Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no idea???? I just post with Google and it does whatever it does. I don't see a place to change preferences anywhere in that regard....sorry.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-03-24, ImStillMags > wrote: > I have no
>I just post with Google and it does whatever it does. I don't see a >place to change preferences anywhere in that regard....sorry. Don't be sorry, fix it!! Yer the only poster on rfc that's doing this. Some other Mac geeks out there wanna help mags? nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:13:58 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> wrote: > I'm not on a Mac right now. I'm in the office....on Google Groups So you're using a PC? -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 2:40*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:13:58 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags > > > wrote: > > I'm not on a Mac right now. *I'm in the office....on Google Groups > > So you're using a PC? > > -- > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. yes, I'm on a PC. There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where you can say 'text wrap' NB is the only one, apparently who has a problem. I see my posts look like everyone elses. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ImStillMags wrote:
> > yes, I'm on a PC. There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where > you can say 'text wrap' NB is the only one, apparently who has a > problem. I see my posts look like everyone elses. You didn't have any problem adding returns in that message. Pecan pie and return - Two ideas that don't much go together. I don't think I've ever returned a pecan pie. So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground into nut butter, who cares. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Freyburger wrote:
> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground > into nut butter, who cares. A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. HTH :-) -Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 3:21*pm, zxcvbob > wrote:
> Doug Freyburger wrote: > > So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? *As long as it's in a pie or ground > > into nut butter, who cares. > > A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. > A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. > > HTH :-) > > -Bob correct-o-mundo ;-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/03/2011 6:21 PM, zxcvbob wrote:
> Doug Freyburger wrote: > >> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground >> into nut butter, who cares. > > > A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. Nope.... That is a **** bottle > A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. > I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 24/03/2011 6:21 PM, zxcvbob wrote: >> Doug Freyburger wrote: >> >>> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground >>> into nut butter, who cares. >> >> >> A pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. > > Nope.... That is a **** bottle > I suppose you could use a bottle, but it's easier to fling it out the window when you're done if you use a can. HTH -Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 5:39*pm, Dave Smith > wrote:
> On 24/03/2011 6:21 PM, zxcvbob wrote: > > > Doug Freyburger wrote: > > >> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground > >> into nut butter, who cares. > > > A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. > > Nope.... That is a **** bottle > > > A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first.. > > I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. > > I've lived in the South all my life and 'peh-kahn' is the way folks around here pronounce it. Pee-can is the way television personalities pronounce it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/03/2011 7:11 PM, Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT), ItsJoanNotJoann > > wrote: > >> On Mar 24, 5:39 pm, Dave > wrote: >> >>>> A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. >>> >>> I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. >> >>> >>> >> I've lived in the South all my life and 'peh-kahn' is the way folks >> around here pronounce it. Pee-can is the way television personalities >> pronounce it. > > Yep, that is what I grew up with too, living in VA. > The Merriam Webster online dictinary gives three different pronunciations, pi-kahn, pi-kan, pee-kan. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 24/03/2011 7:11 PM, Christine Dabney wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT), ItsJoanNotJoann >> > wrote: >> >>> On Mar 24, 5:39 pm, Dave > wrote: >>> >>>>> A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find >>>>> it >>>>> first. >>>> >>>> I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. >>> >>>> >>>> >>> I've lived in the South all my life and 'peh-kahn' is the way >>> folks >>> around here pronounce it. Pee-can is the way television >>> personalities pronounce it. >> >> Yep, that is what I grew up with too, living in VA. >> > > The Merriam Webster online dictinary gives three different > pronunciations, pi-kahn, pi-kan, pee-kan. Then it's pi-kahn, here in Maryland. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> wrote: > yes, I'm on a PC. There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where > you can say 'text wrap' NB is the only one, apparently who has a > problem. I see my posts look like everyone elses. This post line wrapped just fine. Are you on the same computer as before? I've only noticed two that did not wrap and it was just today. I don't read every single post of yours because they often have a reply already. I just skip to that since most people can't be bothered to trim and I'll get your entire post anyway. The reason even your posts that didn't line wrap come out looking okay is that they are line wrapped on reply. At least that's what my news reader does. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/24/2011 5:21 PM, zxcvbob wrote:
> Doug Freyburger wrote: > >> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground >> into nut butter, who cares. > > > A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. > A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. > > HTH :-) > > -Bob Around here it is called a puh-kahn. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:26:17 -0400, "Dora" > wrote:
> Then it's pi-kahn, here in Maryland. I've never thought about how I say it except pee-kan drives me nuts, so I don't say it that way. I guess I say pi-kahn too. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Shirley wrote:
> On 3/24/2011 5:21 PM, zxcvbob wrote: >> Doug Freyburger wrote: >> >>> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground >>> into nut butter, who cares. >> >> >> A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. >> A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. >> >> HTH :-) >> >> -Bob > > Around here it is called a puh-kahn. We didn't really have a vowel at all in the first syllable where I grew up. It was sort of p'kahn. So whether it came out "uh" or "eh" or "i" didn't make much difference cuz it was so short -- just as long as it weren't "ee". :-) Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> wrote: >On Mar 24, 2:40*pm, sf > wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:13:58 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags >> >> > wrote: >> > I'm not on a Mac right now. *I'm in the office....on Google Groups >> >> So you're using a PC? >> >> -- >> >> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. > >yes, I'm on a PC. There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where >you can say 'text wrap' NB is the only one, apparently who has a >problem. I see my posts look like everyone elses. This one is fine but you've got a couple posts up thread that aren't wrapped properly. It's not just NB. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-03-24, ImStillMags > wrote:
> yes, I'm on a PC. There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where > you can say 'text wrap' NB is the only one, apparently who has a > problem. I see my posts look like everyone elses. Let's look at it from the opposite view. You post from GG. I routinely KF all GG. You and a handfull of others are in my exceptions to my GG KF file, Nancy2 being another. Her posts wrap jes fine. I can push a single key and wrap your posts, but why should I have to. I have to do this for no one else but you and haven't had to for years. What makes you special? In fact, what makes you different, now, than a few weeks ago when your posts wrapped jes fine? Sorry, but I haven't changed a damn thing in a couple yrs. You? nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 5:51*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags > > > > > wrote: > >On Mar 24, 2:40*pm, sf > wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:13:58 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags > > >> > wrote: > >> > I'm not on a Mac right now. *I'm in the office....on Google Groups > > >> So you're using a PC? > > >> -- > > >> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. > > >yes, I'm on a PC. * *There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where > >you can say 'text wrap' * NB is the only one, apparently who has a > >problem. * I see my posts look like everyone elses. > > This one is fine but you've got a couple posts up thread that aren't > wrapped properly. *It's not just NB. > > Lou * Well, I'm at home now, on my Mac. So let's have an experiment and see if this shows up as text wrapped or not. I think it's some kind of glitch in the server at the office or something. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 6:09*pm, notbob > wrote:
> On 2011-03-24, ImStillMags > wrote: > > > yes, I'm on a PC. * *There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where > > you can say 'text wrap' * NB is the only one, apparently who has a > > problem. * I see my posts look like everyone elses. > > Let's look at it from the opposite view. * > > You post from GG. *I routinely KF all GG. *You and a handfull of > others are in my exceptions to my GG KF file, Nancy2 being another. > Her posts wrap jes fine. > > I can push a single key and wrap your posts, but why should I have to. > I have to do this for no one else but you and haven't had to for > years. *What makes you special? *In fact, what makes you different, > now, than a few weeks ago when your posts wrapped jes fine? * > > Sorry, but I haven't changed a damn thing in a couple yrs. *You? > > nb * I'm sorry nb.....I have no idea what happened. As I said in my previous post, I was on the computer in my office and it could be some glitch in that computer or the server. I'm at home now on a Mac and Google does not have anywhere you can see preferences or tools to click text wrap. I don't know what else to do and I'm sorry if you are all hot under the collar about it. It's not intentional. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 6:09*pm, notbob > wrote:
> On 2011-03-24, ImStillMags > wrote: > > > yes, I'm on a PC. * *There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where > > you can say 'text wrap' * NB is the only one, apparently who has a > > problem. * I see my posts look like everyone elses. > > Let's look at it from the opposite view. * > > You post from GG. *I routinely KF all GG. *You and a handfull of > others are in my exceptions to my GG KF file, Nancy2 being another. > Her posts wrap jes fine. > > I can push a single key and wrap your posts, but why should I have to. > I have to do this for no one else but you and haven't had to for > years. *What makes you special? *In fact, what makes you different, > now, than a few weeks ago when your posts wrapped jes fine? * > > Sorry, but I haven't changed a damn thing in a couple yrs. *You? > > nb * and what key is it that you can click to change to text wrap????? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-03-25, ImStillMags > wrote:
> > and what key is it that you can click to change to text wrap????? I use the newsreader client, slrn. If posts are not properly wrapped by the poster, like yours are not, I merely hit my w key and they instantly wrap on my screen. Your posts wrapped jes fine several weeks ago. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:49:13 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
> wrote: >On Mar 24, 5:51*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >On Mar 24, 2:40*pm, sf > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:13:58 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > I'm not on a Mac right now. *I'm in the office....on Google Groups >> >> >> So you're using a PC? >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. >> >> >yes, I'm on a PC. * *There is no 'preferences' on Google groups where >> >you can say 'text wrap' * NB is the only one, apparently who has a >> >problem. * I see my posts look like everyone elses. >> >> This one is fine but you've got a couple posts up thread that aren't >> wrapped properly. *It's not just NB. >> >> Lou * > >Well, I'm at home now, on my Mac. So let's have an experiment and see >if this shows up as text wrapped or not. I think it's some kind of >glitch in the server at the office or something. This one is fine. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:48:10 -0500, zxcvbob >
wrote: > We didn't really have a vowel at all in the first syllable where I > grew up. It was sort of p'kahn. So whether it came out "uh" or > "eh" or "i" didn't make much difference cuz it was so short -- just > as long as it weren't "ee". :-) Okay! That sounds even more like how I'd say it. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pecan pie is a favorite desserts during both Thanksgiving and Christmas. Its flaky crust and delicious, roasted pecan filling will have everyone asking for another slice of your masterpiece. Nothing makes a better table center during the holidays then a fresh pecan pie. Pecan pie is a custard pie made, as you might imagine, with pecans as a the focal ingredient. Traditional pecan pie is very rich, thick, and somewhat sticky, and it can be extremely sweet.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ItsJoanNotJoann wrote:
> On Mar 24, 5:39 pm, Dave Smith > wrote: >> On 24/03/2011 6:21 PM, zxcvbob wrote: >> >>> Doug Freyburger wrote: >>>> So is it "pea-can" or "peh-kahn"? As long as it's in a pie or ground >>>> into nut butter, who cares. >>> A Pee-can is something a trucker keeps under the seat. >> Nope.... That is a **** bottle >> >>> A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it first. >> I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. > >> > I've lived in the South all my life and 'peh-kahn' is the way folks > around here pronounce it. Pee-can is the way television personalities > pronounce it. Oh! I didn't know I was such a personality. I am from Massachusetts, and grew up hearing and saying pee-can. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dora wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote: >> On 24/03/2011 7:11 PM, Christine Dabney wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT), ItsJoanNotJoann >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 24, 5:39 pm, Dave > wrote: >>>> >>>>>> A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it >>>>>> first. >>>>> >>>>> I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I've lived in the South all my life and 'peh-kahn' is the way folks >>>> around here pronounce it. Pee-can is the way television >>>> personalities pronounce it. >>> >>> Yep, that is what I grew up with too, living in VA. >>> >> >> The Merriam Webster online dictinary gives three different >> pronunciations, pi-kahn, pi-kan, pee-kan. > > Then it's pi-kahn, here in Maryland. Sounds like we can draw new battle lines. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:26:17 -0400, "Dora" > wrote: > >> Then it's pi-kahn, here in Maryland. > > I've never thought about how I say it except pee-kan drives me nuts, > so I don't say it that way. I guess I say pi-kahn too. > Uh-oh. We'd better not talk. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jean B." > wrote in :
> Dora wrote: >> Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 24/03/2011 7:11 PM, Christine Dabney wrote: >>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT), ItsJoanNotJoann >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar 24, 5:39 pm, Dave > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> A peh-kahn is a something you eat, if the squirrels don't find it >>>>>>> first. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was close to 50 before I ever heard that pronunciation. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I've lived in the South all my life and 'peh-kahn' is the way folks >>>>> around here pronounce it. Pee-can is the way television >>>>> personalities pronounce it. >>>> >>>> Yep, that is what I grew up with too, living in VA. >>>> >>> >>> The Merriam Webster online dictinary gives three different >>> pronunciations, pi-kahn, pi-kan, pee-kan. >> >> Then it's pi-kahn, here in Maryland. > > Sounds like we can draw new battle lines. > Dora's version is much the same as we get on TV here, from the snobs. Pee-carrrrrn. I've always called them pee-cans. -- Peter Lucas Hobart Tasmania Nothing ever truely dies the Universe wastes nothing everything is simply... transformed |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-03-25, Jean B. > wrote:
> Oh! I didn't know I was such a personality. I am from > Massachusetts, and grew up hearing and saying pee-can. Likewise. Being from CA, I've heard it pronounced so many different ways, probably don't say it the same way, twice in a row. ![]() nbxc |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:31:39 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
> sf wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:26:17 -0400, "Dora" > wrote: > > > >> Then it's pi-kahn, here in Maryland. > > > > I've never thought about how I say it except pee-kan drives me nuts, > > so I don't say it that way. I guess I say pi-kahn too. > > > Uh-oh. We'd better not talk. That's okay Jean. We all have our flaws. ![]() -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Abel wrote:
> > It's the nuclear radiation from the tsunami. > > :-) New flavoring option for the pea-can pie! New flavoring mandate for the peh-kahn pie! Special glow in the dark feature for the p'kahn pie! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:56:58 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger
> wrote: > Dan Abel wrote: > > > > It's the nuclear radiation from the tsunami. > > > > :-) > > New flavoring option for the pea-can pie! New flavoring mandate for the > peh-kahn pie! Special glow in the dark feature for the p'kahn pie! Oh, the glow in the dark quality will be very special on Halloween night! -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |