On 11/7/2010 11:32 AM, Dan Abel wrote:
> In article
> >,
> > wrote:
>
>> On Nov 6, 6:43 pm, > wrote:
>>> On 11/6/2010 7:17 PM, Bryan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Nov 6, 4:44 pm, > wrote:
>>>>> Bryan wrote:
>
>>>>>> OK, let's discuss why. The majority of folks don't really even have a
>>>>>> clue about the particulars.
>>>
>>>>> Neither did Congress when they voted for it. THAT is NOT how I want my
>>>>> representatives to work. They sure weren't listening to anyone but
>>>>> themselves when doing their wheelin' and dealin'. Transparency be
>>>>> damned!
>>>
>>>> And you know this HOW?
>
>>> Maybe when the all knowing smarter than everyone soon to be former
>>> speaker said: "We have to pass this bill to find out what¹s in it,² ?
>>>
>>> http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/pressreleases?id=1576
>>
>> Click on his own link to see how he slightly changed the meaning. The
>> ACTUAL quote is, ³But we have to pass the bill so that you can find
>> out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy." She was not
>> addressing fellow Congress members. EXACTLY what in the Patient
>> Protection and Affordable Care Act do you object to? I guess you're
>> sticking with your Fox News talking points and personally attacking
>> Pelosi rather than identifying real faults in this great piece of
>> legislation. Now I'm personally questioning your integrity. Liar.
>
> You've got sharp eyes, Bryan. I looked at the cite and saw that it
> wasn't identical to what George quoted, but didn't catch the change in
> meaning. I really dislike it when people cite the URL and put quote
> marks around what they are quoting, and then change the words. Why do
> they do that? A cut and paste is so easy. It requires extra effort to
> change somebody else's words that you have put in quotation marks. That
> does seem dishonest.
>
I actually copied it and pasted it so I assume full responsibility for
whatever happened.

Good thing it was pointed out since it actually shows Pilosi more
correctly when adding the you since that is the usual behavior of a
"super intellectual" and one reason why she will soon be know as former
speaker Pilosi.


“But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
away from the fog of the controversy..." "You" just really adds the
right touch. You can almost imagine that superior finger pointing at
those stupid people..

On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:33:58 -0500, George wrote:

> On 11/7/2010 11:32 AM, Dan Abel wrote:
>> In article
>> >,
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 6, 6:43 pm, > wrote:
>>>> On 11/6/2010 7:17 PM, Bryan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 6, 4:44 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>> Bryan wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> OK, let's discuss why. The majority of folks don't really even have a
>>>>>>> clue about the particulars.
>>>>
>>>>>> Neither did Congress when they voted for it. THAT is NOT how I want my
>>>>>> representatives to work. They sure weren't listening to anyone but
>>>>>> themselves when doing their wheelin' and dealin'. Transparency be
>>>>>> damned!
>>>>
>>>>> And you know this HOW?
>>
>>>> Maybe when the all knowing smarter than everyone soon to be former
>>>> speaker said: "We have to pass this bill to find out what¹s in it,² ?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/pressreleases?id=1576
>>>
>>> Click on his own link to see how he slightly changed the meaning. The
>>> ACTUAL quote is, ³But we have to pass the bill so that you can find
>>> out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy." She was not
>>> addressing fellow Congress members. EXACTLY what in the Patient
>>> Protection and Affordable Care Act do you object to? I guess you're
>>> sticking with your Fox News talking points and personally attacking
>>> Pelosi rather than identifying real faults in this great piece of
>>> legislation. Now I'm personally questioning your integrity. Liar.
>>
>> You've got sharp eyes, Bryan. I looked at the cite and saw that it
>> wasn't identical to what George quoted, but didn't catch the change in
>> meaning. I really dislike it when people cite the URL and put quote
>> marks around what they are quoting, and then change the words. Why do
>> they do that? A cut and paste is so easy. It requires extra effort to
>> change somebody else's words that you have put in quotation marks. That
>> does seem dishonest.
>>
> I actually copied it and pasted it so I assume full responsibility for
> whatever happened.

copied and pasted from where? certainly not from the cite you provided as
a reference.

>
> Good thing it was pointed out since it actually shows Pilosi more
> correctly when adding the you since that is the usual behavior of a
> "super intellectual" and one reason why she will soon be know as former
> speaker Pilosi.
>
> ´But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
> away from the fog of the controversy..." "You" just really adds the
> right touch. You can almost imagine that superior finger pointing at
> those stupid people..

no, george. she's referring to the mountains of bullshit spread by you and
you pals on the right.

blake

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:33:58 -0500, George wrote:


> > ³But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,
> > away from the fog of the controversy..." "You" just really adds the
> > right touch. You can almost imagine that superior finger pointing at
> > those stupid people..
>
> no, george. she's referring to the mountains of bullshit spread by you and
> you pals on the right.

I guess we can argue about what she really meant until the cows come
home, but I thought she was referring to the fact that the bill hadn't
been signed into law yet, so *nobody* really knew what was *going* to be
in it.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA