Wondering if any others want to chat?

--

cshenk wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> Wondering if any others want to chat?

http://www.recfoodcooking.org/chat.html

--

"cshenk" wrote:
>
>Wondering if any others want to chat?

What are my other choices?

On Oct 1, 1:10*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> "cshenk" wrote:
>
> >Wondering if any others want to chat?
>
> What are my other choices?

Go in the bathroom and play with yourself.

cshenk wrote:
> Wondering if any others want to chat?
>


I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its been
empty for the last few weeks at that time.

It would be nice to se some more activity there.
--
JL

Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> "cshenk" wrote:
> >
> > Wondering if any others want to chat?
>
> What are my other choices?

Hehehehe post messages! No one came in anyways so i wandered out of
chat. There's a small cadre of us who enjoy a weekend chat for a few
hours. Harmless and generally everyone is pretty polite in chat there.

--

M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> cshenk wrote:
> > Wondering if any others want to chat?
> >
>
>
> I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
> been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
>
> It would be nice to se some more activity there.

I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.

--

On 10/1/2011 2:06 PM, cshenk wrote:
>
> Wondering if any others want to chat?

A few folks are chatting now Merry conversations!

Sky

--

Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice!!

cshenk wrote:

> M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>
>>cshenk wrote:
>>
>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
>>>
>>
>>
>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
>>
>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
>
>
> I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
> don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
> tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
>

Sky & i right now, SF popped in and out
--
JL

Sqwertz wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
>
>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>
>>>cshenk wrote:
>>>
>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
>>>>
>>>
>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
>>>
>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
>>
>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
>
>
> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
>
> -sw


Are you really THAT dense?
--
JL

"Chemo the Clown" > wrote in message
...
On Oct 1, 1:10 pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> "cshenk" wrote:
>
> >Wondering if any others want to chat?
>
> What are my other choices?

Go in the bathroom and play with yourself.

In the bathroom? Why?

On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 22:18:01 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:

> "Chemo the Clown" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Oct 1, 1:10 pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>> "cshenk" wrote:
>>
>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
>>
>> What are my other choices?
>
> Go in the bathroom and play with yourself.
>
> In the bathroom? Why?

he doesn't want the cats to see him jack off.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>
>>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>
>>>>cshenk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
>>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
>>>>
>>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
>>>
>>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
>>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
>>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
>>
>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Are you really THAT dense?

what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
done it in a bit! cshenk > 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.

blake

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
>
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>
> >>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>cshenk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
> >>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
> >>>>
> >>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
> >>>
> >>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
> >>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
> >>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
> >>
> >> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
> >> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
> >> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
> >> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > Are you really THAT dense?
>
> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
> done it in a bit! cshenk > 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
>

JL sees the situation clearly.

--

You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:06:18 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
>> Wondering if any others want to chat?
>
> Hello!
>
> (There, that will tide me over for another decade without chat lust)
>
> -sw

Andy you suck! ok I'm good too

On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:40:09 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>cshenk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
>>>>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
>>>>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
>>>>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
>>>>
>>>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
>>>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
>>>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
>>>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> Are you really THAT dense?
>>
>> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
>> done it in a bit! cshenk > 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
>> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
>>
>
> JL sees the situation clearly.

how so? post a notice here that you'll be in chat that many won't see
until a day later?

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:25:01 -0400, blake murphy
> wrote:

> On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:40:09 -0700, sf wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:31:35 -0500, cshenk wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>M. JL Esq. wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>cshenk wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Wondering if any others want to chat?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I usually pop in for a bit in the early evening (ca. time) but its
> >>>>>>been empty for the last few weeks at that time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>It would be nice to se some more activity there.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I think we have stopped posting little 'wanna chat' notices so folks
> >>>>>don't know when to come in for a bit. I'll see what's up here later
> >>>>>tonight (your early evening) and see if chat seems active.
> >>>>
> >>>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
> >>>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
> >>>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
> >>>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
> >>>>
> >>>> -sw
> >>>
> >>> Are you really THAT dense?
> >>
> >> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
> >> done it in a bit! cshenk > 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
> >> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
> >>
> >
> > JL sees the situation clearly.
>
> how so? post a notice here that you'll be in chat that many won't see
> until a day later?
>
Those who are active in rfc and want to chat can do so, the rest don't
care. Steve has no friends who want to chat with him and that's what
his problem is (he can chat to high heaven on FB but apparently he
doesn't).

Why is posting a chat notice such a problem for you? If you see it a
day later, it means you weren't reading rfc and you weren't available
to chat. So what? It's no skin off your nose. Chat is open to
(almost) everyone and it's nice to see new faces there, something that
would never happen with a private (in crowd only) mailing list.


--

You are what you eat, so avoid fruitcake and nuts.

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:34:27 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:25:01 -0400, blake murphy
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:40:09 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:41:05 -0400, blake murphy
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:56:55 -0700, M. JL Esq. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If they want to chat, they check chat before Usenet. There is no
>>>>>> logical mentality for posting chat messages here. Why don't you post
>>>>>> them, on RFC for Facebook or get your own mailing list that sends out
>>>>>> SMS messqages so people can chart with their iPhones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -sw
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you really THAT dense?
>>>>
>>>> what's dense about it? i just now read the original post (Chat? Havent
>>>> done it in a bit! cshenk > 10/1/2011 2:06:18 PM) about 24
>>>> hours later. i'd say you're the dense party here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> JL sees the situation clearly.
>>
>> how so? post a notice here that you'll be in chat that many won't see
>> until a day later?
>>
> Those who are active in rfc and want to chat can do so, the rest don't
> care. Steve has no friends who want to chat with him and that's what
> his problem is (he can chat to high heaven on FB but apparently he
> doesn't).
>
> Why is posting a chat notice such a problem for you? If you see it a
> day later, it means you weren't reading rfc and you weren't available
> to chat. So what? It's no skin off your nose. Chat is open to
> (almost) everyone and it's nice to see new faces there, something that
> would never happen with a private (in crowd only) mailing list.

it's not a problem at all for me. but j.l. seemed to be saying steve was
stupid for pointing out that usenet was not the ideal venue to point out
your availability for chat and i disagreed for the reason stated.

your pal,
blake