sf wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Wow! That would be an extremely dangerous practice. My best
>> friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
>> seafood.
>
> Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. People are usually
> allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. Maybe he's one of those
> who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
Seems to me, in common parlance, seafood does not refer to fish,
although technically, it should.

--
Jean B.

On Oct 30, 4:18*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> > Wow! *That would be an extremely dangerous practice. *My best
> > friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
> > seafood.
>
> Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. *People are usually
> allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. *Maybe he's one of those
> who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
> --
> All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.

Exactly!!! "I LOVE DOGS, but I'm allergic". Okay, why don't you just
admit they're too much trouble. Everyone these days is a whiny,
pathetic pain in the ass <cough> Julie Bove <cough>. Remember when we
just lived our lives and if something didn't appeal we just didn't eat
it without a GRAND ANNOUNCEMENT. Nobody cares. Hey Bovine, if you
don't like something, feel free to just not post on that topic. Is
that really so complicated? And Stormee - really, the "legally
blind" (ie. NOT blind) thing does not excuse top posting and replying
dozens of times. Knock it off, ****.

Now, on the original topic - this sounds like the type of people who
want to do "maximum damage" at an all you can eat buffet. Don't eat
salad because it doesn't cost as much. But don't you like salad?
****ing hill jacks.

On Oct 30, 9:25*pm, "Jean B." > wrote:
> sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> >> Wow! *That would be an extremely dangerous practice. *My best
> >> friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
> >> seafood.
>
> > Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. *People are usually
> > allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. *Maybe he's one of those
> > who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
> Seems to me, in common parlance, seafood does not refer to fish,
> although technically, it should.
>
> --
> Jean B.

And when have you ever heard of someone who was allergic to freshwater
fish but was okay with seafood? I mean someone who is normal <Julie
Bovine just skip this topic>?

"BillyZoom" > wrote in message
...
On Oct 30, 4:18 pm, sf > wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> > Wow! That would be an extremely dangerous practice. My best
> > friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
> > seafood.
>
> Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. People are usually
> allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. Maybe he's one of those
> who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
> --
> All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.

Exactly!!! "I LOVE DOGS, but I'm allergic". Okay, why don't you just
admit they're too much trouble. Everyone these days is a whiny,
pathetic pain in the ass <cough> Julie Bove <cough>. Remember when we
just lived our lives and if something didn't appeal we just didn't eat
it without a GRAND ANNOUNCEMENT. Nobody cares. Hey Bovine, if you
don't like something, feel free to just not post on that topic. Is
that really so complicated? And Stormee - really, the "legally
blind" (ie. NOT blind) thing does not excuse top posting and replying
dozens of times. Knock it off, ****.

Now, on the original topic - this sounds like the type of people who
want to do "maximum damage" at an all you can eat buffet. Don't eat
salad because it doesn't cost as much. But don't you like salad?
****ing hill jacks.

Oh hey! FOAD!

"BillyZoom" > wrote in message
...
On Oct 30, 9:25 pm, "Jean B." > wrote:
> sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> >> Wow! That would be an extremely dangerous practice. My best
> >> friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
> >> seafood.
>
> > Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. People are usually
> > allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. Maybe he's one of those
> > who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
> Seems to me, in common parlance, seafood does not refer to fish,
> although technically, it should.
>
> --
> Jean B.

And when have you ever heard of someone who was allergic to freshwater
fish but was okay with seafood? I mean someone who is normal <Julie
Bovine just skip this topic>?

I'll read whatever the hell I want to!

On Oct 31, 1:38*am, "Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "BillyZoom" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Oct 30, 9:25 pm, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > sf wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> > >> Wow! That would be an extremely dangerous practice. My best
> > >> friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
> > >> seafood.
>
> > > Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. People are usually
> > > allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. Maybe he's one of those
> > > who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
> > Seems to me, in common parlance, seafood does not refer to fish,
> > although technically, it should.
>
> > --
> > Jean B.
>
> And when have you ever heard of someone who was allergic to freshwater
> fish but was okay with seafood? I mean someone who is normal <Julie
> Bovine just skip this topic>?
>
> I'll read whatever the hell I want to!

Please read all you want. Just spare us the comments. Not every post
requires your input. Nobody cares what you're allergic to or what you
don't like.

"BillyZoom" > wrote in message
...
On Oct 31, 1:38 am, "Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "BillyZoom" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Oct 30, 9:25 pm, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > sf wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:20:57 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
> > >> Wow! That would be an extremely dangerous practice. My best
> > >> friend has a potentially fatal allergy to fish, but he can eat
> > >> seafood.
>
> > > Seafood covers fish that live in the ocean. People are usually
> > > allergic to shellfish - not fish in general. Maybe he's one of those
> > > who don't like fish, so they claim to be allergic.
>
> > Seems to me, in common parlance, seafood does not refer to fish,
> > although technically, it should.
>
> > --
> > Jean B.
>
> And when have you ever heard of someone who was allergic to freshwater
> fish but was okay with seafood? I mean someone who is normal <Julie
> Bovine just skip this topic>?
>
> I'll read whatever the hell I want to!

Please read all you want. Just spare us the comments. Not every post
requires your input. Nobody cares what you're allergic to or what you
don't like.

Actually some people care. Some people have even sent me recipes. You
don't care. And I don't care that you don't care. You feel that you can
comment on anything you want. And yet you think you can tell others where
they can and can not reply. That's wrong!

jmcquown wrote:
>
> "Kalmia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Oct 28, 1:47 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>>
>> . Their is no
>>> rip-off here unless they are selling you mackerel and calling it
>>> blue fin
>>> tuna.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>
>> Yeah - big article in Consumer Reports this month on fish
>> substitutions.
>
>
> I seem to recall some years ago restaurants substituting skate and
> pretending they were sea scallops.
>
> Jill
I seem to recall a lot of urban legends. Skate would cost more than
scallops much like ordering a duck and getting a bald eagle.

-HB

On Oct 31, 7:53*pm, Honey Badger > wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
> > "Kalmia" > wrote in message
> ....
> >> On Oct 28, 1:47 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>
> >> . *Their is no
> >>> rip-off here unless they are selling you mackerel and calling it
> >>> blue fin
> >>> tuna.
>
> >>> Paul
>
> >> Yeah - big article in Consumer Reports *this month on fish
> >> substitutions.
>
> > I seem to recall some years ago restaurants substituting skate and
> > pretending they were sea scallops.
>
> > Jill
>
> I seem to recall a lot of urban legends. *Skate would cost more than
> scallops much like ordering a duck and getting a bald eagle.

Eagle meat is supposed to taste nasty. Might as well eat seagulls.
I'd far rather have farm raised, grain fed duck. You are a dumbass.
Skate is far cheaper than real scallops, and I wouldn't eat it unless
I was desperate.
>
> -HB

--Bryan

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:53:43 -0400, Honey Badger
> wrote:

>jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> "Kalmia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Oct 28, 1:47 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
>>>
>>> . Their is no
>>>> rip-off here unless they are selling you mackerel and calling it
>>>> blue fin
>>>> tuna.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>
>>> Yeah - big article in Consumer Reports this month on fish
>>> substitutions.
>>
>>
>> I seem to recall some years ago restaurants substituting skate and
>> pretending they were sea scallops.
>>
>> Jill
>I seem to recall a lot of urban legends. Skate would cost more than
>scallops much like ordering a duck and getting a bald eagle.
>
>-HB

I thought it was shark.
Janet US

On 10/31/2011 9:48 PM, Bryan wrote:
> On Oct 31, 7:53 pm, Honey > wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>> > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Oct 28, 1:47 pm, "Paul M. > wrote:
>>
>>>> . Their is no
>>>>> rip-off here unless they are selling you mackerel and calling it
>>>>> blue fin
>>>>> tuna.
>>
>>>>> Paul
>>
>>>> Yeah - big article in Consumer Reports this month on fish
>>>> substitutions.
>>
>>> I seem to recall some years ago restaurants substituting skate and
>>> pretending they were sea scallops.
>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I seem to recall a lot of urban legends. Skate would cost more than
>> scallops much like ordering a duck and getting a bald eagle.
>
> Eagle meat is supposed to taste nasty. Might as well eat seagulls.
> I'd far rather have farm raised, grain fed duck. You are a dumbass.
> Skate is far cheaper than real scallops, and I wouldn't eat it unless
> I was desperate.
>>

I once went duck hunting and shot one that I later knew had been eating
sea fish. It was quite inedible.


--


James Silverton, Potomac

I'm *not*

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:20:29 -0400, James Silverton
> wrote:

> I once went duck hunting and shot one that I later knew had been eating
> sea fish. It was quite inedible.
>
Wild duck tastes awful, period.

--
All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.