![]() |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
You should be able to bake a whole shell on egg in a low 230-250F
oven, right? Assuming I already have a low oven going, why not? But after cleaning up the bloody mary mess last night I didn't want to clean the self-cleaning oven, too. |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
"Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > You should be able to bake a whole shell on egg in a low 230-250F > oven, right? Assuming I already have a low oven going, why not? > > But after cleaning up the bloody mary mess last night I didn't want > to clean the self-cleaning oven, too. I know you can do it because I have seen various cooking shows that make that bread with the eggs braided into the top. I believe Cake Boss was the last one I saw. He said the eggs came out like hard boiled. I don't know about the quality of them though. |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
On Nov 27, 7:06*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> You should be able to bake a whole shell on egg in a low 230-250F > oven, right? *Assuming I already have a low oven going, why not? > > But after cleaning up the bloody mary mess last night I didn't want > to clean the self-cleaning oven, too. == Never heard of 'baking' eggs in the shell before. Sounds feasible but why? Any special reason that it has any merit over conventional methods? == |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:59:18 -0800 (PST), Roy wrote:
> On Nov 27, 7:06*pm, Sqwertz > wrote: >> You should be able to bake a whole shell on egg in a low 230-250F >> oven, right? *Assuming I already have a low oven going, why not? >> >> But after cleaning up the bloody mary mess last night I didn't want >> to clean the self-cleaning oven, too. > > == > Never heard of 'baking' eggs in the shell before. Sounds feasible but > why? Any special reason that it has any merit over conventional > methods? > == Can you not read? Because I already have a low oven going. Why would I boil water if I already have the necessary heat. I know it will take longer than a water bath, but that is not an issue. -sw |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 04:21:20 GMT, l, not -l wrote:
> On 27-Nov-2010, Sqwertz > wrote: > >> You should be able to bake a whole shell on egg in a low 230-250F >> oven, right? Assuming I already have a low oven going, why not? > > Every Easter I bake sweet rolls with with a decorated egg in the middle > (think bagel with an egg in the hole). The eggs are raw, the dough wrapped > around them, then baked in a 350F oven. I don't know how much of an > insulating effect the bread has; but, the eggs turn out as a perfectly > boiled egg would. Interesting. Doesn't the dye smear at all? Or is that part of the intended effect? Now I wonder how high an egg can be cooked at in the oven. Andy, make yourself useful for a change. -sw |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:42:51 GMT, "l, not -l" > wrote:
> No smearing; but, McCormick Food Color and Egg Dye "bleeds". Where the > dough meets the egg, the dye transfers to the dough. It is noticeable but > not unsightly. It's been many years since I used Paas dye and I don't > recall whether it did the same thing as McCormick or not. You don't use food coloring and vinegar? -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Baking Hard "Boiled" Eggs
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:44:55 GMT, "l, not -l" > wrote:
> > On 28-Nov-2010, sf > wrote: > > > > No smearing; but, McCormick Food Color and Egg Dye "bleeds". Where the > > > dough meets the egg, the dye transfers to the dough. It is noticeable > > > but > > > not unsightly. It's been many years since I used Paas dye and I don't > > > recall whether it did the same thing as McCormick or not. > > > > You don't use food coloring and vinegar? > > Yes, I use vinegar with the McCormick Food Color and Egg Dye. Huh, I never noticed the entire name on the box before this. :) -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter