Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote: >> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> > How'd you make out with your ham? >> >> The 10.6 would have probably been enough by itself. > >What'd I tell you? Sheldon's full of beans. "-) What, you suddenly became illiterate... he clearly said that fully 1/3 of the people were no shows. And I truly believe we aren't hearing all the details because a 10 pound bone-in shank half will not feed even twenty people... there must have been a lot of extra food of all kinds due to those 1/3 no shows. Since it was a pot luck twenty people brought more food than was needed, maybe even a couple brought hams, they were probably all pigged out. We're not hearing an *honest* account because we aren't being told what else was brought to eat... we are getting a very biased account... we'll never know the truth, we weren't there, weren't even any pictures. I think this was from beginning to end another one of those total BS threads, borderline keyboard kookery. Barb, I know that you always offer pictures of your special projects. I don't believe any rfc'er who refuses to show photo images of what they claim was a special event. It wouldn't have been difficult to snap a few pics of the food laid out... there's been a lot more gum flapping than substance, somehow I don't believe there was any potluck, it was all a booze induced dream. Show me that ham on the table with all the other viands, only than will I believe. I think most folks here are so full of doodoo they leave brown stains on their pillows from their ears. And your comment was uncalled for because I would have cooked up a big batch of baked beans to go with that ham. I really don't believe any of what zxcvbob posts, I think his posts are all drug induced fantasy, they are as real as his name and his picture at the rfc mugs... bob is NOT a person's name, it's a haircut. >> I bought another 8# >> shank to go with it, then realized how much I had when I started cooking >> it all. I took a 9x13" lasagna pan full of thick-sliced ham to the >> potluck, and had a pound or two left at home. Probably 2/3 of it got >> eaten even tho' we only had 20 people show up that week. (a lot of the >> regulars were traveling out of town) I put most of the leftovers in the >> church freezer for the next men's breakfast, and we've almost finished >> eating the remainder. >> >> That was a lot of meat for $22! > >Next year you can buy decent candy for Halloween with what you didn't >spend. '-) >> -Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:10:34 PM UTC-5, zxcvbob wrote:
> I thought I was supposed to bring the turkey to the church potluck this > > weekend, but I've been asked to bring a ham instead. I've cooked hams > > before, but never paid any attention to how much they serve. > > > > I bought an 10.6 pound "ham with water added" bone-in ham shank today at > > Aldi. It was the largest half-ham in the case. That ought to serve > > 30-something people if it's not the only meat, right? Or should I go > > back and get one of the smaller butts too? > > > > -Bob not helpful |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/29/2014 7:03 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:06 -0700 (PDT), > wrote: > >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:10:34 PM UTC-5, zxcvbob wrote: >>> I thought I was supposed to bring the turkey to the church potluck this >>> weekend, but I've been asked to bring a ham instead. I've cooked hams >>> before, but never paid any attention to how much they serve. >>> >>> I bought an 10.6 pound "ham with water added" bone-in ham shank today at >>> Aldi. It was the largest half-ham in the case. That ought to serve >>> 30-something people if it's not the only meat, right? Or should I go >>> back and get one of the smaller butts too? >>> >>> -Bob >> >> not helpful > > Two years later, they probably got hungry and went home anyway. > But Ed! We're supposed to be available to answer every Google Grouper who stumbles upon RFC during a search. ![]() Jill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2 servings? | General Cooking | |||
servings per | Diabetic | |||
who wanted individual servings? | General Cooking | |||
Single Servings | General Cooking | |||
Loose leaf tea servings | Tea |