What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?

Felice

On Oct 28, 11:57*am, "Felice" > wrote:
> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>
> Felice

He'd say Andy started it.

On 28/10/2011 2:57 PM, Felice wrote:
> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>
>


Given the way someone is stupidly accusing us of keeping her in the
dark.... I am sure he would like to join in.

On 10/28/2011 12:58 PM, Chemo the Clown wrote:
> On Oct 28, 11:57 am, > wrote:
>> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
>> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>>
>> Felice
>
> He'd say Andy started it.

But I doubt he'd start another thread devoted to it.

"Felice" wrote:

>What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
>appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>
>Felice

The mick would say "oh noes, felice (the disingenuous ****) is a
****ing shit stirrer."

<snort>

On 10/28/2011 1:24 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 28/10/2011 2:57 PM, Felice wrote:
>> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
>> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>>
>>
>
>
> Given the way someone is stupidly accusing us of keeping her in the
> dark.... I am sure he would like to join in.

You really are taking that personally, aren't you?

And you still don't get it. <sigh> Reading IS fundamental.

As I said, I doubt he'd be so small as to start a new thread devoted to
it, or help you schlep your vendetta from thread to thread to plant it
here. He'd be bored with it by now.

On Oct 28, 2:45*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> "Felice" wrote:
> >What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
> >appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>
> >Felice
>
> The mick would say "oh noes, felice (the disingenuous ****) is a
> ****ing shit stirrer."
>
> <snort>

<derisive snort>

On 28/10/2011 4:00 PM, Pennyaline wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 1:24 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 28/10/2011 2:57 PM, Felice wrote:
>>> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
>>> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Given the way someone is stupidly accusing us of keeping her in the
>> dark.... I am sure he would like to join in.
>
> You really are taking that personally, aren't you?
>
> And you still don't get it. <sigh> Reading IS fundamental.
>
> As I said, I doubt he'd be so small as to start a new thread devoted to
> it, or help you schlep your vendetta from thread to thread to plant it
> here. He'd be bored with it by now.


Perhaps not. Probably half of his posts here were snips at stupidity....
read Andy. He could have had a hay day with you.

On 10/28/2011 2:22 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 28/10/2011 4:00 PM, Pennyaline wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 1:24 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 28/10/2011 2:57 PM, Felice wrote:
>>>> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
>>>> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Given the way someone is stupidly accusing us of keeping her in the
>>> dark.... I am sure he would like to join in.
>>
>> You really are taking that personally, aren't you?
>>
>> And you still don't get it. <sigh> Reading IS fundamental.
>>
>> As I said, I doubt he'd be so small as to start a new thread devoted to
>> it, or help you schlep your vendetta from thread to thread to plant it
>> here. He'd be bored with it by now.
>
>
> Perhaps not. Probably half of his posts here were snips at stupidity....
> read Andy. He could have had a hay day with you.

I doubt it. He never did. You should get over it, you know.

On Oct 28, 3:14*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:54:45 -0700, Christine Dabney wrote:
> > During dinner, I sat across from Blake. *He had ordered the raw meat
> > dish,
>
> Way to go Blake! *Ordering a raw meat dish at an Ethiopian restaurant
> - that takes Balls! *:-) *I probably would have done the same unless
> it was chicken.
>
> -sw

Yeah, sure you would.

On Oct 28, 2:57*pm, "Felice" > wrote:
> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>
> Felice

And....why are YOU bringing it up? It's pointless drivel.

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:16:56 -0700 (PDT), projectile vomit chick
> wrote:

>On Oct 28, 2:45*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>> "Felice" wrote:
>> >What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
>> >appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>>
>> >Felice
>>
>> The mick would say "oh noes, felice (the disingenuous ****) is a
>> ****ing shit stirrer."
>>
>> <snort>
>
><derisive snort>

Heheh... I'm really gonna miss my daily mick fix. There was no
animosity between us, each got what we gave... symbiosis personified.
I knew something was amiss when after so many years he stopped taking
my baits. Blake Murphy will forever be my mick.

On Oct 28, 2:57*pm, "Felice" > wrote:
> What Would Blake Do if he could read all the malignant posts that are
> appearing on threads that started out as kind words about him?
>
> Felice

He'd get up on his feet and say...uh, oops...