On 5/18/2011 3:27 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
>
> Not here in STL!! We regularly have pumps which have 3 grades of
> gasoline and diesel all on the same pump!
>
> John Kuthe...

On this rock, it's the same way. There's little chance of filing a car
with diesel though - the nozzle won't fit. I guess you could fill a
diesel with gas - that would suck too.

On May 18, 8:41*pm, dsi1 > wrote:
> On 5/18/2011 3:27 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
>
>
>
> > Not here in STL!! We regularly have pumps which have 3 grades of
> > gasoline and diesel all on the same pump!
>
> > John Kuthe...
>
> On this rock, it's the same way. There's little chance of filing a car
> with diesel though - the nozzle won't fit. I guess you could fill a
> diesel with gas - that would suck too.

It would destroy your diesel engine. Putting diesel into a gas engine
just means draining and cleaning.

--Bryan

On 5/18/2011 3:58 PM, Bryan wrote:
> On May 18, 8:41 pm, > wrote:
>> On 5/18/2011 3:27 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Not here in STL!! We regularly have pumps which have 3 grades of
>>> gasoline and diesel all on the same pump!
>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>>
>> On this rock, it's the same way. There's little chance of filing a car
>> with diesel though - the nozzle won't fit. I guess you could fill a
>> diesel with gas - that would suck too.
>
> It would destroy your diesel engine. Putting diesel into a gas engine
> just means draining and cleaning.
>
> --Bryan

I have heard that gas in a diesel will do this but I suspect that it's
one of those things that everybody knows but nobody's really tried to
test out.

As far as the nozzle for diesel fitting into the filler for gasoline, my
guess is that the federal nozzle compliance squad didn't get to your
neck of the woods or the owners of the station just replaced the nozzle
with a standard one instead of waiting a couple of weeks to have a new
oversized diesel nozzle shipped in. This probably happens quite
frequently. Check to see if there's a federal requirement for this and
if there is, try to extort money from the owners. Good luck! :-)

A happy ending for me to the hail storm that dropped baseball-sized
hail on the Chevy dealer.

Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
green clunker. And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
control. The only downside is it's red, not white, but it sure was
the right price.

I bought it through their internet sales dept. The guy offered it at
that great discount over email.

--Bryan

On Sat, 28 May 2011 18:54:06 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> wrote:

> I bought it through their internet sales dept. The guy offered it at
> that great discount over email.

That's the way we bought our last car too.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

Bwrrryan wrote:
>
>Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
>thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
>you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
>more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
>green clunker. And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
>control.

WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? I've had cruise control in
my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic and in no
traffic can lull you into a comatose state. I even have cruise
control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn at the end of
a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an
accident (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.

On May 29, 8:02*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> Bwrrryan wrote:
>
> >Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
> >thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
> >you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
> >more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
> >green clunker. *And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
> >control. *
>
> WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? *I've had cruise control in
> my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
> no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic

I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. It
makes one's right leg happier on long drives.

> and in no traffic can lull you into a comatose state.

Maybe it could "lull [YOU] into a comatose state."

>*I even have cruise control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn at the end of
> a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. *Cruise control is an accident
> (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen. *

You're especially full of shit this time.

--Bryan

On Sun, 29 May 2011 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> wrote:

>
> I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. It
> makes one's right leg happier on long drives.

It's especially good for wide open highways that are devoid of
anything to remind you of your lead foot on the gas pedal.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:27:37 -0500, Andy wrote:

> Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>
>> WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? I've had cruise control in
>> my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
>> no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic and in no
>> traffic can lull you into a comatose state. I even have cruise
>> control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn at the end of
>> a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an
>> accident (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.
>
> Cruise control is mandatory for safe behind the wheel blow jobs!
>
> Andy

what in the hell would you know about that? (unless you were giving them.)

blake

On May 29, 11:39*am, sf > wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
>
> > wrote:
>
> > I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. *It
> > makes one's right leg happier on long drives.
>
> It's especially good for wide open highways that are devoid of
> anything to remind you of your lead foot on the gas pedal.
>
Which helps keep me from getting a 78 in a 65 ticket. In a 65, I can
set it for 71-72, and not have to worry about speeding tickets.

--Bryan

bryan,

sorry you are wrong this time. he is NOT especially full of shit, he is
TOTALLY full of it...

we started getting cc back in the eighties, new or used, have had it put on
when not present... it is a wonderful tool in general, better for safety,
easier on the back of the driver, and if traffic is going too fast and
someone gets pulled over you won't be that person in most cases because your
speed is constant... and i can't think of one disadvantage.

Lee
"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
On May 29, 8:02 am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> Bwrrryan wrote:
>
> >Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
> >thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
> >you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
> >more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
> >green clunker. And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
> >control.
>
> WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? I've had cruise control in
> my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
> no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic

I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. It
makes one's right leg happier on long drives.

> and in no traffic can lull you into a comatose state.

Maybe it could "lull [YOU] into a comatose state."

> I even have cruise control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn
> at the end of
> a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an accident
> (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.

You're especially full of shit this time.

--Bryan

"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
> On May 29, 11:39 am, sf > wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 May 2011 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
>>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. It
>> > makes one's right leg happier on long drives.
>>
>> It's especially good for wide open highways that are devoid of
>> anything to remind you of your lead foot on the gas pedal.
>>
> Which helps keep me from getting a 78 in a 65 ticket. In a 65, I can
> set it for 71-72, and not have to worry about speeding tickets.
>
> --Bryan

Cruise control has saved me many a ticket. I set if for 5 over the posted
speed and I can go right by a radar trap and have never been stopped.
Without it, on a long drive it is easy to creep up into the danger zone.

A couple of months ago I was in the left lane at 70 mph barely passing a few
cars in the right probably doing 69 mph. The guy behind me was impatient
and badly wanted to get by me. After I passed the last car, I moved to the
right and he went right by me. About 100 yards later, the State Police
cruiser signaled him over for a speeding ticket.

On 29/05/2011 3:51 PM, Storrmmee wrote:
>
> we started getting cc back in the eighties, new or used, have had it put on
> when not present... it is a wonderful tool in general, better for safety,
> easier on the back of the driver, and if traffic is going too fast and
> someone gets pulled over you won't be that person in most cases because your
> speed is constant... and i can't think of one disadvantage.


Yep. I like it for that reason. I can set my speed and just cruise along
without worrying about my lead foot getting me a ticket. I have had a
few cars that tend to be going much faster than they feel.... compared
to the other pieces of crap I drove.

>
> L
>> I even have cruise control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn
>> at the end of
>> a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an accident
>> (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.
>
> You're especially full of shit this time.


I wouldn't go to the bank on that one. I have a lawn tractor with
cruise control, and the one before this one had it too. Most lawn
tractors require that you keep a foot on a pedal with pressure. It gets
tedious after a while, so they have a cruise control lever to hold it at
that speed. As soon as you step on the brake it deactivates.

"Andy" > wrote

>>
>> Cruise control has saved me many a ticket. I set if for 5 over the
>> posted speed and I can go right by a radar trap and have never been
>> stopped. Without it, on a long drive it is easy to creep up into the
>> danger zone.
>>
>> A couple of months ago I was in the left lane at 70 mph barely passing
>> a few cars in the right probably doing 69 mph. The guy behind me was
>> impatient and badly wanted to get by me. After I passed the last car,
>> I moved to the right and he went right by me. About 100 yards later,
>> the State Police cruiser signaled him over for a speeding ticket.
>
>
> Ed,
>
> So, obviously the Indy 500 is not in your near future!?
>
> Me neither! <G>
>
> Best,
>
> Andy
> [waving from Media]
> Top all time land speed: 130mph

Don't say that. There is one stretch of that same highway that is rarely
ever patrolled, had good visibility if it was and I've topped 100 there
often. Top was 120 so far. I want to try for full speed that my car is
supposedly capable of (137), but I've not had that chance yet.

I do know of a few places they lay in wait so I avoid speeding there.

On May 30, 1:56*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On May 29, 11:39*am, sf > wrote:> On Sun, 29 May 2011 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. *It
> > > makes one's right leg happier on long drives.
>
> > It's especially good for wide open highways that are devoid of
> > anything to remind you of your lead foot on the gas pedal.
>
> Which helps keep me from getting a 78 in a 65 ticket. *In a 65, I can
> set it for 71-72, and not have to worry about speeding tickets.
>
> --Bryan

Bingo. You are spot on, Bryan.
I was on the road for my Bank for over 7 yrs (visiting branches) and
did exactly that in Country Western Australia. No tickets, always
+5kph over (occasional warning flash on the oncoming copper's
headlights.)
Even is city traffic it does the same thing. If you can't cope with
it, or it scares you to think it won't "turn off" fast enough, perhaps
you shouldn't be sharing my road?

Bwrrrryan wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>>*I even have cruise control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn at the end of
>> a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. *Cruise control is an accident
>> (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen. *
>
>You're especially full of shit this time.

Are you doubting tractors have cruise control, what an imbecile... not
only to tractors have cruise control many have GPS control, don't even
need a driver. If folks knew what tractors cost they'd better
understand food prices.
http://www.brighthub.com/electronics...les/49812.aspx

On 5/29/2011 9:02 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> Bwrrryan wrote:
>>
>> Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
>> thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
>> you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
>> more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
>> green clunker. And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
>> control.
>
> WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? I've had cruise control in
> my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
> no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic and in no
> traffic can lull you into a comatose state. I even have cruise
> control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn at the end of
> a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an
> accident (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.
>

I use cruise control often. And I'm more aware of what's going on
around me on the road so I can disengage it if needed quickly.

It's too easy to speed when the traffic is light. This ensures that you
don't go over the speed limit.

On May 29, 5:25*pm, "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote:
> "Andy" > wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Cruise control has saved me many a ticket. *I set if for 5 over the
> >> posted speed and I can go right by a radar trap and have never been
> >> stopped. Without it, on a long drive it is easy to creep up into the
> >> danger zone.
>
> >> A couple of months ago I was in the left lane at 70 mph barely passing
> >> a few cars in the right probably doing 69 mph. *The guy behind me was
> >> impatient and badly wanted to get by me. *After I passed the last car,
> >> I moved to the right and he went right by me. *About 100 yards later,
> >> the State Police cruiser signaled him over for a speeding ticket.
>
> > Ed,
>
> > So, obviously the Indy 500 is not in your near future!?
>
> > Me neither! <G>
>
> > Best,
>
> > Andy
> > [waving from Media]
> > Top all time land speed: 130mph
>
> Don't say that. *There is one stretch of that same highway that is rarely
> ever patrolled, had good visibility if it was and I've topped 100 there
> often. *Top was 120 so far. *I want to try for full speed that my car is
> supposedly capable of (137), but I've not had that chance yet.
>
> I do know of a few places they lay in wait so I avoid speeding there.

The only time I've ever gone over 100 was as a passenger in an Olds
Vista Cruiser. I was scared. It was on I-44 in St. Louis County, and
the driver was being very stupid to have done so. I have driven a
Fiat X-1/9 at 95mph for a few miles through KY, and that wasn't very
wise either. I can't imagine ever driving faster than 80 again,
especially since I only drive compact cars. I just bought a new
compact, and only did so because of a great deal I got, and because I
saw little prospect of a great mileage city car being offered for sale
in the USA.

--Bryan

On Sun, 29 May 2011 14:51:57 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote:

> bryan,
>
> sorry you are wrong this time. he is NOT especially full of shit, he is
> TOTALLY full of it...
>
> we started getting cc back in the eighties, new or used, have had it put on
> when not present... it is a wonderful tool in general, better for safety,
> easier on the back of the driver, and if traffic is going too fast and
> someone gets pulled over you won't be that person in most cases because your
> speed is constant... and i can't think of one disadvantage.
>
> Lee
> "Bryan" > wrote in message
> ...
> On May 29, 8:02 am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> > Bwrrryan wrote:
> >
> > >Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
> > >thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
> > >you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
> > >more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
> > >green clunker. And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
> > >control.
> >
> > WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? I've had cruise control in
> > my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
> > no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic
>
> I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. It
> makes one's right leg happier on long drives.
>
> > and in no traffic can lull you into a comatose state.
>
> Maybe it could "lull [YOU] into a comatose state."
>
> > I even have cruise control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to turn
> > at the end of
> > a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an accident
> > (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.
>
> You're especially full of shit this time.
>
This is why the lack of quoting in Window's Live sucks. Bryan is
advocating cruise control, Sheldon is against it.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Sun, 29 May 2011 17:02:40 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> As soon as you step on the brake it deactivates.

That's the way it is with my car's cruise control too.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On May 29, 3:15*pm, "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote:
> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > On May 29, 11:39 am, sf > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 29 May 2011 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. *It
> >> > makes one's right leg happier on long drives.
>
> >> It's especially good for wide open highways that are devoid of
> >> anything to remind you of your lead foot on the gas pedal.
>
> > Which helps keep me from getting a 78 in a 65 ticket. *In a 65, I can
> > set it for 71-72, and not have to worry about speeding tickets.
>
> > --Bryan
>
> Cruise control has saved me many a ticket. *I set if for 5 over the posted
> speed and I can go right by a radar trap and have never been stopped.
> Without it, on a long drive it is easy to creep up into the danger zone.
>
> A couple of months ago I was in the left lane at 70 mph barely passing a few
> cars in the right probably doing 69 mph. *The guy behind me was impatient
> and badly wanted to get by me. *After I passed the last car, I moved to the
> right and he went right by me. *About 100 yards later, the State Police
> cruiser signaled him over for a speeding ticket.

Hee hee! I'd love that! I love my cruise control. I set it to the
speed limit or maybe 3 to 5MPH over, and when overzealous speeders
pass me I say "Go get my ticket for me!"

And when I pass a cop shooting radar, I just smile at them *knowing*
I'm reading at a legal speed! :-)

John Kuthe...

On 29/05/2011 6:54 PM, Hoges in WA wrote:
>
> Bingo. You are spot on, Bryan.
> I was on the road for my Bank for over 7 yrs (visiting branches) and
> did exactly that in Country Western Australia. No tickets, always
> +5kph over (occasional warning flash on the oncoming copper's
> headlights.)


Don't try the % kph over the limit trick in Holland. I was there 10
years ago and driving in what I thought was an 80 kph zone. I never saw
the change in speed limit until I spotted a big wrning sign saying it
was 50 kph and photo radar. I realized I was speeding and immediately
slowed down. Five months later I got the ticket in the mail.... 54 kph
n a 50 kph zone..... 4 kp[h over the limit...walking speed.


> Even is city traffic it does the same thing. If you can't cope with
> it, or it scares you to think it won't "turn off" fast enough, perhaps
> you shouldn't be sharing my road?

The first few cars I had with cruise control would not register under 60
kph, so it wouldn't do much good in the city anyway.

what part of me agreeing with bryan did you miss? i know nothing about
window live, Lee


"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 14:51:57 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> > wrote:
>
>> bryan,
>>
>> sorry you are wrong this time. he is NOT especially full of shit, he is
>> TOTALLY full of it...
>>
>> we started getting cc back in the eighties, new or used, have had it put
>> on
>> when not present... it is a wonderful tool in general, better for safety,
>> easier on the back of the driver, and if traffic is going too fast and
>> someone gets pulled over you won't be that person in most cases because
>> your
>> speed is constant... and i can't think of one disadvantage.
>>
>> Lee
>> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> On May 29, 8:02 am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>> > Bwrrryan wrote:
>> >
>> > >Bought a new hail damaged car this evening. They knocked off over a
>> > >thousand dollars, and you probably wouldn't even notice the dings if
>> > >you weren't looking. Another 1000 off in GM Card savings, and 1500
>> > >more off in instant rebate. I'm now driving a Chevy Aveo. Goodbye old
>> > >green clunker. And it has something I've desired for years, cruise
>> > >control.
>> >
>> > WTF is so wonderful about cruise control? I've had cruise control in
>> > my last three vehicles and never use it, it has only disadvantages and
>> > no advantages... it's dangerous in even light traffic
>>
>> I don't use it in traffic, only on uncrowded divided highways. It
>> makes one's right leg happier on long drives.
>>
>> > and in no traffic can lull you into a comatose state.
>>
>> Maybe it could "lull [YOU] into a comatose state."
>>
>> > I even have cruise control on my tractor, quite useless as slowing to
>> > turn
>> > at the end of
>> > a row or slowing for any reason cancels it. Cruise control is an
>> > accident
>> > (actually an on-purpose) waiting to happen.
>>
>> You're especially full of shit this time.
>>
> This is why the lack of quoting in Window's Live sucks. Bryan is
> advocating cruise control, Sheldon is against it.
>
> --
>
> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Mon, 30 May 2011 12:20:31 -0500, Andy > wrote:

> sf > wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 29 May 2011 17:02:40 -0400, Dave Smith
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> As soon as you step on the brake it deactivates.
> >
> > That's the way it is with my car's cruise control too.
>
>
> sf,
>
> How about you and me cruise control down Lombardo St.?
>
> Dare ya!
>
> I'll need a head start!
>
A challenge, eh? hehehe

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Mon, 30 May 2011 13:25:49 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote:

> what part of me agreeing with bryan did you miss?

Apparently all of it.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

you can reread the post and find the words, he is totally full of it for
starters, Lee
"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 13:25:49 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> > wrote:
>
>> what part of me agreeing with bryan did you miss?
>
> Apparently all of it.
>
> --
>
> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:25:52 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote:

> you can reread the post and find the words, he is totally full of it for
> starters, Lee
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Mon, 30 May 2011 13:25:49 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> what part of me agreeing with bryan did you miss?
> >
> > Apparently all of it.
> >

*Who* is full of it? My interpretation of what you said was that you
were saying Bryan was full of it.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

no brian said asswipe was full of shit or mostly full of shit, and if you
start where i said to brian i had to disagree with him... you can plainly
see from context that my post was to brian about the asswipe... come on sf,
i don't agree with you on much but i haven't ever suspected your eading
comphrhension or context skills were deffecient, go back to my post and read
it in relation to brians, he is the first person to say asswipe had some
measure of shit, Lee


"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:25:52 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> > wrote:
>
>> you can reread the post and find the words, he is totally full of it for
>> starters, Lee
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Mon, 30 May 2011 13:25:49 -0500, "Storrmmee"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> what part of me agreeing with bryan did you miss?
>> >
>> > Apparently all of it.
>> >
>
> *Who* is full of it? My interpretation of what you said was that you
> were saying Bryan was full of it.
>
> --
>
> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:39:46 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote:

> no brian said asswipe was full of shit or mostly full of shit, and if you
> start where i said to brian i had to disagree with him... you can plainly
> see from context that my post was to brian about the asswipe... come on sf,
> i don't agree with you on much but i haven't ever suspected your eading
> comphrhension or context skills were deffecient, go back to my post and read
> it in relation to brians, he is the first person to say asswipe had some
> measure of shit, Lee

Thanks for interpreting. I've had enough of it; no need to torture
myself any further.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

sorry the spelling was so poor, weather change again, time to rest hands,
Lee
"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:39:46 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> > wrote:
>
>> no brian said asswipe was full of shit or mostly full of shit, and if
>> you
>> start where i said to brian i had to disagree with him... you can plainly
>> see from context that my post was to brian about the asswipe... come on
>> sf,
>> i don't agree with you on much but i haven't ever suspected your eading
>> comphrhension or context skills were deffecient, go back to my post and
>> read
>> it in relation to brians, he is the first person to say asswipe had some
>> measure of shit, Lee
>
> Thanks for interpreting. I've had enough of it; no need to torture
> myself any further.
>
> --
>
> Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

On 5/30/2011 3:07 PM, sf wrote:

> On Mon, 30 May 2011 12:20:31 -0500, > wrote:
>> sf,
>> >
>> > How about you and me cruise control down Lombardo St.?
>> >
>> > Dare ya!
>> >
>> > I'll need a head start!
>> >
> A challenge, eh? hehehe

I don't even want to drive down that road again at all let alone cruise
control. Yes, I know he wasn't serious. When is he ever?