Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a waste, nothing to be afraid of if
you can turn it off, if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of that science stuff, and experience teaches most of it as well, tv is for the most part something that should entertain and educate if you haven't had the oppertunity to learn it from a real source of education... ymmv Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 10:39 am, Dan Abel > wrote: > In article >, > (Judy Haffner) wrote: > > > No satellite dish, but do have cable and get LOTS of channels, but I > > never watch daytime TV, except occasionally will watch the judge shows > > (in part) that are on in the morning, but not for long. I watch very > > little TV, as are other things I'd rather do. > > > Depending on how many years ago this guy was on TV too, as went from '74 > > to '87 without TV, as just felt it was better for our four kids to not > > be staring at the boob tube all the time, and they thanked us later for > > having the cable disconnected. Hubby and I sure never missed it, but now > > I would, but I'm still very selective what I watch, and don't watch any > > of the cooking shows, etc. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alton_Brown > > He is still on tv, and has been for over ten years. He has written > several cooking books. > > -- > Dan Abel > Petaluma, California USA > > > Alton was on at night. Not only did he have great recipes but he would give you hows and whys of recipes and not just tossing out ingredients and throw the concoction into the oven. And if you'd be willing to watch a few cooking shows you'd have a lot of your cooking questions answered. Tv is not the boogey man you imagine if you are selective in what you watch and that goes for monitoring what children watch as well. Some, not all, of the cooking shows can be quite informative, much more so than 99% of those 'judge' shows you watch. Most of them are in the Jerry Springer category. Most tv cooks will just tell you they've been preparing such and such recipe for years and it's a family favorite. Alton would tell you how oil reacts at different temperatures, why some small appliances are better than others, what a brine to does to meat, what an egg does for a recipe, and many, many, many more things. You get an understanding of why you get the results from a certain dish if you do this instead of that, etc. And he makes it all very entertaining. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Storrmmee wrote: >totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a > waste, nothing to be afraid of if you can > turn it off, if you take one cooking class > from a reputable school you learn all of > that science stuff, and experience > teaches most of it as well, tv is for the > most part something that should > entertain and educate if you haven't had > the oppertunity to learn it from a real > source of education... ymmv And.....I completely agree with you! TV has never been a big part of my life, as would much rather read, be on my computer, or just spending time with my family and friends. When I do have some time to just sit and be a couch potato <G> then I want to watch something that will entertain me....a "no-brainer" show, that will make me smile and feel good, such as I particularly enjoy "Glee", "Drop Dead Diva", "Project Runway", etc. I don't turn on TV to get an education. I feel anyway, that experience is the best teacher there is. There is good shows on the various channels, but there is a lot of crappy stuff too. I started cooking/baking when I was 9 years old and joined a 4-H Club, and belonged for 4 years, so I got my basic knowledge there, and through several years of taking Home Economics in school, but most of what I got was hand's on from a fantastic cook and baker....my dear mother. I also have been an avid cookbook collector all my life and hubby built 5 long shelves in our storage room for them, and they are completely filled. I read them, as one would a bible. I have won several blue ribbons in local baking contests, and I'm going to be 71 years old next month, so I'm not a novice in the kitchen, but I don't boost certainly that I know it all. Judy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how cool for you, i am not anti tv just don't see the point when there is so
much else to do in the world, and the concept of paying over fifty dollars a month to have all those channels is boggling to me...fifty dollars will buy a lot of things that interest me more. Lees "Judy Haffner" > wrote in message ... > > Storrmmee wrote: > >>totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a >> waste, nothing to be afraid of if you can >> turn it off, if you take one cooking class >> from a reputable school you learn all of >> that science stuff, and experience >> teaches most of it as well, tv is for the >> most part something that should >> entertain and educate if you haven't had >> the oppertunity to learn it from a real >> source of education... ymmv > > And.....I completely agree with you! TV has never been a big part of my > life, as would much rather read, be on my computer, or just spending > time with my family and friends. When I do have some time to just sit > and be a couch potato <G> then I want to watch something that will > entertain me....a "no-brainer" show, that will make me smile and feel > good, such as I particularly enjoy "Glee", "Drop Dead Diva", "Project > Runway", etc. I don't turn on TV to get an education. I feel anyway, > that experience is the best teacher there is. There is good shows on the > various channels, but there is a lot of crappy stuff too. > > I started cooking/baking when I was 9 years old and joined a 4-H Club, > and belonged for 4 years, so I got my basic knowledge there, and through > several years of taking Home Economics in school, but most of what I got > was hand's on from a fantastic cook and baker....my dear mother. I also > have been an avid cookbook collector all my life and hubby built 5 long > shelves in our storage room for them, and they are completely filled. I > read them, as one would a bible. > > I have won several blue ribbons in local baking contests, and I'm going > to be 71 years old next month, so I'm not a novice in the kitchen, but I > don't boost certainly that I know it all. > > Judy > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 3:52*pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote:
> Storrmmee wrote: > >totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a > > waste, nothing to be afraid of if you can > > turn it off, if you take one cooking class > > from a reputable school you learn all of > > that science stuff, and experience > > teaches most of it as well, tv is for the > > most part something that should > > entertain and educate if you haven't had > > the oppertunity to learn it from a real > > source of education... ymmv > > And.....I completely agree with you! TV has never been a big part of my > life, as would much rather read, be on my computer, or just spending > time with my family and friends. When I do have some time to just sit > and be a couch potato <G> then I want to watch something that will > entertain me....a "no-brainer" show, that will make me smile and feel > good, such as I particularly enjoy "Glee", "Drop Dead Diva", "Project > Runway", etc. > > Now we know. > > > I started cooking/baking when I was 9 years old and joined a 4-H Club, > and belonged for 4 years, so I got my basic knowledge there, and through > several years of taking Home Economics in school, but most of what I got > was hand's on from a fantastic cook and baker....my dear mother. I also > have been an avid cookbook collector all my life and hubby built 5 long > shelves in our storage room for them, and they are completely filled. I > read them, as one would a bible. > > I have won several blue ribbons in local baking contests, and I'm going > to be 71 years old next month, so I'm not a novice in the kitchen, but I > don't boost certainly that I know it all. > > Judy > > All this experience and blue ribbons and you don't know why your cookies crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of smoke and mirrors to me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ItsJoanNotJoann wrote: >All this experience and blue ribbons and > you don't know why your cookies > crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of > smoke and mirrors to me. You really must be a very sarcastic person, as I only found the cooking group just this week, and have noticed most of your posts are of a "snippy" nature. Do you ever offer advice without putting the person down in negative manner? Just asking! <shrug> FYI winning blue ribbons has nothing to do with asking for a T&T chocolate chip cookie that is chewy in texture, instead of hard and crisp, or light and fragile. I never said my cookies crumbled. I won a blue ribbon on my filled mincemeat cookies and also my fresh orange frosted cookies. I have been baking cookies since I was in grade school with great results, but for some reason the last few times I made CC Cookies I was disappointed because they didn't seem to be the exact texture I wanted them to be, but I know that many products have changed their ingredients too, as Crisco is a lot "greasier" feeling on my hands as I remembered it to be, and I've had better results with certain brands of butter than others also, which makes a big difference in any type of baking. Judy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Judy Haffner" > wrote in message
... > > ItsJoanNotJoann wrote: > >>All this experience and blue ribbons and >> you don't know why your cookies >> crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of >> smoke and mirrors to me. > > You really must be a very sarcastic person, as I only found the cooking > group just this week, and have noticed most of your posts are of a > "snippy" nature. Do you ever offer advice without putting the person > down in negative manner? Just asking! <shrug> Just ignore it Judy, there are always a few in every group. :-) Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Cheri wrote: >Just ignore it Judy, there are always a > few in every group. :-) Thanks, Cheri.....for a minute I almost forgot what group I was in and thought I was in the A. I. group! =:-} I was tickled to find this group, as cooking 'n' baking have always been my most favorite pastime, and enjoy talking to other happy cookers! Judy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:08:32 -0800, (Judy Haffner)
wrote: > thought I was in the A. I. group! A. I. ? -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 10:08*pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote:
> Cheri wrote: > >Just ignore it Judy, there are always a > > few in every group. :-) > > Thanks, Cheri.....for a minute I almost forgot what group I was in and > thought I was in the A. I. group! =:-} > > I was tickled to find this group, as cooking 'n' baking have always been > my most favorite pastime, and enjoy talking to other happy cookers! > > Judy > > Both of you will have to deal with it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Judy Haffner" > wrote in message
... > > Cheri wrote: > >>Just ignore it Judy, there are always a >> few in every group. :-) > > Thanks, Cheri.....for a minute I almost forgot what group I was in and > thought I was in the A. I. group! =:-} Yes, and I always enjoy your recipes. Maybe a sock or two here? ;-) Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this is an excellent group, and there are a LOT of nice people here, you
will eventually over time, as you have already noticed with some posters, find a pattern of posting, this is a very valuable tool due to th e volume of postings, simply use the kf button when someone gets to annoying/vulgar or disgusting, keeps the experience cleaner and more on topic, although i must admit in the interest of full disclosure, there a few i don't block because they are simply to silly and entertaining to block.. Lee "Judy Haffner" > wrote in message ... > > Cheri wrote: > >>Just ignore it Judy, there are always a >> few in every group. :-) > > Thanks, Cheri.....for a minute I almost forgot what group I was in and > thought I was in the A. I. group! =:-} > > I was tickled to find this group, as cooking 'n' baking have always been > my most favorite pastime, and enjoy talking to other happy cookers! > > Judy > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 7:14*pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote:
> ItsJoanNotJoann wrote: > >All this experience and blue ribbons and > > you don't know why your cookies > > crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of > > smoke and mirrors to me. > > You really must be a very sarcastic person, as I only found the cooking > group just this week, and have noticed most of your posts are of a > "snippy" nature. Do you ever offer advice without putting the person > down in negative manner? Just asking! <shrug> > > > Judy > > September 18 to be exact. Deal with the snippiness. <shrug> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oh my and i thought I was bored, to track when people come and go on this
group... my life doesn't suck at all!!! LOLLOLLOL, Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 7:14 pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote: > ItsJoanNotJoann wrote: > >All this experience and blue ribbons and > > you don't know why your cookies > > crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of > > smoke and mirrors to me. > > You really must be a very sarcastic person, as I only found the cooking > group just this week, and have noticed most of your posts are of a > "snippy" nature. Do you ever offer advice without putting the person > down in negative manner? Just asking! <shrug> > > > Judy > > September 18 to be exact. Deal with the snippiness. <shrug> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
judy post those orange cookies please, Lee
"Judy Haffner" > wrote in message ... > > ItsJoanNotJoann wrote: > >>All this experience and blue ribbons and >> you don't know why your cookies >> crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of >> smoke and mirrors to me. > > You really must be a very sarcastic person, as I only found the cooking > group just this week, and have noticed most of your posts are of a > "snippy" nature. Do you ever offer advice without putting the person > down in negative manner? Just asking! <shrug> > > FYI winning blue ribbons has nothing to do with asking for a T&T > chocolate chip cookie that is chewy in texture, instead of hard and > crisp, or light and fragile. I never said my cookies crumbled. I won a > blue ribbon on my filled mincemeat cookies and also my fresh orange > frosted cookies. I have been baking cookies since I was in grade school > with great results, but for some reason the last few times I made CC > Cookies I was disappointed because they didn't seem to be the exact > texture I wanted them to be, but I know that many products have changed > their ingredients too, as Crisco is a lot "greasier" feeling on my hands > as I remembered it to be, and I've had better results with certain > brands of butter than others also, which makes a big difference in any > type of baking. > > Judy > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i find it fascinating that when someone disagrees with your opinion, and
thats all it is, that you immediately resort to vulgarity as in your response to me, or personal attacks as in this response to judy, in case you hadn't noticed, this group is to voice opinions and discus specific problems about specific cooking situations, i am sorry this is stressing you to the point of attack, for someone so sure of your opinions it might be nice if you at least restrained yourself from vulgarity and personal attacks as you know neither one of us or what our lives are about... and if you respond that you have read enough to make inferences... i could then do so but mine about you would be almost as rude as what you have just posted and you/your opinions aren't worth lowering myself to that level, Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 3:52 pm, (Judy Haffner) wrote: > Storrmmee wrote: > >totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a > > waste, nothing to be afraid of if you can > > turn it off, if you take one cooking class > > from a reputable school you learn all of > > that science stuff, and experience > > teaches most of it as well, tv is for the > > most part something that should > > entertain and educate if you haven't had > > the oppertunity to learn it from a real > > source of education... ymmv > > And.....I completely agree with you! TV has never been a big part of my > life, as would much rather read, be on my computer, or just spending > time with my family and friends. When I do have some time to just sit > and be a couch potato <G> then I want to watch something that will > entertain me....a "no-brainer" show, that will make me smile and feel > good, such as I particularly enjoy "Glee", "Drop Dead Diva", "Project > Runway", etc. > > Now we know. > > > I started cooking/baking when I was 9 years old and joined a 4-H Club, > and belonged for 4 years, so I got my basic knowledge there, and through > several years of taking Home Economics in school, but most of what I got > was hand's on from a fantastic cook and baker....my dear mother. I also > have been an avid cookbook collector all my life and hubby built 5 long > shelves in our storage room for them, and they are completely filled. I > read them, as one would a bible. > > I have won several blue ribbons in local baking contests, and I'm going > to be 71 years old next month, so I'm not a novice in the kitchen, but I > don't boost certainly that I know it all. > > Judy > > All this experience and blue ribbons and you don't know why your cookies crumble?? Tsk, tsk. Sounds like a lot of smoke and mirrors to me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:23:10 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote: > All this experience and blue ribbons and you don't know why your > cookies crumble?? You're quick to call her rude, I guesss it takes one to know one. -- You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/26/2011 10:57 AM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:23:10 -0500, "Storrmmee" > > wrote: > >> All this experience and blue ribbons and you don't know why your >> cookies crumble?? > > You're quick to call her rude, I guesss it takes one to know one. Storrmee's posts don't correctly show attributions, and it wasn't her that posted what you quoted. I understand the mistake though. I often slip right past Lee's top posted message, and while I like reading her, it's too much trouble to scroll back up most of the time. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks for writing what i write, Lee
"Cheryl" > wrote in message .com... > On 9/26/2011 10:57 AM, sf wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:23:10 -0500, "Storrmmee" >> > wrote: >> >>> All this experience and blue ribbons and you don't know why your >>> cookies crumble?? >> >> You're quick to call her rude, I guesss it takes one to know one. > > Storrmee's posts don't correctly show attributions, and it wasn't her that > posted what you quoted. I understand the mistake though. I often slip > right past Lee's top posted message, and while I like reading her, it's > too much trouble to scroll back up most of the time. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:10:31 -0400, Cheryl >
wrote: > On 9/26/2011 10:57 AM, sf wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:23:10 -0500, "Storrmmee" > > > wrote: > > > >> All this experience and blue ribbons and you don't know why your > >> cookies crumble?? > > > > You're quick to call her rude, I guesss it takes one to know one. > > Storrmee's posts don't correctly show attributions, and it wasn't her > that posted what you quoted. I understand the mistake though. I often > slip right past Lee's top posted message, and while I like reading her, > it's too much trouble to scroll back up most of the time. It would help if her news reader quoted correctly. -- You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 2:31*pm, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a waste, nothing to be afraid of if > you can turn it off, if you take one cooking class from a reputable school > you learn all of that science stuff, > > Bull shit. > > > and experience teaches most of it as > well, tv is for the most part something that should entertain and educate if > you haven't had the oppertunity to learn it from a real source of > education... ymmv > > Your statements already prove you don't watch to tv to even know what's offered. Your comments are meaningless until you can comment with some authority. Being a Disney fan doesn't qualify. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you are rude and now vulgar
Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 2:31 pm, "Storrmmee" > wrote: > totally disagree, 99 percent of tv is a waste, nothing to be afraid of if > you can turn it off, if you take one cooking class from a reputable school > you learn all of that science stuff, > > Bull shit. > > > and experience teaches most of it as > well, tv is for the most part something that should entertain and educate > if > you haven't had the oppertunity to learn it from a real source of > education... ymmv > > Your statements already prove you don't watch to tv to even know what's offered. Your comments are meaningless until you can comment with some authority. Being a Disney fan doesn't qualify. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:19:19 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote: > you are rude and now vulgar You need a ng more like nursery school. -- You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lee wrote:
> if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of > that science stuff This is simply not true. People take YEARS to acquire that kind of knowledge, and some of the people on the forefront (e.g. Harold McGee and Shirley Corriher) are still experimenting and learning after thirty years. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 8:34*pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote: > Lee wrote: > > if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of > > that science stuff > > This is simply not true. People take YEARS to acquire that kind of > knowledge, and some of the people on the forefront (e.g. Harold McGee and > Shirley Corriher) are still experimenting and learning after thirty years.. > > Bob > > True, true. Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes appearances on Alton's show. But people tend to miss out on these little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or
attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he responded with a civilized disagreement to me, in no way validates you, your opinion or your rude manner of posting, Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 8:34 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote: > Lee wrote: > > if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of > > that science stuff > > This is simply not true. People take YEARS to acquire that kind of > knowledge, and some of the people on the forefront (e.g. Harold McGee and > Shirley Corriher) are still experimenting and learning after thirty years. > > Bob > > True, true. Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes appearances on Alton's show. But people tend to miss out on these little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:39:27 -0500, "Storrmmee"
> wrote: > and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > responded with a civilized disagreement to me, in no way validates you, your > opinion or your rude manner of posting, Lee I think you're better suited for the British group - where they take offense when none is intended. -- You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lee wrote:
> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > responded with a civilized disagreement to me, in no way validates you, > your opinion or your rude manner of posting It's a sad day on Usenet when *I* am the civil one! Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lol, Lee
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message b.com... > Lee wrote: > >> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or >> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he >> responded with a civilized disagreement to me, in no way validates you, >> your opinion or your rude manner of posting > > It's a sad day on Usenet when *I* am the civil one! > > Bob > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 5:39*am, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > responded with a civilized disagreement to me, in no way validates you, your > opinion or your rude manner of posting, Lee"ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > > ... > On Sep 25, 8:34 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" > > wrote: > > > Lee wrote: > > > if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of > > > that science stuff > > > This is simply not true. People take YEARS to acquire that kind of > > knowledge, and some of the people on the forefront (e.g. Harold McGee and > > Shirley Corriher) are still experimenting and learning after thirty years. > > > Bob > > True, true. *Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes > appearances on Alton's show. *But people tend to miss out on these > little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. > > I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these squirrely posts you are making would make sense. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
... On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote: > and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these squirrely posts you are making would make sense. ========== She's blind, you ignorant clod. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cheri" > wrote in message ... > "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > ... > On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote: >> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or >> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > > I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I > responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If > you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these > squirrely posts you are making would make sense. > > ========== > > She's blind, you ignorant clod. > > Cheri This post has gone too far downhill but I'll climb in anyway. Just what Superior Authority decided that posts MUST BE bottom posted? For whose convenience? Beats me. I really don't need to wade through every line since Genesis again and again et boredom to see what anyone else would like to contribute. If we've read what comes before, why not simply reply? No need to copy. No need to carry forward. Might have been necessary when we were running our computers on kerosene. It makes my old heart happy that Lee can participate without being able to see. I object to the notion that bottom posting is preferred. By whom and why? No more bottom posting from here. Enough! Polly |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
but joan has proven she doesn't read here much, Lee
"Cheri" > wrote in message ... > "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > ... > On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote: >> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or >> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > > I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I > responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If > you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these > squirrely posts you are making would make sense. > > ========== > > She's blind, you ignorant clod. > > Cheri > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:22:26 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > ... > On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote: > > and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or > > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > > I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I > responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If > you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these > squirrely posts you are making would make sense. > > ========== > > She's blind, you ignorant clod. Blind or not, she's an idiot. > > Cheri --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
now we sink to the last refuge of one who has no valid point, thereby
proving that either you haven't read here enough to know this is a well travelled road, or you are so lacking in logic and valid arguement, you are trying that time honored trick of changing the arguement, thinking you will get other posters to defend you, anyone who has read my posts and some of this discussion would know i don't discuss it anymore, sorry try again, Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote: > and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he > responded with a civilized disagreement to me, in no way validates you, > your > opinion or your rude manner of posting, Lee"ItsJoanNotJoann" > > wrote in message > > ... > On Sep 25, 8:34 pm, "Bob Terwilliger" > > wrote: > > > Lee wrote: > > > if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of > > > that science stuff > > > This is simply not true. People take YEARS to acquire that kind of > > knowledge, and some of the people on the forefront (e.g. Harold McGee > > and > > Shirley Corriher) are still experimenting and learning after thirty > > years. > > > Bob > > True, true. Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes > appearances on Alton's show. But people tend to miss out on these > little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. > > I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these squirrely posts you are making would make sense. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
news:72108cea-a231-4ae8-b033- True, true. Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes appearances on Alton's show. But people tend to miss out on these little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. ========= LMAO, all these insults coming from *web tv* land no less. Bite me. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what is hillarious is that dh and find disney the most pallateable, sp of
all tv fare, cooking shows are somewha t down the list, the fact that someone who has such a high opinion of herself wants to throw insults cracks me up, you would think someone so very important would have better things to do like say stalking judy and tracking where/when she posts, Lee "Cheri" > wrote in message ... > "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > news:72108cea-a231-4ae8-b033- > > True, true. Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes > appearances on Alton's show. But people tend to miss out on these > little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. > > ========= > > LMAO, all these insults coming from *web tv* land no less. Bite me. > > Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 9:11*am, "Cheri" > wrote:
> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > > news:72108cea-a231-4ae8-b033- > > True, true. *Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes > appearances on Alton's show. *But people tend to miss out on these > little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. > > ========= > > LMAO, all these insults coming from *web tv* land no less. Bite me. > > Cheri > > Bite my ass bitch. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
as i said, she is losing, and eventually will have a full blown troll
tantrum, at least she is mildy amusing, Lee "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message ... On Sep 26, 9:11 am, "Cheri" > wrote: > "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message > > news:72108cea-a231-4ae8-b033- > > True, true. Shirley is sharp as a tack and I love it when she makes > appearances on Alton's show. But people tend to miss out on these > little gems when Disney and American Idol are their normal tv fare. > > ========= > > LMAO, all these insults coming from *web tv* land no less. Bite me. > > Cheri > > Bite my ass bitch. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
> Bite my ass bitch. I'd probably take off your ear or put out your eye if I did that, so I'll pass. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i was referring to what one could learn on tv, knowing a process is vastly
different from developing skills from knowing about it, i am sure one simple class doesn't make one an expert on any particular skill set, cooking or not, but to claim that veiwing a tv show does the same is really silly, and that was my point, i didn't mean to infer that years ow work and practice was discounted, as you know, i can tell from the recipes you post, experience in general and experimintation, are the only way to improve skills, I hope tha t makes sense, Lee "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message b.com... > Lee wrote: > >> if you take one cooking class from a reputable school you learn all of >> that science stuff > > This is simply not true. People take YEARS to acquire that kind of > knowledge, and some of the people on the forefront (e.g. Harold McGee and > Shirley Corriher) are still experimenting and learning after thirty years. > > Bob > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When the cookie recipe calls for "soft shortening" | General Cooking | |||
"101 Perfect Chocolate Chip Cookies" (2000) by Gwen Steege - youropinion? | General Cooking | |||
making chocolate chip cooks with the "grands" | General Cooking | |||
Choc chip cookies: chewy or crisp? | General Cooking | |||
Request - Soft Chocolate Chip Cookie Recipe | Baking |