In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> > wrote:
>
> >If you regularly hard-boil bunches of eggs, and don't want to think about
> >how fresh they are (peelability), get yourself an egg cooker - you will
> >never regret it and you can hard-cook an egg straight from the henhouse that
> >peels slicker than you would believe, no matter how fresh it is.
> >
> >N.
>
> I don't mind having to scroll over to see your unwrapped post.

I find this whole thing very strange. I have a Mac, and it knows how to
wrap text windows. I can make the window the full length of my screen
(I have a 23 inch monitor, so that's pretty big), or I can scrunch it
way down. It rewraps as I change the window size.

Now, when I send a post, I have my news client set to wrap at 72.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:07:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

>In article >,
> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >If you regularly hard-boil bunches of eggs, and don't want to think about
>> >how fresh they are (peelability), get yourself an egg cooker - you will
>> >never regret it and you can hard-cook an egg straight from the henhouse that
>> >peels slicker than you would believe, no matter how fresh it is.
>> >
>> >N.
>>
>> I don't mind having to scroll over to see your unwrapped post.
>
>I find this whole thing very strange. I have a Mac, and it knows how to
>wrap text windows. I can make the window the full length of my screen
>(I have a 23 inch monitor, so that's pretty big), or I can scrunch it
>way down. It rewraps as I change the window size.
>
>Now, when I send a post, I have my news client set to wrap at 72.

Other people have mentioned it so it's not just me. Also other google
posters show up fine. The machine I'm on at the moment is Vista but
the same thing happens with my windows 7 machine.

With all the silliness that was going on here when google took a dump
and observing a few who figured out how easy it was to use a real
setup I don't have much patience for those who refuse to use the free
readers and servers that are available.

Lou

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:43:56 GMT, "l, not -l" > wrote:

>
>On 15-Aug-2011, Dan Abel > wrote:
>
>> > I don't mind having to scroll over to see your unwrapped post.
>>
>> I find this whole thing very strange. I have a Mac, and it knows how to
>> wrap text windows. I can make the window the full length of my screen
>> (I have a 23 inch monitor, so that's pretty big), or I can scrunch it
>> way down. It rewraps as I change the window size.
>>
>> Now, when I send a post, I have my news client set to wrap at 72.
>
>I have a PC and my news client also knows how to wrap text. As I adjust the
>window size, the text wraps to accomodate the new viewing window size; it's
>great using software that doesn't act as if the display is an ASCII
>terminal.

In the last few minutes aem posted and the post is fine.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:24:05 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:07:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>
>>In article >,
>> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >If you regularly hard-boil bunches of eggs, and don't want to think about
>>> >how fresh they are (peelability), get yourself an egg cooker - you will
>>> >never regret it and you can hard-cook an egg straight from the henhouse that
>>> >peels slicker than you would believe, no matter how fresh it is.
>>> >
>>> >N.
>>>
>>> I don't mind having to scroll over to see your unwrapped post.
>>
>>I find this whole thing very strange. I have a Mac, and it knows how to
>>wrap text windows. I can make the window the full length of my screen
>>(I have a 23 inch monitor, so that's pretty big), or I can scrunch it
>>way down. It rewraps as I change the window size.
>>
>>Now, when I send a post, I have my news client set to wrap at 72.
>
> Other people have mentioned it so it's not just me. Also other google
> posters show up fine. The machine I'm on at the moment is Vista but
> the same thing happens with my windows 7 machine.
>
> With all the silliness that was going on here when google took a dump
> and observing a few who figured out how easy it was to use a real
> setup I don't have much patience for those who refuse to use the free
> readers and servers that are available.
>
> Lou

nancy's posts suddenly stopped wrapping for me as well (40tude dialog).

your pal,
blake

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:24:24 -0400, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:24:05 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:07:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >If you regularly hard-boil bunches of eggs, and don't want to think about
>>>> >how fresh they are (peelability), get yourself an egg cooker - you will
>>>> >never regret it and you can hard-cook an egg straight from the henhouse that
>>>> >peels slicker than you would believe, no matter how fresh it is.
>>>> >
>>>> >N.
>>>>
>>>> I don't mind having to scroll over to see your unwrapped post.
>>>
>>>I find this whole thing very strange. I have a Mac, and it knows how to
>>>wrap text windows. I can make the window the full length of my screen
>>>(I have a 23 inch monitor, so that's pretty big), or I can scrunch it
>>>way down. It rewraps as I change the window size.
>>>
>>>Now, when I send a post, I have my news client set to wrap at 72.
>>
>> Other people have mentioned it so it's not just me. Also other google
>> posters show up fine. The machine I'm on at the moment is Vista but
>> the same thing happens with my windows 7 machine.
>>
>> With all the silliness that was going on here when google took a dump
>> and observing a few who figured out how easy it was to use a real
>> setup I don't have much patience for those who refuse to use the free
>> readers and servers that are available.
>>
>> Lou
>
>nancy's posts suddenly stopped wrapping for me as well (40tude dialog).
>
It seems a few want to blame the news reader but it's odd the only
time there's a problem it's with google posts. Folks can chest pound
all they want about thier superior readers but Agent is a fine
product.

Lou

In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:24:24 -0400, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:24:05 -0500, Lou Decruss wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:07:13 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article >,
> >>> Lou Decruss > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >If you regularly hard-boil bunches of eggs, and don't want to think
> >>>> >about
> >>>> >how fresh they are (peelability), get yourself an egg cooker - you will
> >>>> >never regret it and you can hard-cook an egg straight from the henhouse
> >>>> >that
> >>>> >peels slicker than you would believe, no matter how fresh it is.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >N.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't mind having to scroll over to see your unwrapped post.
> >>>
> >>>I find this whole thing very strange. I have a Mac, and it knows how to
> >>>wrap text windows. I can make the window the full length of my screen
> >>>(I have a 23 inch monitor, so that's pretty big), or I can scrunch it
> >>>way down. It rewraps as I change the window size.
> >>>
> >>>Now, when I send a post, I have my news client set to wrap at 72.
> >>
> >> Other people have mentioned it so it's not just me. Also other google
> >> posters show up fine. The machine I'm on at the moment is Vista but
> >> the same thing happens with my windows 7 machine.
> >>
> >> With all the silliness that was going on here when google took a dump
> >> and observing a few who figured out how easy it was to use a real
> >> setup I don't have much patience for those who refuse to use the free
> >> readers and servers that are available.
> >>
> >> Lou
> >
> >nancy's posts suddenly stopped wrapping for me as well (40tude dialog).
> >
> It seems a few want to blame the news reader but it's odd the only
> time there's a problem it's with google posts. Folks can chest pound
> all they want about thier superior readers but Agent is a fine
> product.

Of course, you're right, Lou. When I read your reply two above, I
twiddled with resizing the window. Absolutely useless. So I went back
and twiddled with your first reply. Yes, it rewraps Nancy's post, but
there's still only one quote marker, whether I have two lines spread
wide, or five lines as narrow as I can get it. As soon as there's a
quote marker on every line, resizing and rewrapping makes it very hard
to read, indeed. Absolutely useless.

Live and learn.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
fix it.

N.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:50:02 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

> Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
> fix it.
>
If you don't want to spend any money, I think the only thing you can
do is sign up with eternal-september (free) and use a free news reader
(like 40-tude). If installing a newsreader on your employer's
computer is an issue, put it on a thumb (USB) drive and use it from
there.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:35:18 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

>In article >,
> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:24:24 -0400, blake murphy
>> > wrote:

>> >nancy's posts suddenly stopped wrapping for me as well (40tude dialog).
>> >
>> It seems a few want to blame the news reader but it's odd the only
>> time there's a problem it's with google posts. Folks can chest pound
>> all they want about thier superior readers but Agent is a fine
>> product.
>
>Of course, you're right, Lou. When I read your reply two above, I
>twiddled with resizing the window. Absolutely useless. So I went back
>and twiddled with your first reply. Yes, it rewraps Nancy's post, but
>there's still only one quote marker, whether I have two lines spread
>wide, or five lines as narrow as I can get it. As soon as there's a
>quote marker on every line, resizing and rewrapping makes it very hard
>to read, indeed. Absolutely useless.
>
>Live and learn.

I played around with it myself also to make sure I wasn't doing
something wrong before I spouted off. What's weird is some of them
are doing it right sporadically.

Lou

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:50:02 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

>Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
>fix it.

Get a free reader and server. It's been posted here 1000 times.

Lou

On Aug 13, 7:42*am, James Silverton >
wrote:
> On 8/13/2011 6:35 AM, Andy wrote:
>
> > > *wrote:
>
> >> > *ha scritto nel messaggio
>
> >>> Can hard boiled eggs out of the shell be frozen successfully?
> >>> Does anyone have actual experience doing this?
>
> >> Yep. *You can sell the whites to Goodyear.
>
> > A silly question with a silly answer!
>
> > It doesn't take but a few minutes to hard boil eggs.
>
> Twenty minutes is hardly a "few" and you'll need even more time if you
> want the eggs quite cold. You can buy pre-boiled eggs in supermarkets. I
> think they are safe enough and don't taste bad even if the shell has
> been treated with some sort of resin.

Um, who doesn't have twenty damn minutes to hard boil eggs? What a
retarded thread.

You think that those rubber balls they sell in supermarkets is good?
What a retarded man.

On 8/16/2011 12:50 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
> fix it.
>
> N.



I use Firefox also and your posts wrap perfectly for me.

gloria p

On 8/16/2011 8:38 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:44:19 -0600, >
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/16/2011 12:50 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>> Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
>>> fix it.
>>>
>>> N.
>>
>>
>>
>> I use Firefox also and your posts wrap perfectly for me.
>>
> How are you reading her posts? Google on Firefox? Not having a
> problem if it's Google reading Google is to be expected. Google is a
> little bit better than AOL with the small box to read actual content
> and all the extraneous surrounding cr*p.
>


eternal-september on Firefox.


gloria p

In article >,
"gloria.p" > wrote:

> On 8/16/2011 8:38 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:44:19 -0600, >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/16/2011 12:50 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> >>> Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
> >>> fix it.
> >>>
> >>> N.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I use Firefox also and your posts wrap perfectly for me.
> >>
> > How are you reading her posts? Google on Firefox? Not having a
> > problem if it's Google reading Google is to be expected. Google is a
> > little bit better than AOL with the small box to read actual content
> > and all the extraneous surrounding cr*p.
> >
>
>
> eternal-september on Firefox.

I don't believe that FF works as a news client. Besides, your headers
say you are using Thunderbird.

Are you using FF to read posts through GoogleGroups?

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Nancy2 wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
> fix it.

Hi Nancy, I'm not having any problems either but I think Xananews is
automatically wrapping for us both on my end.

Xananews is one of several free newsgroup readers.
--

Dan Abel wrote:
> "gloria.p" > wrote:
>> sf wrote:
>
>> > How are you reading her posts? Google on Firefox?
>
>> eternal-september on Firefox.
>
> I don't believe that FF works as a news client. Besides, your headers
> say you are using Thunderbird.

Thunderbird is an optional expansion module to Firefox. It's an email
client that supports newsgroups not the browser itself. Being an email
client it is supposed to do autowrap when it displays messages.

I use XPN to display my messages. It wraps these messages but it uses
the longest line it can before wrapping them. I use a smaller font so
the unwrapped nature of the lines is obvious to me at a glance.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:44:55 -0600, "gloria.p" >
wrote:

> On 8/16/2011 8:38 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:44:19 -0600, >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/16/2011 12:50 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> >>> Tell me how to fix it (I'm using Firefox instead of IE), and I'll
> >>> fix it.
> >>>
> >>> N.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I use Firefox also and your posts wrap perfectly for me.
> >>
> > How are you reading her posts? Google on Firefox? Not having a
> > problem if it's Google reading Google is to be expected. Google is a
> > little bit better than AOL with the small box to read actual content
> > and all the extraneous surrounding cr*p.
> >
>
>
> eternal-september on Firefox.
>
Firefox is a browser. What news reader are you using?


--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila