"ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
...
On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or
> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he

I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I
responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If
you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these
squirrely posts you are making would make sense.

==========

She's blind, you ignorant clod.

Cheri

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
>> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or
>> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he
>
> I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I
> responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If
> you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these
> squirrely posts you are making would make sense.
>
> ==========
>
> She's blind, you ignorant clod.
>
> Cheri
This post has gone too far downhill but I'll climb in anyway. Just what
Superior Authority decided that posts MUST BE bottom posted? For whose
convenience? Beats me. I really don't need to wade through every line
since Genesis again and again et boredom to see what anyone else would like
to contribute.
If we've read what comes before, why not simply reply? No need to copy.
No need to carry forward. Might have been necessary when we were running
our computers on kerosene.
It makes my old heart happy that Lee can participate without being able
to see. I object to the notion that bottom posting is preferred. By whom
and why? No more bottom posting from here. Enough! Polly

"Polly Esther" > wrote in message
...

> It makes my old heart happy that Lee can participate without being able
> to see. I object to the notion that bottom posting is preferred. By whom
> and why? No more bottom posting from here. Enough! Polly

Exactly.

Cheri

but lets not have this arguement as she has only resorted to this because
she has lost the real arguement and either is angry about that or has just
come here to troll, so lets not even have the discussion, at least not in
this thread as it will only validate her behavoior and i don't care to
reinforce inappropriate behavior, Lee
"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "Polly Esther" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> It makes my old heart happy that Lee can participate without being
>> able to see. I object to the notion that bottom posting is preferred.
>> By whom and why? No more bottom posting from here. Enough! Polly
>
> Exactly.
>
> Cheri

"Polly Esther" wrote:


>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
>>> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or
>>> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he
>>
>> I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I
>> responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If
>> you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these
>> squirrely posts you are making would make sense.
>>
>> ==========
>>
>> She's blind, you ignorant clod.
>>
>> Cheri
>This post has gone too far downhill but I'll climb in anyway. Just what
>Superior Authority decided that posts MUST BE bottom posted?

It's proper usenet convention to reply directly *following* to that
which one is replying.

>For whose convenience?

Everyones.

>I really don't need to wade through every line

Then learn to trim you lazy spoiled **** who was raised in a garbage
dump and never had chores.

>It makes my old heart happy that Lee can participate without being able
>to see.

Anyone who can make as many posts sees just fine, Lee is an obstinate
otiose trashy **** is all... she's not even a regular poster, she
returns after long absenses just to stir up shit, she contributes
absolutely nothing of value.

>I object to the notion that bottom posting is preferred. By whom
>and why? No more bottom posting from here.

Then be prepared to be mostly ignored. And learn to trim
attributions, wouldja just look at that pile of shit you left to
filthy up this newsgroup, just because you live in a stinkin' dump
don't litter here, SLOB! And to date you've not contributed an iota
of anything on topic, go away useless bitch!

but joan has proven she doesn't read here much, Lee
"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
>> and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or
>> attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he
>
> I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I
> responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If
> you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these
> squirrely posts you are making would make sense.
>
> ==========
>
> She's blind, you ignorant clod.
>
> Cheri
>
>

On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:22:26 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "ItsJoanNotJoann" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Sep 26, 5:39 am, "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> > and your attching yourself to bob's post doesn't reduce your vulgarity or
> > attempts to improve your status in your own eyes... just because he
>
> I was responding to Bob's post and not to you nitwit. Notice I
> responded as is appreciated and not a top poster as yourself. If
> you'd learn to read and then respond in a proper manner then these
> squirrely posts you are making would make sense.
>
> ==========
>
> She's blind, you ignorant clod.

Blind or not, she's an idiot.
>
> Cheri

--Bryan