|
PIC's: A giants meal.
Just for that moronic brain dead Mcquown..........
http://tinypic.com/m/fcths0/3 http://tinypic.com/m/fcths1/3 O...M...F...G!!!!! That is one *HUGE* ****ing meal, isn't it jilly mac? The people eating it must be *HUGE* because everything in the picture is just *sooooooooooooooooooo* ****ing huge!!! I mean...... those grapes must be the size of a wheelbarrow!! And the capsicum...!! Jeeeeeeeezus!! That must be the size of a small car!! And the cucumber.......... *faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaark*, that's the size of a large tree!!! (You truly are a *complete* brain dead ****ing moron mcquown!!) -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 3/14/2012 8:43 AM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> O...M...F...G!!!!! That is one *HUGE* ****ing meal, isn't it jilly mac? > > The people eating it must be *HUGE* because everything in the picture is > just *sooooooooooooooooooo* ****ing huge!!! > > I mean...... those grapes must be the size of a wheelbarrow!! And the > capsicum...!! Jeeeeeeeezus!! That must be the size of a small car!! And the > cucumber.......... *faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaark*, that's the size of a > large tree!!! At least it's not those shitty mashed potatoes. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Pennyaline wrote:
>> The people eating it must be *HUGE* because everything in the picture is >> just *sooooooooooooooooooo* ****ing huge!!! >At least it's not those shitty mashed potatoes. Must have been bleached. The shit, that is. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Pennyaline > wrote in
: > On 3/14/2012 8:43 AM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: > >> O...M...F...G!!!!! That is one *HUGE* ****ing meal, isn't it jilly >> mac? >> >> The people eating it must be *HUGE* because everything in the picture >> is just *sooooooooooooooooooo* ****ing huge!!! >> >> I mean...... those grapes must be the size of a wheelbarrow!! And the >> capsicum...!! Jeeeeeeeezus!! That must be the size of a small car!! >> And the cucumber.......... *faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaark*, that's the >> size of a large tree!!! > > > At least it's not those shitty mashed potatoes. > If you didn't try them for the flavour, you have no right to comment like that. -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 3/14/2012 3:37 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> If you didn't try them for the flavour, you have no right to comment like > that. The samples you sent out for flavor sampling still haven't arrived, so that left the pictures alone to judge by. If you don't want your food pics judged by appearance, don't post them. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Pennyaline > wrote in
: > On 3/14/2012 3:37 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: >> If you didn't try them for the flavour, you have no right to comment >> like that. > > > The samples you sent out for flavor sampling still haven't arrived, so > that left the pictures alone to judge by. > > If you don't want your food pics judged by appearance, don't post > them. > Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan, however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very pedestrian life. The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very* tasty. It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did. One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats the same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. Your uninformed comments only make you look like the rest of the morons on here, who, at the end of the day, are showing how immature and bigotted they are. Are you a bigot? Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ?? BTW, you talk about "judging" peoples food pics. This group is about food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of it, it's not a contest so no 'judges' are required. You are stood down. -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 15/03/2012 11:38 AM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> > wrote in > : > >> On 3/14/2012 3:37 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: >>> If you didn't try them for the flavour, you have no right to comment >>> like that. >> >> >> The samples you sent out for flavor sampling still haven't arrived, so >> that left the pictures alone to judge by. >> >> If you don't want your food pics judged by appearance, don't post >> them. >> > > > Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan, > however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what > something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very > pedestrian life. You keep forgetting that the only way people can come to any judgement on what you post is by your words (oft proven to be lies) and your deeds, in these cases shown as pictures of your cooking. Given that you are prone to lies, your pictures may not even be of your works. > > The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very* tasty. We have only your word for that and that has proven to be more than a little shaky! The pics you posted showed very lumpy mash covered by what could best be described as glop. No doubt the glop was intentional to cover the evidence of the lumpy mash. > > It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did. > You had to eat ALL of it as no one else would (or could!). > > One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats the > same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. The only people I ever hear making "not everyone in the world .... " kinds of excuses are attempting to cover up the fact that they screwed up. My neighbour is prone to usage of the phrase when he makes a comment and the responses are not to his liking. If you're not prepared for the gamut of possible responses, don't put your views (or pics) foreward for discussion. > Your uninformed comments only make you look like the rest of > the morons on here, who, at the end of the day, are showing > how immature and bigotted they are. If our comments are "uninformed" as you say, then it seems you are wasting your time writing and posting pics of your cooking escapades as they are all we have to go on. Someone suggested you provide samples to all and sundry on RFC so they can be "suitably informed". Don't bother! As any good chef knows, proper presentation of a meal is the start of a fine dining experience. Your presentation sucks so we will automatically have much lower expectations. > > Are you a bigot? That would be you! > > Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ?? See above. > > BTW, you talk about "judging" peoples food pics. This group is about food, > the cooking thereof, and the eating of it, it's not a contest so no > 'judges' are required. You are stood down. > The way you run it, it IS a contest where you are always saying "Hey, look at me!!! look at me!!!" Well, other posters did look at you, did judge your works and did find you wanting. Get over it or better yet, get used to it as you will get a lot more negative criticism in future. -- Krypsis |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 3/14/2012 6:38 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan, > however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what > something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very > pedestrian life. Which is why I asked about any pending tasting samples, about which you consistently demur. I'm left with no option but to use the only venue left, appearance, which was dreadful. > The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very* tasty. Glad for ya, sport! Unfortunately, your assertion is unprovable. > It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did. I've seen people eat some strange things in my time, so your brag may be a bit empty. > One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats the > same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. Your uninformed > comments only make you look like the rest of the morons on here, who, at > the end of the day, are showing how immature and bigotted they are. Nothing points up immaturity and bigotry like your comment right there. > Are you a bigot? You're bigoted enough for both of us, hon. > Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ?? Unlike you, yes, I am! I don't understand why you're taking this so hard. > BTW, you talk about "judging" peoples food pics. This group is about food, > the cooking thereof, and the eating of it, it's not a contest so no > 'judges' are required. You are stood down. I didn't mention judging first. You did. Yes, this group is about food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of it. Eating is done with the eyes. Presentation is everything. The pic of those potatoes that you ever so proudly provided--and believe me, we could tell you were beaming and busting your buttons--made them look like lumpy pallid pudding. Those potatoes were unappetizing and dreadful to look at. If you hadn't told us they were mashed potatoes, we probably wouldn't have been able to identify what it was at all. Sorry you can't deal with it. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Pennyaline > wrote in
: > On 3/14/2012 6:38 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: > >> Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan, >> however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what >> something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very >> pedestrian life. > > > Which is why I asked about any pending tasting samples, about which > you consistently demur. I'm left with no option but to use the only > venue left, appearance, which was dreadful. You bang on avbout 'samples' and don't give me an address to send them to (and highly unlikely you would!!), so therefore, one can only assume you're full of shit when you're talking about it. And once again, you make an *ass*umption based on a (generally reported) photo with bad lighting. More fool you. > > > >> The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very* >> tasty. > > Glad for ya, sport! Unfortunately, your assertion is unprovable. As is yours..... but that part will never come into the argument, will it? LOL!!! > > > >> It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did. > > I've seen people eat some strange things in my time, so your brag may > be a bit empty. It's not a brag. It's a statement. > > > >> One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats >> the same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. Your >> uninformed comments only make you look like the rest of the morons on >> here, who, at the end of the day, are showing how immature and >> bigotted they are. > > Nothing points up immaturity and bigotry like your comment right > there. Oh dear!! That point hit a home run, and we didn't like it, did we??!! LOL!!! > > > >> Are you a bigot? > > You're bigoted enough for both of us, hon. Your non-compliance to a straight yes or no question is duly noted. I wouldn't say I was a bigot, honey, I like everyone and anything till you **** me off. You, on the other hand, along with the other bigots on here, show your true colours with your posts. > > > >> Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ?? > > Unlike you, yes, I am! I don't understand why you're taking this so > hard. I'm not, it's you morons that can't accept the truth about yourselves. > > > >> BTW, you talk about "judging" peoples food pics. This group is about >> food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of it, it's not a contest >> so no 'judges' are required. You are stood down. > > I didn't mention judging first. You did. LOL!!! Semantics..... the first sign that you have lost the argument. > > Yes, this group is about food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of > it. Eating is done with the eyes. Presentation is everything. The pic > of those potatoes that you ever so proudly provided--and believe me, > we could tell you were beaming and busting your buttons-- You *could*!! LOL!!! You make up whatever shit you want to help your bigotry along, honey, it probably helps you to sleep better at night knowing you're such a person of 'high standards' and principles, doesn't it sweetie? > made them > look like lumpy pallid pudding. Those potatoes were unappetizing and > dreadful to look at. If you hadn't told us they were mashed potatoes, > we probably wouldn't have been able to identify what it was at all. Which just goes to show you are a pedestrian cook/eater. > Sorry you can't deal with it. > ROFLMAO!!! It's you bigotted morons who can't deal with it!!! -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
"Julie Bove" > wrote in
: > > "jmcquown" > wrote in message > ... >> >>> >> Oh, I wouldn't say "unprovoked" :) But it's true I haven't met any >> one person who could eat three thick slices of beef tenderloin and a >> plate full of salad at one sitting. > > I guess you don't get out much? > > > LOL!!! mcquown will start whining now about the cost of going out, hoping you'll take pity on her 'plight' and send her money!! -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
"I'm back on the laptop" > wrote in message ... > "Julie Bove" > wrote in > : > >> >> "jmcquown" > wrote in message >> ... >>> > >>>> >>> Oh, I wouldn't say "unprovoked" :) But it's true I haven't met any >>> one person who could eat three thick slices of beef tenderloin and a >>> plate full of salad at one sitting. >> >> I guess you don't get out much? >> >> >> > > > LOL!!! > > > mcquown will start whining now about the cost of going out, hoping you'll > take pity on her 'plight' and send her money!! Oh yeah. I forgot that she doesn't like to go out. After all when you go out, you might encounter cold food. And she doesn't like cold food. I remember! |
It looks amazing. Really a giants diet.
|
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 15/03/2012 2:29 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> > wrote in > : > >> On 3/14/2012 6:38 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: >> >>> Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan, >>> however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what >>> something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very >>> pedestrian life. >> >> >> Which is why I asked about any pending tasting samples, about which >> you consistently demur. I'm left with no option but to use the only >> venue left, appearance, which was dreadful. > > > You bang on avbout 'samples' and don't give me an address to send them > to (and highly unlikely you would!!), so therefore, one can only assume > you're full of shit when you're talking about it. That's samples to EVERYONE who reads RFC. You'll be spending quite some time in the kitchen and down at the post office! > > And once again, you make an *ass*umption based on a (generally reported) > photo with bad lighting. More fool you. You made an "ass"umption that **** poor photography could in some way compensate for bad food preparation and presentation. The greatest fool here is you. > > >> >> >> >>> The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very* >>> tasty. >> >> Glad for ya, sport! Unfortunately, your assertion is unprovable. > > > As is yours..... but that part will never come into the argument, will > it? LOL!!! > Based on the poor presentation of your "product" and suitably "enhanced" by poor lighting and even poorer photography, your assertion needs no further proof. It is plainly evident to all. > > >> >> >> >>> It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did. >> >> I've seen people eat some strange things in my time, so your brag may >> be a bit empty. > > > It's not a brag. You wanted plaudits, you received brickbats! You cracked the sads! It was a brag! > > It's a statement. > A statement that was "read" by all and which provided confirmation of your poor cooking skills. > > >> >> >> >>> One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats >>> the same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. Your >>> uninformed comments only make you look like the rest of the morons on >>> here, who, at the end of the day, are showing how immature and >>> bigotted they are. >> >> Nothing points up immaturity and bigotry like your comment right >> there. > > > > Oh dear!! That point hit a home run, and we didn't like it, did we??!! > LOL!!! > Home run? I sincerely doubt it. It just showed all on RFC just how childish you really are. Now run along sonny and go play with people who will pander to your deflated ego. > > >> >> >> >>> Are you a bigot? >> >> You're bigoted enough for both of us, hon. > > > Your non-compliance to a straight yes or no question is duly noted. > > I wouldn't say I was a bigot, honey, I like everyone and anything till > you **** me off. > > You, on the other hand, along with the other bigots on here, show your > true colours with your posts. > You are indeed showing yours now! >> >>> Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ?? >> >> Unlike you, yes, I am! I don't understand why you're taking this so >> hard. > > I'm not, it's you morons that can't accept the truth about yourselves. > Like you can't accept the truth about your disastrous mashed spuds! > >> >>> BTW, you talk about "judging" peoples food pics. This group is about >>> food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of it, it's not a contest >>> so no 'judges' are required. You are stood down. >> >> I didn't mention judging first. You did. > > LOL!!! Semantics..... the first sign that you have lost the argument. > >> Yes, this group is about food, the cooking thereof, and the eating of >> it. Eating is done with the eyes. Presentation is everything. The pic >> of those potatoes that you ever so proudly provided--and believe me, >> we could tell you were beaming and busting your buttons-- > > > > You *could*!! LOL!!! > > > You make up whatever shit you want to help your bigotry along, honey, it > probably helps you to sleep better at night knowing you're such a person > of 'high standards' and principles, doesn't it sweetie? > Judging by your comments, you have no such high standards. Certainly you display little intellect! > > > >> made them >> look like lumpy pallid pudding. Those potatoes were unappetizing and >> dreadful to look at. If you hadn't told us they were mashed potatoes, >> we probably wouldn't have been able to identify what it was at all. > > > Which just goes to show you are a pedestrian cook/eater. > Nobody would have been able to identify your mashed spuds. That's because they were (a) lumpy and (b) hidden by the glop you put on them. You ascribed the lumpiness to having cooked the spuds with skin on. Nobody makes mashed potatoes with potato skins in the mix because it well and truly stuffs up the creamy texture mashed spuds are supposed to have. No wonder you secreted your mash under copious quantities of glop. > > >> Sorry you can't deal with it. >> > > > ROFLMAO!!! > > It's you bigotted morons who can't deal with it!!! > > You, after being told so many times by so many different people, still cannot deal with it. -- Krypsis |
PIC's: A giants meal.
"Julie Bove" > wrote in
: > > "I'm back on the laptop" > wrote in message > ... >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in >> : >> >>> >>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> >> >>>>> >>>> Oh, I wouldn't say "unprovoked" :) But it's true I haven't met any >>>> one person who could eat three thick slices of beef tenderloin and >>>> a plate full of salad at one sitting. >>> >>> I guess you don't get out much? >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> LOL!!! >> >> >> mcquown will start whining now about the cost of going out, hoping >> you'll take pity on her 'plight' and send her money!! > > Oh yeah. I forgot that she doesn't like to go out. After all when > you go out, you might encounter cold food. And she doesn't like cold > food. I remember! > > > LOL!!! *Any* excuse will do to throw the real thruth off that she's a cheap nasty piece of work, who's more comfortable sitting at home in her ****ed stained tackie daks, peering through the curtains at the outside world. Cold food!!!! ROFLMAO!!! -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:22:27 PM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
> But it's true I haven't met any one > person who could eat three thick slices > of beef tenderloin and a plate full > of salad at one sitting. It is true that we have never met. :) > > Jill --Bryan |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Bryan > wrote in
news:9952360.612.1331819513933.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlt15: > On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:22:27 PM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote: > >> But it's true I haven't met any one >> person who could eat three thick slices >> of beef tenderloin and a plate full >> of salad at one sitting. > > It is true that we have never met. :) >> >> Jill > > --Bryan > And you probably don't want to meet her either. Think leech. -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 4:30:30 AM UTC-6, RussianFoodDire wrote:
> It looks amazing. Really a giants diet. > > > > > -- > RussianFoodDire Yes, if you like chopped tomatoes with partial stems attached. Looks like he just grabbed a cleaver and went berserk on the veggies. == |
PIC's: A giants meal.
> PL away from home > wrote: > >> But I *really* don't expect your immature little brain to be able to >> comprehend that........ no wonder your parents killed themselves to >> get away from you!!! LOL!!! > HOW ****ING DARE YOU! YOU GODDAMN TROLL! |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Dave Smith > wrote in news:bTR8r.59948$rl3.18277
@unlimited.newshosting.com: > On 14/03/2012 8:22 PM, moronic mcquown wrote: >> >>> >> Oh, I wouldn't say "unprovoked" :) But it's true I haven't met any one >> person who could eat three thick slices of beef tenderloin and a plate >> full of salad at one sitting. >> > > My wife could. > Here's the pic again........ you be the 'judge' on "three thick slices of beef tenderloin and a plate full of salad" Bearing in mind that the green sphere on the left of that *HUGE* slab of meat, is a grape. http://tinypic.com/m/fco58z/3 Oh, and the *HUGE* chunks of black stuff on the steak, are cracked pepper. Moronic mcqwuon has based her entire pathetic statements on the fact that its brain can't recognise that the picture was taken in close up. Its brain looks at the pic and goes "WHOA!! That's one *HUGE* meal!!" -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On Mar 17, 11:18*am, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> > PL away from home > wrote: > > >> But I *really* don't expect your immature little brain to be able to > >> comprehend that........ no wonder your parents killed themselves to > >> get away from you!!! LOL!!! > > HOW ****ING DARE YOU! *YOU GODDAMN TROLL! Well, here's a clue, you mental retard..... if you don't sling shit, you won't end up with any slung at you. Got it?? When you *do* sling shit, don't start crying and bleating because you get the same back, it just makes you look like the pathetic mental retard you are. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:43:25 +0000 (UTC), "I'm back on the laptop"
> wrote: >Just for that moronic brain dead Mcquown.......... > > >http://tinypic.com/m/fcths0/3 > > >http://tinypic.com/m/fcths1/3 > > > >O...M...F...G!!!!! That is one *HUGE* ****ing meal, isn't it jilly mac? > >The people eating it must be *HUGE* because everything in the picture is >just *sooooooooooooooooooo* ****ing huge!!! > >I mean...... those grapes must be the size of a wheelbarrow!! And the >capsicum...!! Jeeeeeeeezus!! That must be the size of a small car!! And the >cucumber.......... *faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaark*, that's the size of a >large tree!!! > > >(You truly are a *complete* brain dead ****ing moron mcquown!!) and you are a freaking complete nutjob. period. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:38:11 +0000 (UTC), "I'm back on the laptop"
> wrote: >Pennyaline > wrote in : > >> On 3/14/2012 3:37 PM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: >>> If you didn't try them for the flavour, you have no right to comment >>> like that. >> >> >> The samples you sent out for flavor sampling still haven't arrived, so >> that left the pictures alone to judge by. >> >> If you don't want your food pics judged by appearance, don't post >> them. >> > > >Yes, admittedly, it didn't look very appertizing in the saucepan, >however... if you were to make up your mind wholly and soley on what >something looks like in a pan, then you'd have a very insular, very >pedestrian life. > >The potato that you made comment on was smooth, creamy, and *very* tasty. > >It was also something that I could eat quite a bit of, which I did. > > >One important point to remember..... not *everyone* in the world eats the >same food as you, and everyone has different tastes. Your uninformed >comments only make you look like the rest of the morons on here, who, at >the end of the day, are showing how immature and bigotted they are. > >Are you a bigot? it seems you have just learned the word 'bigot' this week. >Or are you mature enough to say "Hey, whatever floats your boat" ?? are you mature enough to turn the other cheek or just plain not worry about it? NO. instead you start new threads trying to prove how small the serving is. but thats not enough for you either, you then stalk her wherever she posts to blather on about the same thing there too! lmao just get over it!!!!!!!!! |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:29:26 +0000 (UTC), "I'm back on the laptop"
> wrote: >I wouldn't say I was a bigot, honey, I like everyone and anything till >you **** me off. which is why those lonely sailers are so nice to you. you like their semen and they like giving it to you. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
PL away from home wrote:
>> >> But I *really* don't expect your immature little brain to be able to >> >> comprehend that........ no wonder your parents killed themselves to >> >> get away from you!!! LOL!!! >> >> HOW ****ING DARE YOU! *YOU GODDAMN TROLL! >Well, here's a clue, you mental retard..... if you don't sling shit, >you won't end up with any slung at you. Got it?? Easy, Petey. Try teaching that same principle to Mary. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Will wrote:
>which is why those lonely sailers are so nice to you. you like their >semen and they like giving it to you. Does Petey boast about cheating on his wife with other men? |
PIC's: A giants meal.
I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> > So, back to the meal.......... do you eat shark? If you do, how do you cook > it? I bought some shark meat circa 30 years ago. That's when I was married with 2 children. the wife cut it up and fried "shark nuggets" looked just like chicken nuggets. Well...the two very young daughters ate it and loved it, thinking it was their favorite chicken nuggets. After the meal, I told them that it was shark meat not chicken. They both freaked out and refused to eat any REAL chicken nuggets for a long time afterwards. Even when it was chicken, they still suspected it was shark again. LOL! Stupid reasoning but true! Gary |
PIC's: A giants meal.
"I'm back on the laptop" wrote:
> >Here's the pic again........ you be the 'judge' on "three thick slices of >beef tenderloin and a plate full of salad" > >Bearing in mind that the green sphere on the left of that *HUGE* slab of >meat, is a grape. > >http://tinypic.com/m/fco58z/3 Portion size aside your presentation doesn't look at all appetizing... again with the not owning a salad plate... and you really destroyed that cut of beef... should have been a roast and sliced, not hacked into those puny hocky pucks served so that next to that pile of lawn clippings they look exactly like the raccoon turds I see on my lawn. If a resto served me that abortion I'd send it right back. When there's only a photo no one can smell or taste so it has to look edible and your presentations keep getting scummier, if that's possible... this one is as bad as your UNshark dish. Doesn't have to be art (better if it's not), just make it look palatable, that it actually looks like food, and that it was prepared by someone who cares about the people who have to eat it... your cooking style is obviously of the "my way or the highway/hooray for me and **** yoose" school... truth be known your wife tosses her portion to slop the hogs. I think Jill was just being polite in telling you about the portion size, but what she was really thinking is it looks like shit. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > "I'm back on the laptop" wrote: > > > >Here's the pic again........ you be the 'judge' on "three thick slices of > >beef tenderloin and a plate full of salad" > > > >Bearing in mind that the green sphere on the left of that *HUGE* slab of > >meat, is a grape. > > > >http://tinypic.com/m/fco58z/3 > > Portion size aside your presentation doesn't look at all appetizing... > again with the not owning a salad plate... and you really destroyed > that cut of beef... should have been a roast and sliced, not hacked > into those puny hocky pucks served so that next to that pile of lawn > clippings they look exactly like the raccoon turds I see on my lawn. > If a resto served me that abortion I'd send it right back. When > there's only a photo no one can smell or taste so it has to look > edible and your presentations keep getting scummier, if that's > possible... this one is as bad as your UNshark dish. Doesn't have to > be art (better if it's not), just make it look palatable, that it > actually looks like food, and that it was prepared by someone who > cares about the people who have to eat it... your cooking style is > obviously of the "my way or the highway/hooray for me and **** yoose" > school... truth be known your wife tosses her portion to slop the > hogs. I think Jill was just being polite in telling you about the > portion size, but what she was really thinking is it looks like shit. Whoa!~ :-o |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Gary > wrote in :
> Brooklyn1 wrote: >> (Nothing of any value or consequence..... again) > > Whoa!~ :-o > See what I mean about the bigots in here? If it's not done exactly how *they* want it done, then it's a pile of shit. More fool them. They sit behind the safety of their computer screens and postulate in their pompous way about something they know jack shit about. They leade *very* pedestrian lives, both in cooking sense, and in the lifestyle sense. -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 17/03/2012 12:39 AM, PL away from home wrote:
> > Well, here's a clue, you mental retard..... if you don't sling shit, > you won't end up with any slung at you. Got it?? > And here's a clue for you.... if you weren't such a retarded asshole you would not have to keep changing your name to get around twit filters. It's not big deal to end up in a the filters of a few people, but it is pathetic to have to keep changing names to get the attention you crave. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Captain Peter Swallows wrote about the other RFC participants:
> They leade[sic] *very* pedestrian lives, both in cooking sense, and in the lifestyle sense. Well, look where *your* lifestyle choices got you: Life-altering ass surgery, pancreas problems, inability to consume wine or most whole vegetables, tight budget, parasitism on a woman who loathes you by now, and probably AIDS! Bob |
PIC's: A giants meal.
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 17/03/2012 12:39 AM, PL away from home wrote: > >> >> Well, here's a clue, you mental retard..... if you don't sling shit, >> you won't end up with any slung at you. Got it?? >> What, Lucas, you think you're a mental giant?! Hardly. So I don't like your food photos... big ****ing deal! It does NOT give you the right to insult my parents, much less make up crap about them killing themselves. > And here's a clue for you.... if you weren't such a retarded asshole you > would not have to keep changing your name to get around twit filters. It's > not big deal to end up in a the filters of a few people, but it is > pathetic to have to keep changing names to get the attention you crave. > Yep, he's an attention whore, plain and simple. The fact that a lot of posters seem to agree with me jumps right over his pointy head. Jill |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Petey's meltdown is reaching critical mass.
>Like I said, you moronic bitch..... if you don't like personal shit >being flung at you, don't fling personal shit at anyone else. Get >*that* through that thick ****ing skull of yours. Isn't that funny. I said pretty much the same thing to Mary, and she threw a major hissy fit. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 19/03/2012 9:32 PM, PL away from home wrote:
>>> And here's a clue for you.... if you weren't such a retarded asshole you >>> would not have to keep changing your name to get around twit filters. It's >>> not big deal to end up in a the filters of a few people, but it is >>> pathetic to have to keep changing names to get the attention you crave. > > > > "Keep changing my name"??? You're an idiot Smith.... but then again, > you're from Canadia. > I only have *two* ID's in here, one for when > I'm at home, and one for > when I'm away from home. > > Stop being such a lying drama queen. > Yeah right. That is why there are so many of them in my Lucas filter.... and another just added. > >> >> Yep, he's an attention whore, plain and simple. > > > > ROFLMAO!!! And there, ladies and gentlemen, is the voice of > experience!! > > > >> The fact that a lot of >> posters seem to agree with me jumps right over his pointy head. > > > ROFLMFAO!!! "A lot of posters".... which seems to be made up of all > the useless ****ing trolls in here!! Yeah, you keep good company. > Naw. Jill is right. We aren't the only ones who think you are an ass. |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Dave Smith > wrote in
. com: > On 19/03/2012 9:32 PM, PL away from home wrote: > >>>> And here's a clue for you.... if you weren't such a retarded >>>> asshole you would not have to keep changing your name to get around >>>> twit filters. It's not big deal to end up in a the filters of a few >>>> people, but it is pathetic to have to keep changing names to get >>>> the attention you crave. >> >> >> >> "Keep changing my name"??? You're an idiot Smith.... but then again, >> you're from Canadia. >> I only have *two* ID's in here, one for when > I'm at home, and one >> for when I'm away from home. >> >> Stop being such a lying drama queen. >> > > > Yeah right. That is why there are so many of them in my Lucas > filter.... and another just added. "Soooo many"??? That's because you've killfiled half your idiot mates who are so obsessed with me that they use my name when they make a post. But you're too thick and stupid to realise that, aren't you? Once again, moron..... I have *two* ID's in here. This one, and "Pl away from home". Try not to show everyone you are as thick as two short planks, OK? http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...-thick-as-two- short-planks >> ROFLMFAO!!! "A lot of posters".... which seems to be made up of all >> the useless ****ing trolls in here!! Yeah, you keep good company. >> > > Naw. Jill is right. We aren't the only ones who think you are an > ass. > No, you're not. There's all the other useless trolls as well. Like I said!! You really *are* as thick as two short planks, aren't you? You are an embarrassment to Canadia, and the Commonwealth. -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
On 21/03/2012 6:54 AM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> Dave > wrote in <snip> > You are an embarrassment to Canadia, and the Commonwealth. > > > You, Peter Lucas, are a severe embarrassment to Australia. Luckily you have chosen to reside in a backwater and will rapidly sink into insignificance as a consequence. Still wonder what Tasmanians did to deserve the likes of you! Krypsis |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Gary > wrote in :
> I'm back on the laptop wrote: >> >> So, back to the meal.......... do you eat shark? If you do, how do >> you cook it? > > I bought some shark meat circa 30 years ago. That's when I was > married with 2 children. > > the wife cut it up and fried "shark nuggets" looked just like chicken > nuggets. > > Well...the two very young daughters ate it and loved it, thinking it > was their favorite chicken nuggets. > > > After the meal, I told them that it was shark meat not chicken. They > both freaked out and refused to eat any REAL chicken nuggets for a > long time afterwards. Even when it was chicken, they still suspected > it was shark again. LOL! > > Stupid reasoning but true! > > Gary :-) When all the kids were at home and going to school, the 3 of them would come home ravenous and be like a nest full of little chicks, cheeping and crying till they got something to eat. This happened *every* damn day!! So one day, it was cold and wet when they came home, and I had fixed them a hot 'snack' to have while waiting for dinner. Fried rice and 'Indonesian Chicken'. They had just about polished it all off (even though a few noses were turned up at the Indon Chook) when I asked the oldest girl to go get the empty can of 'Indonesian Chicken' and put it in the bin. She went into the kitchen and gave it a cursory look, gave it a more intense look, screamed and dropped it on the floor while yelling "SNAILS!!!! You fed us SNAILS??!!" Ever seen 3 kids all dry heaving at once?? Bloody hilarious!!! Needless to say, for the next few weeks, they waited paitiently for dinner to be served, rather than whinge for snacks :-) And to this day, all we have to do is say the words "Indonesian Chicken" and it induces some gagging :-) -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Andy wrote:
> > The ex, her girlfriend and I were having dinner in Lahaina, Maui, HI, > 1984, at a popular fish restaurant ("Kimo's", iirc). > > Without knowledge, I ordered Mahi-Mahi going by the loose menu > description. > > When the waiter left, her girlfriend looked at me and under her breath > asked me, "do you know what mahi-mahi is?" I said, "No, what?" With a few > seconds of straight-faced silence from both of them, she said > "FLIPPER!!!" I said, "No way." haha That's actually sort of funny in a mean way. heheheh ;) |
PIC's: A giants meal.
> "I'm back on the laptop" > wrote: > > When all the kids were at home and going to school, the 3 of them > > would come home ravenous and be like a nest full of little chicks, > > cheeping and crying till they got something to eat. > > This happened *every* damn day!! > > So one day, it was cold and wet when they came home, and I had fixed > > them a hot 'snack' to have while waiting for dinner. > > > > Fried rice and 'Indonesian Chicken'. > > > > They had just about polished it all off (even though a few noses were > > turned up at the Indon Chook) when I asked the oldest girl to go get > > the empty can of 'Indonesian Chicken' and put it in the bin. > > > > She went into the kitchen and gave it a cursory look, gave it a more > > intense look, screamed and dropped it on the floor while yelling > > "SNAILS!!!! You fed us SNAILS??!!" > > > > Ever seen 3 kids all dry heaving at once?? Bloody hilarious!!! LMAO! Great story! ;-D |
PIC's: A giants meal.
Gary > wrote in :
> >> "I'm back on the laptop" > wrote: > >> > When all the kids were at home and going to school, the 3 of them >> > would come home ravenous and be like a nest full of little chicks, >> > cheeping and crying till they got something to eat. >> > This happened *every* damn day!! >> > So one day, it was cold and wet when they came home, and I had fixed >> > them a hot 'snack' to have while waiting for dinner. >> > >> > Fried rice and 'Indonesian Chicken'. >> > >> > They had just about polished it all off (even though a few noses were >> > turned up at the Indon Chook) when I asked the oldest girl to go get >> > the empty can of 'Indonesian Chicken' and put it in the bin. >> > >> > She went into the kitchen and gave it a cursory look, gave it a more >> > intense look, screamed and dropped it on the floor while yelling >> > "SNAILS!!!! You fed us SNAILS??!!" >> > >> > Ever seen 3 kids all dry heaving at once?? Bloody hilarious!!! > > LMAO! Great story! ;-D > Thanks. It's taken #1 daughter a loooooong time to get over her snail 'phobia', but she recently tried some when she did a 2 month tour through Europe. She's told us that now she's done it, never doing it again!! :-) -- Peter Tasmania Australia |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter