Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a
while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be edible? get soggy? How soon? Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 4:31*pm, Kalmia > wrote:
> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? *What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? *Will it still be > edible? get soggy? *How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? I would go ahead cook the spaghetti just a bit underdone, drain it and let it cool, then put the sauce on it and keep it warm in those chaffing servers. If you leave spaghettin in the water even cool, it will just wind up being mush. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kalmia wrote:
> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? Stagger it, or undercook it and plunge it into a REALLY large pot of rapidly boiling salted water at the last minute. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kalmia wrote:
> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? Another possibility is to cook it al dente, toss it with a little olive oil or butter, and keep it warm for several minutes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kalmia" > wrote in message ... > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? Cook it till al dente, stop the cooking by immersing in ice water. When ready to serve, place in boiling water for 1 minute. Paul |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:13 -0700 (PDT), Kalmia wrote: > >> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >> edible? get soggy? How soon? >> >> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > You drain it and freshen it with a dunk in hot water just before > serving. That's how all the Italian (not Olive Garden) and Vietnamese > restaurants do it. > > -sw Like the man said. Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message ... > > "Kalmia" > wrote in message > ... >> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >> edible? get soggy? How soon? >> >> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > Cook it till al dente, stop the cooking by immersing in ice water. When > ready to serve, place in boiling water for 1 minute. > > Paul Perfect. Dimitri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Janet wrote: > > Kalmia wrote: > > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > Stagger it, or undercook it and plunge it into a REALLY large pot of rapidly > boiling salted water at the last minute. Undercooking followed by the boiling water dunk before finishing is how most restaurants do it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:51:30 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote: > >"Kalmia" > wrote in message ... >> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >> edible? get soggy? How soon? >> >> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > >Cook it till al dente, stop the cooking by immersing in ice water. When >ready to serve, place in boiling water for 1 minute. > >Paul > Isn't that the way it is done in restaurants? Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dimitri" > wrote in message ... > > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:13 -0700 (PDT), Kalmia wrote: >> >>> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >>> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >>> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >>> edible? get soggy? How soon? >>> >>> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >>> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >>> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? >> >> You drain it and freshen it with a dunk in hot water just before >> serving. That's how all the Italian (not Olive Garden) and Vietnamese >> restaurants do it. >> >> -sw > > Like the man said. > > Dimitri yep, when he's right he's right. cook it a bit under the first time, though. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:51:30 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > >> >>"Kalmia" > wrote in message ... >>> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >>> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >>> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >>> edible? get soggy? How soon? >>> >>> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >>> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >>> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? >> >>Cook it till al dente, stop the cooking by immersing in ice water. When >>ready to serve, place in boiling water for 1 minute. >> >>Paul >> > Isn't that the way it is done in restaurants? Yes, that's where I learned it. Often we'd take about 8 ounces at a time and roll them into "nests" and store in the fridge Pre-cooking the pasta has no effect on the final dish. Nobody can tell. Paul |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kalmia" > wrote in message ... > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? You can cook it almost all the way through, toss with some olive oil to keep it from sticking and then keep a pot of water going to finish the cooking. I take it there is no steam table? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i would precook it, drain and let cool, then keep a boiling vat of water on
the stove, get a strainer that will hold a serving or two and plunge into the water to reheat and serve, if you could have a couple of strainers or maybe more to load for the plunge it would go even fster, if the sauce is hot, and everything is assmebly line ready plating it shouldn't be an issue, Lee "Kalmia" > wrote in message ... > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> "Kalmia" > wrote in message > ... > >>Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >>while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >>down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >>edible? get soggy? How soon? >> >>Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >>3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >>it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > > You can cook it almost all the way through, toss with some olive oil to keep > it from sticking and then keep a pot of water going to finish the cooking. > > I take it there is no steam table? > > There's also a technique where you take it out of the boiling water under cooked, dip in ice water too stop the cooking and then when ready to serve toss in a pan with the hot sauce to heat through and finish cooking. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:13 -0700 (PDT), Kalmia
> wrote: > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? If that's what you really want to do, I would drain it completely, keep the water hot, then dip it in the hot water to separate and reheat. Is there some reason why you can't dress the noodles and keep them warm in the chaffing dish? -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> You drain it and freshen it with a dunk in hot water just before > serving. That's how all the Italian (not Olive Garden) and Vietnamese > restaurants do it. That's horrible. It takes 7-8 minutes to cook spaghetti, if they ruin a good dish of spaghetti just to save 6-7 minutes then they are very cheap guys, along with their customers. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> Isn't that the way it is done in restaurants? > Yes, that's where I learned it. Often we'd take about 8 ounces at a > time and roll them into "nests" and store in the fridge Pre-cooking > the pasta has no effect on the final dish. Nobody can tell. Only if everybody is used to eat overcooked pasta, otherwise everybody can tell. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kalmia wrote:
> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? I'd prepare some kinf of pasta al forno (lasagne, cannelloni, pasticcio di maccheroni...) which can perfectly stay there for much more than 15-20 minutes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ViLco" > wrote in message ... > Paul M. Cook wrote: > >>> Isn't that the way it is done in restaurants? > >> Yes, that's where I learned it. Often we'd take about 8 ounces at a >> time and roll them into "nests" and store in the fridge Pre-cooking >> the pasta has no effect on the final dish. Nobody can tell. > > Only if everybody is used to eat overcooked pasta, otherwise everybody can > tell. Hello? Al dente?? If you know what the **** you're doing you do not get overcooked pasta. And that is sort of the key to cooking. Knowing what the **** you're doing. Paul |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/28/2011 4:27 AM, ViLco wrote:
> Kalmia wrote: > >> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >> edible? get soggy? How soon? >> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > I'd prepare some kinf of pasta al forno (lasagne, cannelloni, pasticcio di > maccheroni...) which can perfectly stay there for much more than 15-20 > minutes. Spaghetti cooked al dente, cooled, then reheated with a quick in and out of boiling water works out just fine. There is not enough time for the water to cook the pasta any further during rewarming. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 7:31*pm, Kalmia > wrote:
> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? *What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? *Will it still be > edible? get soggy? *How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? If you have an oven, put properly cooked pasta in roasting pans or some such, toss with some olive oil, and keep warm in a 200F oven. Try and start cooking as close to serving time as possible. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kalmia wrote:
> > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? A 100 hungry people can eat a lot of spaghetti, figure on at least 1lb feeding four... have you ever cooked 25 pounds of pasta in a brief period. I don't recommend doing a spaghetti dinner for 100 in a home kitchen. The typical residentail stove has but one large top burner, and will probably need 15 minutes to bring an 8 qt pot of water to the boil and 15 minutes cooking time... unless you plan on staggering the feeding over several hours I don't think it's a reasonable concept to fulfill. You need a commercial kitchen. I think you may have a better chance feeding 100 people baked ziti, and that's a tremendous undertaking in a home kitchen. So besides spaghetti, what else are you serving, you'd need several gallons of sauce, and what about meatballs? How many stoves are available? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "ViLco" > wrote in message > ... >> Paul M. Cook wrote: >> >>>> Isn't that the way it is done in restaurants? >> >>> Yes, that's where I learned it. Often we'd take about 8 ounces at a >>> time and roll them into "nests" and store in the fridge Pre-cooking >>> the pasta has no effect on the final dish. Nobody can tell. >> >> Only if everybody is used to eat overcooked pasta, otherwise >> everybody can tell. > > Hello? Al dente?? If you know what the **** you're doing you do > not get overcooked pasta. And that is sort of the key to cooking. Knowing > what the **** you're doing. Heh. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() >>> Yes, that's where I learned it. Often we'd take about 8 ounces at a >>> time and roll them into "nests" and store in the fridge Pre-cooking >>> the pasta has no effect on the final dish. Nobody can tell. >> Only if everybody is used to eat overcooked pasta, otherwise >> everybody can tell. > Hello? Al dente?? If you know what the **** you're doing you do > not get overcooked pasta. If you know what the **** you're eating you do not eat pre-cooked pasta. Plain and simple. > And that is sort of the key to cooking. Knowing what the **** you're > doing. You missed the main point: knowing what the **** you're eating. But that doesn't surprise me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pennyaline" > ha scritto nel messaggio > Spaghetti cooked al dente, cooled, then reheated with a quick in and out > of boiling water works out just fine. There is not enough time for the > water to cook the pasta any further during rewarming. But the spaghetti is not still cooking and will never blend with the sauce as it should. Vilco is telling you an Italian truth. You all are insisting it isn't true. I am on Vilco's side, sorry. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 6:26*pm, "Pete C." > wrote:
> Janet wrote: > > > Kalmia wrote: > > > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > > > while - say 15-20 minutes? *What if I just add cold water, bring it > > > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? *Will it still be > > > edible? get soggy? *How soon? > > > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > > > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > > > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > > Stagger it, or undercook it and plunge it into a REALLY large pot of rapidly > > boiling salted water at the last minute. > > Undercooking followed by the boiling water dunk before finishing is how > most restaurants do it. You can even cook it several hours ahead of time before reheating in boiling water. If you do, separate it into servings because it will all stick together. http://www.richardfisher.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 3:24*am, "ViLco" > wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote: > > You drain it and freshen it with a dunk in hot water just before > > serving. *That's how all the Italian (not Olive Garden) and Vietnamese > > restaurants do it. > > That's horrible. It takes 7-8 minutes to cook spaghetti, if they ruin a good > dish of spaghetti just to save 6-7 minutes then they are very cheap guys, > along with their customers. Reheating gives a much more controlled result than trying to time exactly in a busy kitchen. It is not detrimental to texture or taste. http://www.richardisher.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message news ![]() > Kalmia wrote: >> >> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > A 100 hungry people can eat a lot of spaghetti, figure on at least 1lb > feeding four... have you ever cooked 25 pounds of pasta in a brief > period. I recently cooked past for about 250 people, and the servers couldn't keep up with me. A lot of this depends on who is doing the cooking, how old the crowd is, and what kitchen arrangements you have. I would opt for cooking on the fly, as Vilco states, but if that is not possible the cook not quite done, shock, reheat works. If you add olive oil to the cooled pasta to keep it from sticking,the sauce won't stick as well (depends on the sauce) When storing the cooled pasta, spread it out on sheets, not lump in a bucket. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:00:31 -0700, Reggie wrote: > >> "Dimitri" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:13 -0700 (PDT), Kalmia wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a >>>>> while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it >>>>> down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be >>>>> edible? get soggy? How soon? >>>>> >>>>> Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >>>>> 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger >>>>> it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? >>>> >>>> You drain it and freshen it with a dunk in hot water just before >>>> serving. That's how all the Italian (not Olive Garden) and Vietnamese >>>> restaurants do it. >>>> >>>> -sw >>> >>> Like the man said. >>> >>> Dimitri >> >> yep, when he's right he's right. > > I'm right 97.62% of the time, Shirley. yes, but around here, the expectation is 100%, or better. Please get your act together. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/28/2011 8:26 AM, Giusi wrote:
> h> ha scritto nel messaggio >> Spaghetti cooked al dente, cooled, then reheated with a quick in and out >> of boiling water works out just fine. There is not enough time for the >> water to cook the pasta any further during rewarming. > > But the spaghetti is not still cooking and will never blend with the sauce > as it should. Vilco is telling you an Italian truth. You all are insisting > it isn't true. I am on Vilco's side, sorry. > > Don't be sorry. I'm just repeating to you something that's been known to work for big spaghetti dinners. The object is to hold it then rewarm it without over cooking it. Remember how Americans tend to use sauce, too. We don't generally think of it as a lightly-used complement to pasta. We swamp our pasta with it! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ViLco" > wrote in message ... > >>>> Yes, that's where I learned it. Often we'd take about 8 ounces at a >>>> time and roll them into "nests" and store in the fridge Pre-cooking >>>> the pasta has no effect on the final dish. Nobody can tell. > >>> Only if everybody is used to eat overcooked pasta, otherwise >>> everybody can tell. > >> Hello? Al dente?? If you know what the **** you're doing you do >> not get overcooked pasta. > > If you know what the **** you're eating you do not eat pre-cooked pasta. > Plain and simple. Can't read, Bubba? The poster was making a lot of pasta for a lot of people and wanted to know how not to overcook it. We'll add imbecile to your lengthy list of talents. >> And that is sort of the key to cooking. Knowing what the **** you're >> doing. > > You missed the main point: knowing what the **** you're eating. > But that doesn't surprise me. If you can't pre-cook pasta and then warm it up and not have it turn into a pile of goop, then you have absolutely no business in a kitchen. Have your mommy hide the sharp knives, too. Paul |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 10:05*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> Kalmia wrote: > > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > A 100 hungry people can eat a lot of spaghetti, figure on at least 1lb > feeding four... have you ever cooked 25 pounds of pasta in a brief > period. > > I don't recommend doing a spaghetti dinner for 100 in a home kitchen. > The typical residentail stove has but one large top burner, and will > probably need 15 minutes to bring an 8 qt pot of water to the boil and > 15 minutes cooking time... unless you plan on staggering the feeding > over several hours I don't think it's a reasonable concept to fulfill. > You need a commercial kitchen. > > I think you may have a better chance feeding 100 people baked ziti, > and that's a tremendous undertaking in a home kitchen. *So besides > spaghetti, what else are you serving, you'd need several gallons of > sauce, and what about meatballs? *How many stoves are available? The facility has a 6 burner stove. The sauce and meatballs will be in a huge cauldron, I guess. I only offered to help, but would like to add some logistical expertise. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Giusi" wrote:
>"Pennyaline" writes >> Spaghetti cooked al dente, cooled, then reheated with a quick in and out >> of boiling water works out just fine. There is not enough time for the >> water to cook the pasta any further during rewarming. That works in a commercial kitchen with huge pots of boiling water on a commercial stove, they even have pots with several pie shaped baskets http://www.bakedeco.com/detail.asp?id=22968 the typical home stove can't recover quickly enough to reheat cold pasta, certainly not in quantities to feed so many. >But the spaghetti is not still cooking and will never blend with the sauce >as it should. Vilco is telling you an Italian truth. You all are insisting >it isn't true. I am on Vilco's side, sorry. That's a lotta hooey, one WOP lies and the other WOP swears to it... neither of you dagos ever cooked in a commercial kitchen. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
its how most resto do it nowdays from the small mom and pop right up to
olive garden "ViLco" > wrote in message ... > Sqwertz wrote: > >> You drain it and freshen it with a dunk in hot water just before >> serving. That's how all the Italian (not Olive Garden) and Vietnamese >> restaurants do it. > > That's horrible. It takes 7-8 minutes to cook spaghetti, if they ruin a > good dish of spaghetti just to save 6-7 minutes then they are very cheap > guys, along with their customers. > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Kalmia > wrote: > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > while - say 15-20 minutes? What if I just add cold water, bring it > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? Will it still be > edible? get soggy? How soon? > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. I figure if we stagger > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? We used to oil ours a bit (after rinsing) and keep it in a roaster on low. Serving about the same number of people. I would never let it sit in water. Just sayin'. -- Barb, http://web.me.com/barbschaller September 5, 2011 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote: > Kalmia wrote: > > > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > I don't recommend doing a spaghetti dinner for 100 in a home kitchen. She didn't say it was a home kitchen, Sheldon. <slaps him upside the haid> Pay attention!! "-0) -- Barb, http://web.me.com/barbschaller September 5, 2011 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 1:44*pm, Melba's Jammin' >
wrote: > In article > >, > > *Kalmia > wrote: > > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > > while - say 15-20 minutes? *What if I just add cold water, bring it > > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? *Will it still be > > edible? get soggy? *How soon? > > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > We used to oil ours a bit (after rinsing) and keep it in a roaster on > low. *Serving about the same number of people. * I would never let it > sit in water. *Just sayin'. > -- > Barb,http://web.me.com/barbschallerSeptember 5, 2011 Sounds like a good way to keep it hot, not sticking together, and out of water. Thanks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:46:23 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote: >In article >, > Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote: > >> Kalmia wrote: >> > >> > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep >> > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger >> > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > >> I don't recommend doing a spaghetti dinner for 100 in a home kitchen. > >She didn't say it was a home kitchen, Sheldon. <slaps him upside the >haid> Pay attention!! "-0) No slapping. Use a club please. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:05:12 -0600, Pennyaline
> wrote: > > > > Don't be sorry. I'm just repeating to you something that's been known to > work for big spaghetti dinners. The object is to hold it then rewarm it > without over cooking it. Remember how Americans tend to use sauce, too. > We don't generally think of it as a lightly-used complement to pasta. We > swamp our pasta with it! What I don't like is that it's poured on top of naked pasta. Ugh. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Kalmia > wrote: > On Oct 28, 1:44*pm, Melba's Jammin' > > wrote: > > In article > > >, > > > > *Kalmia > wrote: > > > Is there a way to keep it hot on the stove but not serve it for a > > > while - say 15-20 minutes? *What if I just add cold water, bring it > > > down to abt 100 degrees and let it sit in the water? *Will it still be > > > edible? get soggy? *How soon? > > > > > Trying to help a woman put on a spaghetti dinner for 100 ppl and keep > > > 3 pots of pasta 'going' and ready to serve. *I figure if we stagger > > > it, one pot every 15 minutes......or is this a fool's errand? > > > > We used to oil ours a bit (after rinsing) and keep it in a roaster on > > low. *Serving about the same number of people. * I would never let it > > sit in water. *Just sayin'. > > -- > > Barb,http://web.me.com/barbschallerSeptember 5, 2011 > > Sounds like a good way to keep it hot, not sticking together, and out > of water. Thanks. It's not perfect but it is practical, especially if your sauce is very hot. -- Barb, http://web.me.com/barbschaller September 5, 2011 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what do you do with overcooked lamb? | Diabetic | |||
overcooked broccoli | General Cooking | |||
Overcooked broccoli? don't throw it out, here's a remedy. | General Cooking | |||
Most easily overcooked foods... | General Cooking |