Honor the ladies:
http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/..._lnk2%7C208550

Sqwertz wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> Honor the ladies:
>> http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/bra-fit-guide
>
>Is this what you do first thing in the morning? It sure seems that
>way.
>
>It's too bad you didn't get any while you were younger and more
>virile. And now you're stuck in eternal limbo for the rest of your
>life while your pee-pee doesn't work any more.

Being how out of dozens of peeps you're the only one who took my post
seriously proves that your rant is describing yourself, the 8th Dwarf:
Impotent! <G>

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .

Steve wrote to Pussy:

> You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
> "serious". You're infatuated with boobs.

And cocksucking.

Bob

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:09:35 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> Steve wrote to Pussy:
>
> > You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
> > "serious". You're infatuated with boobs.
>
> And cocksucking.
>
and butt ****ing

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On 4/8/2011 10:35 PM, Omelet wrote:
> In >,
> > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:25:57 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Honor the ladies:
>>>>> http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/bra-fit-guide
>>>>
>>>> Is this what you do first thing in the morning? It sure seems that
>>>> way.
>>>>
>>>> It's too bad you didn't get any while you were younger and more
>>>> virile. And now you're stuck in eternal limbo for the rest of your
>>>> life while your pee-pee doesn't work any more.
>>>
>>> Being how out of dozens of peeps you're the only one who took my post
>>> seriously proves that your rant is describing yourself, the 8th Dwarf:
>>> Impotent!<G>
>>
>> You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
>> "serious". You're infatuated with boobs.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Aren't most "normal" Hetero' men?

The answer to this is "yes - of course." The question I have is if ***
guys are seriously interested in female boobs. I think it could go
either way. OTOH, Hetro gals and *******s are also infatuated with
female boobs too so I guess the question is if there's anyone that isn't
interested in this boobage?

On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:05:04 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:

>On 4/8/2011 10:35 PM, Omelet wrote:
>> In >,
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:25:57 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Honor the ladies:
>>>>>> http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/bra-fit-guide
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this what you do first thing in the morning? It sure seems that
>>>>> way.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's too bad you didn't get any while you were younger and more
>>>>> virile. And now you're stuck in eternal limbo for the rest of your
>>>>> life while your pee-pee doesn't work any more.
>>>>
>>>> Being how out of dozens of peeps you're the only one who took my post
>>>> seriously proves that your rant is describing yourself, the 8th Dwarf:
>>>> Impotent!<G>
>>>
>>> You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
>>> "serious". You're infatuated with boobs.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Aren't most "normal" Hetero' men?
>
>The answer to this is "yes - of course." The question I have is if ***
>guys are seriously interested in female boobs. I think it could go
>either way. OTOH, Hetro gals and *******s are also infatuated with
>female boobs too so I guess the question is if there's anyone that isn't
>interested in this boobage?

*** males nurse on penises.

On 09/04/2011 10:35 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

>>
>> The answer to this is "yes - of course." The question I have is if ***
>> guys are seriously interested in female boobs. I think it could go
>> either way. OTOH, Hetro gals and *******s are also infatuated with
>> female boobs too so I guess the question is if there's anyone that isn't
>> interested in this boobage?
>
> *** males nurse on penises.



Reminds me of when I was the ICU 5 months ago. There was always lots of
conversation right outside my room at shift change as the two shifts of
nurses had a few minutes to talk. One of the male nurses was happy to
have scored a pair of ticket to Priscilla Queen of the Desert. He said
that he wanted to take his girlfriend. Call me a skeptic, but....
male nurse.... theatre tickets.... a play about a drag queen. ?? That's
three stereotypes in a row.

In article > ,
dsi1 > wrote:

> On 4/8/2011 10:35 PM, Omelet wrote:
> > In >,
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:25:57 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Honor the ladies:
> >>>>> http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/bra-fit-guide
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this what you do first thing in the morning? It sure seems that
> >>>> way.

> >> You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
> >> "serious". You're infatuated with boobs.

> > Aren't most "normal" Hetero' men?
>
> The answer to this is "yes - of course."

The answer is "no, of course not. I don't get up in the morning and
read bra fitting instructions. And, yes, of course I checked them.
They didn't have nearly enough pictures.

:-)

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

. And now you're stuck in eternal limbo for the rest of your
life while your pee-pee doesn't work any more.when he squats to pee he really
isn't quite sure just where just where the moisture is originating from.
Neither he nor his sweetie could ever find it much less get even the
slightest quiver out of it. So, he got dumped for lack of performance.
Job not well done.You're infatuated with boobs.

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:40:59 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:25:57 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Honor the ladies:
>>>> http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/bra-fit-guide
>>>
>>>Is this what you do first thing in the morning? It sure seems that
>>>way.
>>>
>>>It's too bad you didn't get any while you were younger and more
>>>virile. And now you're stuck in eternal limbo for the rest of your
>>>life while your pee-pee doesn't work any more.
>>
>> Being how out of dozens of peeps you're the only one who took my post
>> seriously proves that your rant is describing yourself, the 8th Dwarf:
>> Impotent! <G>
>
>You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
>"serious". You're infatuated with boobs.

That's what happens when a mother breast feeds a kid until they leave
home.

Lou

On 4/9/2011 6:33 AM, Dan Abel wrote:
> In ws.com>,
> > wrote:
>
>> On 4/8/2011 10:35 PM, Omelet wrote:
>>> In >,
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:25:57 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Honor the ladies:
>>>>>>> http://www.stylelist.com/2011/04/01/bra-fit-guide
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this what you do first thing in the morning? It sure seems that
>>>>>> way.
>
>>>> You post about boobs on average of ONCE A DAY. That's when it becomes
>>>> "serious". You're infatuated with boobs.
>
>>> Aren't most "normal" Hetero' men?
>>
>> The answer to this is "yes - of course."
>
> The answer is "no, of course not. I don't get up in the morning and
> read bra fitting instructions. And, yes, of course I checked them.
> They didn't have nearly enough pictures.
>
> :-)
>

I'm not a boobie crazed maniac but it's really a strain when a gal with
a large amount of cleavage stands in front of me and holds a
conversation. What's a guy to do? I can only do one thing at a time and
can actually feel my mind losing it's feeble grip on the topic at hand...

On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 10:50:29 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 09/04/2011 10:35 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The answer to this is "yes - of course." The question I have is if ***
>>> guys are seriously interested in female boobs. I think it could go
>>> either way. OTOH, Hetro gals and *******s are also infatuated with
>>> female boobs too so I guess the question is if there's anyone that isn't
>>> interested in this boobage?
>>
>> *** males nurse on penises.
>
>
>
>Reminds me of when I was the ICU 5 months ago. There was always lots of
>conversation right outside my room at shift change as the two shifts of
>nurses had a few minutes to talk. One of the male nurses was happy to
>have scored a pair of ticket to Priscilla Queen of the Desert. He said
>that he wanted to take his girlfriend. Call me a skeptic, but....
>male nurse.... theatre tickets.... a play about a drag queen. ?? That's
>three stereotypes in a row.

And I'm sure his girlfriend wasn't a GIRL.

On 4/9/2011 6:19 PM, Omelet wrote:
> In article
> >,
> > wrote:
>
>>>> I'm not a boobie crazed maniac but it's really a strain when a gal with
>>>> a large amount of cleavage stands in front of me and holds a
>>>> conversation. What's a guy to do? I can only do one thing at a time and
>>>> can actually feel my mind losing it's feeble grip on the topic at hand...
>>>
>>> Women take offence to that with a "you think I'm a sexual object for your
>>> gratification don't you, quit looking at my breasts you pig I'm up here".
>>> Be smart and look her straight in the eye, don't wander or you'll pay for
>>> it.
>>> Then there are the women who like that sort of thing, but that's a topic
>>> for
>>> another day ;-)
>>
>> I already know of this. It's a very important rule to learn. OTOH,
>> I've been caught sneaking a peak. I've also caught females taking a
>> peek at the goodies too. Gosh, women can be such animals!
>
> <chuckles> Contrary to popular belief, women are only human too. ;-)
> I, for one, like a man with a nice tight ass tucked in a pair of tight
> jeans...

Women got it easy. If boobs were located on your backs and not just
within our peripheral vision, straying eyes would be duck soup to keep
under control and then we'd be able to focus our full attention to your
faces. Women's faces are great but it's under a lot of competition for a
man's attention. Sometimes the competition gets really heavy...

On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:54:51 -0500, Omelet >
wrote:

>In article >,
> dsi1 > wrote:
>
>> On 4/9/2011 6:19 PM, Omelet wrote:
>> > In article
>> > >,
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >>>> I'm not a boobie crazed maniac but it's really a strain when a gal with
>> >>>> a large amount of cleavage stands in front of me and holds a
>> >>>> conversation. What's a guy to do? I can only do one thing at a time and
>> >>>> can actually feel my mind losing it's feeble grip on the topic at hand...
>> >>>
>> >>> Women take offence to that with a "you think I'm a sexual object for your
>> >>> gratification don't you, quit looking at my breasts you pig I'm up here".
>> >>> Be smart and look her straight in the eye, don't wander or you'll pay for
>> >>> it.
>> >>> Then there are the women who like that sort of thing, but that's a topic
>> >>> for
>> >>> another day ;-)
>> >>
>> >> I already know of this. It's a very important rule to learn. OTOH,
>> >> I've been caught sneaking a peak. I've also caught females taking a
>> >> peek at the goodies too. Gosh, women can be such animals!
>> >
>> > <chuckles> Contrary to popular belief, women are only human too. ;-)
>> > I, for one, like a man with a nice tight ass tucked in a pair of tight
>> > jeans...
>>
>> Women got it easy. If boobs were located on your backs and not just
>> within our peripheral vision, straying eyes would be duck soup to keep
>> under control and then we'd be able to focus our full attention to your
>> faces. Women's faces are great but it's under a lot of competition for a
>> man's attention. Sometimes the competition gets really heavy...
>
>Good makeup can really enhance the eyes without making you look like a
>whore. That can be distracting too. :-)

When a guy tells a large breasted woman that she has great eyes
there's no way she believes him... first opportunity she'll ask him
what color are her eyes and he will guess wrong. I'll bet most
husbands don't know the color of their wife's eyes... even if they
check em out tonight by next week they will have forgotten... but
every man has the bra size of every women he's ever been with commited
to memory forever. No husband knows his wife's shoe size, dress size,
glove size, hat size, or even her panty size (he had best not guess
that one), but every husband knows his wife's bra size better than he
knows his own SSN.

On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 20:16:18 -1000, dsi1
> wrote:

>On 4/9/2011 6:19 PM, Omelet wrote:
>> In article
>> >,
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>>> I'm not a boobie crazed maniac but it's really a strain when a gal with
>>>>> a large amount of cleavage stands in front of me and holds a
>>>>> conversation. What's a guy to do? I can only do one thing at a time and
>>>>> can actually feel my mind losing it's feeble grip on the topic at hand...
>>>>
>>>> Women take offence to that with a "you think I'm a sexual object for your
>>>> gratification don't you, quit looking at my breasts you pig I'm up here".
>>>> Be smart and look her straight in the eye, don't wander or you'll pay for
>>>> it.
>>>> Then there are the women who like that sort of thing, but that's a topic
>>>> for
>>>> another day ;-)
>>>
>>> I already know of this. It's a very important rule to learn. OTOH,
>>> I've been caught sneaking a peak. I've also caught females taking a
>>> peek at the goodies too. Gosh, women can be such animals!
>>
>> <chuckles> Contrary to popular belief, women are only human too. ;-)
>> I, for one, like a man with a nice tight ass tucked in a pair of tight
>> jeans...
>
>Women got it easy. If boobs were located on your backs and not just
>within our peripheral vision, straying eyes would be duck soup to keep
>under control and then we'd be able to focus our full attention to your
>faces. Women's faces are great but it's under a lot of competition for a
>man's attention. Sometimes the competition gets really heavy...

If women exposed them on a regular basis I'd bet the fascination would
die off pretty fast. An exception might be the occasional perfect
pair of breasts whatever that means. I myself find other areas of a
woman far more interesting.

Lou

On 4/10/2011 1:54 AM, Omelet wrote:
>
> Good makeup can really enhance the eyes without making you look like a
> whore. That can be distracting too. :-)

You're right about this. My fearless prediction is that in the future,
men will wear mascara. Mansacra? :-)

On 4/10/2011 6:11 AM, Lou Decruss wrote:
> If women exposed them on a regular basis I'd bet the fascination would
> die off pretty fast. An exception might be the occasional perfect
> pair of breasts whatever that means. I myself find other areas of a
> woman far more interesting.
>
> Lou

You're absolutely right about this. Our only problem now is how to get
them exposed on a regular basis.

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:22:26 -1000, dsi1
> wrote:

>On 4/10/2011 6:11 AM, Lou Decruss wrote:
>> If women exposed them on a regular basis I'd bet the fascination would
>> die off pretty fast. An exception might be the occasional perfect
>> pair of breasts whatever that means. I myself find other areas of a
>> woman far more interesting.
>>
>> Lou
>
>You're absolutely right about this. Our only problem now is how to get
>them exposed on a regular basis.

After a certain age they're better left concealed. Naked beauty is
only a light switch away and that goes for both sexes when we get
older.

Lou