" > wrote:
>> "Manda Ruby" > ha scritto nel messaggio
>>
>>> Similar post? When did I say that. *That's what I >meant by "logical
>>> resoning ability" about some >people, I mean *lack of*.
>>
>> And there, Mandy, is why people bend over backward to help you out. *You are
>> so unfailingly polite and grateful for the attention we waste on you. *The
>> praise you lavish on the other posters here is boundless. *I bet if we ever
>> award a Miss Congeniality cup it's yours.
>
> If you track down *systematically* to what kind of posts I re-act like
> this, you'll understand, I think, I hope. There're some people who are
> sneakily rude but they are not blunt like I do and so I, not they,
> appear uncongenial.

wow, there's some mighty goodness with words right there.

blake

On 7/15/2010 7:41 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jul 14, 9:53 pm, "Bob >
> wrote:
>> amandaF wrote:
>>>> According to Muddlerabid she does already have a similar job.
>>
>>>> Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar post;
>>
>>> Similar post? When did I say that.
>>
>> The word "post" has several meanings. Janet wasn't using the word "post" in
>> the sense of "sending to a newsgroup". By "post" Janet meant "job." She's
>> saying that you already have a job similar to the job for which you were
>> being interviewed. That being the case, you must have been interviewed
>> before being hired for that job.
>>
>> Bob
>
> I wonder if MR realizes that in these times, prospective employers
> routinely check out prospective employees by finding them on the Web
> in various places, and can easily see how someone reacts to others'
> comments and how literate they are....
>
> N.

Wow! No wonder I've been getting so many offers as a hit man? Who knew? <G>

On 7/15/2010 7:33 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jul 14, 6:24 pm, Janet >
> wrote:
>> The >
>> from Manda > contains these words:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 10:52 am, Janet >
>>> wrote:
>>>> The message
>>>> >
>>>> from "Catmandy > contains these words:
>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 9:09 pm, Manda > wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is for a job interview at a college (for adjunct Chemistry
>>>>>>>> teaching that I do on the side sometimes).
>>>>> You should dress for the interview as if you already have the job.
>>
>>>> See above. According to Muddlerabid she does already have a
>>>> similar job.
>>
>>>> Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar
>>>> post;
>>> Similar post? When did I say that.
>>
>> Look up there /\. "This is for a job interview at a college (for
>> adjunct Chemistry teaching THAT I DO ON THE SIDE SOMETIMES)."
>>
>>> That's what I meant by "logical
>>> resoning ability" about some people, I mean *lack of*.
>>
>> If you already teach adjunct Chemistry, that is a SIMILAR TEACHING
>> POST to the one you are applying for.
>>
>> In the English-speaking world, we refer to academic teaching jobs
>> as posts. I thought a professor would know that.
>>
>> Janet- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Well, it's not so much here in the U.S. - I rarely hear "post" used in
> reference to a teaching position.
>
> N.

In the past I taught at two different universities and no one ever
called my job a "post." They just wanted to know if I would work cheap
so some full professor could do his "research."

On 7/15/2010 9:38 AM, Lou Decruss wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:33:19 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> > wrote:
>
>
>> I don't have a problem with the word "post," I just rarely hear it
>> referring to a teaching position out here in fly-over country.
>> Undoubtedly, that's my problem. Usually, I hear, "I have a new
>> teaching job." LOL.
>
> It's young corporate jargon and I hate it. Every word is used to make
> something more desirable. Who wants a job when you can have a post.
> My favorite is opportunity. Who wants to apply for a job when you can
> be a candidate for an opportunity?
>
> Gimmie a break. It's a freekin JOB!
>
> Lou

Geez Lou, I just blew iced green tea over the key board. I was a
corporate recruiter for a couple of years and my idiot boss wanted me to
write newspaper ads for opportunities. Luckily they caught up with the
idiot and got rid of him. People I was talking to were looking for
paying jobs, not the opportunity of a lifetime.

On Jul 15, 11:30*am, George Shirley > wrote:
> On 7/15/2010 7:33 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 6:24 pm, Janet >
> > wrote:
> >> The >
> >> from Manda > *contains these words:
>
> >>> On Jul 13, 10:52 am, Janet >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> The message
> >>>> >
> >>>> from "Catmandy > *contains these words:
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 12, 9:09 pm, Manda > *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> * This is for a job interview at a college (for adjunct Chemistry
> >>>>>>>> teaching that I do on the side sometimes).
> >>>>> You should dress for the interview as if you already have the job.
>
> >>>> * * See above. According to Muddlerabid *she does already have a
> >>>> similar job.
>
> >>>> * * Either, she has already been interviewed for and awarded a similar
> >>>> post;
> >>> * *Similar post? When did I say that.
>
> >> * * * Look up there /\. * "This is for a job interview at a college (for
> >> adjunct Chemistry *teaching THAT I DO ON THE SIDE SOMETIMES)."
>
> >>> That's what I meant by "logical
> >>> resoning ability" about some people, I mean *lack of*.
>
> >> * * * If you already *teach adjunct Chemistry, that is a SIMILAR TEACHING
> >> POST to the one you are applying for.
>
> >> * * * In the English-speaking world, we refer to academic teaching jobs
> >> as posts. I thought a professor would know that.
>
> >> * * *Janet- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Well, it's not so much here in the U.S. - I rarely hear "post" used in
> > reference to a teaching position.
>
> > N.
>
> In the past I taught at two different universities and no one ever
> called my job a "post." They just wanted to know if I would work cheap
> so some full professor could do his "research."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

LOL. Sounds familiar. (Did you ever read "Moo" by Jane Smiley, or
"Straight Man" by Richard Russo? Both are absolutely spot-on and
funny.)

N.

On Jul 15, 1:22*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:35:18 +0100, Janet Baraclough wrote:
> > The message >
> > from Sqwertz > contains these words:
>
> >> OK, *I* am Manda Ruby. *Just another one of my many multiple sock
> >> puppets. *I give up. *Game over. *Move along. *Nothing more to see
> >> here.
>
> > * That explains the hairy legs and bad lipstick, Cinderella. So, did the
> > transvestite outfit get you the job?
>
> Could never get that lipstick right. *And my calves, hair or not,
> are always a dead giveaway. *Not to mention the wide fingernails
> (which is how I always identify the mean from the women - the
> fingernails).
>
> -sw

You know, I never thought of that characteristic, but you may have
something there. OTOH, did you read that news item a week or so ago
about the woman who could "tell" if a man was guilty of rape or not
because if he was a virgin, he had a red spot behind his ear? And
some men who had been locked up for rape were released by the
courts? Unbelievable what some people believe .... [oops, I see a
lot of men checking out their ears....]
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_1...-10391704.html
Too weird.

N.

On Jul 13, 2:42*am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> I got
> affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
> temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
> parking lot through a short cut, also talking.

Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
have a stuffy nose?

How curious.

Cindy Hamilton

On Jul 15, 12:30*pm, George Shirley > wrote:

> In the past I taught at two different universities and no one ever
> called my job a "post." They just wanted to know if I would work cheap
> so some full professor could do his "research."

By "research" do you mean "get his name added to all of his
grad students' published papers so that his curriculum vitae
looks better"?

Cindy Hamilton

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2:42 am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
>> I got
>> affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
>> temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
>> parking lot through a short cut, also talking.
>
> Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
> have a stuffy nose?
>
> How curious.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

very! Its amazing to me to hear what some people think about their
bodies at times. Sometimes it is just downright laughable.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:33:56 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

> Well, it's not so much here in the U.S. - I rarely hear "post" used in
> reference to a teaching position.

Thanks for the clarification. I know a couple of professors in the
California university system and they don't use the term (at least
around me) either.

--

Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:41:57 +0100, Janet Baraclough
> wrote:

> In the US, do they teach the comprehension skill of reading for
> context?

I think she read it too quickly before responding. It was easy to
misconstrue the meaning of the entire sentence, especially when on the
defensive the way she was.

--

Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

On Jul 15, 12:32*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> amandaF wrote:
> > I don't have social skills for retards that I'd not go near much less
> > associate with outside of usenet. *I see no need to work on such social
> > skills since I gaurantee that I will never need such social skills (in
> > dealing with retards pretending to be smart).
>
> Good luck with teaching at a vocational school!
>
> Bob

You clueless Americans judge people based on afe winteraction online.
Trust me, I will have no problem.

On Jul 15, 12:32*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> amandaF wrote:
> > I don't have social skills for retards that I'd not go near much less
> > associate with outside of usenet. *I see no need to work on such social
> > skills since I gaurantee that I will never need such social skills (in
> > dealing with retards pretending to be smart).
>
> Good luck with teaching at a vocational school!
>
> Bob

Trust me that I will have NO problem. Those students are not racist
like nncy and the likes of her. Most are proabbly Hispanic people. I
have dealt with mnay of them. They are much better human beings than
people like you and Nancy and her idiot group, none of whom are worth
any more of my time.


You clueless Americans judge me from a few interaction on usenet.
Very smart (NOT)!

Note: Read "Very smart (NOT)!' in the sense of negation; it means
DUMB.

In article
>,
Cindy Hamilton > wrote:

> On Jul 13, 2:42*am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> > I got
> > affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
> > temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
> > parking lot through a short cut, also talking.
>
> Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
> have a stuffy nose?
>
> How curious.

I have chronic rhinitis and my body can adjust to changes of temperature
just fine.

Miche

--
Electricians do it in three phases

On Jul 15, 11:59*am, Cindy Hamilton >
wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2:42*am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
>
> > I got
> > affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
> > temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
> > parking lot through a short cut, also talking.
>
> Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
> have a stuffy nose?
>
> How curious.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

No, not because of stuffy nose though stuufy nose can be caused by
many different conditions.

On Jul 15, 12:03*pm, Goomba > wrote:
> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 2:42 am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> >> I got
> >> affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
> >> temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
> >> parking lot through a short cut, also talking.
>
> > Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
> > have a stuffy nose?
>
> > How curious.
>
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> very! Its amazing to me to hear what some people think about their
> bodies at times. Sometimes it is just downright laughable.

Another idiot. Don't even know what type of Rhinitis I have and make
comments. If this is not stupidity, what is?

On Jul 15, 1:51*pm, Miche > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
>
> > On Jul 13, 2:42*am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> > > I got
> > > affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
> > > temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
> > > parking lot through a short cut, also talking.
>
> > Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
> > have a stuffy nose?
>
> > How curious.
>
> I have chronic rhinitis and my body can adjust to changes of temperature
> just fine.

Gee Miche. Are you aware how many main category of rhinitis there are
and how many sub categories in each category based on the causes and
that some are more complicated than others?
There are two main types: Allergic Rhinitis and Non-Allergic Rhinitis.

Guess which category mine is. If you guess right, I will share (not in
this group but via direct reply) how mine works and there's no
medication to cope with and how the sunus mmebrane swells.

>
> Miche
>
> --
> Electricians do it in three phases

On 7/15/2010 3:48 PM, Manda Ruby wrote:

> You clueless Americans judge me from a few interaction on usenet.
> Very smart (NOT)!


Are you saying that you portray a different personality on Usenet than
your real personality?

Your interactions on Usenet are not indicative of your real personality?

Now why would someone intentionally do that?

George L

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:22:25 -0400, blake murphy
> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:35:39 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 wrote:
>
>> What's your problem?
> >
> > N.
>
> i think there's more than one.
>
How long has it been... and people are just starting to figure that
part out?

--

Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:36:52 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

> On Jul 14, 8:56*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT), Manda Ruby wrote:
> > > Give it up already. Your comment doesn't count. *You ARE a retard.
> >
> > > Why don't you go fuclk yourself if you don;t have anythign better to
> > > do?
> >
> > OK, *I* am Manda Ruby. *Just another one of my many multiple sock
> > puppets. *I give up. *Game over. *Move along. *Nothing more to see
> > here.
> >
> > -sw
>
> Too funny.... ;-)
>
If only it was that simple. Manda is the new Jerry.


--

Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get.

On Jul 15, 3:48*pm, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> On Jul 15, 12:32*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
> wrote:
>
> > amandaF wrote:
> > > I don't have social skills for retards that I'd not go near much less
> > > associate with outside of usenet. *I see no need to work on such social
> > > skills since I gaurantee that I will never need such social skills (in
> > > dealing with retards pretending to be smart).
>
> > Good luck with teaching at a vocational school!
>
> > Bob
>
> Trust me that I will have NO problem. Those students are not racist
> like nncy and the likes of her. *Most are proabbly Hispanic people. I
> have dealt with mnay of them. *They are much better human beings than
> people like you and Nancy and her idiot group, none of whom are worth
> any more of my time.
>
> You clueless Americans judge me from a few interaction on usenet.
> Very smart (NOT)!
>
> Note: Read "Very smart (NOT)!' in the sense of negation; it means
> DUMB.

I wasn't aware that you knew I had groups! That would include, of
course, the r.f.c. A group and also the B group. I'm also in the
Cabal (TINC). I also know that I don't know what race you are, so I
can hardly be called a racist, and I also know that you are not a
native-born American because you use the "R" word with spectacularly
cavalier abandon and apparently aren't aware of how destructive and
derogatory it is perceived to be here in the U.S. I also know that
it's unfair of me to try and match wits with someone who is unarmed.
That's really all I need to know. Happy trails, as we say in my
world.

N.

On 7/14/2010 4:17 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2:02 pm, Michel > wrote:
>> Manda > wrote
>> s.com:
>>
>>> That doesn't mean the a professor or adjunct professor in
>>> Chemistry can get away going to the interview with a tennis
>>> shoe.
>>
>> Why not? Do they mix formulae with their feet? I fail to see the
>> reasoning.
>>
>> --
>>
>
>
> Well, see, Michel, she said "with A tennis shoe." One really might
> wonder if someone showed up at an interview with only one shoe
> on....
>
> (P.S., reasoning is a foreign concept for her.)

Showing up for a Professor interview with one shoe, no, that would be a
problem--professor is pretty far up the food chain. But showing up for
an associate professor interview, they're expecting a newly minted PhD
who has been living on a student's income for going on a decade--one
shoe means that the other one fell apart.

"J. Clarke" > wrote in
:

> But showing up for
> an associate professor interview, they're expecting a newly
> minted PhD who has been living on a student's income for going
> on a decade--one shoe means that the other one fell apart.

Or that you are one-legged.

--

"When a government starts to cancel dissent or avoid dissent
is frankly when it's rapidly losing its moral authority to
govern."

Stephen Harper, 18 April 2005

In article
>,
Manda Ruby > wrote:

> On Jul 15, 1:51*pm, Miche > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
> >
> > > On Jul 13, 2:42*am, Manda Ruby > wrote:
> > > > I got
> > > > affected by the sun - my body cannot andjust to the change in
> > > > temperature quickly because of my rhinitis - as she took me to the
> > > > parking lot through a short cut, also talking.
> >
> > > Your body cannot adjust to changes in temperature because you
> > > have a stuffy nose?
> >
> > > How curious.
> >
> > I have chronic rhinitis and my body can adjust to changes of temperature
> > just fine.
>
> Gee Miche. Are you aware how many main category of rhinitis there are
> and how many sub categories in each category based on the causes and
> that some are more complicated than others?
> There are two main types: Allergic Rhinitis and Non-Allergic Rhinitis.

Yes, I know that.

> Guess which category mine is. If you guess right, I will share (not in
> this group but via direct reply) how mine works and there's no
> medication to cope with and how the sunus mmebrane swells.

Sorry, I don't play guessing games.

Miche

--
Electricians do it in three phases

On Jul 15, 2:06*pm, George Leppla > wrote:
> On 7/15/2010 3:48 PM, Manda Ruby wrote:
>
> > You clueless Americans judge me from a few interaction on usenet.
> > Very smart (NOT)!
>
> Are you saying that you portray a different personality on Usenet than
> your real personality?
>
> Your interactions on Usenet are not indicative of your real personality?
>
> Now why would someone intentionally do that?
>
> George L

Do you really think I'd pick Gumbo and Nancy and the likes to
associate in no usenet life?