Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jmcquown" > wrote:
> >"notbob" > wrote in message ... >> On 2010-11-17, sf > wrote: >> >>> Now you know. >> >> What took you so long!? >> >> nb > > >LOL I see purple and gold potatos and "fingerlings". And I wonder why >people are paying so much for potatoes. For us ['them', I guess, as I wouldn't buy *any*<g>] it is the increased 'skin to potato ratio". Roasted, baked, smashed, or salted- the skin is still the best part, even to the folks in our family who purport to like potatoes. >I just buy regular russets or white >potatoes, half the cost. I don't get it. Try a good gold or waxy potato next to a russet some time. Especially for a salad, a little less so for baked. There really is a difference. For mashed I throw enough butter, milk, cheese and parsley that sawdust might pass. >I'm not willing to pay extra for >them. It's like broccoflower or whatever that flourescent green thing is >that pretends to be broccoli but isn't ![]() >broccoli. I'll combine them in a dish. I won't buy someting bred to be >both. I'm with you there. I'll buy some of that stuff once just to see if I can tell a difference. I grow purple beans to entertain children of all ages. Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message
... > "jmcquown" > wrote: > >> >>"notbob" > wrote in message ... >>> On 2010-11-17, sf > wrote: >>> >>>> Now you know. >>> >>> What took you so long!? >>> >>> nb >> >> >>LOL I see purple and gold potatos and "fingerlings". And I wonder why >>people are paying so much for potatoes. > > For us ['them', I guess, as I wouldn't buy *any*<g>] it is the > increased 'skin to potato ratio". Roasted, baked, smashed, or > salted- the skin is still the best part, even to the folks in our > family who purport to like potatoes. > >>I just buy regular russets or white >>potatoes, half the cost. I don't get it. > > Try a good gold or waxy potato next to a russet some time. Especially > for a salad, a little less so for baked. There really is a difference. > For mashed I throw enough butter, milk, cheese and parsley that > sawdust might pass. > I've tried Yukon gold and waxy potatoes. Not impressed. I'm not sure what you're saying... are they better or worse baked? Heh. I can bake a good old russet or even red potatoes without blinking. And boiled, tossed with butter and dill weed. Delicious! If mashed potatoes taste like sawdust, no thanks! >>I'm not willing to pay extra for >>them. It's like broccoflower or whatever that flourescent green thing is >>that pretends to be broccoli but isn't ![]() >>broccoli. I'll combine them in a dish. I won't buy someting bred to be >>both. > > I'm with you there. I'll buy some of that stuff once just to see if > I can tell a difference. I grow purple beans to entertain children > of all ages. > > Jim LOL Purple beans would be fun, IMHO. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jmcquown" > wrote:
>"Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message .. . -snip- >> Try a good gold or waxy potato next to a russet some time. Especially >> for a salad, a little less so for baked. There really is a difference. >> For mashed I throw enough butter, milk, cheese and parsley that >> sawdust might pass. >> >I've tried Yukon gold and waxy potatoes. Not impressed. I'm not sure what >you're saying... are they better or worse baked? Heh. I can bake a good >old russet or even red potatoes without blinking. And boiled, tossed with >butter and dill weed. Delicious! If mashed potatoes taste like sawdust, no >thanks! I'm sayin' that, IMO, Yukon Gold's make the best salads. I'm a cube first (skins on), then cook, person. I don't see a benefit in using them for baked. For that- russets seem to get a crisper skin. I usually use russets for boiling/mashing. I look at them as just something to hold the butter & whatever together. -snip- > >LOL Purple beans would be fun, IMHO. Especially when they turn green. 5 year old comes to the house & we pick some beans for supper. She picks green & I pick purple. 'I'm not eating purple beans.' she states. OK- let's change their color in the microwave. I let her put them in the bowl- cover it and put it in the microwave on the special 'bean color changing cycle'. Voila! a few minutes later- all the beans are green. Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > ha scritto nel messaggio > "Jim Elbrecht" wrote in message >>>I'm not willing to pay extra for >>>them. It's like broccoflower or whatever that flourescent green thing is >>>that pretends to be broccoli but isn't ![]() >>>buy>>>broccoli. I'll combine them in a dish. I won't buy someting bred >>>to be >>>both. >> > LOL Purple beans would be fun, IMHO. > What you all call broccoflower is not bred to be both, it's a separate vegetable and tastes different. What it has in common is that same cabbage background all the cabbage family have. It's really delicious on its own, often tastier than broccoli at least until it gets a frost, and nuttier than cauliflower. It's called Broccolo Romano where it originates. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:22:07 +0100, "Giusi" >
wrote: > > > > What you all call broccoflower is not bred to be both, it's a separate > vegetable and tastes different. What it has in common is that same cabbage > background all the cabbage family have. It's really delicious on its own, > often tastier than broccoli at least until it gets a frost, and nuttier than > cauliflower. It's called Broccolo Romano where it originates. > Our broccoflower doesn't look like that, but in any case - I like it too. -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Giusi" > wrote: > "jmcquown" > ha scritto nel messaggio > > "Jim Elbrecht" wrote in message > > >>>I'm not willing to pay extra for > >>>them. It's like broccoflower or whatever that flourescent green thing is > >>>that pretends to be broccoli but isn't ![]() > >>>buy>>>broccoli. I'll combine them in a dish. I won't buy someting bred > >>>to be > >>>both. > >> > > LOL Purple beans would be fun, IMHO. > > > > What you all call broccoflower is not bred to be both, it's a separate > vegetable and tastes different. What it has in common is that same cabbage > background all the cabbage family have. It's really delicious on its own, > often tastier than broccoli at least until it gets a frost, and nuttier than > cauliflower. It's called Broccolo Romano where it originates. And Romanesco in New Zealand. I rather like it. Miche -- Electricians do it in three phases |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mystery solved: Explorers Club meal wasnt woolly mammoth | General Cooking | |||
Mystery of the rat-shaped KFC chicken is solved: It's a bird | General Cooking | |||
Purple potatoes | General Cooking | |||
Sopranos sandwich mystery solved! | General Cooking | |||
Why Is The Airlock Moving??? - Mystery Solved | Winemaking |