Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models.
One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into baking. I already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from those of you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 2:01*pm, wrote:
> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. Maybe Andy has one in his dumpster. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ... > I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid > models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully > bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and > we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from > those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. Bigger the better for bread. I have a KA Pro 6. It can do two pounds of dough and not even work up a sweat. Paul |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote:
> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. I have the larger one and don't regret getting it, even though there's only the two of us here. I love it for bread. If cost isn't an issue, go for the bigger one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 2:01*pm, wrote:
> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. If you are really getting into bread making, get the six quart. Better still, go on dBay and find a Hobart/Kitchen Aid and snatch it up. Have it serviced and it will out do any of the new models. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-07-26, ImStillMags > wrote:
> Here you go....looked one up for you. Looks goodl. A photo of the Hobart name would be reassuring. Were KAs "solid state" when still made by Hobart? nb -- vi ...the heart of evil |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 4:31*pm, notbob > wrote:
> On 2011-07-26, ImStillMags > wrote: > > > Here you go....looked one up for you. * *Looks goodl. > > A photo of the Hobart name would be reassuring. *Were KAs "solid > state" when still made by Hobart? > > nb > > -- > vi ...the heart of evil there is a photo of the Hobart name....on both listings. You have to enlarge the photos to see it but its there. don't know about solid state. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cshenk wrote:
> wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen >> Aid models. One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a >> five quart, 325 watt model. My question is,which one do I need for >> basic baking and hopefully bread making. They both come with a dough >> hook. It's only my wife and myself and we really don't do much >> entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into baking. I >> already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from those of >> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. > > Um, why would you use a stand mixer instead of a bread machine? Your > situation leads to a bread machine. Because you can make better bread with a stand mixer, and use it for things other than bread, too. I'd get the 6-qt. I have a 5-qt, and find that when I make my standard 2-loaf batch of dough it tends to throw the flour around at times, even with the shield in place. I could use some more room. I also make very large tiered cakes upon occasion, and the larger size would be good for that, too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:23 -0500, Chemiker
> wrote: snip I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the >dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta >type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. > snip I've never found that mechanical kneading causes small crumb. It's the handling after first rise that determines the crumb. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> wrote in message
... > I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid > models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully > bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and > we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from > those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. I had the large Kitchenaid, but I found that it was too big for my use. I like, and now have the under 200.00 dollar model. Kneads dough really well, and easier for me to use than the large one which I passed on to my DIL. She loves it. YMMV Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 12:52*pm, Janet Bostwick > wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:23 -0500, > wrote: > *I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the>dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta > >type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. > > I've never found that mechanical kneading causes small crumb. *It's > the handling after first rise that determines the crumb. Yes, and the wetness of the dough etc. And over-rising is hardly a problem - just give it a good kneading and let it rise again. Following Elizabeth David, I believe in using a minimum starting amount of yeast (about 1/8 teaspoon of dried yeast to a pound of flour) with the result that I have very long rising times and quite often forget about the dough until it has risen and collapsed again. So many of my loafs have had three (or more) risings with kneadings in between, and I think they taste better for it. And the bread has a strong texture which makes it easy to slice thinly and put spreads on. I used to knead by hand all the way, but these days I use the mixer (a 60-year-old Kenwood in my case) to do the initial mixing and kneading to the point where the dough is no longer sticky, when I take over and enjoy the tactility of it all. LW |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chemiker > wrote:
-snip- >ball by hand. I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the >dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta >type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. You want a quick Ciabatta with an open crumb? Done completely with the machine? How's this look? http://i52.tinypic.com/33usfmg.jpg It is a high hydration mix, beat for 15-30 minutes on my KA on #4. Here's the original recipe from 2004- https://groups.google.com/group/alt....5cc8dbb869544b tinied- http://tinyurl.com/6dtf2pz I've done it a few times and it has come out perfect each time. > >Also, if you come to love your KA and want to add accessories like a >pasta roller, meat grinder or electric welder, then go for the 6. Know >in advance: to make 1 lb loaves for 2 on occasion, you will find the 6 >qt bowl a little too large. YMMV. > Could you explain that a bit. I haven't noticed it but maybe I'm missing something. I've done single loaves with my 6qt. Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ImStillMags wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2:01 pm, wrote: >> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. >> One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt >> model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread >> making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we >> really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into >> baking. I already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from those of >> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. > > If you are really getting into bread making, get the six quart. > > Better still, go on dBay and find a Hobart/Kitchen Aid and snatch it > up. Have it serviced and it will out > do any of the new models. Yup. I agree. -- Jean B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-07-26, ImStillMags > wrote:
> > there is a photo of the Hobart name....on both listings. You have to > enlarge the photos to see it but its there. I only replied to first listing. Still don't see it. Where is it? On the speed control thingie? All I see is "solid state" and a lotta glare. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "notbob" > wrote in message ... | On 2011-07-26, ImStillMags > wrote: | > | > there is a photo of the Hobart name....on both listings. You have to | > enlarge the photos to see it but its there. | | I only replied to first listing. Still don't see it. Where is it? | On the speed control thingie? All I see is "solid state" and a lotta | glare. There are eight pictures, look at number seven. Very clear. pavane |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011-07-27, pavane > wrote:
> There are eight pictures, look at number seven. Very clear. Very clear for you, maybe. Obviously, not me! I will readily admit I'm long overdue for a new monitor. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Denise in NH
> wrote: >On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote: >> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. >> One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt >> model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread >> making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we >> really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into >> baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of >> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. > >I have the larger one and don't regret getting it, even though there's >only the two of us here. I love it for bread. If cost isn't an >issue, go for the bigger one. First thing is to ask yourself how often you'll use it and for what, and be honest. Neither can knead more dough than one can easily by hand, those bowls are too small and neither has the power to knead the heavier doughs in any large amounts... and no machine can knead dough better than human hands... I'd not get either unless you're disabled. I'd suggest a quality hand mixer instead, KA makes a nice one, a lot less money and needs little storeage space. Only down side is you can't display it to impress anyone except those that really cook. Years ago when I had stand mixers I still most often reached for my hand mixer, did the job as well if not better and so much less clean up. And btw, wattage is power consumed, not power produced... those higher wattage stand mixers produce more heat is all... the larger machine produces excessive heat mostly due to the larger bowl diameter. If you insist on a stand mixer go with the smaller, it's more efficient. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:48:38 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Denise in NH > wrote: > >>On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote: >>> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. >>> One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt >>> model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread >>> making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we >>> really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into >>> baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of >>> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. >> >>I have the larger one and don't regret getting it, even though there's >>only the two of us here. I love it for bread. If cost isn't an >>issue, go for the bigger one. > >First thing is to ask yourself how often you'll use it and for what, >and be honest. Neither can knead more dough than one can easily by >hand, those bowls are too small and neither has the power to knead the >heavier doughs in any large amounts... and no machine can knead dough >better than human hands... I'd not get either unless you're disabled. >I'd suggest a quality hand mixer instead, KA makes a nice one, a lot >less money and needs little storeage space. Only down side is you >can't display it to impress anyone except those that really cook. >Years ago when I had stand mixers I still most often reached for my >hand mixer, did the job as well if not better and so much less clean >up. And btw, wattage is power consumed, not power produced... those >higher wattage stand mixers produce more heat is all... the larger >machine produces excessive heat mostly due to the larger bowl >diameter. If you insist on a stand mixer go with the smaller, it's >more efficient. A hand mixer is fine if you want to whip cream or mix a box cake mix. They want to make bread. Your notion that a hand mixer will do bread dough is nonsense. A stand mixer is fine for bread dough. It makes short order of mixing the goopy part of bread dough and handles kneading the dough just fine. Not everyone can handle bread dough without pain in fingers and wrists. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:26:09 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: >On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:48:38 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote: > >>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Denise in NH > wrote: >> >>>On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote: >>>> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. >>>> One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt >>>> model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread >>>> making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we >>>> really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into >>>> baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of >>>> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. >>> >>>I have the larger one and don't regret getting it, even though there's >>>only the two of us here. I love it for bread. If cost isn't an >>>issue, go for the bigger one. >> >>First thing is to ask yourself how often you'll use it and for what, >>and be honest. Neither can knead more dough than one can easily by >>hand, those bowls are too small and neither has the power to knead the >>heavier doughs in any large amounts... and no machine can knead dough >>better than human hands... I'd not get either unless you're disabled. >>I'd suggest a quality hand mixer instead, KA makes a nice one, a lot >>less money and needs little storeage space. Only down side is you >>can't display it to impress anyone except those that really cook. >>Years ago when I had stand mixers I still most often reached for my >>hand mixer, did the job as well if not better and so much less clean >>up. And btw, wattage is power consumed, not power produced... those >>higher wattage stand mixers produce more heat is all... the larger >>machine produces excessive heat mostly due to the larger bowl >>diameter. If you insist on a stand mixer go with the smaller, it's >>more efficient. > >A hand mixer is fine if you want to whip cream or mix a box cake mix. >They want to make bread. Your notion that a hand mixer will do bread >dough is nonsense. A stand mixer is fine for bread dough. It makes >short order of mixing the goopy part of bread dough and handles >kneading the dough just fine. Not everyone can handle bread dough >without pain in fingers and wrists. >Janet US I can handle the dough but why? I toss the stuff in the bowl and turn the machine on. And yes shemp is wrong again. I have the KA hand mixer and there's no way it can be used for dough. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet Bostwick wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:48:38 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote: > >>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Denise in NH > wrote: >> >>>On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote: >>>> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. >>>> One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt >>>> model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread >>>> making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we >>>> really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into >>>> baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of >>>> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. >>> >>>I have the larger one and don't regret getting it, even though there's >>>only the two of us here. I love it for bread. If cost isn't an >>>issue, go for the bigger one. >> >>First thing is to ask yourself how often you'll use it and for what, >>and be honest. Neither can knead more dough than one can easily by >>hand, those bowls are too small and neither has the power to knead the >>heavier doughs in any large amounts... and no machine can knead dough >>better than human hands... I'd not get either unless you're disabled. >>I'd suggest a quality hand mixer instead, KA makes a nice one, a lot >>less money and needs little storeage space. Only down side is you >>can't display it to impress anyone except those that really cook. >>Years ago when I had stand mixers I still most often reached for my >>hand mixer, did the job as well if not better and so much less clean >>up. And btw, wattage is power consumed, not power produced... those >>higher wattage stand mixers produce more heat is all... the larger >>machine produces excessive heat mostly due to the larger bowl >>diameter. If you insist on a stand mixer go with the smaller, it's >>more efficient. > >A hand mixer is fine if you want to whip cream or mix a box cake mix. > >They want to make bread. >Your notion that a hand mixer will do bread dough is nonsense. Never said that... said for bread dough to use ones hands, unless one is handicapped... try reading again. Were you not so possessed with admonishing me your low IQ wouldn't become so obvious... what an angry unfullfilled woman you are... I'd not be surprised to learn that you have no legs either, Janet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/27/2011 9:14 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> A hand mixer is fine if you want to whip cream or mix a box cake mix. >> > >> >They want to make bread. >> >Your notion that a hand mixer will do bread dough is nonsense. > Never said that... said for bread dough to use ones hands, unless one > is handicapped... try reading again. Or unless one just doesn't want to stand there kneading dough by hand. I also don't feel like lighting a wood fire every time I want to cook something so I have a stove. I also don't feel like cutting ice out of a lake in winter and storing it... so I have a refrigerator. Now Sheldon, pick up your scythe and go mow your lawn. What? You use a tractor? Are you handicapped... or just lazy? Or do you just like displaying your tractor to impress people? George L |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:12:51 -0500, Lou Decruss
> wrote: >On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:26:09 -0600, Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >>On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:48:38 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Denise in NH > wrote: >>> >>>>On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote: >>>>> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. >>>>> One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt >>>>> model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread >>>>> making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we >>>>> really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into >>>>> baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of >>>>> you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. >>>> >>>>I have the larger one and don't regret getting it, even though there's >>>>only the two of us here. I love it for bread. If cost isn't an >>>>issue, go for the bigger one. >>> >>>First thing is to ask yourself how often you'll use it and for what, >>>and be honest. Neither can knead more dough than one can easily by >>>hand, those bowls are too small and neither has the power to knead the >>>heavier doughs in any large amounts... and no machine can knead dough >>>better than human hands... I'd not get either unless you're disabled. >>>I'd suggest a quality hand mixer instead, KA makes a nice one, a lot >>>less money and needs little storeage space. Only down side is you >>>can't display it to impress anyone except those that really cook. >>>Years ago when I had stand mixers I still most often reached for my >>>hand mixer, did the job as well if not better and so much less clean >>>up. And btw, wattage is power consumed, not power produced... those >>>higher wattage stand mixers produce more heat is all... the larger >>>machine produces excessive heat mostly due to the larger bowl >>>diameter. If you insist on a stand mixer go with the smaller, it's >>>more efficient. >> >>A hand mixer is fine if you want to whip cream or mix a box cake mix. >>They want to make bread. Your notion that a hand mixer will do bread >>dough is nonsense. A stand mixer is fine for bread dough. It makes >>short order of mixing the goopy part of bread dough and handles >>kneading the dough just fine. Not everyone can handle bread dough >>without pain in fingers and wrists. >>Janet US > >I can handle the dough but why? I toss the stuff in the bowl and turn >the machine on. And yes shemp is wrong again. I have the KA hand >mixer and there's no way it can be used for dough. All that snorting interferes with reading comprehension. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:07:41 -0500, George Leppla
> wrote: >On 7/27/2011 9:14 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> A hand mixer is fine if you want to whip cream or mix a box cake mix. >>> > >>> >They want to make bread. >>> >Your notion that a hand mixer will do bread dough is nonsense. > >> Never said that... said for bread dough to use ones hands, unless one >> is handicapped... try reading again. > >Or unless one just doesn't want to stand there kneading dough by hand. > >I also don't feel like lighting a wood fire every time I want to cook >something so I have a stove. > >I also don't feel like cutting ice out of a lake in winter and storing >it... so I have a refrigerator. > >Now Sheldon, pick up your scythe and go mow your lawn. What? You use a >tractor? Are you handicapped... or just lazy? Or do you just like >displaying your tractor to impress people? > >George L Doughboy You're too fat to knead dough, you'd have a coronary. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 5:01*pm, wrote:
> I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking *:-) *Any suggestions from those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. Just for another angle on this, I don't own a standmixer and don't want one, but I LOVE my bread machine. It bakes the bread too, something the stand mixer won't do. Think upon these things. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > I don't know that it really matters which one you choose apart from > price. The only thing that my 40-year old KitchenAid lacks is a handle > to make rotating the bowl easy. I think they all have them now but make > sure. I also am rather attracted by the glass bowls on some but they > aren't essential. > > -- > > James Silverton, Potomac > > I'm *not* The 6 quart KA bowl does not move in the mixer stand. The paddle moves. The stainless steel bowls have a small handle to aid in putting it in the mixer stand and taking it out, or for holding onto it while you hand-stir something into the mix, off the mixer stand. If you're going to be baking bread on a fairly consistent schedule, go for the higher wattage one. You only live once, and he who dies with the most toys wins. ;-) N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:52:26 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: >On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:23 -0500, Chemiker > wrote: >snip > I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the >>dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta >>type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. >> >snip > > >I've never found that mechanical kneading causes small crumb. It's >the handling after first rise that determines the crumb. >Janet US Looks like your using the direct(1 step) method. I make a poolish, as I said, the day before and let it mature in the fridge overnight. When I add it to the main mix of dough, I do not knead the two at all, but merely fold one into the other by hand and allow to rise. Then, rather than kneading and breaking up the formed bubbles, I gently stretch the dough, fold it over itself in layers and lay it (covered) on a loaf form covered with parchment paper. This way nickel- and quarter-sized holes are easy to obtain. For details, see: The Breadmaker's Apprentice, p 135 et seq. entitled "Ciabatta" The same technique works well for Baguettes and the like, and the poolish method develops a light sour-dough like flavor that is excellent. No direct method I know of (except for adding vinegar to the dough) develops the flavor like the 2-step method, starting with a mature poolish or biga. Hope this explains it. Alex |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:36:59 -0400, Jim Elbrecht >
wrote: >Chemiker > wrote: >-snip- >>ball by hand. I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the >>dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta >>type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. > >You want a quick Ciabatta with an open crumb? Done completely with >the machine? > >How's this look? >http://i52.tinypic.com/33usfmg.jpg > >It is a high hydration mix, beat for 15-30 minutes on my KA on #4. > >Here's the original recipe from 2004- >https://groups.google.com/group/alt....5cc8dbb869544b > >tinied- >http://tinyurl.com/6dtf2pz > >I've done it a few times and it has come out perfect each time. > >Could you explain that a bit. I haven't noticed it but maybe I'm >missing something. I've done single loaves with my 6qt. Sure Jim. You can sure do it, but I found the K5 to be a little better at handling single one pound loaves than the 6. That said, if I want more bread (for my married kids and certain neighbors) the K6 shines. Also, my K5 *did* tend to get a little hot and bog down with certain heavy doughs. The K6 takes anything in stride; it's a tank. Yet, I'm to make 2 loaves of WW today, one for use and one for the handyman. I will use the Zoji to mix and knead the dough. Then I will knead and form by hand and bake in Calphalon loaf pans (love 'em), so there are no holes in the bottom. Sugar will be turbinado. FWIW: Our present KA is the K6. Alex |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:01 -0500, Chemiker
> wrote: > This way nickel- and quarter-sized holes are easy to obtain. I would consider that a defect, not something to strive for. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:01 -0500, Chemiker
> wrote: >On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:52:26 -0600, Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:23 -0500, Chemiker > wrote: >>snip >> I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the >>>dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta >>>type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. >>> >>snip >> >> >>I've never found that mechanical kneading causes small crumb. It's >>the handling after first rise that determines the crumb. >>Janet US > >Looks like your using the direct(1 step) method. I make a poolish, as >I said, the day before and let it mature in the fridge overnight. When >I add it to the main mix of dough, I do not knead the two at all, but >merely fold one into the other by hand and allow to rise. Then, rather >than kneading and breaking up the formed bubbles, I gently stretch the >dough, fold it over itself in layers and lay it (covered) on a loaf >form covered with parchment paper. This way nickel- and quarter-sized >holes are easy to obtain. For details, see: > >The Breadmaker's Apprentice, p 135 et seq. entitled "Ciabatta" > >The same technique works well for Baguettes and the like, and the >poolish method develops a light sour-dough like flavor that is >excellent. No direct method I know of (except for adding vinegar to >the dough) develops the flavor like the 2-step method, starting with a >mature poolish or biga. Hope this explains it. > >Alex That technique may produce the open crumb you seek - along with the hydration of the dough, of course, but using a mixer will not screw up the crumb. One of the most "holey" breads I know - Carol Field's cocodrillo, spends 17 minute in the mixer and you could drive a truck through the crumb openings in the finished loaf. And IMHO, listening to advice from Janet Bostwick about bread baking will do you even better than reading Reinhart...and that is "The Bread Baker's Apprentice," by the way. Boron |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:52:58 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote: > And IMHO, listening to advice from Janet Bostwick about bread baking > will do you even better than reading Reinhart...and that is "The Bread > Baker's Apprentice," by the way. Are you saying Janet is our very own rfc bread guru? KEWL! -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sf wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:01 -0500, Chemiker > > wrote: > > > This way nickel- and quarter-sized holes are easy to obtain. > > I would consider that a defect, not something to strive for. Crusty, chewy large pore breads are pretty damned good, and I don't think they would be as good if they were not large pore. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
wrote: > I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen Aid models. > One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a five quart, 325 watt > model. My question is,which one do I need for basic baking and hopefully bread > making. They both come with a dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we > really don't do much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into > baking. I already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from those of > you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. My KA is an old 5-quart, the bowl lifts to the mixing head; the head does not tilt. I like it. It easily handles dough for two loaves at a time. And I usually make three loaves from the recipe (5 cups flour) because I don't like the bread sitting around for very long. I cut one and freeze two. -- Barb, http://web.me.com/barbschaller July 19, 2011 - Pickled Boiled Dirt Chunks |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> cshenk wrote: > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > I'm looking into getting a stand mixer. I'm looking at two Kitchen > > > Aid models. One is a six quart, 575 watt model and the other is a > > > five quart, 325 watt model. My question is,which one do I need for > > > basic baking and hopefully bread making. They both come with a > > > dough hook. It's only my wife and myself and we really don't do > > > much entertaining. I'm retired and would like to get into baking. > > > I already do all the other cooking :-) Any suggestions from > > > those of you who own a stand mixer? Thanks. > > > > Um, why would you use a stand mixer instead of a bread machine? > > Your situation leads to a bread machine. > > Because you can make better bread with a stand mixer, and use it for > things other than bread, too. > > I'd get the 6-qt. I have a 5-qt, and find that when I make my > standard 2-loaf batch of dough it tends to throw the flour around at > times, even with the shield in place. I could use some more room. > > I also make very large tiered cakes upon occasion, and the larger > size would be good for that, too. Thats fine but the OP's post doens't lead to a stand mixer and I'll add if you learn how to properly use a breadmachine, the bread is as good or better than improper use of a stand mixer where the rising times are not followed correctly. -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:57:00 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> Thats fine but the OP's post doens't lead to a stand mixer and I'll add > if you learn how to properly use a breadmachine, the bread is as good > or better than improper use of a stand mixer where the rising times are > not followed correctly. > some people have the knack, some don't. I can't make decent banana bread and I make doorstops with a bread machine. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:52:58 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote: >On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:01 -0500, Chemiker > wrote: > >>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:52:26 -0600, Janet Bostwick > wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:23 -0500, Chemiker > wrote: >>>snip >>> I found tha both the KA and the Zoji overbeat/knead the >>>>dough, which is OK if you want a fine crumb. I prefer the Ciabatta >>>>type open crumb, which IMHO must be done by hand. >>>> >>>snip >>> >>> >>>I've never found that mechanical kneading causes small crumb. It's >>>the handling after first rise that determines the crumb. >>>Janet US >> >>Looks like your using the direct(1 step) method. I make a poolish, as >>I said, the day before and let it mature in the fridge overnight. When >>I add it to the main mix of dough, I do not knead the two at all, but >>merely fold one into the other by hand and allow to rise. Then, rather >>than kneading and breaking up the formed bubbles, I gently stretch the >>dough, fold it over itself in layers and lay it (covered) on a loaf >>form covered with parchment paper. This way nickel- and quarter-sized >>holes are easy to obtain. For details, see: >> >>The Breadmaker's Apprentice, p 135 et seq. entitled "Ciabatta" >> >>The same technique works well for Baguettes and the like, and the >>poolish method develops a light sour-dough like flavor that is >>excellent. No direct method I know of (except for adding vinegar to >>the dough) develops the flavor like the 2-step method, starting with a >>mature poolish or biga. Hope this explains it. >> >>Alex > >That technique may produce the open crumb you seek - along with the >hydration of the dough, of course, but using a mixer will not screw up >the crumb. > >One of the most "holey" breads I know - Carol Field's cocodrillo, >spends 17 minute in the mixer and you could drive a truck through the >crumb openings in the finished loaf. > >And IMHO, listening to advice from Janet Bostwick about bread baking >will do you even better than reading Reinhart...and that is "The Bread >Baker's Apprentice," by the way. > >Boron Boron, thank you for saying that, it was kind of you. But I respect your knowledge and hands on expertise and am in awe of your 'feel' for the dough. I can't imagine what would make Chemiker get small crumb results when he uses a mixer. I can only think that maybe he is making too dry a dough in the mixer just because he doesn't see the dough clear the bowl the way he thinks it should and keeps on adding flour? Unless he is handling too much/too roughly after rise . Janet US |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stand mixers or... | General Cooking | |||
Home Stand Mixers | Baking | |||
The Viking Stand Mixers | Baking | |||
The Viking Stand Mixers | Baking | |||
Stand mixers | General Cooking |