Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
fish?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/

nb

On 25/12/2010 9:43 AM, notbob wrote:
> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> fish?
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/

Isn't it great that there seems to be research grant money available for
useless research. All fried foods increase the likelihood of heart
attacks and strokes. It is the frying, not the fish that presents the risk.

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> fish?
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
> nb
>
I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S. eat
fried food all the time. You know, every once in a while I l do like fried
food. But it's not like I eat it every week or even even every month.
Seems to me more people are apt to eat it up north. They seem to like
Friday fish fries Apparently it's a Catholic thing.

I haven't owned a deep fryer since I had a fry-daddy in the 1980's.
Everything "southern" is fried is a myth. I've lived in the south since
1973. I occasionally buy fried chicken... maybe twice a year. But I don't
fry anything at home. I steam or bake most vegetables and I bake or roast
meat.

It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry, it's
just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what they're
talking about.

Jill

"jmcquown" wrote
> "notbob" wrote

>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> fish?

>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/

> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S. eat
> fried food all the time.

> Seems to me more people are apt to eat it up north. They seem to like
> Friday fish fries Apparently it's a Catholic thing.

> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry,
> it's just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
> neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what
> they're talking about.

We do have some fantastic recipes that are fried, but we don't eat them all
that often either nor do my friends who are southern to the bone. More
common to my area in real cooking is stews and soups and things that are
steamed or boiled.

On 25 Dec 2010 14:43:48 GMT, notbob wrote:

> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> fish?
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
> nb

it's them pork rinds what does it.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:26:35 -0500, jmcquown wrote:

> "notbob" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> fish?
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> nb
>>
> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S. eat
> fried food all the time. You know, every once in a while I l do like fried
> food. But it's not like I eat it every week or even even every month.
> Seems to me more people are apt to eat it up north. They seem to like
> Friday fish fries Apparently it's a Catholic thing.
>
> I haven't owned a deep fryer since I had a fry-daddy in the 1980's.
> Everything "southern" is fried is a myth. I've lived in the south since
> 1973. I occasionally buy fried chicken... maybe twice a year. But I don't
> fry anything at home. I steam or bake most vegetables and I bake or roast
> meat.
>
> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry, it's
> just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
> neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what they're
> talking about.
>
> Jill

dixie fried:

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4-yh43xZeE>

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:26:35 -0500, jmcquown wrote:

> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry, it's
> just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
> neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what they're
> talking about.

I certainly notice a lot of fried foods on menus and places
specializing in fried foods when I travel between Texas and the
Carolinas - more than I do any where else.

Here in Texas, there's a hell of a lot of fried catfish. Served
with hushpuppies and French fries.

-sw

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:36:31 -0500, blake murphy wrote:

> it's them pork rinds what does it.

Pork rinds have significantly less fat then potato chips.

That's weird - I just remembered I had a dream about pork rinds
last night. I was in the kitchen of a Chinese restaurant where they
slathered crushed pork rinds all over the beef rib roasts and the
Chinese cooks were fighting over the last bucket of them.

Calling Dr Freud...

Speaking of roasts, I have an 8-bone rib roast to put in the
oven...

-sw

On Dec 25, 11:41*am, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:36:31 -0500, blake murphy wrote:
> > it's them pork rinds what does it.
>
> Pork rinds have significantly less fat then potato chips.
>
> That's weird - I just remembered I had a dream about pork rinds
> last night. I was in the kitchen of a Chinese restaurant where they
> slathered crushed pork rinds all over the beef rib roasts and the
> Chinese cooks were fighting over the last bucket of them.
>
Better than watching them fight over a litter of newborn kittens.
Tender newborn kittens.
>
> -sw

--Bryan

On Dec 25, 8:43*am, notbob > wrote:
> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> fish?
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/

Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. Poor folks are more
likely to fry in shortening.
>
> nb

--Bryan

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:36:11 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:26:35 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry, it's
>> just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
>> neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what they're
>> talking about.
>
>I certainly notice a lot of fried foods on menus and places
>specializing in fried foods when I travel between Texas and the
>Carolinas - more than I do any where else.
>
>Here in Texas, there's a hell of a lot of fried catfish. Served
>with hushpuppies and French fries.

I don't think it's a fried fish thing so much as a fast food thing,
folks eat all kinds of fried fast food pretty much equally all over,
and it's the greazy breading and chips, not the fried fish per se.
When fish is fried without breading it contains minimal fat.

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:36:31 -0500, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On 25 Dec 2010 14:43:48 GMT, notbob wrote:
>
>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> fish?
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> nb
>
>it's them pork rinds what does it.

Nope, gotta be fish. It's those fried calamari what does it, ie.
fried foreskins. Hey, better then planting foreskins in Ireland and
growing little micks! LOL

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:26:35 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry,
>> it's
>> just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
>> neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what
>> they're
>> talking about.
>
> I certainly notice a lot of fried foods on menus and places
> specializing in fried foods when I travel between Texas and the
> Carolinas - more than I do any where else.
>
> Here in Texas, there's a hell of a lot of fried catfish. Served
> with hushpuppies and French fries.
>
> -sw


Oddly enough, I can't find hush puppies *or* catfish on a menu around here.
I can't even find catfish at the grocery store. I can find frozen hush
puppies. I'm sure someone fried them before they were frozen. LOL

I'm more prone to baking, roasting, steaming, grilling. The south gets a
bad rap when it comes to fried everything.

Jill

On 12/25/2010 10:26 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>
> "notbob" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> fish?
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> nb
>>
> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S.
> eat fried food all the time. You know, every once in a while I l do like
> fried food. But it's not like I eat it every week or even even every
> month. Seems to me more people are apt to eat it up north. They seem to
> like Friday fish fries Apparently it's a Catholic thing.
>
> I haven't owned a deep fryer since I had a fry-daddy in the 1980's.
> Everything "southern" is fried is a myth. I've lived in the south since
> 1973. I occasionally buy fried chicken... maybe twice a year. But I
> don't fry anything at home. I steam or bake most vegetables and I bake
> or roast meat.
>
> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry,
> it's just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south. And
> neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what
> they're talking about.
>
> Jill
Mostly, we just gut it put it on a stick and either over or through the
fire.
We toss the scraps utside the cave.

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:48:27 -0800 (PST), Bryan
> wrote:

>On Dec 25, 8:43*am, notbob > wrote:
>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> fish?
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
>Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. Poor folks are more
>likely to fry in shortening.

That's not true. Poor folks are more likely to fry in cheap salad
oil, reused bacon greaze, lard and other rendered animal fats
(schmaltz). Most hydrolized vegetable oil (shortening) by far is used
by bakeries, and folks who use margerine... margerine IS shortening,
ie. flavored Crisco. Unless you do all your own baking every baked
product you eat contains generic Crisco.

"Lil Abner" > wrote in message
...
> On 12/25/2010 10:26 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>
> Mostly, we just gut it put it on a stick and either over or through the
> fire.
> We toss the scraps utside the cave.

LOL I actually had a cousin who asked if we had indoor toilets. Excuse
me?! There must be something wrong with your television. This is the same
person who served Reunite on Ice (that's nice LOL). Oh, how lovely. Of
course we have indoor toilets. We had four bedrooms and two fulls baths and
this guy is asking if we pee inside. Yes, we have an indoor kitchen too!

Jill

On Dec 25, 2:41*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:48:27 -0800 (PST), Bryan
>
> > wrote:
> >On Dec 25, 8:43 am, notbob > wrote:
> >> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
> >> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> >> fish?
>
> >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
> >Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. *Poor folks are more
> >likely to fry in shortening.
>
> That's not true. *Poor folks are more likely to fry in cheap salad
> oil, reused bacon greaze, lard and other rendered animal fats
> (schmaltz). *Most hydrolized vegetable oil (shortening) by far is used
> by bakeries, and folks who use margerine... margerine IS shortening,
> ie. flavored Crisco. *Unless you do all your own baking every baked
> product you eat contains generic Crisco.

You are full of shit. Many bakeries do not use hydrogenated (not
"hydrolized"), and my wife does bake, other than everyday bread from
the grocer, which also doesn't contain hydrogenated fats. Poor
country bumpkins and poor urban folks both use a lot of margarine.

--Bryan

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>
> "notbob" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> fish?
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> nb
>>
> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S. eat
> fried food all the time.

That article didn't say that.

On Dec 25, 4:31*pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> "Lil Abner" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On 12/25/2010 10:26 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>
> > Mostly, we just gut it put it on a stick and either over or through the
> > fire.
> > We toss the scraps utside the cave.
>
> LOL *I actually had a cousin who asked if we had indoor toilets. *Excuse
> me?! *There must be something wrong with your television. *This is the same
> person who served Reunite on Ice (that's nice LOL). *Oh, how lovely. *Of
> course we have indoor toilets. *We had four bedrooms and two fulls baths and
> this guy is asking if we pee inside. *Yes, we have an indoor kitchen too!

Reunite any way.
>
> Jill

--Bryan

"dejablues" > wrote in message
...
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "notbob" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>>> fish?
>>>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>>
>>> nb
>>>
>> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S.
>> eat fried food all the time.
>
> That article didn't say that.
>
Maybe not but notbob did. And it's a blatant misconception.

Jill

Bwrrrryan wrote:

>On Dec 25, 2:41*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:

>> >On Dec 25, 8:43 am, notbob > wrote:
>> >> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> >> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> >> fish?
>>
>> >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> >Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. *Poor folks are more
>> >likely to fry in shortening.
>>
>> That's not true. *Poor folks are more likely to fry in cheap salad
>> oil, reused bacon greaze, lard and other rendered animal fats
>> (schmaltz). *Most hydrolized vegetable oil (shortening) by far is used
>> by bakeries, and folks who use margerine... margerine IS shortening,
>> ie. flavored Crisco. *Unless you do all your own baking every baked
>> product you eat contains generic Crisco.
>
>You are full of shit. Many bakeries do not use hydrogenated (not
>"hydrolized"), and my wife does bake, other than everyday bread from
>the grocer, which also doesn't contain hydrogenated fats. Poor
>country bumpkins and poor urban folks both use a lot of margarine.


You are by FAR the least knowlegeable poster here... and you're a
flaming Crisco butt and your "wife" has a dick, Bwrrrryan.

On 25/12/2010 10:24 AM, Stu wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:06:26 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 25/12/2010 9:43 AM, notbob wrote:
>>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>>> fish?
>>>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> Isn't it great that there seems to be research grant money available for
>> useless research. All fried foods increase the likelihood of heart
>> attacks and strokes. It is the frying, not the fish that presents the risk.
>>
>
> Not completely true, the amount and specific chemicals in the fish
> from the area may be a factor.

I guess you didn't read the linked article. The compared people who ate
fried fish and people who ate fish cooked other ways. Their summary
indicted that fish is good source of nutrients and omega 3 oils, but too
much fried fish increased the risk of stroke.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> "jmcquown" wrote
>> "notbob" wrote
>
>>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>>> fish?
>
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
>> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S.
>> eat fried food all the time.
>
>> Seems to me more people are apt to eat it up north. They seem to like
>> Friday fish fries Apparently it's a Catholic thing.
>
>> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry,
>> it's just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south.
>> And neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what
>> they're talking about.
>
> We do have some fantastic recipes that are fried, but we don't eat them
> all that often either nor do my friends who are southern to the bone.
> More common to my area in real cooking is stews and soups and things that
> are steamed or boiled.
>

I'm not southern to the bone... I just happened to wind up in the south. It
wasn't my choice, really. I was born in SO Cal. Lived there twice. And I
lived from Lakehurst to Quantico Parris Island to Thailand to Ohio to
Pennsylvania to back again. I'm a military brat. I went wherever my father
dragged us.

But I agree, I cook more soups and stews and steam and broile. *Broil* not
boil. That's also a stereotype. That we boil vegetables to death.

Jill

On 25/12/2010 11:39 PM, Stu wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:18:11 -0500, Dave Smith

>>>> Isn't it great that there seems to be research grant money available for
>>>> useless research. All fried foods increase the likelihood of heart
>>>> attacks and strokes. It is the frying, not the fish that presents the risk.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not completely true, the amount and specific chemicals in the fish
>>> from the area may be a factor.
>>
>> I guess you didn't read the linked article. The compared people who ate
>> fried fish and people who ate fish cooked other ways. Their summary
>> indicted that fish is good source of nutrients and omega 3 oils, but too
>> much fried fish increased the risk of stroke.
>
> Well duh, saturated oils and cholesterol.

well duh. yes..... not the specific chemicals in the fish in the area
like you suggested.

On 26/12/2010 12:35 PM, Stu wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:48:04 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 25/12/2010 11:39 PM, Stu wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:18:11 -0500, Dave Smith
>>
>>>>>> Isn't it great that there seems to be research grant money available for
>>>>>> useless research. All fried foods increase the likelihood of heart
>>>>>> attacks and strokes. It is the frying, not the fish that presents the risk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not completely true, the amount and specific chemicals in the fish
>>>>> from the area may be a factor.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you didn't read the linked article. The compared people who ate
>>>> fried fish and people who ate fish cooked other ways. Their summary
>>>> indicted that fish is good source of nutrients and omega 3 oils, but too
>>>> much fried fish increased the risk of stroke.
>>>
>>> Well duh, saturated oils and cholesterol.
>>
>> well duh. yes..... not the specific chemicals in the fish in the area
>> like you suggested.
>
> Oh but there are chemicals non the less


So what is your point. When I sugggested the problem was fried food you
came back and said it could be the chemicals. When I pointed out that
the research had accounted for other methods of cooking and that it was
the frying that was the problem. Then you came back with the
condescending remark about saturated oils and cholesterol. And when I
referred back to your claim about the chemicals you little mind bounced
back to that.

I had suggested that you obviously did not read the article that was
linked. Apparently you still haven't.

On Dec 25, 11:36*am, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:26:35 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
> > It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. *Sorry, it's
> > just not true. *But then again, you've never lived in the south. *And
> > neither have the people who wrote that article *They don't know what they're
> > talking about.
>
> I certainly notice a lot of fried foods on menus and places
> specializing in fried foods when I travel between Texas and the
> Carolinas - more than I do any where else.
>
> Here in Texas, there's a hell of a lot of fried catfish. *Served
> with hushpuppies and French fries.

Oh ugh catfish! I like to fish for the damned things but have NEVER
tasted one bite of catfish. The Missouri, Mississippi and other
assorted and sundry rivers up here in the plains states are NASTY and
I can't believe anyone would eat a bottom feeder from that sludge.
Bleh I just made myself nauseous thinking about it lol....

On Dec 25, 12:48*pm, Bryan > wrote:
> On Dec 25, 8:43*am, notbob > wrote:
>
> > Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
> > Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> > fish?
>
> >http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
> Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. *Poor folks are more
> likely to fry in shortening.

Wow, where do you get your facts? I've been poor my whole life, and I
don't fry in shortening, I don't eat foods fried in shortening, and I
didn't grow up on foods fried in shortening! You sure have a thing
about "poor white trash", did you grow up in a trailer park or
something? Or are you one of those reformed drunks/AA/NA types that
are so *superior* to the rest of us mere mortals now that you have
*recovered*? Reminds me of my sister, she used to bitch and moan
about people smoking. Well it turns out she now has a two pack a day
habit. Hehhhhhh

On Dec 25, 8:46*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> Bwrrrryan wrote:
> >On Dec 25, 2:41 pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> >> >On Dec 25, 8:43 am, notbob > wrote:
> >> >> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish..
> >> >> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
> >> >> fish?
>
> >> >>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>
> >> >Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. Poor folks are more
> >> >likely to fry in shortening.
>
> >> That's not true. Poor folks are more likely to fry in cheap salad
> >> oil, reused bacon greaze, lard and other rendered animal fats
> >> (schmaltz). Most hydrolized vegetable oil (shortening) by far is used
> >> by bakeries, and folks who use margerine... margerine IS shortening,
> >> ie. flavored Crisco. Unless you do all your own baking every baked
> >> product you eat contains generic Crisco.
>
> >You are full of shit. *Many bakeries do not use hydrogenated (not
> >"hydrolized"), and my wife does bake, other than everyday bread from
> >the grocer, which also doesn't contain hydrogenated fats. *Poor
> >country bumpkins and poor *urban folks both use a lot of margarine.
>
> You are by FAR the least knowlegeable poster here... and you're a
> flaming Crisco butt and your "wife" has a dick, Bwrrrryan.- Hide quoted text -

Bingo!

On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:23:22 -0800 (PST), projectile vomit chick
> wrote:

>On Dec 25, 12:48*pm, Bryan > wrote:
>> On Dec 25, 8:43*am, notbob > wrote:
>>
>> > Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>> > Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>> > fish?
>>
>> >http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>> Plenty of dumb hicks outside the South too. *Poor folks are more
>> likely to fry in shortening.
>
>Wow, where do you get your facts? I've been poor my whole life, and I
>don't fry in shortening, I don't eat foods fried in shortening, and I
>didn't grow up on foods fried in shortening! You sure have a thing
>about "poor white trash", did you grow up in a trailer park or
>something? Or are you one of those reformed drunks/AA/NA types that
>are so *superior* to the rest of us mere mortals now that you have
>*recovered*? Reminds me of my sister, she used to bitch and moan
>about people smoking. Well it turns out she now has a two pack a day
>habit. Hehhhhhh

Bwrrrryan has a thing about shortening because as a teen when the ***
guys made fun of his widdle two inch pecker his mommy told him to rub
it with Crisco twice a day, little did shit for brains realize that
Crisco is shortening... so now he has a one inch fuse! LOL

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:54:17 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> projectile vomit chick wrote:
>>Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> Here in Texas, there's a hell of a lot of fried catfish. *
>>
>>Oh ugh catfish! I like to fish for the damned things but have NEVER
>>tasted one bite of catfish. The Missouri, Mississippi and other
>>assorted and sundry rivers up here in the plains states are NASTY and
>>I can't believe anyone would eat a bottom feeder from that sludge.
>>Bleh I just made myself nauseous thinking about it lol....
>
> I'm not surprised Sqwirtz loves it... eating catfish is _probably_
> like uncircumcised penis. <heehee>

You don't exactly increase your credibility here by putting words
into other people's mouths. I have never said I liked catfish.

But if they had a catfish SPAM, I'm sure you'd be waiting at the
factory to get your hands on the first case off the production
line. For the Katz, of course.

And your fascination with tube steaks and penises has been duly
noted many times.

-sw

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:04:45 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> Bwrrrryan has a thing about shortening because as a teen when the ***
> guys made fun of his widdle two inch pecker his mommy told him to rub
> it with Crisco twice a day, little did shit for brains realize that
> Crisco is shortening... so now he has a one inch fuse! LOL

The Crystal Palace is just kicking in. More tube-steak and penis
references.

-sw

On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:15:57 -0500, jmcquown wrote:

> "cshenk" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "jmcquown" wrote
>>> "notbob" wrote
>>
>>>> Interesting study about high rate of strokes from eating fried fish.
>>>> Uhmmm... isn't this "belt" also notorious for fried foods other than
>>>> fish?
>>
>>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40795126...and_nutrition/
>>
>>> I love the way news reports claim people who live in the southern U.S.
>>> eat fried food all the time.
>>
>>> Seems to me more people are apt to eat it up north. They seem to like
>>> Friday fish fries Apparently it's a Catholic thing.
>>
>>> It's just weird, the stereotype that everything here is fried. Sorry,
>>> it's just not true. But then again, you've never lived in the south.
>>> And neither have the people who wrote that article They don't know what
>>> they're talking about.
>>
>> We do have some fantastic recipes that are fried, but we don't eat them
>> all that often either nor do my friends who are southern to the bone.
>> More common to my area in real cooking is stews and soups and things that
>> are steamed or boiled.
>>
>
> I'm not southern to the bone... I just happened to wind up in the south. It
> wasn't my choice, really. I was born in SO Cal. Lived there twice. And I
> lived from Lakehurst to Quantico Parris Island to Thailand to Ohio to
> Pennsylvania to back again. I'm a military brat. I went wherever my father
> dragged us.
>
> But I agree, I cook more soups and stews and steam and broile. *Broil* not
> boil. That's also a stereotype. That we boil vegetables to death.
>
> Jill

you take pains to point out you're not really a southerner and then take
offense at stereotypes of southern cooking.

blake

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:54:17 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> projectile vomit chick wrote:
>>Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> Here in Texas, there's a hell of a lot of fried catfish. *
>>
>>Oh ugh catfish! I like to fish for the damned things but have NEVER
>>tasted one bite of catfish. The Missouri, Mississippi and other
>>assorted and sundry rivers up here in the plains states are NASTY and
>>I can't believe anyone would eat a bottom feeder from that sludge.
>>Bleh I just made myself nauseous thinking about it lol....
>
> I'm not surprised Sqwirtz loves it... eating catfish is _probably_
> like uncircumcised penis. <heehee>

you can't stop thinking about sucking cock, can you?

blake

Jill, Iowa ain't "south." JK

I know what you're saying. I have noticed, though, that many souther town eat out much more than we do up north. In Houston, TX, Shreveport, LA, I noticed people all out to eat on weeknights frequently. I go to their homes and the stove top range is clean as a whistle.

I'm with you. I like fried berading some times, but I'll enjoy steamed veggies becasue they taste like veggies, not fried breading.

Here in WI, the Friday fish fry is king. But, I'll venture to guess that the fish fry is the only fried food eaten that week/month in many cases. People where I live can't afford to dine out a couple nights per week.

"Andy" > wrote in message ...
>
> The year I spent in Florida, I got no sign of southern hospitality

Your reputation preceeded you. They already knew everything about you.

>
> Of course my world in
> Boynton Beach was only maybe 10 miles in diameter, so that probably is
> not correct.

Just like your world now, except it's linited to 10 feet. All those
restraining orders must be a bitch, huh?

>
> I credit the southern states more for soul food and BBQ. Cajun cuisine
> is darn great stuff too.
>
> Best,
>
> Andy

"BigBadBubba" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Andy" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> The year I spent in Florida, I got no sign of southern hospitality
>
> Your reputation preceeded you. They already knew everything about you.
>
>>
>> Of course my world in
>> Boynton Beach was only maybe 10 miles in diameter, so that probably is
>> not correct.
>
> Just like your world now, except it's linited to 10 feet. All those
> restraining orders must be a bitch, huh?
>
>
>

Not restraining orders, Bubba. It's "the voices".

"Paco" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "BigBadBubba" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Andy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> The year I spent in Florida, I got no sign of southern hospitality
>>
>> Your reputation preceeded you. They already knew everything about you.
>>
>>>
>>> Of course my world in
>>> Boynton Beach was only maybe 10 miles in diameter, so that probably is
>>> not correct.
>>
>> Just like your world now, except it's linited to 10 feet. All those
>> restraining orders must be a bitch, huh?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Not restraining orders, Bubba. It's "the voices".
>
>

Same thing. Well, almost. Same effects.

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:32:38 -0500, Paco wrote:

> "BigBadBubba" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Andy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> The year I spent in Florida, I got no sign of southern hospitality
>>
>> Your reputation preceeded you. They already knew everything about you.
>>
>>>
>>> Of course my world in
>>> Boynton Beach was only maybe 10 miles in diameter, so that probably is
>>> not correct.
>>
>> Just like your world now, except it's linited to 10 feet. All those
>> restraining orders must be a bitch, huh?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Not restraining orders, Bubba. It's "the voices".
>

i'm still wondering in what part of the world beaches have a diameter.

your pal,
blake