Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 19, 10:38*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:47:06 -0600, Omelet > > wrote: > > > In article > > >, > > *spamtrap1888 > wrote: > > > > On Dec 18, 3:36 pm, sf > wrote: > > > > > Make it in a heavy pot and you'll wonder why you haven't done it > > > > sooner. I'm thinking my new slanted side pot might make awesome > > > > popcorn. Hm. Must make popcorn this weekend! > > > > We use an old aluminum pressure cooker with the lid loose. > > > Yeah. *Just remove the lid gasket and don't put the weight on. > > I'm not getting it. *What does "pressure cooker" have to do with > anything? *Is that the only appropriately sized pot you two have to > make popcorn in? It's the only heavy pot I have that I don't mind making popcorn in. It has a thick, heat conductive bottom, and a half cup of popcorn fills it up when popped. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:33:52 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
> wrote: > It's the only heavy pot I have that I don't mind making popcorn in. It > has a thick, heat conductive bottom, and a half cup of popcorn fills > it up when popped. Ah, okay... heavy is good, but I've never measured popcorn like that. In a normal pot, I find that covering the bottom w/o stacking kernels makes a perfect pot-full. -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:34:50 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:08:57 -0600, Chemiker > wrote: > >> Saw this one at tuesday morning and was >> intriqued by the ceramic lining it has. > >Thanks. I couldn't tell by the pictures... are the sides and top also >lined with ceramics? Both sides, yes. Back wall, no.(Fan is there) Door, no. Top, no. (2 calrod bars and a bright reflective plate). It looks like the "brick oven" blurb is at least half hyperbole. Might be OK for small loaves in a clay baker like maybe a Reston-Lloyd (if they make one that small). Alex |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:35:58 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>On 12/19/2010 10:45 AM, Omelet wrote: >> In >, >> > wrote: >S may have an ambivalent pride in being able to cook in a coffee can but >in my way of thinking, being proficient in this is not an indicator of >anything, except maybe a past that's somewhat shady. I used to heat >sardines in the can - not because I'm smart* or resourceful or even any >kind of a cook - mostly, I was a lazy *******. Anyway, it's not >something I'd like to disclose to the wife and kids... :-) during the depression years and part of ww-II, some boy scout troops taught the scouts how to make their own cook kits. Two necessary things were 1 lb coffee cans, and some tool to use as a handle. The latter is still available, I think, for backpackers. I used a pair of Channel-lock angle head pliers (worn out but still useful for moving cans about the campfire. Also made "ovens" out of 2 lb coffee cans, with holes punched around the base with a churchkey can opener. fill with a few pieces of wood and charcoal, place your cooking vessel on top. Made "skillets" out of larger cans, cut into a shallow pan with a piece of the side folded down to make a handle. Crisco cans, I think. 1 Lb coffee cans were turned into pots with coat-hanger wire for the bails. Alex |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:30:13 -0600, Omelet >
wrote: >In article >, > dsi1 > wrote: > > >It only holds 4 cups of oil!!! So if you only deep fry a couple of times >per year (like I do any more), there is not much waste. I've had both fry-Daddy and Fry-Baby. Nonstick coating peeled off on both. Have they started using a good lining yet, like silverstone or titanium? Alex |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Went to Bed, Bath, and Beyond yesterday, and had a nice time walking around
and looking. Think I'll go there without the wife and do some shopping. I don't know why, but I seem to buy more, and shop better alone. ;-) The amount and styles of woks they had was impressive. I really liked the one that has the two wood handles, one straight, the other a loop, and I think a responder to this thread posted a link to it. It was $20, IIRC. It was impressively heavy. It would be slightly different use than one with a cover, the grill, and all that. I really like the covers, and gratings, but I may already have a cover that will work, and those round gratings from the Dollar Store do just fine. I really like steaming fish with that combo, as even light flesh fish like sole will stay together nicely. Laying lemon, onion, or spices on top is easy, and makes a nice presentation. Juicing up the water with lemon juice, lime juice, or whatever is simple. I find that steaming in a wok this way brings out the flavor and texture of most any fish. Also very good for veggies. I think I must have one to replace my tired barely adequate electric now that I have the 15,000 btu burner. Yes, I definitely feel a shopping trip coming on. And a new timer. And one of those new titanium two to a set peelers with the julienne cutter for $10. And one of those Micro Files for doing zesting and Parmaesan. I'm going to have a good Christmas. Santa is going to bring me lots of gifts this year. Ho Ho Ho! Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:20:27 -0600, Chemiker
> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:34:50 -0800, sf > wrote: > > >On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:08:57 -0600, Chemiker > > wrote: > > > >> Saw this one at tuesday morning and was > >> intriqued by the ceramic lining it has. > > > >Thanks. I couldn't tell by the pictures... are the sides and top also > >lined with ceramics? > > Both sides, yes. Back wall, no.(Fan is there) Door, no. Top, no. (2 > calrod bars and a bright reflective plate). It looks like the "brick > oven" blurb is at least half hyperbole. Might be OK for small loaves > in a clay baker like maybe a Reston-Lloyd (if they make one that > small). > Thanks for the more complete description, Alex. If you ever decide to bake in it, please post your results. ![]() -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 20, 1:09*am, sf > wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:33:52 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888 > > > wrote: > > It's the only heavy pot I have that I don't mind making popcorn in. It > > has a thick, heat conductive bottom, and a half cup of popcorn fills > > it up when popped. > > Ah, okay... heavy is good, but I've never measured popcorn like that. > In a normal pot, I find that covering the bottom w/o stacking kernels > makes a perfect pot-full. > I forgot the other advantage -- the pressure cooker's plastic handle makes it easy to move back and forth on the burner, which I feel compelled to do when it starts popping. Orville's label says to use a half-cup of popcorn with 3 T of oil, if I recall correctly. Using peanut oil makes it delicious even without butter. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
> wrote: > On Dec 20, 1:09*am, sf > wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:33:52 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888 > > > > > wrote: > > > It's the only heavy pot I have that I don't mind making popcorn in. It > > > has a thick, heat conductive bottom, and a half cup of popcorn fills > > > it up when popped. > > > > Ah, okay... heavy is good, but I've never measured popcorn like that. > > In a normal pot, I find that covering the bottom w/o stacking kernels > > makes a perfect pot-full. > > > > I forgot the other advantage -- the pressure cooker's plastic handle > makes it easy to move back and forth on the burner, which I feel > compelled to do when it starts popping. > Try just once not to jiggle the pot while your corn is popping and I bet you'll get fewer unpopped kernels. > Orville's label says to use a half-cup of popcorn with 3 T of oil, if > I recall correctly. Using peanut oil makes it delicious even without > butter. I see. Well, I learned how to pop corn in a pot from my mother - but if I measured, it would probably be about the same proportions. My mac and cheese turned out to be almost exactly like a recipe I had only I don't measure. -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/20/2010 7:30 AM, Chemiker wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:35:58 -1000, > wrote: > >> On 12/19/2010 10:45 AM, Omelet wrote: >>> In >, >>> > wrote: > >> S may have an ambivalent pride in being able to cook in a coffee can but >> in my way of thinking, being proficient in this is not an indicator of >> anything, except maybe a past that's somewhat shady. I used to heat >> sardines in the can - not because I'm smart* or resourceful or even any >> kind of a cook - mostly, I was a lazy *******. Anyway, it's not >> something I'd like to disclose to the wife and kids... :-) > > during the depression years and part of ww-II, some boy scout troops > taught the scouts how to make their own cook kits. Two necessary > things were 1 lb coffee cans, and some tool to use as a handle. The > latter is still available, I think, for backpackers. I used a pair of > Channel-lock angle head pliers (worn out but still useful for moving > cans about the campfire. > > Also made "ovens" out of 2 lb coffee cans, with holes punched around > the base with a churchkey can opener. fill with a few pieces of wood > and charcoal, place your cooking vessel on top. Made "skillets" out of > larger cans, cut into a shallow pan with a piece of the side folded > down to make a handle. Crisco cans, I think. 1 Lb coffee cans were > turned into pots with coat-hanger wire for the bails. I used to read Boys Life in the 60s - they sure were a resourceful bunch. It was probably a little different from the scouting in the thirties. Those scouts probably could have used a wok! It was pretty cool that you could bake stuff by putting coals on the lid of a dutch oven. > > Alex |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:02:35 -0600, Omelet >
wrote: > In article >, > sf > wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:35:18 -0600, Omelet > > > wrote: > > > > > In article >, > > > sf > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:33:42 -1000, dsi1 > wrote: > > > > > > > > > For some reason, I've never thought to do this. These days I just stick > > > > > with the microwave stuff - I'm pretty much totally corrupt. :-) > > > > > > > > I've made my popcorn with Orville's for so many years that I can't be > > > > satisfied with the other grocery store brands and microwave popcorn > > > > just doesn't taste right anymore. > > > > > > Ever tried the blue popping corn? I find it is lighter and has a > > > softer, slightly sweeter flavor. > > > > I stated very clearly that I use *grocery store" popcorn. Can *you* > > buy blue popcorn at your grocery store? I've never seen it in mine. > > Hm... Yes, I can. :-) It's with the rest. > > I see that puts yet another delay at mailing this box I'm getting > together for you. Red and black (black rice is the last of my stock of > Forbidden rice) rices, Black soy beans, bindweed and garlic chive seeds, > and I'm holding back on that Mexican Oregano until I'm just ready to > ship so it'll hopefully still arrive live. > > Now I gotta go back to the store and get some blue popping corn. <g> > The South Coast is so different from the West Coast when it comes to > common Groceries! <laughing> I guess so... do you have blue corn tortillas too? We can buy the chips, but I've never seen fresh. > > Right now, whole pig heads are available in the aisle freezers. I've > never bought one, but they are there... ;-) > > The best meat for REAL Tamales! Okay... I'd try it one if someone else made them with pig head, but I wouldn't do it myself. To be honest, I don't think I've ever seen the option in a taqueria either. -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf replied to Sycophant:
>> Right now, whole pig heads are available in the aisle freezers. I've >> never bought one, but they are there... ;-) >> >> The best meat for REAL Tamales! > > Okay... I'd try it one if someone else made them with pig head, but I > wouldn't do it myself. To be honest, I don't think I've ever seen the > option in a taqueria either. "REAL" tamales, the original ones, didn't have any meat at all. Bob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|