Ranee wrote:

>Then, I'm sorry I'll be missing your posts.
> I don't have time to scan through the
> hundreds of posts here to find the
> ontopic ones and try to avoid all the
> nastiness that people like you quote and
> feed.

You do what you feel you must, as that is strictly up to you. It seems
very strange to me though, that you called ME out for my quotes, when
'I' was the one that was called nasty names and ridiculed for my posts,
as soon as I started posting here, but suddenly, the tables get turned
and I'M the bad guy, so apparently, it's perfectly fine for someone to
get bashed here, but dare they speak up and try to defend
themselves...double standard much? <shrug> I came here with the purpose
of discussing COOKING, so dumb me for not realizing it was a group to
join, only to be put down and made fun of by some, and yet some of the
other regulars just want to look the other way, and it is acceptable.

I know the majority here are nice people, but I'm still trying to get to
know who is here for the same purpose I am. I don't like strife, but
when I become a target, I do object to it. As soon as I know WHO the
obnoxious ones are, I can ignore them.

Judy

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:16:14 -0800, (Judy Haffner)
wrote:

>
>Ranee wrote:
>
>>Then, I'm sorry I'll be missing your posts.
>> I don't have time to scan through the
>> hundreds of posts here to find the
>> ontopic ones and try to avoid all the
>> nastiness that people like you quote and
>> feed.
>
>You do what you feel you must, as that is strictly up to you. It seems
>very strange to me though, that you called ME out for my quotes, when
>'I' was the one that was called nasty names and ridiculed for my posts,
>as soon as I started posting here, but suddenly, the tables get turned
>and I'M the bad guy, so apparently, it's perfectly fine for someone to
>get bashed here, but dare they speak up and try to defend
>themselves...double standard much? <shrug> I came here with the purpose
>of discussing COOKING,

Then why don't you... so far you've added not a whit to the cooking
aspect, all you've done for your two weeks here is moan about how much
your widdle poopie has been violated... why don't you grow TF up.

The favorite one is from the stores of dominoz. To be true I prefer more of the garlic breads than the pizzas..they are really yummy..

My favorite is Mexican spicy chicken pizza it’s really tasty and so delicious to eat.

judy the point is that renee already has all the trash in the bin, and like
me, never sees those posts unless someone responds... so your post was her
first inkling of anything amiss since she had enjoyed earlier posts from you
it was not a pleaseant idea i am sure... i was wondering if you could use a
blocking program tied to google? Lee
"Judy Haffner" > wrote in message
...
>
> Ranee wrote:
>
>>Then, I'm sorry I'll be missing your posts.
>> I don't have time to scan through the
>> hundreds of posts here to find the
>> ontopic ones and try to avoid all the
>> nastiness that people like you quote and
>> feed.
>
> You do what you feel you must, as that is strictly up to you. It seems
> very strange to me though, that you called ME out for my quotes, when
> 'I' was the one that was called nasty names and ridiculed for my posts,
> as soon as I started posting here, but suddenly, the tables get turned
> and I'M the bad guy, so apparently, it's perfectly fine for someone to
> get bashed here, but dare they speak up and try to defend
> themselves...double standard much? <shrug> I came here with the purpose
> of discussing COOKING, so dumb me for not realizing it was a group to
> join, only to be put down and made fun of by some, and yet some of the
> other regulars just want to look the other way, and it is acceptable.
>
> I know the majority here are nice people, but I'm still trying to get to
> know who is here for the same purpose I am. I don't like strife, but
> when I become a target, I do object to it. As soon as I know WHO the
> obnoxious ones are, I can ignore them.
>
> Judy
>

In article >,
Ranée at Arabian Knits > wrote:
>In article >,
> "Storrmmee" > wrote:
>
>> judy the point is that renee already has all the trash in the bin, and like
>> me, never sees those posts unless someone responds... so your post was her
>> first inkling of anything amiss since she had enjoyed earlier posts from you
>> it was not a pleaseant idea i am sure... i was wondering if you could use a
>> blocking program tied to google? Lee
>
> That is exactly it. It's not that I favor them over her. It's that
>until she started waging war on them, I didn't have to see much, if at
>all, from them. Her vendetta is making her the bringer of their idiocy.

IMO The best solution is to not use killfiles in the first place.
I realize I'm a voice in the wilderness here, but widespread killfile
use is part of the process that leads to social newsgroups going
down the drain.

At any rate, the fact that person X does not have person Y killfiled
is not a valid reason for criticizing person X.

Steve

Steve Pope > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> Ranée at Arabian Knits > wrote:
> >In article >,
> > "Storrmmee" > wrote:
> >
> >> judy the point is that renee already has all the trash in the bin,
> > > and like
> >> me, never sees those posts unless someone responds... so your post
> > > was her
> >> first inkling of anything amiss since she had enjoyed earlier posts
> > > from you
> >> it was not a pleaseant idea i am sure... i was wondering if you
> > > could use a
> >> blocking program tied to google? Lee
> >
> > That is exactly it. It's not that I favor them over her. It's
> > that
> >until she started waging war on them, I didn't have to see much, if
> > at
> >all, from them. Her vendetta is making her the bringer of their
> > idiocy.
>
> IMO The best solution is to not use killfiles in the first place.
> I realize I'm a voice in the wilderness here, but widespread killfile
> use is part of the process that leads to social newsgroups going
> down the drain.
>
> At any rate, the fact that person X does not have person Y killfiled
> is not a valid reason for criticizing person X.

That is not the criticism. The criticism is that she perpetuates the
crassness, the noise and the strife.

if one day dh and i both haven't one single thing to do i am going to get
him to set my filters so that not only the person who i want filtered is
gone but any response to that person is also not seen, i might use a few
good recipes but overall i think it will make reading easier, but as i said,
it is absolutely at the bottom of the to do list, Lee
"Dan Abel" > wrote in message
...
> In article
> -september.
> org>,
> Ranée @ Arabian Knits > wrote:
>
>> Steve Pope > wrote:
>
>> > IMO The best solution is to not use killfiles in the first place.
>> > I realize I'm a voice in the wilderness here, but widespread killfile
>> > use is part of the process that leads to social newsgroups going
>> > down the drain.
>
> I always like a voice from the wilderness, but still, how does one
> handle the situation where a poster appears to have, as their sole goal,
> the destruction and fragmentation of the newsgroup by propagating
> character attacks, obscenities, lies and false information?
>
>> > At any rate, the fact that person X does not have person Y killfiled
>> > is not a valid reason for criticizing person X.
>
> That's very true. From my point of view, ideally, most of the time, no
> one should know who is in anybody else's killfile. My killfile is
> primarily a method to manage my reading of the group, not to "punish"
> anybody.
>
>> That is not the criticism. The criticism is that she perpetuates the
>> crassness, the noise and the strife.
>
> That's very true also.
>
> --
> Dan Abel
> Petaluma, California USA
>