On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
wrote:

> Redi-Whip on store brand sandwich cookies (Bob likes to snort the
> nitrous, it makes for a good rush while he whacks off after dinner)

That's amyl nitrate you snort during sex, not N20.

I was at Walmart this morning walking around aimlessly trying to
kill an hour when I saw Redi-Whip on sale for $1. I didn't think
anything of it but then I did a double-take and grabbed a can and
carried it gently to the cash register so as not to shake it up,
along with a 7-pack of Fruit of Looms.

The can of whipped cream lasted another 5 minutes. Ahh, the good
'ol days. At that price it was less expensive than the Whip-It's
you buy at the head shop.

ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.

-sw

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 03:15:21 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
>wrote:
>
>> Redi-Whip on store brand sandwich cookies (Bob likes to snort the
>> nitrous, it makes for a good rush while he whacks off after dinner)
>
>That's amyl nitrate you snort during sex, not N20.
>
>I was at Walmart this morning walking around aimlessly trying to
>kill an hour when I saw Redi-Whip on sale for $1. I didn't think
>anything of it but then I did a double-take and grabbed a can and
>carried it gently to the cash register so as not to shake it up,
>along with a 7-pack of Fruit of Looms.
>
>The can of whipped cream lasted another 5 minutes. Ahh, the good
>'ol days. At that price it was less expensive than the Whip-It's
>you buy at the head shop.
>
>ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
>instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
>7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.
>
>-sw


That should read your weekly period not schedule buffoon. So now it
seems you'll have a nine week window until being forced to go brief
shopping again. It's a well known fact that you wear the briefs for a
week, and then put a clean pair on and burn the feces filed ones.

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:07:35 -0500, BobT > wrote:

>On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 03:15:21 -0600, Sqwertz >
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Redi-Whip on store brand sandwich cookies (Bob likes to snort the
>>> nitrous, it makes for a good rush while he whacks off after dinner)
>>
>>That's amyl nitrate you snort during sex, not N20.
>>
>>I was at Walmart this morning walking around aimlessly trying to
>>kill an hour when I saw Redi-Whip on sale for $1. I didn't think
>>anything of it but then I did a double-take and grabbed a can and
>>carried it gently to the cash register so as not to shake it up,
>>along with a 7-pack of Fruit of Looms.
>>
>>The can of whipped cream lasted another 5 minutes. Ahh, the good
>>'ol days. At that price it was less expensive than the Whip-It's
>>you buy at the head shop.
>>
>>ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
>>instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
>>7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.
>>
>>-sw
>
>
>That should read your weekly period not schedule buffoon. So now it
>seems you'll have a nine week window until being forced to go brief
>shopping again. It's a well known fact that you wear the briefs for a
>week, and then put a clean pair on and burn the feces filed ones.


Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
aforementioned brief instead of burning.

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:53:55 -0600, Omelet >
wrote:

>In article >,
> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Redi-Whip on store brand sandwich cookies (Bob likes to snort the
>> > nitrous, it makes for a good rush while he whacks off after dinner)
>>
>> That's amyl nitrate you snort during sex, not N20.
>>
>> I was at Walmart this morning walking around aimlessly trying to
>> kill an hour when I saw Redi-Whip on sale for $1. I didn't think
>> anything of it but then I did a double-take and grabbed a can and
>> carried it gently to the cash register so as not to shake it up,
>> along with a 7-pack of Fruit of Looms.
>>
>> The can of whipped cream lasted another 5 minutes. Ahh, the good
>> 'ol days. At that price it was less expensive than the Whip-It's
>> you buy at the head shop.
>>
>> ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
>> instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
>> 7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.
>>
>> -sw
>
>Redi-whip for 1 buck a can?
>Damn that was cheap. ;-)
>
>I could have had a LOT more fun with it for a few hours if I...
>
>Nevermind. <wicked grin>


See you get him going, then bash him for his horny posts. Seems to me
you enjoy this way to much.

Omelet wrote:
>
>Redi-whip for 1 buck a can?
>Damn that was cheap. ;-)
>
>I could have had a LOT more fun with it for a few hours if I...

If you had me to lick it off....

On Nov 4, 4:15*am, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
> wrote:
>
> > Redi-Whip on store brand sandwich cookies (Bob likes to snort the
> > nitrous, it makes for a good rush while he whacks off after dinner)
>
> That's amyl nitrate you snort during sex, not N20.

Ahh yer right, I knew I had that wrong LOL

>
> I was at Walmart this morning walking around aimlessly trying to
> kill an hour when I saw Redi-Whip on sale for $1. *I didn't think
> anything of it but then I did a double-take and grabbed a can and
> carried it gently to the cash register so as not to shake it up,
> along with a 7-pack of Fruit of Looms.
>
> The can of whipped cream lasted another 5 minutes. *Ahh, the good
> 'ol days. *At that price it was less expensive than the Whip-It's
> you buy at the head shop.

Redi-Whip and a pack of Fruit O' Looms? Man, if I had been the
cashier I would have died laughing. : D

>
> ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
> instead of 7. *I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
> 7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.

Please don't tell us that you have the days of the week embroidered on
them!

Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:

> Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
> spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
> aforementioned brief instead of burning.

LOL... how easily you're found out!

Bob

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:17:48 -0500, BobT wrote:

>>>ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
>>>instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
>>>7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.>
>>
>>That should read your weekly period not schedule buffoon. So now it
>>seems you'll have a nine week window until being forced to go brief
>>shopping again. It's a well known fact that you wear the briefs for a
>>week, and then put a clean pair on and burn the feces filed ones.
>
> Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
> spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
> aforementioned brief instead of burning.

I gave you the perfect setup an you blew it. Not just once, but
twice.

Here - borrow my gun. There's one bullet in it.

-sw

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:04:05 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:17:48 -0500, BobT wrote:
>
>>>>ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
>>>>instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
>>>>7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.>
>>>
>>>That should read your weekly period not schedule buffoon. So now it
>>>seems you'll have a nine week window until being forced to go brief
>>>shopping again. It's a well known fact that you wear the briefs for a
>>>week, and then put a clean pair on and burn the feces filed ones.
>>
>> Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
>> spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
>> aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>
>I gave you the perfect setup an you blew it. Not just once, but
>twice.
>
>Here - borrow my gun. There's one bullet in it.
>
>-sw

Awwwww the two lovers are fighting again, isn't it sweet.

On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:47:56 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
wrote:

> Redi-Whip and a pack of Fruit O' Looms? Man, if I had been the
> cashier I would have died laughing. : D

Redi-whip and Depends. And a couple pacifiers. Now that would be
pretty scary.

> Please don't tell us that you have the days of the week embroidered on
> them!

At least you have a better imagination that BobT.

-sw

On Nov 4, 7:54*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:
>
> > Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
> > spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
> > aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>
> LOL... how easily you're found out!

I would be very surprised to see the REAL Terwilliger use the words,
"should of," instead of should *have*, but that's perfectly in
character for the semi-literate Stu.
>
> Bob

--Bryan

On Nov 4, 3:09*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> Omelet wrote:
>
> >Redi-whip for 1 buck a can?
> >Damn that was cheap. ;-)
>
> >I could have had a LOT more fun with it for a few hours if I...
>
> If you had me to lick it off....

sf is gonna be jealous.

--Bryan

On Nov 4, 11:28*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:47:56 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
> wrote:
>
> > Redi-Whip and a pack of Fruit O' Looms? *Man, if I had been the
> > cashier I would have died laughing. *: D
>
> Redi-whip and Depends. *And a couple pacifiers. *Now that would be
> pretty scary.
>
> > Please don't tell us that you have the days of the week embroidered on
> > them!
>
> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.

He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
high.
>
> -sw

--Bryan

Bryan wrote:
> On Nov 4, 7:54 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
> wrote:
>> Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:
>>
>>> Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
>>> spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
>>> aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>>
>> LOL... how easily you're found out!
>
> I would be very surprised to see the REAL Terwilliger use the words,
> "should of," instead of should *have*, but that's perfectly in
> character for the semi-literate Stu.

I haven't been following along but somehow I caught that
"should of" and knew it wasn't Bob. Or most of the people around
here, for that matter.

nancy

Sycophant wrote:

>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>>
>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
>> high.
>>>
>> --Bryan
>
> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D

ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about Chester.
Not very bright, that one.

Bob

Chester wrote:

>>On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:17:48 -0500, BobT wrote:
>>
>>>>>ObFood: My "7-Pack"of Fruit the Loom briefs actually had 9 pairs
>>>>>instead of 7. I should have returned them since 9 pairs instead of
>>>>>7 it totally going to screw up my weekly schedule.>
>>>>
>>>>That should read your weekly period not schedule buffoon. So now it
>>>>seems you'll have a nine week window until being forced to go brief
>>>>shopping again. It's a well known fact that you wear the briefs for a
>>>>week, and then put a clean pair on and burn the feces filed ones.
>>>
>>> Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
>>> spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
>>> aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>>
>>I gave you the perfect setup an you blew it. Not just once, but
>>twice.
>>
>>Here - borrow my gun. There's one bullet in it.
>>
>>-sw
>
> Awwwww the two lovers are fighting again, isn't it sweet.

LOL at the fact that Chester's sock is trying to stir up shit between Steve
and *another* of Chester's socks.

Bob

On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:06:12 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Sycophant wrote:
>
>>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>>>
>>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
>>> high.
>>>>
>>> --Bryan
>>
>> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>
> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about Chester.
> Not very bright, that one.

She doesn't follow conversations worth a shit. I don't know how
she possibly manages to function at work. I wonder how many people
have been wrongly diagnosed with diseases due to mixed up blood
tests, while others are dying from not getting the treatment they
need.

ObFood: Dinner:

http://yfrog.com/07porkpi1j

-sw

On Nov 5, 8:47*pm, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Bryan > wrote:
> > > >On Nov 4, 7:54 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >> Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:
>
> > > >> > Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed (damn
> > > >> > spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file the
> > > >> > aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>
> > > >> LOL... how easily you're found out!
>
> > > >I would be very surprised to see the REAL Terwilliger use the words,
> > > >"should of," instead of should *have*, but that's perfectly in
> > > >character for the semi-literate Stu.
>
> > > >> Bob
>
> > > >--Bryan
>
> > > Sorry children wasn't me
>
> > If it wasn't you, perhaps it was someone pretending to be you
> > pretending to be Bob. *They got the poor language skills down, *Maybe
> > this is a job for Mysterion.
>
> > --Bryan, who is 50 today
>
> Hey congrats! :-) *I hope you were gifted with many a black balloon...
> <g>
>
> I know my sister will do that for me in two more years.

Nothing hokey like that. Just relatives and friends meeting me at my
favorite taqueria for dinner. I swear, that green stuff in the
mustard bottles is from Heaven. The red stuff in the ketchup bottles
is wonderful too.

> --
> Peace! Om
>
--Bryan

On Nov 5, 10:06*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> Sycophant wrote:
> >>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>
> >> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
> >> high.
>
> >> --Bryan
>
> > ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>
> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about Chester..
> Not very bright, that one.

I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own
merits. YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render
the joke unfunny.
>
> Bob

--Bryan

Bryan wrote:

>> Sycophant wrote:
>>>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>>
>>>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
>>>> high.
>>
>>> --Bryan
>>
>>> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>>
>> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about
>> Chester. Not very bright, that one.
>
> I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own merits.
> YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render the joke
> unfunny.

Unfunny to YOU, perhaps, but Sycophant finds any perceived shot at me to be
hilarious, regardless of whether it makes sense or not. Her brain is so
fried nowadays that nothing makes sense to her anyway, so she might as well
laugh at what she thinks might be funny to her band of soulmates, viz., PVC,
Swallows, Chester, and Pussy. She would *never* intentionally laugh at
something which poked fun at Chester, even though the reference to Cool Whip
should have been the tip-off that that's who the joke was about: She was
just too stupid to make that connection.

Bob

On Nov 6, 8:16*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Bryan > wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 10:06*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
> > wrote:
> > > Sycophant wrote:
> > > >>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>
> > > >> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
> > > >> high.
>
> > > >> --Bryan
>
> > > > ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>
> > > ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about Chester.
> > > Not very bright, that one.
>
> > I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own
> > merits. *YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render
> > the joke unfunny.
>
> > > Bob
>
> > --Bryan
>
> Thanks Bryan. ;-)

You're welcome, but I was just calling it as I saw it.

> --
> Peace! Om
>
--Bryan

Bryan wrote:

>>>> Sycophant wrote:
>>>>>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>>
>>>>>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
>>>>>> high.
>>
>>>>>> --Bryan
>>
>>>>> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>>
>>>> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about
>>>> Chester.
>>>> Not very bright, that one.
>>
>>> I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own
>>> merits. YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render
>>> the joke unfunny.
>>
>> Thanks Bryan. ;-)
>
> You're welcome, but I was just calling it as I saw it.

Funny thing is, Sycophant *still* doesn't comprehend that you were making
fun of Chester. She really is that stupid.

Bob

On Nov 6, 8:15*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Bryan > wrote:
> > > > --Bryan, who is 50 today
>
> > > Hey congrats! :-) I hope you were gifted with many a black balloon...
> > > <g>
>
> > > I know my sister will do that for me in two more years.
>
> > Nothing hokey like that. *Just relatives and friends meeting me at my
> > favorite taqueria for dinner. *I swear, that green stuff in the
> > mustard bottles is from Heaven. The red stuff in the ketchup bottles
> > is wonderful too.
>
> > --Bryan
>
> I hope you had a pleasant time!
>
It was nice. Layla, the owner/cook makes the best darned condiments.
There was also an opaque white squirt bottle with sour cream.

> --
> Peace! Om
>
--Bryan

In article >,
Omelet > wrote:

> In article
> >,
> Bryan > wrote:

> > It was nice. Layla, the owner/cook makes the best darned condiments.

I guess I'm an odd person. I'm more interested in the "sides" and the
condiments than the "main" dish.

> IMHO Sour Cream and a good Guacamole are the best condiments in the
> world, followed closely by a good mild Picante.

I'm very interested in the derivation of words. That doesn't mean that
they have that meaning, of course. So the word "salsa" is simply
"sauce" in Spanish. It doesn't have that meaning in the US, but that's
what the word means. The word "picante" means "spicy" in Spanish. So a
mild picante would translate into a "mild spicy". The fact that you
capitalized it might mean that you are referring to a brand name, which
makes a lot more sense.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

On Nov 6, 6:27*pm, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Dan Abel > wrote:
>
> > > IMHO Sour Cream and a good Guacamole are the best condiments in the
> > > world, followed closely by a good mild Picante.
>
> > I'm very interested in the derivation of words. *That doesn't mean that
> > they have that meaning, of course. *So the word "salsa" is simply
> > "sauce" in Spanish. *It doesn't have that meaning in the US, but that's
> > what the word means. *The word "picante" means "spicy" in Spanish. *So a
> > mild picante would translate into a "mild spicy". *The fact that you
> > capitalized it might mean that you are referring to a brand name, which
> > makes a lot more sense.
>
> > --
> > Dan Abel
>
> In that "case", make it "Pace" brand. ;-)

Pace may very well be the best of the jarred salsas that can sit on
shelves in the grocery dept w/o refrigeration. That's like saying
Gorton's are the best fish sticks. Not all "picante" is jarred stuff,
just like not all fried fish is fish sticks.

> --
> Peace! Om
>
--Bryan

Omelet > wrote in
news
> In article
> >,
> Bryan > wrote:
>
>> On Nov 6, 6:27*pm, Omelet > wrote:
>> > In article
>> > >,
>> > *Dan Abel > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > IMHO Sour Cream and a good Guacamole are the best condiments in
>> > > > the world, followed closely by a good mild Picante.
>> >
>> > > I'm very interested in the derivation of words. *That doesn't mean
>> > > that they have that meaning, of course. *So the word "salsa" is
>> > > simply "sauce" in Spanish. *It doesn't have that meaning in the US,
>> > > but that's what the word means. *The word "picante" means "spicy"
>> > > in Spanish. *So a mild picante would translate into a "mild spicy".
>> > > *The fact that you capitalized it might mean that you are referring
>> > > to a brand name, which makes a lot more sense.
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > Dan Abel
>> >
>> > In that "case", make it "Pace" brand. ;-)
>>
>> Pace may very well be the best of the jarred salsas that can sit on
>> shelves in the grocery dept w/o refrigeration. That's like saying
>> Gorton's are the best fish sticks. Not all "picante" is jarred stuff,
>> just like not all fried fish is fish sticks.
>>
>> > --
>> > Peace! Om
>> >
>> --Bryan
>
> Funny you should mention that. ;-) I just served some Gortons Fish
> Fillet's out of the convection oven to dad tonight. He loves them...
>


http://www.gortons.com/our_products.htm


They have coupons that you can download too :-)


But I see your 'fillets' contain "White Fish", not Whiting.



--
Peter Lucas
Hobart
Tasmania

If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If
you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !

On Nov 6, 7:35*pm, Aussie > wrote:
> Omelet > wrote innews >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > *Bryan > wrote:
>
> >> On Nov 6, 6:27*pm, Omelet > wrote:
> >> > In article
> >> > >,
> >> > *Dan Abel > wrote:
>
> >> > > > IMHO Sour Cream and a good Guacamole are the best condiments in
> >> > > > the world, followed closely by a good mild Picante.
>
> >> > > I'm very interested in the derivation of words. *That doesn't mean
> >> > > that they have that meaning, of course. *So the word "salsa" is
> >> > > simply "sauce" in Spanish. *It doesn't have that meaning in the US,
> >> > > but that's what the word means. *The word "picante" means "spicy"
> >> > > in Spanish. *So a mild picante would translate into a "mild spicy".
> >> > > *The fact that you capitalized it might mean that you are referring
> >> > > to a brand name, which makes a lot more sense.
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > Dan Abel
>
> >> > In that "case", make it "Pace" brand. ;-)
>
> >> Pace may very well be the best of the jarred salsas that can sit on
> >> shelves in the grocery dept w/o refrigeration. *That's like saying
> >> Gorton's are the best fish sticks. *Not all "picante" is jarred stuff,
> >> just like not all fried fish is fish sticks.
>
> >> > --
> >> > Peace! Om
>
> >> --Bryan
>
> > Funny you should mention that. ;-) *I just served some Gortons Fish
> > Fillet's out of the convection oven to dad tonight. *He loves them...
>
> http://www.gortons.com/our_products.htm
>
> They have coupons that you can download too :-)
>
> But I see your 'fillets' contain "White Fish", not Whiting.

Whitefish usually means pollock, which is not bad. Whiting is
disgusting.
>
> --
> Peter Lucas *

--Bryan

"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
> On Nov 5, 8:47 pm, Omelet > wrote:
>> In article
>> >,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bryan > wrote:
>> > > >On Nov 4, 7:54 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >> Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:
>>
>> > > >> > Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed
>> > > >> > (damn
>> > > >> > spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file
>> > > >> > the
>> > > >> > aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>>
>> > > >> LOL... how easily you're found out!
>>
>> > > >I would be very surprised to see the REAL Terwilliger use the words,
>> > > >"should of," instead of should *have*, but that's perfectly in
>> > > >character for the semi-literate Stu.
>>
>> > > >> Bob
>>
>> > > >--Bryan
>>
>> > > Sorry children wasn't me
>>
>> > If it wasn't you, perhaps it was someone pretending to be you
>> > pretending to be Bob. They got the poor language skills down, Maybe
>> > this is a job for Mysterion.
>>
>> > --Bryan, who is 50 today
>>
>> Hey congrats! :-) I hope you were gifted with many a black balloon...
>> <g>
>>
>> I know my sister will do that for me in two more years.
>
> Nothing hokey like that. Just relatives and friends meeting me at my
> favorite taqueria for dinner...

> --Bryan

Del Taco?

"Paco" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Bryan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Nov 5, 8:47 pm, Omelet > wrote:
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bryan > wrote:
>>> > > >On Nov 4, 7:54 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
>>> > > >wrote:
>>> > > >> Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:
>>>
>>> > > >> > Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed
>>> > > >> > (damn
>>> > > >> > spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might
>>> > > >> > file the
>>> > > >> > aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>>>
>>> > > >> LOL... how easily you're found out!
>>>
>>> > > >I would be very surprised to see the REAL Terwilliger use the
>>> > > >words,
>>> > > >"should of," instead of should *have*, but that's perfectly in
>>> > > >character for the semi-literate Stu.
>>>
>>> > > >> Bob
>>>
>>> > > >--Bryan
>>>
>>> > > Sorry children wasn't me
>>>
>>> > If it wasn't you, perhaps it was someone pretending to be you
>>> > pretending to be Bob. They got the poor language skills down, Maybe
>>> > this is a job for Mysterion.
>>>
>>> > --Bryan, who is 50 today
>>>
>>> Hey congrats! :-) I hope you were gifted with many a black balloon...
>>> <g>
>>>
>>> I know my sister will do that for me in two more years.
>>
>> Nothing hokey like that. Just relatives and friends meeting me at my
>> favorite taqueria for dinner...
>
>> --Bryan
>
> Del Taco?
>
>
>
Now, THAT'S disgusting.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On Nov 6, 10:41*pm, "Paco" > wrote:
> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 5, 8:47 pm, Omelet > wrote:
> >> In article
> >> >,
>
> >> *Bryan > wrote:
> >> > > >On Nov 4, 7:54 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > > >> Chester wrote using his "BobT" sock:
>
> >> > > >> > Spelling mistake Steve, should of been filled and not filed
> >> > > >> > (damn
> >> > > >> > spellchecker), although it's highly possible that you might file
> >> > > >> > the
> >> > > >> > aforementioned brief instead of burning.
>
> >> > > >> LOL... how easily you're found out!
>
> >> > > >I would be very surprised to see the REAL Terwilliger use the words,
> >> > > >"should of," instead of should *have*, but that's perfectly in
> >> > > >character for the semi-literate Stu.
>
> >> > > >> Bob
>
> >> > > >--Bryan
>
> >> > > Sorry children wasn't me
>
> >> > If it wasn't you, perhaps it was someone pretending to be you
> >> > pretending to be Bob. *They got the poor language skills down, *Maybe
> >> > this is a job for Mysterion.
>
> >> > --Bryan, who is 50 today
>
> >> Hey congrats! :-) *I hope you were gifted with many a black balloon....
> >> <g>
>
> >> I know my sister will do that for me in two more years.
>
> > Nothing hokey like that. *Just relatives and friends meeting me at my
> > favorite taqueria for dinner...
> > --Bryan
>
> Del Taco?

Del Taco isn't a taqueria.

--Bryan

On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 00:59:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> wrote:

>On Nov 6, 10:41*pm, "Paco" > wrote:
>> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...

>>
>> Del Taco?
>
>Del Taco isn't a taqueria.
>
>--Bryan

Have you seen just how unhealthy their food is
http://www.deltaco.com/nutrition.html

On Nov 7, 7:09*am, nfw > wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 00:59:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
>
> > wrote:
> >On Nov 6, 10:41 pm, "Paco" > wrote:
> >> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> >> Del Taco?
>
> >Del Taco isn't a taqueria.
>
> >--Bryan
>
> Have you seen just how unhealthy their food ishttp://www.deltaco.com/nutrition.html

Half pound green burrito?
Chicken soft taco with green sauce instead of "secret sauce"??

If you're meaning high sodium, I don't have sodium sensitive
hypertension.

--Bryan

On Nov 6, 8:26*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> Bryan wrote:
> >>>> Sycophant wrote:
> >>>>>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>
> >>>>>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
> >>>>>> high.
>
> >>>>>> --Bryan
>
> >>>>> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>
> >>>> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about
> >>>> Chester.
> >>>> Not very bright, that one.
>
> >>> I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own
> >>> merits. *YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render
> >>> the joke unfunny.
>
> >> Thanks Bryan. ;-)
>
> > You're welcome, but I was just calling it as I saw it.
>
> Funny thing is, Sycophant *still* doesn't comprehend that you were making
> fun of Chester. She really is that stupid.

We'll see if she can make any kind of a reasonable argument against
the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka
Obamacare.
She, George and Goomba might all look pretty stupid, or...maybe one or
more of them could admit they were mistaken, which would be a smart
thing to do. There's no shame in *having been* incorrect.
More likely they'll be too cowardly to engage, but again, we'll see.
>
> Bob

--Bryan

On 2010-11-07, Omelet > wrote:

> I am done with discussing politics on this list.
> It does not belong here. At all.
>
> Nothing cowardly about it. I've finally simply come to my senses!
> You would be wise to do so too.

Howzabout religion?

nb

On Nov 7, 8:49*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
> *Bryan > wrote:
> > On Nov 6, 8:26*am, "Bob Terwilliger" <virtualgoth@die spammer.biz>
> > wrote:
> > > Bryan wrote:
> > > >>>> Sycophant wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> At least you have a better imagination that BobT.
>
> > > >>>>>> He would have bought Cool Whip and wondered why it wasn't getting him
> > > >>>>>> high.
>
> > > >>>>>> --Bryan
>
> > > >>>>> ROFL! Good one Bryan. ;-D
>
> > > >>>> ROFL! Sycophant thinks you're talking about me, rather than about
> > > >>>> Chester.
> > > >>>> Not very bright, that one.
>
> > > >>> I assumed that she read the thread and found it funny on its own
> > > >>> merits. *YOU buying Cool Whip would make no sense, and would render
> > > >>> the joke unfunny.
>
> > > >> Thanks Bryan. ;-)
>
> > > > You're welcome, but I was just calling it as I saw it.
>
> > > Funny thing is, Sycophant *still* doesn't comprehend that you were making
> > > fun of Chester. She really is that stupid.
>
> > We'll see if she can make any kind of a reasonable argument against
> > the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka
> > Obamacare.
> > She, George and Goomba might all look pretty stupid, or...maybe one or
> > more of them could admit they were mistaken, which would be a smart
> > thing to do. *There's no shame in *having been* incorrect.
> > More likely they'll be too cowardly to engage, but again, we'll see.
>
> > > Bob
>
> > --Bryan
>
> I am done with discussing politics on this list.
> It does not belong here. At all.
>
> Nothing cowardly about it. I've finally simply come to my senses!
> You would be wise to do so too.

How convenient when you've taken an indefensible position. Perhaps
one of the other two folks will show some backbone.
> --
> Peace! Om
>
--Bryan

> On 2010-11-07, Omelet > wrote:
>
>> I am done with discussing politics on this list.
>> It does not belong here. At all.

Kinda like all your Gun Talk.

-sw

Omelet wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
>> Omelet wrote:
>>
>> > I am done with discussing politics on this list.
>> > It does not belong here. At all.
>>
>> Kinda like all your Gun Talk.
>
>You may note that I totally ignored the last gun thread jackass...

The gaseous dwarf is fulla beans.

http://i54.tinypic.com/1zvep3d.jpg

http://i52.tinypic.com/4j6nlw.jpg

http://i52.tinypic.com/bed1ma.jpg

Omelet wrote:
> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> Omelet wrote:
>> > Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> Omelet wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I am done with discussing politics on this list.
>> >> > It does not belong here. At all.
>> >>
>> >> Kinda like all your Gun Talk.
>> >
>> >You may note that I totally ignored the last gun thread jackass...
>>
>> The gaseous dwarf is fulla beans.
>
>He's acting like the typical reject. <g>

The sqwertz dwarf has a very negative outlook, he has no sense of
humor whatsoever, with every situation he only sees the glass half
empty... personality wise he could easily be a clone of the mick and
notbob.... even the baboon assface cracks an occasional smile.
Crack... get it. lol

>> http://i54.tinypic.com/1zvep3d.jpg
>>
>> http://i52.tinypic.com/4j6nlw.jpg
>>
>> http://i52.tinypic.com/bed1ma.jpg
>
>Nice pot of beans! ;-d

Thanks.

I wouldn't do the Cajon flavored again, should have tossed those
flavor packets... nor would I do those multi-bean mixes, it's just a
cutesy gimmick... probably promoted by the dried bean companys as a
way sell their warehouse floor sweepings/dregs.

On Nov 7, 11:47*am, Omelet > wrote:
> In article >,
>
> *Sqwertz > wrote:
> > > On 2010-11-07, Omelet > wrote:
>
> > >> I am done with discussing politics on this list.
> > >> It does not belong here. At all.
>
> > Kinda like all your Gun Talk.
>
> > -sw
>
> You may note that I totally ignored the last gun thread jackass...

But you used the loaded term, Obamacare, and now that you have a
diaper "loaded" with indefensible objections to the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act, you slink away and say, I don't wanna talk
about it. I don't have a problem with your extreme 2nd Amendment
position. I'm halfway there myself, even though I will probably never
own a firearm intended for anything other than killing animals for
food, but this "Obamacare" crap is Right wing garbage, and you've
repeated it. It's dishonest, and/or ignorant, so which was it in your
case? It reminds me of my Right wing brother-in-law, a successful
lawyer who makes seven times as much money as me, when I was calmly
making my case for abortion rights. He said, "You're not right,
you're just better at arguing than me. **** you," then stomped out of
his own house and drove off. He was wrong on both counts. He was
better at arguing than me, but I had a far easier position to defend.

> --
> Peace! Om

--Bryan

"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
> On Nov 6, 10:41 pm, "Paco" > wrote:
>>
>> > Nothing hokey like that. Just relatives and friends meeting me at my
>> > favorite taqueria for dinner...
>> > --Bryan
>>
>> Del Taco?
>
> Del Taco isn't a taqueria.
>
> --Bryan

Oh.

From Dictionary.com: "Taqueria - a restaurant or stand specializing in
Mexican dishes, as tacos and burritos."

From the Del Taco website: "The menu includes Mexican offerings of tacos,
burritos, quesadillas and nachos..."

Whatever.