Lee wrote:

> romantic designs and sw simply does not compute, my brain won't process
> that.

It's not like Sycophant's any prize herself; maybe she thinks she's "playing
in her league" by going after Sqwertz.

One would think that since the interest isn't mutual, her efforts are
ultimately doomed, but I'm not one to question that kind of thing: With Lin
I am *way* out of my league, and I happily admit it.

Bob

Lew wrote about clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz:

> i really have some serious pity for the fool

Did you have to put on ten pounds of gold chains before posting that, Miz T?

Bob

On Jul 7, 12:15*pm, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> lol, different strokes, actually if i could see and was god of usnet,
> anything that is a line or less would be top posted, anything more and it
> would go to the bottom, and people who answer in line wouldn't appear at
> all, but that is just what i think i would want if i could still see. *the
> point is that while conventions are nice, some of this net copping and
> flaming over it is why people leave here nd go elsewhere for moderated
> groups,
>
> i don't like moderated anything, and i am not going anywhere so m y kf
> button is my friend,
>
> Lee, wishing she could use thunderbird
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "dsi1" > wrote in ....
> > On 7/6/2011 5:01 AM, Storrmmee wrote:
> >> how arrogant to think one can pass a judgement on what is and is not
> >> nessary, this is not only hillarious, but pompus and arrogant, next sw
> >> will
> >> be telling those of you with children how many is nessary... too funny,
> >> Lee
>
> > I view these posts by using a T-bird preview screen. I don't know how
> > everybody else reads newsgroups but your top posting saves me the trouble
> > of having relocate my pointer to the little box thingie and dragging down
> > to scroll to the bottom. I guess everybody else must have some kind of
> > automatic scrolling gizmo or they really enjoy being forced to make the
> > same sequence of moves over and over again.
>
> >> "Steve > *wrote in message
> ...
> >>> > *wrote:
>
> >>>> Lee is the only one here who consistently top posts unnecessarily.
>
> >>> That's right, and because she's the only one doing it, it's not that
> >>> irritating. *If half the newsgroup were doing it, it would be a
> >>> nightmare, but as it is, it's no big deal.
>
> >>> S.

==
I am sure that I could teach you to bottom post like a pro in fewer
than five minutes using OE with or without "quote-fix". It is not
rocket science. Same with "Live Mail" or "Thunderbird" and at the same
time use proper capitalization and spacing.
==

Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be all
> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if he
> treats them good then there should be something to salvage/like about
> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee "cshenk" >

LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number mentioned and
he seems to take the best of care of them that he knows how. A much
better care than most do if i can believe what he posts (always
problematic with him).

I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best care to
his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial in his mind and
trip out his fingers at times.

From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs to so
as to feed the cats.

I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly at
home, feeding the deer and cats.

Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with sheldon
when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts and he has
many of them. Takes time though to understand them!

i
l pass, thanks, Lee

"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
eb.com...
> Lee replied to sf and me:
>
>>>> Don't forget that Sycophant had romantic designs on Sqwertz at one
>>>> time,
>>>> and she still has a soft spot for him.
>>>
>>> Or so he likes to claim.
>>>
>> i have no idea, i chose to not read any of that when i realised what it
>> was about, Lee now needing a rolaids
>
>
> JUST a Rolaids? Most of us needed a boiling hot shower (preferably with
> bleach and a wire brush) after reading her sordid -- and allegedly
> inadvertent -- disclosures!
>
> To sf, we had this discussion before. Sycophant wrote to Sqwertz, "I'm not
> interesting in sharing [my house] with some selfish, nasty little prick
> that
> is unable to hold down a stable job." She tried to play it off like she
> was talking about her FATHER! Of course, then it came out that she had at
> one time wanted Steve to move in with her.
>
> If you want to Google to refresh your memory, the thread was "OT: Far Out
> Chicks on Heavy Drugs".
>
> Bob
>

well, to be honest, i figure dh was not processing correctly when we got
together, so i try to not judge others coupling, if he had any sense he
could have done much better, but i am glad he choose me instead, Lee


"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message
eb.com...
> Lee wrote:
>
>> romantic designs and sw simply does not compute, my brain won't process
>> that.
>
> It's not like Sycophant's any prize herself; maybe she thinks she's
> "playing in her league" by going after Sqwertz.
>
> One would think that since the interest isn't mutual, her efforts are
> ultimately doomed, but I'm not one to question that kind of thing: With
> Lin I am *way* out of my league, and I happily admit it.
>
> Bob
>

i know the steps to bottom posting the s/r program won't allow it, unless
you want to cough up three grand for the system that will allow it i am
stuck top posting, now proper caps is a matter of being able to reach the
shift key with my fingers, somedays, and even some sentences, maybe, other
times no, that i wish i could change but its a matter of how the joints are
doing.

i ws so thrilled when i first installed thunderbird, it had that little
check mark that said, always post at bottom great... i set it all up, s/r
worked perfectlu through set up and then i opened a message... total lock up
no reading, i tink newer versions of what i use to read with might work, but
i am not serious enough about bottom posting to spend three grand, hope that
makes sense, lee

"Roy" > wrote in message
...
On Jul 7, 12:15 pm, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> lol, different strokes, actually if i could see and was god of usnet,
> anything that is a line or less would be top posted, anything more and it
> would go to the bottom, and people who answer in line wouldn't appear at
> all, but that is just what i think i would want if i could still see. the
> point is that while conventions are nice, some of this net copping and
> flaming over it is why people leave here nd go elsewhere for moderated
> groups,
>
> i don't like moderated anything, and i am not going anywhere so m y kf
> button is my friend,
>
> Lee, wishing she could use thunderbird
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "dsi1" > wrote in
> ...
> > On 7/6/2011 5:01 AM, Storrmmee wrote:
> >> how arrogant to think one can pass a judgement on what is and is not
> >> nessary, this is not only hillarious, but pompus and arrogant, next sw
> >> will
> >> be telling those of you with children how many is nessary... too funny,
> >> Lee
>
> > I view these posts by using a T-bird preview screen. I don't know how
> > everybody else reads newsgroups but your top posting saves me the
> > trouble
> > of having relocate my pointer to the little box thingie and dragging
> > down
> > to scroll to the bottom. I guess everybody else must have some kind of
> > automatic scrolling gizmo or they really enjoy being forced to make the
> > same sequence of moves over and over again.
>
> >> "Steve > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> > wrote:
>
> >>>> Lee is the only one here who consistently top posts unnecessarily.
>
> >>> That's right, and because she's the only one doing it, it's not that
> >>> irritating. If half the newsgroup were doing it, it would be a
> >>> nightmare, but as it is, it's no big deal.
>
> >>> S.

==
I am sure that I could teach you to bottom post like a pro in fewer
than five minutes using OE with or without "quote-fix". It is not
rocket science. Same with "Live Mail" or "Thunderbird" and at the same
time use proper capitalization and spacing.
==

On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:01:58 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

> Lee replied to sf and me:
>
> >>> Don't forget that Sycophant had romantic designs on Sqwertz at one time,
> >>> and she still has a soft spot for him.
> >>
> >> Or so he likes to claim.
> >>
> > i have no idea, i chose to not read any of that when i realised what it
> > was about, Lee now needing a rolaids
>
>
> JUST a Rolaids? Most of us needed a boiling hot shower (preferably with
> bleach and a wire brush) after reading her sordid -- and allegedly
> inadvertent -- disclosures!
>
> To sf, we had this discussion before. Sycophant wrote to Sqwertz, "I'm not
> interesting in sharing [my house] with some selfish, nasty little prick that
> is unable to hold down a stable job." She tried to play it off like she was
> talking about her FATHER! Of course, then it came out that she had at one
> time wanted Steve to move in with her.
>
> If you want to Google to refresh your memory, the thread was "OT: Far Out
> Chicks on Heavy Drugs".
>
I don't need to. I remember the thread and I remember the comment. I
also remember knowing what she was talking about and then you jumped
in to muddy the waters.
>


--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

you are a better person than i am then, i migt give him another chance, i
would starve before letting the cats be hungry one single day, i mean i took
them in they depend on us for their food/care, so its up to us to do it,
lee, says as she remembers last month's vet bills...

we had the annual trek to the vet for all six of ours, then the next week an
intensive dental for chester, who is now we discover, in the early sgttages
of kidney issues,

Lee again
"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be all
>> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if he
>> treats them good then there should be something to salvage/like about
>> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee "cshenk" >
>
> LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number mentioned and
> he seems to take the best of care of them that he knows how. A much
> better care than most do if i can believe what he posts (always
> problematic with him).
>
> I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best care to
> his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial in his mind and
> trip out his fingers at times.
>
> From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs to so
> as to feed the cats.
>
> I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
> he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
> same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly at
> home, feeding the deer and cats.
>
> Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with sheldon
> when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts and he has
> many of them. Takes time though to understand them!

On 7/7/2011 2:53 PM, notbob wrote:
> On 2011-07-07, > wrote:
>>
>> I couldn't care less.....
>
> Obviously.
>
> Top posting and not trimming. What's next. Bad spelling?
>
> nb

Feel free to bitch about other people's spelling. I couldn't care less...

:-)

projectile vomit chick wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2:00 pm, Andy > wrote:
>>
>> Lee, Don't top post!
>>
>> You may want to think you're being a trendsetter
>> but from decades of
>> membership here on Usenet, you are pointlessly
>> "swimming against the
>> tide" by top posting. You can't even finish the
>> end of your top
>> postings correctly.
>>
>> The obvious fact that you won't conform to a
>> simple worldwide
>> established "bottom posting" norm from years gone
>> by, makes you a
>> stubborn shithead!
>>
>> You can't even top post correctly!!! You must be
>> what, a 5th grader?
>
> I think she's legally blind. She posts that way
> because it's easier
> for her. I don't mind it. I like what she posts.

Andy. The Net Cop.

On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:55:03 -0500, Storrmmee wrote:

<WRT top posting, not trimming and bad spelling>

> i already got that covered, lol, Lee

Your not trimming posts and bad spelling and/or typos don't bother me in
the least. However, I admit that your top posting (to a group where the
vast majority don't practice it themselves) becomes confusing when trying
to read who said what to whom in a given thread... (not that my opinion
matters one iota to you, I'm willing to bet).

FWIW, I am also fairly sure you are not the only 'officially blind' person
who participates in r.f.c. - heck, even the poster who calls himself
"Orlando" manages to 'middle post' and 'bottom post' on the odd occasions
he joins in the discussions here.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:00:34 -0500, Andy wrote:

> "Storrmmee" > wrote:
>
>> that is way far above my brain grade, and it was funny as it was stuck
>> on something like stir or whip or something, so it just kep saying all
>> but the last letter and it kept getting quicker... and when these s/rs
>> malfunction the octave of the voice goes up in a sliding way... so at
>> the point where it was resembling that star trek episode where kirk
>> convinced the thing it had made a mistake and it was self destructing
>> is where she had to do a manual shut down... it is funny now but it
>> sure wasn't then, Lee "Cheryl" > wrote in
>> message ...
>>> On 7/6/2011 7:27 PM, Storrmmee wrote:
>
> Lee, Don't top post!
>
> You may want to think you're being a trendsetter but from decades of
> membership here on Usenet, you are pointlessly "swimming against the
> tide" by top posting. You can't even finish the end of your top postings
> correctly.
>
> The obvious fact that you won't conform to a simple worldwide established
> "bottom posting" norm from years gone by, makes you a stubborn shithead!
>
> You can't even top post correctly!!! You must be what, a 5th grader?
>
> Andy

she's blind, you asshole. her software defaults to that.

blake

On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 01:03:36 -0400, John Smythe wrote:

> projectile vomit chick wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 2:00 pm, Andy > wrote:
>>>
>>> Lee, Don't top post!
>>>
>>> You may want to think you're being a trendsetter
>>> but from decades of
>>> membership here on Usenet, you are pointlessly
>>> "swimming against the
>>> tide" by top posting. You can't even finish the
>>> end of your top
>>> postings correctly.
>>>
>>> The obvious fact that you won't conform to a
>>> simple worldwide
>>> established "bottom posting" norm from years gone
>>> by, makes you a
>>> stubborn shithead!
>>>
>>> You can't even top post correctly!!! You must be
>>> what, a 5th grader?
>>
>> I think she's legally blind. She posts that way
>> because it's easier
>> for her. I don't mind it. I like what she posts.
>
> Andy. The Net Cop.

more like the net idiot.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:07:03 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote:

>
> Night of the serious fabricator... HTF does someone who claims they
> have a serious vision problem make 10 posts within 25 minutes to just
> this one thread... this lying Lee sees better than anyone at rfc.

you are one ignorant, nasty ****.

blake

On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 19:57:40 -0500, Storrmmee wrote:

> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be all bad he
> has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if he treats them good
> then there should be something to salvage/like about him, but err, well, i
> don't see it, lee

um, no. being nasty to people makes him an asshole, no matter how nice he
is to his cats.

your pal,
blake

> "cshenk" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> Night of the serious fabricator... HTF does someone who claims they
>>> have a serious vision problem make 10 posts within 25 minutes to just
>>> this one thread... this lying Lee sees better than anyone at rfc.
>>
>> You are right in a way. Lee 'sees' better than most of us. Certainly
>> better than you do for all that her actual eye vision is no longer
>> there.

On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:

> Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be all
>> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if he
>> treats them good then there should be something to salvage/like about
>> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee "cshenk" >
>
> LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number mentioned and
> he seems to take the best of care of them that he knows how. A much
> better care than most do if i can believe what he posts (always
> problematic with him).
>
> I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best care to
> his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial in his mind and
> trip out his fingers at times.
>
> From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs to so
> as to feed the cats.
>
> I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
> he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
> same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly at
> home, feeding the deer and cats.
>
> Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with sheldon
> when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts and he has
> many of them. Takes time though to understand them!

'many' good parts? like what?

your pal,
blake

orlando has a much better system than i do, if i had his system and skills i
would probably be better at it, he and i have talked off group, his system
is designed for academic work and much more sophistocated than mine.

what i do appreciate is the fact that you are so polite about it, that makes
all the difference in the world to me. I am sure that many who post here
and on other groups have lots of differing levels of disablities... and some
luckily can be handled with the basics that microsoft offers,

two best for people who wear glasses are magnifier and customising
stylesheets.

Lee
"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:55:03 -0500, Storrmmee wrote:
>
> <WRT top posting, not trimming and bad spelling>
>
>> i already got that covered, lol, Lee
>
> Your not trimming posts and bad spelling and/or typos don't bother me in
> the least. However, I admit that your top posting (to a group where the
> vast majority don't practice it themselves) becomes confusing when trying
> to read who said what to whom in a given thread... (not that my opinion
> matters one iota to you, I'm willing to bet).
>
> FWIW, I am also fairly sure you are not the only 'officially blind' person
> who participates in r.f.c. - heck, even the poster who calls himself
> "Orlando" manages to 'middle post' and 'bottom post' on the odd occasions
> he joins in the discussions here.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy
>

alas blake,

I fear you are correct, i was thinking earlier how one gets sterotypes in
one's head that doesn't allow for looking outsides one's own little world,

Lee
"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 19:57:40 -0500, Storrmmee wrote:
>
>> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be all bad
>> he
>> has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if he treats them
>> good
>> then there should be something to salvage/like about him, but err, well,
>> i
>> don't see it, lee
>
> um, no. being nasty to people makes him an asshole, no matter how nice he
> is to his cats.
>
> your pal,
> blake
>
>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> Night of the serious fabricator... HTF does someone who claims they
>>>> have a serious vision problem make 10 posts within 25 minutes to just
>>>> this one thread... this lying Lee sees better than anyone at rfc.
>>>
>>> You are right in a way. Lee 'sees' better than most of us. Certainly
>>> better than you do for all that her actual eye vision is no longer
>>> there.

Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> you are a better person than i am then, i migt give him another
> chance, i would starve before letting the cats be hungry one single
> day, i mean i took them in they depend on us for their food/care, so
> its up to us to do it, lee, says as she remembers last month's vet
> bills...

I know the feeling on the bills. Even I am a bit stressed with a close
to 1,400 dollar lay out the last 6 weeks. Thats after my care plan
offset. Then again, I deliberately adopted 2 dogs with medical issues
knowing this would be the cost at times.

> we had the annual trek to the vet for all six of ours, then the next
> week an intensive dental for chester, who is now we discover, in the
> early sgttages of kidney issues,

Mine go every 6 months by default (1 cat, 2 dogs) but often need to be
seen earlier. The good news is we may finally be reaching resolution
on Aunti Mabels's ear issues. A special mail off and culture test on
her and Cash resolve to a primary specific anti-biotic for her and a
yeast yet again for him. Meds and tests for ears last 6 weeks was half
that bill.

In a strange way, Aunti Mabel lucks up. Because she's 14 and deaf as a
doornail, she can use the better med for elderly dogs for the
psuedomonous infection with a higher success rate. See, it's main
negative side effect is 'may cause deafness'. LOL! Not an issue here
for her!

Anyways, Sheldon has his moments like all here and believe it or not,
I'm in some folks killfiles. Sometimes, I'm in them because i can get
****ed off too and flame back. Not my normal modus-operendi but I'm
not all sweetness and light!


--

blake murphy wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be
> all >> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if
> he >> treats them good then there should be something to salvage/like
> about >> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee "cshenk"
> >
> >
> > LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number mentioned
> > and he seems to take the best of care of them that he knows how. A
> > much better care than most do if i can believe what he posts (always
> > problematic with him).
> >
> > I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best care
> > to his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial in his
> > mind and trip out his fingers at times.
> >
> > From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs
> > to so as to feed the cats.
> >
> > I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
> > he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
> > same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly
> > at home, feeding the deer and cats.
> >
> > Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with
> > sheldon when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts
> > and he has many of them. Takes time though to understand them!
>
> 'many' good parts? like what?

Well, when he feels like it, he provides really good answers to peoples
questions with good links.

He obviously takes the best care he knows how of his cats and likes
feeding the local deer.

He can post some simple basic recipes that a regular person at home
might make and some are quite tastey seeming.

Although often fanciful about what he did, the posts really do validate
he had time in the Navy for 1-2 tours with experience as a Navy cook on
shipboard. Like all he would have 'mess cranked' but his details prove
he did more than that for a period of time I estimate to be possibly 3
years though hard to tell.

He can be funny as hell in a droll sort of way if he isnt picking on
'you' (whoever that is, sometimes me and even I can laugh when he picks
on me).

Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you dislike,
but he's real.

--

Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> i know the steps to bottom posting the s/r program won't allow it,
> unless you want to cough up three grand for the system that will
> allow it i am stuck top posting, now proper caps is a matter of being
> able to reach the shift key with my fingers, somedays, and even some
> sentences, maybe, other times no, that i wish i could change but its
> a matter of how the joints are doing.
>
> i ws so thrilled when i first installed thunderbird, it had that
> little check mark that said, always post at bottom great... i set it
> all up, s/r worked perfectlu through set up and then i opened a
> message... total lock up no reading, i tink newer versions of what i
> use to read with might work, but i am not serious enough about bottom
> posting to spend three grand, hope that makes sense, lee

You may want to check. Prices on this have gone up to close to 4,000$
again. I am not sure why. Economy related? Maybe I'm looking at more
additions too.

For a totally adaptive system, still running close to 6 grand. It's
been that since about 2002 when it dropped from 10 grand to 6.

In 1986 they ran 14,000$ and didnt do what the today 3,000$ machines
provide.


--

i quit worrying about whose kf i am in, i post for my enjoyment, i read to
be entertained and learn new things, if you don't fit that cryteria or
become rude, vulgar or abusive to me or others beyond a disagreement you go
in kf,

like sf for example, we don't agree a lot but for the most part we just
don't agree she isn't rude vulgar or nasty to any great degree,

btw, sorry to sf for talking about you like that, just you were the first
one to come to mind. also sometimes someone goes into kf but if i come
across a decent post tht someone has responded to i read and cn't remember
why i put them in kf they come out again until i remember via the repeat
behavior,

Lee


"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
>
> Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> you are a better person than i am then, i migt give him another
>> chance, i would starve before letting the cats be hungry one single
>> day, i mean i took them in they depend on us for their food/care, so
>> its up to us to do it, lee, says as she remembers last month's vet
>> bills...
>
> I know the feeling on the bills. Even I am a bit stressed with a close
> to 1,400 dollar lay out the last 6 weeks. Thats after my care plan
> offset. Then again, I deliberately adopted 2 dogs with medical issues
> knowing this would be the cost at times.
>
>> we had the annual trek to the vet for all six of ours, then the next
>> week an intensive dental for chester, who is now we discover, in the
>> early sgttages of kidney issues,
>
> Mine go every 6 months by default (1 cat, 2 dogs) but often need to be
> seen earlier. The good news is we may finally be reaching resolution
> on Aunti Mabels's ear issues. A special mail off and culture test on
> her and Cash resolve to a primary specific anti-biotic for her and a
> yeast yet again for him. Meds and tests for ears last 6 weeks was half
> that bill.
>
> In a strange way, Aunti Mabel lucks up. Because she's 14 and deaf as a
> doornail, she can use the better med for elderly dogs for the
> psuedomonous infection with a higher success rate. See, it's main
> negative side effect is 'may cause deafness'. LOL! Not an issue here
> for her!
>
> Anyways, Sheldon has his moments like all here and believe it or not,
> I'm in some folks killfiles. Sometimes, I'm in them because i can get
> ****ed off too and flame back. Not my normal modus-operendi but I'm
> not all sweetness and light!
>
>
> --
>

i can tell you why prices are up right now, today, this minute...

I got a call today from a rehab sort, they got stimulus money, they want me
to open a case to see if any of the new stuff will help in my job... i told
her what i really need, and the program i need is 14 hundred, i need an
external drive to run it on, and i need a compact notebook so its easy to
carry but has the power to handle windows data base/spread sheet stuff...
then what i need even more is a gismo that will snapshot things and give a
verbal readout so i can know the denominations of money and invoices for
machine parts.... all told around 11 k last time i looked...

she seems to think they will buy it, i doubt it,

Lee
"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> i know the steps to bottom posting the s/r program won't allow it,
>> unless you want to cough up three grand for the system that will
>> allow it i am stuck top posting, now proper caps is a matter of being
>> able to reach the shift key with my fingers, somedays, and even some
>> sentences, maybe, other times no, that i wish i could change but its
>> a matter of how the joints are doing.
>>
>> i ws so thrilled when i first installed thunderbird, it had that
>> little check mark that said, always post at bottom great... i set it
>> all up, s/r worked perfectlu through set up and then i opened a
>> message... total lock up no reading, i tink newer versions of what i
>> use to read with might work, but i am not serious enough about bottom
>> posting to spend three grand, hope that makes sense, lee
>
> You may want to check. Prices on this have gone up to close to 4,000$
> again. I am not sure why. Economy related? Maybe I'm looking at more
> additions too.
>
> For a totally adaptive system, still running close to 6 grand. It's
> been that since about 2002 when it dropped from 10 grand to 6.
>
> In 1986 they ran 14,000$ and didnt do what the today 3,000$ machines
> provide.
>
>
> --
>

"cshenk" > ha scritto nel messaggio

> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you dislike,
> but he's real.

I doubt it. I watch him wind himself up, getting edgier by the line. He's
working th3e bombast. I don't mind if people go off into0 fantasy worlds, I
just don't like it when they do it by picking on other people. Sheldon and
Andy are obscene in the way they enjoy being cruel and filthy mouthed at
others' expense. That's sociopathic ain anyone's textbook.

Other than the sock puppets, who isn't real? We are not alike, but both of
us are real.

On 7/8/2011 6:40 PM, cshenk wrote:
> blake murphy wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>>> Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be
>> all>> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if
>> he>> treats them good then there should be something to salvage/like
>> about>> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee "cshenk"
>> >
>>>
>>> LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number mentioned
>>> and he seems to take the best of care of them that he knows how. A
>>> much better care than most do if i can believe what he posts (always
>>> problematic with him).
>>>
>>> I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best care
>>> to his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial in his
>>> mind and trip out his fingers at times.
>>>
>>> From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs
>>> to so as to feed the cats.
>>>
>>> I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
>>> he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
>>> same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly
>>> at home, feeding the deer and cats.
>>>
>>> Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with
>>> sheldon when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts
>>> and he has many of them. Takes time though to understand them!
>>
>> 'many' good parts? like what?
>
> Well, when he feels like it, he provides really good answers to peoples
> questions with good links.
>
> He obviously takes the best care he knows how of his cats and likes
> feeding the local deer.
>
> He can post some simple basic recipes that a regular person at home
> might make and some are quite tastey seeming.
>
> Although often fanciful about what he did, the posts really do validate
> he had time in the Navy for 1-2 tours with experience as a Navy cook on
> shipboard. Like all he would have 'mess cranked' but his details prove
> he did more than that for a period of time I estimate to be possibly 3
> years though hard to tell.
>
> He can be funny as hell in a droll sort of way if he isnt picking on
> 'you' (whoever that is, sometimes me and even I can laugh when he picks
> on me).
>
> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you dislike,
> but he's real.
>

Sheldon is a product of Usenet... a place where the socially inept can
safely say things out loud that they would never have the nerve to say
in public. He and I are about the same age and come from the same place
and I'm sure that even he would tell you that anyone who talked to
people in "real life" they way he talks on Usenet.... would find that
his next meal would include a heaping helping of his own teeth.

People who are like this on Usenet tend to be loners in real life.

Another clue to Sheldon is how good he is to his cats, and probably
other animals. People with limited social abilities are very often
great lovers of pets... they get love back and are never rejected.

Sheldon is the kid playing in the sandbox who throws the sand at the
other kids when he isn't getting the attention he needs.

George L

George Leppla wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 7/8/2011 6:40 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > blake murphy wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > > On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> > >
> > > > Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > > >
> > > > > i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't
> > > > > be
> >>all>> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but
> if >>he>> treats them good then there should be something to
> salvage/like >>about>> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee
> "cshenk"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number
> > > > mentioned and he seems to take the best of care of them that he
> > > > knows how. A much better care than most do if i can believe
> > > > what he posts (always problematic with him).
> > > >
> > > > I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best
> > > > care to his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial
> > > > in his mind and trip out his fingers at times.
> > > >
> >>> From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs
> > > > to so as to feed the cats.
> > > >
> > > > I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of
> > > > tuna, he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner.
> > > > All at the same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here
> > > > while quietly at home, feeding the deer and cats.
> > > >
> > > > Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with
> > > > sheldon when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts
> > > > and he has many of them. Takes time though to understand them!
> > >
> > > 'many' good parts? like what?
> >
> > Well, when he feels like it, he provides really good answers to
> > peoples questions with good links.
> >
> > He obviously takes the best care he knows how of his cats and likes
> > feeding the local deer.
> >
> > He can post some simple basic recipes that a regular person at home
> > might make and some are quite tastey seeming.
> >
> > Although often fanciful about what he did, the posts really do
> > validate he had time in the Navy for 1-2 tours with experience as a
> > Navy cook on shipboard. Like all he would have 'mess cranked' but
> > his details prove he did more than that for a period of time I
> > estimate to be possibly 3 years though hard to tell.
> >
> > He can be funny as hell in a droll sort of way if he isnt picking on
> > 'you' (whoever that is, sometimes me and even I can laugh when he
> > picks on me).
> >
> > Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you
> > dislike, but he's real.
> >
>
> Sheldon is a product of Usenet... a place where the socially inept
> can safely say things out loud that they would never have the nerve
> to say in public. He and I are about the same age and come from the
> same place and I'm sure that even he would tell you that anyone who
> talked to people in "real life" they way he talks on Usenet.... would
> find that his next meal would include a heaping helping of his own
> teeth.
>
> People who are like this on Usenet tend to be loners in real life.
>
> Another clue to Sheldon is how good he is to his cats, and probably
> other animals. People with limited social abilities are very often
> great lovers of pets... they get love back and are never rejected.
>
> Sheldon is the kid playing in the sandbox who throws the sand at the
> other kids when he isn't getting the attention he needs.
>
> George L

That is probably also true of him. He's definately a loner and uses
this place as an outlet to garner attention.

--

On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:40:08 -0500, cshenk wrote:

> blake murphy wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>
>>> I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
>>> he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
>>> same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly
>>> at home, feeding the deer and cats.
>>>
>>> Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with
>>> sheldon when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts
>>> and he has many of them. Takes time though to understand them!
>>
>> 'many' good parts? like what?
>
> Well, when he feels like it, he provides really good answers to peoples
> questions with good links.
>

no. nine-tenths of what he posts is flat-out wrong, often laughably so.
if he's trying to prove a point, his links usually do no such thing.

> He obviously takes the best care he knows how of his cats and likes
> feeding the local deer.

frankly, i'd be happier if he was nicer to people. that seems to be beyond
his ability. cats and deer get good treatment because they never
contradict him.

>
> He can post some simple basic recipes that a regular person at home
> might make and some are quite tastey seeming.

when has that happened?

> He can be funny as hell in a droll sort of way

are you kidding? he's a dolt, his 'wit' doesn't rise to third grade level
'you suck dicks, LOLOL!'

> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you dislike,
> but he's real.

i'll admit he's a real asshole, sure.

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:40:08 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
>> blake murphy wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of
>>>> tuna,
>>>> he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at
>>>> the
>>>> same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while
>>>> quietly
>>>> at home, feeding the deer and cats.
>>>>
>>>> Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with
>>>> sheldon when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts
>>>> and he has many of them. Takes time though to understand them!
>>>
>>> 'many' good parts? like what?
>>
>> Well, when he feels like it, he provides really good answers to
>> peoples questions with good links.
>>
>
> no. nine-tenths of what he posts is flat-out wrong, often laughably
> so. if he's trying to prove a point, his links usually do no such
> thing.
>
>> He obviously takes the best care he knows how of his cats and likes
>> feeding the local deer.
>
> frankly, i'd be happier if he was nicer to people. that seems to be
> beyond his ability. cats and deer get good treatment because they
> never contradict him.
>
>>
>> He can post some simple basic recipes that a regular person at home
>> might make and some are quite tastey seeming.
>
> when has that happened?
>
>> He can be funny as hell in a droll sort of way
>
> are you kidding? he's a dolt, his 'wit' doesn't rise to third grade
> level 'you suck dicks, LOLOL!'
>
>> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you
>> dislike,
>> but he's real.
>
> i'll admit he's a real asshole, sure.
>
> your pal,
> blake

He lost me when I was a newbie here almost 12 years ago, when his foul
mouth insulted my dead mother.

On 7/8/2011 7:40 PM, cshenk wrote:
> blake murphy wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:25:44 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>>> Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> i really have some serious pity for the fool, i mean he can't be
>> all>> bad he has cats, unless he is horrid and cruel to them, but if
>> he>> treats them good then there should be something to salvage/like
>> about>> him, but err, well, i don't see it, lee "cshenk"
>> >
>>>
>>> LOL! Yeah though, he has 6 cats last I recall a number mentioned
>>> and he seems to take the best of care of them that he knows how. A
>>> much better care than most do if i can believe what he posts (always
>>> problematic with him).
>>>
>>> I have zero reason to believe however he doesnt give the best care
>>> to his cats even if the details get wildly fantasmigorial in his
>>> mind and trip out his fingers at times.
>>>
>>> From what i have seen over the years, he'll go hungry if he needs
>>> to so as to feed the cats.
>>>
>>> I bet my bottom dollar if he was hungry and just had a can of tuna,
>>> he'd feed the cats and lick the can for his own dinner. All at the
>>> same time he will be rude, abrasive and abusive here while quietly
>>> at home, feeding the deer and cats.
>>>
>>> Grin, dont be confused. I feel no need to restrain myself with
>>> sheldon when he irks me, but I can also recognize his good parts
>>> and he has many of them. Takes time though to understand them!
>>
>> 'many' good parts? like what?
>
> Well, when he feels like it, he provides really good answers to peoples
> questions with good links.
>
> He obviously takes the best care he knows how of his cats and likes
> feeding the local deer.
>
> He can post some simple basic recipes that a regular person at home
> might make and some are quite tastey seeming.
>
> Although often fanciful about what he did, the posts really do validate
> he had time in the Navy for 1-2 tours with experience as a Navy cook on
> shipboard. Like all he would have 'mess cranked' but his details prove
> he did more than that for a period of time I estimate to be possibly 3
> years though hard to tell.
>
> He can be funny as hell in a droll sort of way if he isnt picking on
> 'you' (whoever that is, sometimes me and even I can laugh when he picks
> on me).
>
> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you dislike,
> but he's real.
>
"Real" just like the weird uncle I think everyone had that we had to
pretend to like because he was family.

He has the idea that he is omniscient. If someone knows something
through personal experience they must be wrong even though his point of
reference is a single data point from 25 years ago.

On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:04:11 -0400, Dora wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:40:08 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>>> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you
>>> dislike,
>>> but he's real.
>>
>> i'll admit he's a real asshole, sure.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> He lost me when I was a newbie here almost 12 years ago, when his foul
> mouth insulted my dead mother.

that sounds typical.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:11:56 -0400, George wrote:

> On 7/8/2011 7:40 PM, cshenk wrote:
>>
>> Unlike some here, he's real people. Maybe he's the sort you dislike,
>> but he's real.
>>
> "Real" just like the weird uncle I think everyone had that we had to
> pretend to like because he was family.
>
> He has the idea that he is omniscient. If someone knows something
> through personal experience they must be wrong even though his point of
> reference is a single data point from 25 years ago.

....that was likely wrong then, too.

your pal,
blake

i feel so sorry for you,
-i have told you repeatedly that program didn't work with my system
-i know what you have discussed about your disabilites, i took you at your
word as nobody has any reason to lie about such a thing.
-i have surmised your greatest disability is your inability to look outside
yourself to what others lives are like.

-i truly feel sorry for you that you have to create a new identy so that
people who choose to not read your posts might accidentally, as i did this
one read your vitrail, is it so hard for you to be ignreed, how very sad,

Lee
"Blind Mice" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:48:56 -0700, Kent wrote:
>
>> "Storrmmee" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> the saddest part of this is that he has talked about his own
>>> disabilities
>>> and the stresses with having ceizures and the difficulty/non understand
>>> he
>>> gets, but can't accept that others also have limitations, and his
>>> greatest
>>> disability to mee seems to be that with this attitude he will and might
>>> be
>>> already very loney and alone without real relationships in future, Lee
>
> Go to hell, Lee. You don't know anything about my disabilities. But
> I KNOW you can install OE Quotefix to fix YOUR problem. And YOU know
> that you have no interest in solving your problem.
>
> But you LIKE the attention this brings you. I beginning to doubt
> you're even blind.
>
> -sw

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:05:03 -0500, Blind Mice wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:48:56 -0700, Kent wrote:
>
>> "Storrmmee" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> the saddest part of this is that he has talked about his own disabilities
>>> and the stresses with having ceizures and the difficulty/non understand he
>>> gets, but can't accept that others also have limitations, and his greatest
>>> disability to mee seems to be that with this attitude he will and might be
>>> already very loney and alone without real relationships in future, Lee
>
> Go to hell, Lee. You don't know anything about my disabilities. But
> I KNOW you can install OE Quotefix to fix YOUR problem. And YOU know
> that you have no interest in solving your problem.
>
> But you LIKE the attention this brings you. I beginning to doubt
> you're even blind.
>
> -sw

you realize you're throwing in your lot with sheldon here.

your pal,
blake

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:26:15 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> i am not sure if he was the only one or just one of several to
> >> suggest that fix, but the one he put in this thread is what ate
> both >> sets of software, in my case it just locked up the system and
> >> refiused to work, in hers it seemed to grab one of the programs
> that >> did pronouncing, its not worth bothering about, soon i will
> have to >> get a new system and i suspect that OE won't be usable,
> then there >> will be a whole new hunt, as for gramby she got a new
> system and has >> new stuff, still can't bottom post but her system
> is all fresh and >> new and she is getting like me using different
> s/rs for different >> things, i might email you when i get to
> getting a new system, Lee
> >
> > Ok! I'm dated on advice but i google pretty good and understand OS
> > compatibility issues.
>
> OE Quotefix is COm object module that only runs when you load Outlook.
> It is not a TSR. So somebody is obviously doing something wrong.
>
> I'm through with thread. There is NO reason shouldn't work with her
> version of Outlook. It sounds like her computer has other, probably
> virus, issues.

What part of not compatible with screen readers did you not get? I
suppose you think it's fine if they drop the TSR screen reader when
running outlook eh? Not very bright.

--

i think he is miffed because he isn't getting mch response right now, more
and more people are ignoring him, then when i called him on his hypocracy he
again got his panties in a bunch, sad really as i suspect he has a lot to
offer in cooking arena but not enough anymore for me to tolerat his pathetic
behavior, blake said he was throwing in his lot with sheldlon, almost the
same thing anymore, Lee


"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:26:15 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>> > Storrmmee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> i am not sure if he was the only one or just one of several to
>> >> suggest that fix, but the one he put in this thread is what ate
>> both >> sets of software, in my case it just locked up the system and
>> >> refiused to work, in hers it seemed to grab one of the programs
>> that >> did pronouncing, its not worth bothering about, soon i will
>> have to >> get a new system and i suspect that OE won't be usable,
>> then there >> will be a whole new hunt, as for gramby she got a new
>> system and has >> new stuff, still can't bottom post but her system
>> is all fresh and >> new and she is getting like me using different
>> s/rs for different >> things, i might email you when i get to
>> getting a new system, Lee
>> >
>> > Ok! I'm dated on advice but i google pretty good and understand OS
>> > compatibility issues.
>>
>> OE Quotefix is COm object module that only runs when you load Outlook.
>> It is not a TSR. So somebody is obviously doing something wrong.
>>
>> I'm through with thread. There is NO reason shouldn't work with her
>> version of Outlook. It sounds like her computer has other, probably
>> virus, issues.
>
> What part of not compatible with screen readers did you not get? I
> suppose you think it's fine if they drop the TSR screen reader when
> running outlook eh? Not very bright.
>
> --
>