On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT), Peter Lucas
> wrote:

>Let me start by saying I beleive a woman has the right to
>choose.........
>To chose to keep her frikken legs closed, not to murder unborn
>children!
>Girls; if you dont want a baby use bloody protection or abstain from
>penetrative sex. Is that too hard to comprahend?

So that makes abortion OK for cases of rape, birth defects, incest, or
saving life acceptable to you? If so, I might agree with you.

Abortion is a lousy substitute for ready access to a condom, sex
education, morning after pills. BC pills, contraceptive foam, etc..

Trying to obliterate one of the strongest human survival drives is a
non-starter. Normal people have sex - frequently. It makes a lot
more sense to adapt the laws to the people - not the other way around!

'Specially when the one pushing this stupidity is some 90 year old
cleric who can't remember what sex was like - and that's probably
homosexual sex in a seminary somewhere.
--