IE seems to be the big problem.

On Mar 1, 7:16*am, Bull > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *ImStillMags > wrote:
> > IE seems to be the big problem.
>
> Damn, is this YOU Kuthe?
>
> B *U LL

no.....I'm just informing other people, like me, who use google groups
to access this board, there have been some problems with google
switching formats on the groups.

On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:16:38 -0600, Bull > wrote:

>In article
>,
> ImStillMags > wrote:
>
>> IE seems to be the big problem.
>
>Damn, is this YOU Kuthe?
>
>B U LL

Dude! All I use IE for is possibly DLing Firefox on a new OS install!
But I have an EXE of Firefox backed up now, so...

:-)

John Kuthe...

On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:48:50 -0600, Bull > wrote:

>In article >,
> John Kuthe > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:16:38 -0600, Bull > wrote:
>>
>> >In article
>> >,
>> > ImStillMags > wrote:
>> >
>> >> IE seems to be the big problem.
>> >
>> >Damn, is this YOU Kuthe?
>> >
>> >B U LL
>>
>> Dude! All I use IE for is possibly DLing Firefox on a new OS install!
>> But I have an EXE of Firefox backed up now, so...
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> John Kuthe...
>
>IE and anything running it sucks. The PC will go the way of the
>dinosaur. The requirements for Windows 8 = 1GHz processor, 2GB RAM for
>a 64-bit install (1GB for 32-bit), 20GB of storage (16GB for 32-bit),
>and DX9 graphics. It has become the brontosaurus. Too BIG for its own
>self - overgrown, cumbersome and not all that smart.
>
>
>BULL

We agree in this Bull! Microsoft's "everything including the kitchen
sink" paradigm of OS construction is BS. If I can't afford a Mac next
time I need a magor hardware upgrade/repair, I will go with some
flavor of Linux if I can't reuse my Win XP CD.

John Kuthe...

On Mar 1, 7:48*am, Bull > wrote:
> In article >,
> *John Kuthe > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:16:38 -0600, Bull > wrote:
>
> > >In article
> > >,
> > > ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > >> IE seems to be the big problem.
>
> > >Damn, is this YOU Kuthe?
>
> > >B *U LL
>
> > Dude! All I use IE for is possibly DLing Firefox on a new OS install!
> > But I have an EXE of Firefox backed up now, so...
>
> > :-)
>
> > John Kuthe...
>
> IE and anything running it sucks. *The PC will go the way of the
> dinosaur. The requirements for Windows 8 = *1GHz processor, 2GB RAM for
> a 64-bit install (1GB for 32-bit), 20GB of storage (16GB for 32-bit),
> and DX9 graphics. It has become the brontosaurus. *Too BIG for its own
> self - overgrown, *cumbersome and not all that smart.
>

Firefox isn't helping -- it uses more memory than Exploder for the
same number of windows.

On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:51:14 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
> wrote:
....
>
>Firefox isn't helping -- it uses more memory than Exploder for the
>same number of windows.

The newer versions of FF suck. I backdated to V3.6.4 I think, because
as I upgraded FF became more and more unusable.

John Kuthe...