Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Doesn't look like bucatini, bucatini is hollow, a thick spaghetti-like > pasta with a hole running through... I see no holes in any of the > pasta in that picture and that pasta looks too thin, looks like > ordinary spaghetti. If you see them as ordinary spaghetti then you must be used to very thick spaghetti, since those bucatini are about 3 millimeters in diameter |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/14/2012 11:35 AM, ViLco wrote:
> Brooklyn1 wrote: > >> Doesn't look like bucatini, bucatini is hollow, a thick spaghetti-like >> pasta with a hole running through... I see no holes in any of the >> pasta in that picture and that pasta looks too thin, looks like >> ordinary spaghetti. > > If you see them as ordinary spaghetti then you must be used to very thick > spaghetti, since those bucatini are about 3 millimeters in diameter > > > Shelden uses aol and it might display pictures differently. That definitely isn't spaghetti in the pictured dish. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:47:05 -0400, George >
wrote: >On 3/14/2012 11:35 AM, ViLco wrote: >> Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >>> Doesn't look like bucatini, bucatini is hollow, a thick spaghetti-like >>> pasta with a hole running through... I see no holes in any of the >>> pasta in that picture and that pasta looks too thin, looks like >>> ordinary spaghetti. >> >> If you see them as ordinary spaghetti then you must be used to very thick >> spaghetti, since those bucatini are about 3 millimeters in diameter >> >> >> >Shelden uses aol and it might display pictures differently. Shows how LITTLE you know about computers... it's the computer that displays images, not the ISP... I could be using IE with Forte Agent. I never claimed to be a computer pro but you and several others here who like to flap their gums know absolutely NOTHING! Can always pick out the ignoranuses, they rely on self praise for a recomendation and they smell like asshole. This George is still on his first computer and only has it like six months at most, and has no business here as he's never cooked anything. >That definitely isn't spaghetti in the pictured dish. You know that how? Click on the picture and it enlarges, it looks like ordinary spaghetti... it's too thin for any type of bucatini and you won't see even one hole on the ends... should have been a no brainer to photograph the holes, that's the entire point of mentioning bucatini. Anyway, it looks pretty awful with that dry sauce and it's over cooked, looks like slimey Chef Boyardi from a can... doesn't look at all appetizing. Can tell from how sloppily you post that you're a newbie. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Mar, 16:47, George > wrote:
> On 3/14/2012 11:35 AM, ViLco wrote:> Brooklyn1 wrote: > > >> Doesn't look like bucatini, bucatini is hollow, a thick spaghetti-like > >> pasta with a hole running through... I see no holes in any of the > >> pasta in that picture and that pasta looks too thin, looks like > >> ordinary spaghetti. > > > If you see them as ordinary spaghetti then you must be used to very thick > > spaghetti, since those bucatini are about 3 millimeters in diameter > > Shelden uses aol and it might display pictures differently. That > definitely isn't spaghetti in the pictured dish. Sheldon has become old and he needs some glasses, perhaps ![]() cheers Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/14/2012 1:08 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:47:05 -0400, > > wrote: > >> On 3/14/2012 11:35 AM, ViLco wrote: >>> Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> >>>> Doesn't look like bucatini, bucatini is hollow, a thick spaghetti-like >>>> pasta with a hole running through... I see no holes in any of the >>>> pasta in that picture and that pasta looks too thin, looks like >>>> ordinary spaghetti. >>> >>> If you see them as ordinary spaghetti then you must be used to very thick >>> spaghetti, since those bucatini are about 3 millimeters in diameter >>> >>> >>> >> Shelden uses aol and it might display pictures differently. > > Shows how LITTLE you know about computers... it's the computer that > displays images, not the ISP... I could be using IE with Forte Agent. > I never claimed to be a computer pro but you and several others here > who like to flap their gums know absolutely NOTHING! Can always pick > out the ignoranuses, they rely on self praise for a recomendation and > they smell like asshole. This George is still on his first computer > and only has it like six months at most, and has no business here as > he's never cooked anything. You always insist you need aol. Doesn't aol still use their own browser ? > >> That definitely isn't spaghetti in the pictured dish. > > You know that how? Click on the picture and it enlarges, it looks I know because I click on the photo and when I enlarge it I can clearly see a larger than spaghetti paste shape that clearly has holes in the ends that are in view. It really isn't that hard... > like ordinary spaghetti... it's too thin for any type of bucatini and > you won't see even one hole on the ends... should have been a no > brainer to photograph the holes, that's the entire point of mentioning > bucatini. Anyway, it looks pretty awful with that dry sauce and it's > over cooked, looks like slimey Chef Boyardi from a can... doesn't look > at all appetizing. > > Can tell from how sloppily you post that you're a newbie. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bucatini All'Amatriciana (Pandora's recipe) | General Cooking | |||
Bucatini All'Amatriciana (Pandora's recipe) | General Cooking | |||
Bucatini All'Amatriciana (Pandora's recipe) | General Cooking | |||
Pandora or anyone: Sfogliata recipe | General Cooking | |||
Bucatini All'Amatriciana | General Cooking |