[sf[_9_]]

{Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[Kalmia]

On Dec 12, 3:33*pm, sf > wrote:
> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>
> --
>
> Never trust a dog to watch your food.

Chicken Kiev?

[JL[_3_]]

Kalmia wrote:
> On Dec 12, 3:33 pm, sf > wrote:
>
>>{Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
>>tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>>
>>--
>>
>>Never trust a dog to watch your food.
>
>
> Chicken Kiev?


Well pooh!

*hiding Sotheby's Faberge catalogue*
--

Mr. Joseph Paul Littleshoes Esq.

Domine, dirige nos.

Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky.../sf_anthem.mp3

[notbob]

On 2010-12-12, sf > wrote:
>
> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.

Computer problem.

nb

[Virginia Tadrzynski[_2_]]

"sf" > wrote in message
...
>
> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>
> --
>
> Never trust a dog to watch your food.

can we label it either Czarist or Tsarist (based on your spelling
preferences)?
-ginny

[BigBadBubba]

"sf" > wrote in message
...
>
> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>
So, it's all about YOU now?

[Sqwertz[_25_]]

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:33:04 -0800, sf wrote:

> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.

New RFC Rule: We can't talk about anything Russian.

Barbara said so.

-sw

[sf[_9_]]

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:44:01 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
> wrote:

> can we label it either Czarist or Tsarist (based on your spelling
> preferences)?

Those words aren't killed.... yet. LOL

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On 13 Dec 2010 03:24:15 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 07:58:09p, sf told us...
>
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:44:01 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> can we label it either Czarist or Tsarist (based on your spelling
> >> preferences)?
> >
> > Those words aren't killed.... yet. LOL
> >
>
> sf, you can kf whatever you want. However, that shouldn't preclude
> others from posting something you don't want to see. Why do you think
> it's your place to dictate what they should or shouldn't post. Do you
> think we actually care if you read something posted about "Russian"
> whatever? This just seems out of character for you.

Wayne... Couldn't you tell which word stars in what little spam I'm
seeing on my news server? It was an FYI in the form of a joke. Ginny
"got it". To be blunt, if a thread has the word Russian in the title
- it won't matter how interesting it is, where it drifts or who
participates, I won't see it until the Russian invasion is over and I
delete that filter.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[Julie Bove[_2_]]

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On 13 Dec 2010 03:24:15 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 07:58:09p, sf told us...
>>
>> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:44:01 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> can we label it either Czarist or Tsarist (based on your spelling
>> >> preferences)?
>> >
>> > Those words aren't killed.... yet. LOL
>> >
>>
>> sf, you can kf whatever you want. However, that shouldn't preclude
>> others from posting something you don't want to see. Why do you think
>> it's your place to dictate what they should or shouldn't post. Do you
>> think we actually care if you read something posted about "Russian"
>> whatever? This just seems out of character for you.
>
> Wayne... Couldn't you tell which word stars in what little spam I'm
> seeing on my news server? It was an FYI in the form of a joke. Ginny
> "got it". To be blunt, if a thread has the word Russian in the title
> - it won't matter how interesting it is, where it drifts or who
> participates, I won't see it until the Russian invasion is over and I
> delete that filter.

I must not be seeing what you are seeing.

[Virginia Tadrzynski[_2_]]

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On 13 Dec 2010 03:24:15 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 07:58:09p, sf told us...
>>
>> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:44:01 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> can we label it either Czarist or Tsarist (based on your spelling
>> >> preferences)?
>> >
>> > Those words aren't killed.... yet. LOL
>> >
>>
>> sf, you can kf whatever you want. However, that shouldn't preclude
>> others from posting something you don't want to see. Why do you think
>> it's your place to dictate what they should or shouldn't post. Do you
>> think we actually care if you read something posted about "Russian"
>> whatever? This just seems out of character for you.
>
> Wayne... Couldn't you tell which word stars in what little spam I'm
> seeing on my news server? It was an FYI in the form of a joke. Ginny
> "got it". To be blunt, if a thread has the word Russian in the title
> - it won't matter how interesting it is, where it drifts or who
> participates, I won't see it until the Russian invasion is over and I
> delete that filter.
>
> --
>
> Never trust a dog to watch your food.

I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do you need
Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking if I need a Russian
doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf on this one, I'm ready to
go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting for the Russians to start peddling
Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys (another bane of email/newgroup
existence).
-g

[Jim Elbrecht]

"Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote:

-snip-
>
>I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do you need
>Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking if I need a Russian
>doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf on this one, I'm ready to
>go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting for the Russians to start peddling
>Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys (another bane of email/newgroup
>existence).

I've never seen one. Are they crossposted to more than 2 groups?
That makes my bozo-bin.

Maybe individual.net filters them before they get to me. I see
little spam. [trolls I get-- and after I KF them it seems I still get
5 copies of their crap in other's replies to them]

Jim

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

Christine Dabney > wrote in
news
>> I'm ready to go Bolshevik on their asses.

You are ready to go "majority" on their asses?

Bolshevik, from bol'shinstvo (= majority) same root as Bolshoi (= big), in
comparison to menshevik, from men'shinstvo (= minority).

--

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag
and carrying a cross.

Sinclair Lewis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnrYMafCzeE

[Jim Elbrecht]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:37:29 -0800, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:16:55 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
> wrote:
>
>>I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do you need
>>Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking if I need a Russian
>>doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf on this one, I'm ready to
>>go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting for the Russians to start peddling
>>Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys (another bane of email/newgroup
>>existence).
>>-g
>
>I never see any of these...ever.

That answer *my* question- probably. We're both on individual.net.

Thanks indy.<g>

Jim

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:37:30 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:33:04 -0800, sf wrote:
>
>> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
>> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>
> New RFC Rule: We can't talk about anything Russian.
>
> Barbara said so.
>
> -sw

borscht!

your pal,
blake

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

Christine Dabney > wrote in
:

> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:45:56 -0600, Michel Boucher
> > wrote:
>
>>Christine Dabney > wrote in
>>news >>
>>>> I'm ready to go Bolshevik on their asses.
>
> I didn't write that.

You're right, it's Virginia. Apologies.

--

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag
and carrying a cross.

Sinclair Lewis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnrYMafCzeE

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

"Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote in
:

> I'm ready to
> go Bolshevik on their asses.

You are ready to go "majority" on their asses?

Bolshevik, from bol'shinstvo (= majority) same root as Bolshoi (= big), in
comparison to menshevik, from men'shinstvo (= minority).

--

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag
and carrying a cross.

Sinclair Lewis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnrYMafCzeE

[James Silverton[_4_]]

Michel wrote on Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:55:20 -0600:

>> I'm ready to
>> go Bolshevik on their asses.

> You are ready to go "majority" on their asses?

> Bolshevik, from bol'shinstvo (= majority) same root as Bolshoi
> (= big), in comparison to menshevik, from men'shinstvo (=
> minority).

Even so, "go bolshie" was a common British English expression, a bit
like "go postal", and obviously comes from Russian Bolsheviks and their
habits. Communists were also referred to as "Bolshies".As the song says;
"Harry was a Bolshie, one of Lenin's lads
'Til he was foully murdered by reactionary cads"
--

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

[Dora]

Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:16:55 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
> > wrote:
>
>> I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do
>> you need Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking
>> if
>> I need a Russian doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf
>> on
>> this one, I'm ready to go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting
>> for
>> the Russians to start peddling Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys
>> (another bane of email/newgroup existence).
>> -g
>
> I never see any of these...ever.
>
> Christine

Neither do I.
Dora

[Michel Boucher[_3_]]

"James Silverton" > wrote in news:ie5nrc$ab4
:

> Even so, "go bolshie" was a common British English expression, a bit
> like "go postal", and obviously comes from Russian Bolsheviks and their
> habits. Communists were also referred to as "Bolshies".As the song says;
> "Harry was a Bolshie, one of Lenin's lads
> 'Til he was foully murdered by reactionary cads"

If she had said Bolshie I wouldn't have commented. That should be obvious.

--

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag
and carrying a cross.

Sinclair Lewis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnrYMafCzeE

[sf[_9_]]

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:47:37 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Wayne... Couldn't you tell which word stars in what little spam I'm
> > seeing on my news server? It was an FYI in the form of a joke. Ginny
> > "got it". To be blunt, if a thread has the word Russian in the title
> > - it won't matter how interesting it is, where it drifts or who
> > participates, I won't see it until the Russian invasion is over and I
> > delete that filter.
>
> I must not be seeing what you are seeing.
>
Maybe not. We're on different servers. That's what's slipping by on
mine. I tweaked my KF and I'm Russian spam free now, but I'm also not
going to see any legitimate thread with that word in the title. I
know it's not a word we commonly use here, so I made a little joke
about it... it was done in the vane of if someone tells you not to
think about something, that's all you can think about afterwards.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On 13 Dec 2010 11:16:33 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 09:27:36p, sf told us...
>
> > On 13 Dec 2010 03:24:15 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 07:58:09p, sf told us...
> >>
> >
> > Wayne... Couldn't you tell which word stars in what little spam
> > I'm seeing on my news server? It was an FYI in the form of a
> > joke. Ginny "got it". To be blunt, if a thread has the word
> > Russian in the title - it won't matter how interesting it is,
> > where it drifts or who participates, I won't see it until the
> > Russian invasion is over and I delete that filter.
> >
> No, I couldn't tell. Apparently I'm not seeing what you see. The
> subject of your post did not stand out as any kind of joke.

I didn't use the emphasized word enough times to make the point?
Sorry.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:16:55 -0500, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
> wrote:

> I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do you need
> Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking if I need a Russian
> doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf on this one, I'm ready to
> go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting for the Russians to start peddling
> Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys (another bane of email/newgroup
> existence).
> -g
>
Thanks, Ginny!

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:23:32 -0500, Jim Elbrecht >
wrote:

> "Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote:
>
> -snip-
> >
> >I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do you need
> >Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking if I need a Russian
> >doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf on this one, I'm ready to
> >go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting for the Russians to start peddling
> >Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys (another bane of email/newgroup
> >existence).
>
> I've never seen one. Are they crossposted to more than 2 groups?
> That makes my bozo-bin.
>
> Maybe individual.net filters them before they get to me. I see
> little spam. [trolls I get-- and after I KF them it seems I still get
> 5 copies of their crap in other's replies to them]
>
You know very well that Individual.net filters it. DUH.


--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[Jim Elbrecht]

sf > wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:23:32 -0500, Jim Elbrecht >
>wrote:
-snip-
>>
>> Maybe individual.net filters them before they get to me. I see
>> little spam. [trolls I get-- and after I KF them it seems I still get
>> 5 copies of their crap in other's replies to them]
>>
>You know very well that Individual.net filters it. DUH.

Why should I know that? I know *now* because 2 other folks from
individual.net have said they don't see them. But indy doesn't send
us a list of what they are filtering-- and every once in a while a
spammer/scammer/troll gets a new idea on how to get pass individual's
filters for a few days.

Still-- you can't beat $15 a year for nearly spamfree Usenet.

Jim

[Default User]

"sf" > wrote in message
...
>
> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.

Haven't seen any such spam myself.




Brian
--
Day 677 of the "no grouchy usenet posts" project.
Current music playing: None.

[JL[_3_]]

Default User wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>{Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
>>tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>
>
> Haven't seen any such spam myself.
>
>
>
>
> Brian

The occasional Russian wife scam but if i were going to filter a country
by name it would be for all the Chinese spam. Filter anything .cn that
comes in.

And not that im a sinophobe but because of the plethora of Chinese
commercial spaming that takes place. Though in my email box Canada is
the worst offender
--

Mr. Joseph Paul Littleshoes Esq.

Domine, dirige nos.

Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky.../sf_anthem.mp3

[sf[_9_]]

On 13 Dec 2010 22:50:20 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> On Mon 13 Dec 2010 12:14:32p, sf told us...
>
> > On 13 Dec 2010 11:16:33 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 09:27:36p, sf told us...
> >>
> >> > On 13 Dec 2010 03:24:15 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 07:58:09p, sf told us...
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Wayne... Couldn't you tell which word stars in what little
> >> > spam I'm seeing on my news server? It was an FYI in the form
> >> > of a joke. Ginny "got it". To be blunt, if a thread has the
> >> > word Russian in the title - it won't matter how interesting it
> >> > is, where it drifts or who participates, I won't see it until
> >> > the Russian invasion is over and I delete that filter.
> >> >
> >> No, I couldn't tell. Apparently I'm not seeing what you see.
> >> The subject of your post did not stand out as any kind of joke.
> >
> > I didn't use the emphasized word enough times to make the point?
> > Sorry.
> >
>
> I thought you were just mad. :-)

Noooo! That was my way of throwing out a broad hint about which word
I'd killfiled w/o making the usual "I just kill filed x" announcement
and hoped it was taken in a light hearted way. Oh, well. That one
went over like a lead balloon.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0500, Jim Elbrecht >
wrote:
>
> Still-- you can't beat $15 a year for nearly spamfree Usenet.
>
It doesn't carry binary groups and I want binary.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On 14 Dec 2010 00:54:10 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> sf, does your newsreader have a way of filtering posts that are
> mosted to multiple newsgroups? Mine does, and I have it set to "1".
> Many folks have theirs set to "2". Most of these types of posts are
> cross-posted, so I never see them. I can't even recall when I saw
> anything "Russian" that was spam. That also goes for most spam that
> gets posted. The majority of spammers don't have sense enough to use
> another method to reach coutless groups at the same time, so they
> cross-post.

I would do that except some crossposted threads are legitimate and
they are crossposted to appropriate newsgroups. For me, it's easier
to just kill key words as I figure them out.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[sf[_9_]]

On 14 Dec 2010 00:58:32 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> On Mon 13 Dec 2010 05:49:39p, sf told us...
>
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0500, Jim Elbrecht >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Still-- you can't beat $15 a year for nearly spamfree Usenet.
> >>
> > It doesn't carry binary groups and I want binary.
> >
>
> Have you looked into Newsnet.News? The cost is nominal and there is
> very little spam.

I don't get enough spam to care about switching. Most days I don't
have any spam at all. It just so happens that "Russian" is a new one
that has evaded my news provider's spambots the last couple of days
and therefore fodder for jokes by me.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[projectile vomit chick[_3_]]

On Dec 13, 8:03*pm, sf > wrote:
> On 14 Dec 2010 00:58:32 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
>
> > wrote:
> > On Mon 13 Dec 2010 05:49:39p, sf told us...
>
> > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0500, Jim Elbrecht >
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> Still-- you can't beat $15 a year for nearly spamfree Usenet.
>
> > > It doesn't carry binary groups and I want binary.
>
> > Have you looked into Newsnet.News? *The cost is nominal and there is
> > very little spam.
>
> I don't get enough spam to care about switching. *Most days I don't
> have any spam at all. *It just so happens that "Russian" is a new one
> that has evaded my news provider's spambots the last couple of days
> and therefore fodder for jokes by me.

Drama Queen much?

[Terry Pulliam Burd[_5_]]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:13:29 -0600, "Default User"
> arranged random neurons and said:

>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>>
>> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
>> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
>
>Haven't seen any such spam myself.
>
Nor I. Since Cox quit their newsgroup feed, I switched to Agent's APN
and the spam quotient has ratcheted down considerably. Haven't seen
anything with "Russian" in the header except this thread with regular
posters' comments.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd

--

"If the soup had been as warm as the wine,
if the wine had been as old as the turkey,
and if the turkey had had a breast like the maid,
it would have been a swell dinner." Duncan Hines


To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox"

[sf[_9_]]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:24:10 -0800, Terry Pulliam Burd
> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:13:29 -0600, "Default User"
> > arranged random neurons and said:
>
> >"sf" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >>
> >> {Russian} dressing, {Russian} caviar or {Russian} tea rooms.... I'm
> >> tired of {Russian} spam, so guess which word is filtered as of now.
> >
> >Haven't seen any such spam myself.
> >
> Nor I. Since Cox quit their newsgroup feed, I switched to Agent's APN
> and the spam quotient has ratcheted down considerably. Haven't seen
> anything with "Russian" in the header except this thread with regular
> posters' comments.
>
Really? You may have figured out already that my news server is also
APN. I'll switch the filter to x number of days w/o the key word so I
don't have to delete it manually, thanks.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[Goomba[_2_]]

Virginia Tadrzynski wrote:

> I know of what you speak, as soon as I killfile a thread about 'Do you need
> Russian virgin for a bride'.....I get another one asking if I need a Russian
> doctor to 'give me bigger penis'.....I'm with sf on this one, I'm ready to
> go Bolshevik on their asses. I'm waiting for the Russians to start peddling
> Chinese sneakers and sports jerseys (another bane of email/newgroup
> existence).
> -g

Odd. I don't have a filter on the word "Russian" yet see none of this
spam mail you're speaking of.
Yay me!

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0500, Jim Elbrecht wrote:

> sf > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:23:32 -0500, Jim Elbrecht >
>>wrote:
> -snip-
>>>
>>> Maybe individual.net filters them before they get to me. I see
>>> little spam. [trolls I get-- and after I KF them it seems I still get
>>> 5 copies of their crap in other's replies to them]
>>>
>>You know very well that Individual.net filters it. DUH.
>
> Why should I know that? I know *now* because 2 other folks from
> individual.net have said they don't see them. But indy doesn't send
> us a list of what they are filtering-- and every once in a while a
> spammer/scammer/troll gets a new idea on how to get pass individual's
> filters for a few days.
>
> Still-- you can't beat $15 a year for nearly spamfree Usenet.
>
> Jim

i can. usenet.news for three dollars-some for what might be a lifetime,
and you gat *all* groups. possibly you get more spam from there, but what
there is is easily handled.

your pal,
blake

[Doug Freyburger]

sf wrote:
>
> {Russian} dressing

Catalina then. Or Green Goddess.

> {Russian} caviar or

I've had it. It's wonderfull but I like Japanese smelt roe and flying
fish roe better and they cost less.

> {Russian} tea rooms....

Let's all watch Doctor Zhivago and drink our tea from tall thin glasses
with wicker handles.

> I'm tired of {Russian} spam

So there's another knock off brand on the market now in addition to
Treet? Thrills.

> so guess which word is filtered as of now.

I'll make a point of calling them Polish perogies and Russian peroshkies
then.

[sf[_9_]]

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger
> wrote:

> I'll make a point of calling them Polish perogies and Russian peroshkies
> then.

<shrug> Fire away.

--

Never trust a dog to watch your food.

[Terry Pulliam Burd[_5_]]

On 14 Dec 2010 18:21:38 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> arranged random neurons and said:

>I'm using usenet.news now, Blake, and I actually see less spam than
>when I had access through Cox.

Word up, Wayne - since I started using APN when Cox flaked, the spam
level is way, way down. And yesterday, Cox internet *and* cable was
out for about 2 hours. No idea why that happened nor was there any
word from Cox about the outage.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd

--

"If the soup had been as warm as the wine,
if the wine had been as old as the turkey,
and if the turkey had had a breast like the maid,
it would have been a swell dinner." Duncan Hines


To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox"

[blake murphy[_2_]]

On 14 Dec 2010 18:21:38 GMT, Wayne Boatwright wrote:

> On Tue 14 Dec 2010 10:07:55a, blake murphy told us...
>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0500, Jim Elbrecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why should I know that? I know *now* because 2 other folks from
>>> individual.net have said they don't see them. But indy doesn't
>>> send us a list of what they are filtering-- and every once in a
>>> while a spammer/scammer/troll gets a new idea on how to get pass
>>> individual's filters for a few days.
>>>
>>> Still-- you can't beat $15 a year for nearly spamfree Usenet.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> i can. usenet.news for three dollars-some for what might be a
>> lifetime, and you gat *all* groups. possibly you get more spam
>> from there, but what there is is easily handled.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>>
>
> I'm using usenet.news now, Blake, and I actually see less spam than
> when I had access through Cox.

i'm not surprised. usenet is usenet.news' business, not just an
afterthought as it was with cox.

your pal,
blake