Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Captain Peter Swallows sputtered impotently:
> When you die, you die........ and it's not always a 'wonderful' experience. When *you* die it'll be wonderful for the people around you! Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/03/2012 3:32 AM, I'm back on the laptop wrote:
> <snip> > > Twice (in one afternoon) from snake bite, and twice (12-14 years later, but > several years apart) on the operating table. Once after a parachute > accident, the other after an altercation (which I won), but the other > asshole used a knife. (Which is why I *always* carry a gun now :-) > You carry "*always* carry a gun now :-)"??? Lucky you included that smiley else readers might have thought you serious. You are not allowed to carry a concealed handgun in this country and I'm sure you don't wander about with a rifle. In fact, only in special circumstances here are people allowed to even own a gun in this country. Now don't try to kid us that you have such a special circumstance. <snip> -- Krypsis |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Krypsis replied to Captain Peter Swallows:
>> several years apart) on the operating table. Once after a parachute >> accident, the other after an altercation (which I won), but the other >> asshole used a knife. (Which is why I *always* carry a gun now :-) >> > You carry "*always* carry a gun now :-)"??? Lucky you included that > smiley else readers might have thought you serious. You are not allowed > to carry a concealed handgun in this country and I'm sure you don't > wander about with a rifle. In fact, only in special circumstances here > are people allowed to even own a gun in this country. Now don't try to > kid us that you have such a special circumstance. This is what Swallows was talking about: Her "Big Gun"! http://www.overstock.com/Health-Beau...2/product.html Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:47:07 GMT, "I'm back on the laptop"
> wrote: >Gary > wrote in : > >> closing their eyes and passing peacefully. The gasping at the very >> end haunts me to this day and brings tears to my eyes from the >> memories of those last minutes. >> > >This sanctimonious crap about lights, and feelings of peace, and seeing >passed loved ones is complete and utter bullshit!! > >I've (clinically) died 4 times in my life....... and there was nothing. >None of this 'going to the light' bullshit, or 'leaving my body'. > >It's all hysterical crap made up by those who can't handle reality. > >When you die, you die........ and it's not always a 'wonderful' experience. god and satan think your a whining effeminate sexually confused asshole and even they dont want you anywhere near them, thats why your not dead yet! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC), "I'm back on the laptop"
> wrote: >John Kuthe > wrote in : > >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:47:07 GMT, "I'm back on the laptop" >> > wrote: >> ... >>>This sanctimonious crap about lights, and feelings of peace, and >>>seeing passed loved ones is complete and utter bullshit!! >>> >>>I've (clinically) died 4 times in my life....... and there was >>>nothing. None of this 'going to the light' bullshit, or 'leaving my >>>body'. >>> >>>It's all hysterical crap made up by those who can't handle reality. >>> >>>When you die, you die........ and it's not always a 'wonderful' >>>experience. >> >> Wow! What stuff have you been though which allowed you to have "I've >> (clinically) died 4 times in my life" and you are still here? > > >Twice (in one afternoon) from snake bite, and twice (12-14 years later, but >several years apart) on the operating table. Once after a parachute >accident, the other after an altercation (which I won), but the other >asshole used a knife. (Which is why I *always* carry a gun now :-) AHHHHHHHAHAHAHA!!! so you now claim to CCW? AHHHHHHHAHAHAHA this just keeps getting better by the day. you got a permit for that in a land with some of the toughest gun laws in the world did you? AHHHHHHHAHAHAHA!.................................. ............................another silly lie that will trip you up over and over again lol. >-- >Peter >Tasmania >Australia has brisbane been relocated to tasmannia now or are you lying again peternoccio? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:33:28 +1100, Krypsis >
wrote: >On 23/03/2012 3:32 AM, I'm back on the laptop wrote: >> ><snip> >> >> Twice (in one afternoon) from snake bite, and twice (12-14 years later, but >> several years apart) on the operating table. Once after a parachute >> accident, the other after an altercation (which I won), but the other >> asshole used a knife. (Which is why I *always* carry a gun now :-) >> >You carry "*always* carry a gun now :-)"??? Lucky you included that >smiley else readers might have thought you serious. You are not allowed >to carry a concealed handgun in this country and I'm sure you don't >wander about with a rifle. In fact, only in special circumstances here >are people allowed to even own a gun in this country. Now don't try to >kid us that you have such a special circumstance. its only march and how many obvious lies has he been caught out in already this year? lol he makes it too easy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:03:38 +0000 (UTC), "I'm back on the laptop"
> wrote: > >One only has to look at the 30 year old pic that spurts has on the rfc >site!! > >http://www.recfoodcooking.org/mug/sh...ve%20Wertz.jpg > > >LOL!!! That pic has ***** written all over it!!! wishful thinking on your part more like it. faggot. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:04:54 -0700, Bob Terwilliger
> wrote: >Captain Peter Swallows sputtered impotently: > >> When you die, you die........ and it's not always a 'wonderful' experience. > >When *you* die it'll be wonderful for the people around you! all those lonely sailors will just have to find another bitch when he does croak |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message ... > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:59:10 -0700, Bryan wrote: > >> On Mar 21, 7:16 am, John Kuthe > wrote: >>> >>> >>> I am a medical professional Bryan. >> >> No. You're not. You merely have the license and degree to be "a >> medical professional." >>> >>> John Kuthe... >> >> --Bryan > > Huh? When I used to participate here on a regular basis, you two were "Big > Buddies"? What did I miss? > > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy > A whole lot of senseless drama. Hi Cathy ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 5:24*pm, John Kuthe > wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:09:37 -0500, John Kuthe > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:45:33 -0700 (PDT), Bryan > > wrote: > > >>On Mar 22, 10:58*am, John Kuthe > wrote: > >>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:49:29 GMT, "I'm back on the laptop" > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> ... > > >>> >Nurses make hospice patients comfortable (or we hope they do anyway!!) in > >>> >their last moments. > > >>> >It's what any caring individual would do. But most of us do it without > >>> >being paid to do it. > > >>> And Bryan if he'd do it! ;-) > > >>You sure think about me a lot. > > >Only here. > > >And I made abnotheer typo. Should have been "Ask Bryan if he'd do it!" > > >Well, wouldja? Couldja? Bet not! > > >John Kuthe... > > Crickets chirping.... > > John Kuthe... Aw, don't talk about the response to your resume that way! Things will pick up...well...no, I guess they won't. What's it like to be such a complete failure? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 23, 5:26*am, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:59:10 -0700, Bryan wrote: > > >> On Mar 21, 7:16 am, John Kuthe > wrote: > > >>> *I am a medical professional Bryan. > > >> No. *You're not. *You merely have the license and degree to be "a > >> medical professional." > > >>> John Kuthe... > > >> --Bryan > > > Huh? When I used to participate here on a regular basis, you two were "Big > > Buddies"? What did I miss? > > > -- > > Cheers > > Chatty Cathy > > A whole lot of senseless drama. *Hi Cathy ![]() > > Jill So now that Bryan hates him, too, do you think the queer will finally give it up and go away? A failure on so many levels. Employers reject him in multiple professions. His wife rejects him. His son rejects him. His friend rejects him. Now even usenet rejects him. Fail. Ure. Kuthe. That name is going to remembered by more and more people as we get the word out. I'm considering setting up a web site with links to his greatest hits just to make it easier for background checkers to find him. I shudder to think this piece of garbage finds employment because of a lazy recruiter. Think about it - John Kuthe as your nurse. www.johnkuthe.com. You think that's specific enough? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 6:47*pm, Dan Abel > wrote:
> In article >, Gary > wrote: > > I've got a mere Associates degree in Business Administration and I'm > > painting houses for a living right now. *All of the other guys are > > high-school dropouts (and druggies). It works for me now though....it pays > > the bills. * ![]() > > you anyway these days. > > > Any work is honorable work and no one should look down on even the lowliest > > workers. > > From the movie, Caddyshack, "The world needs ditchdiggers." * ![]() > > > The people that I look down on (and I know one) are those that get layed off > > and milk the unemployment until it runs out....rather than go out and find a > > new job. *I could have gone on partial unemployment this past winter but I > > wasn't brought up that way. *I went out and found my own work to keep me > > going until the company work picked up again. > > People call it "unemployment" for short. *It's really called > unemployment insurance. *It's insurance, paid for by the employer. *It's > a state program, here in the US, so how it works varies by state. > Generally, employers pay premiums based on their payroll and how much > they lay off. *Employers who have a lot of seasonal work, pay higher > premiums because they lay a lot of people off. *It's part of the cost of > doing business. > > If you don't wish to take the insurance payments that are due to you, > that's fine, but it isn't a government handout. Everyone should've know that already, but a lot of people don't. I've never collected unemployment because the only time I was laid off from a job happened to be during a period of low unemployment, and I got another job right away. > > -- > Dan Abel --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:50:01 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> wrote: > Everyone should've know that already, but a lot of people don't. A lot of people are just plain ignorant. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:47:14 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>In article >, Gary > wrote: > > >> I've got a mere Associates degree in Business Administration and I'm >> painting houses for a living right now. All of the other guys are >> high-school dropouts (and druggies). It works for me now though....it pays >> the bills. ![]() >> you anyway these days. >> >> Any work is honorable work and no one should look down on even the lowliest >> workers. >> From the movie, Caddyshack, "The world needs ditchdiggers." ![]() >> >> The people that I look down on (and I know one) are those that get layed off >> and milk the unemployment until it runs out....rather than go out and find a >> new job. I could have gone on partial unemployment this past winter but I >> wasn't brought up that way. I went out and found my own work to keep me >> going until the company work picked up again. > >People call it "unemployment" for short. It's really called >unemployment insurance. It's insurance, paid for by the employer. It's >a state program, here in the US, so how it works varies by state. >Generally, employers pay premiums based on their payroll and how much >they lay off. Employers who have a lot of seasonal work, pay higher >premiums because they lay a lot of people off. It's part of the cost of >doing business. > >If you don't wish to take the insurance payments that are due to you, >that's fine, but it isn't a government handout. It's a government cop out... unemployment insurance is government's way of failing at doing its job but instead shifting the blame for lack of employment onto both the employer and the employee. Gary is not saying he's not taking the unemployment insurance money because it's a government handout, you're the one jumping to that conclusion (you probably drive a desk), what he's saying is that he'd rather do meaningful work instead of vegetating in front of a TV all day for month after month after month until eventually becoming a useless POS. And I totally agree... painting houses is far better than atrophing into a slug. If the grubbermints had an IQ (they don't) they'd furnish meaningful/gainful employment instead of encouraging people to become lazy louts just like all the rest of the politicos. I've said it before and I'll say it again, there are plenty of jobs out there, but yoose gotta be willing to get dirty hands, calluses, and perspire. And driving a desk is not gainful employment, that's 100% overhead... if all everyone did is drive a desk what you'd have is one giant circle jerk, and the house would never get painted. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 8:14*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> if all everyone did is drive a desk what you'd have is one giant circle jerk, and > the house would never get painted. You sure seem to think about *** sex a lot. You should change your middle name to Santorum. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bryan wrote:
>> if all everyone did is drive a desk what you'd have is one giant circle jerk, and >You sure seem to think about *** sex a lot. Circle jerks are the province of adolescents, irrespective of sexuality. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 8:41*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Bryan wrote: > >> if all everyone did is drive a desk what you'd have is one giant circle jerk, and > >You sure seem to think about *** sex a lot. > > Circle jerks are the province of adolescents, irrespective of > sexuality. The first thing that came to mind was to ask, "Come again?" Your reply made no sense, but the pun did. When I was ten or eleven, this guy who had brought this erotic book to our place we went in a grove of trees, suggested that we *cool each other off^. I wasn't interested in anything sexual with other males, and I quit going to that place with him or his brother who was my age, but I didn't get all freaked out about it. Shit, sex was exciting, but I wasn't the least bit interested in anything sexual with other males. There was a girl whom I was wildly attracted to, but I was terrified that I'd fall hopelessly in love with her, and in retrospect I think that I was fearing getting spoiled of having access to a female body. I'm not afraid of homosexuality, and pretty much never was. I was afraid of developing essentially the relationship that I now have with my wife, but with far less prospects for stability. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bryan wrote:
>> >You sure seem to think about *** sex a lot. >> >> Circle jerks are the province of adolescents, irrespective of >> sexuality. > >The first thing that came to mind was to ask, "Come again?" Your >reply made no sense, but the pun did. When I was ten or eleven, this >guy who had brought this erotic book to our place we went in a grove >of trees, suggested that we *cool each other off^. That's not a circle jerk. A circle jerk is a bunch of kids standing around in a circle jacking off. The first one to *** is the "winner". The movie Slaughter Rule depicted a circle jerk. What you're talking about is mutual masturbation, I guess. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:47:14 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote: > >People call it "unemployment" for short. It's really called > >unemployment insurance. It's insurance, paid for by the employer. It's > >a state program, here in the US, so how it works varies by state. > >Generally, employers pay premiums based on their payroll and how much > >they lay off. Employers who have a lot of seasonal work, pay higher > >premiums because they lay a lot of people off. It's part of the cost of > >doing business. > > > >If you don't wish to take the insurance payments that are due to you, > >that's fine, but it isn't a government handout. > > It's a government cop out... unemployment insurance is government's > way of failing at doing its job but instead shifting the blame for > lack of employment onto both the employer and the employee. > > Gary is not saying he's not taking the unemployment insurance money > because it's a government handout, you're the one jumping to that > conclusion (you probably drive a desk), what he's saying is that he'd > rather do meaningful work instead of vegetating in front of a TV all > day for month after month after month until eventually becoming a > useless POS. And I totally agree... painting houses is far better > than atrophing into a slug. Thank you Sheldon. And I didn't say it was a government handout either. That said, it is monitored and run by the state government. The employer does NOT pay this directly to an insurance company...it's paid to the state each month via 'unemployment tax.' You apply for it through the state, not an insurance company. And if you are receiving it, you have to report back to the state once a week and tell them if you worked at all, and if not, they require you provide names and contact of 5 companies that you applied for work. I actually know several people that abuse this.... They don't look for work but they go through the phone book each week and provide 5 companies that they supposedly applied for. The one I know personally has even worked during the time but reported no income so he can still get his weekly payments. The abuse is widespread and the state is too busy to check up on people. It disgusts me. As I said, work is easy here to come by if you try. Too many people change their budget to live on the unemployment *insurance* and then milk it until it runs out. A year or so, I think it is here. Gary |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bwrrrryan wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: > >> if all everyone did is drive a desk what you'd have is one giant circle jerk, and >> the house would never get painted. > >You sure seem to think about *** sex a lot. Huh? What does group masturbation have to do with queer sex, Bwrrrryan? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:14:39 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:47:14 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote: > >> >People call it "unemployment" for short. It's really called >> >unemployment insurance. It's insurance, paid for by the employer. It's >> >a state program, here in the US, so how it works varies by state. >> >Generally, employers pay premiums based on their payroll and how much >> >they lay off. Employers who have a lot of seasonal work, pay higher >> >premiums because they lay a lot of people off. It's part of the cost of >> >doing business. >> > >> >If you don't wish to take the insurance payments that are due to you, >> >that's fine, but it isn't a government handout. >> >> It's a government cop out... unemployment insurance is government's >> way of failing at doing its job but instead shifting the blame for >> lack of employment onto both the employer and the employee. >> >> Gary is not saying he's not taking the unemployment insurance money >> because it's a government handout, you're the one jumping to that >> conclusion (you probably drive a desk), what he's saying is that he'd >> rather do meaningful work instead of vegetating in front of a TV all >> day for month after month after month until eventually becoming a >> useless POS. And I totally agree... painting houses is far better >> than atrophing into a slug. > >Thank you Sheldon. And I didn't say it was a government handout either. >That said, it is monitored and run by the state government. The employer >does NOT pay this directly to an insurance company...it's paid to the state >each month via 'unemployment tax.' You apply for it through the state, not >an insurance company. And if you are receiving it, you have to report back >to the state once a week and tell them if you worked at all, and if not, >they require you provide names and contact of 5 companies that you applied >for work. > >I actually know several people that abuse this.... They don't look for work >but they go through the phone book each week and provide 5 companies that >they supposedly applied for. The one I know personally has even worked >during the time but reported no income so he can still get his weekly >payments. The abuse is widespread and the state is too busy to check up on >people. It disgusts me. > >As I said, work is easy here to come by if you try. Too many people change >their budget to live on the unemployment *insurance* and then milk it until >it runs out. A year or so, I think it is here. Yup, unemployment insurance is just a giant bureaucracy operated by totally worthless desk driving POS. And I agree, work is very easy to come by if one actually wants to work. Unfortunately the politicos make it very desirable to live off the grubbermint tit. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz wrote:
> Huh? What does group masturbation have to do with queer sex, You mean you've been giving handjobs to guys for the last six decades and you never knew it was ***? Or is that just your EXCUSE? Bob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Green beans | Preserving | |||
More green beans | Preserving | |||
Green beans for all | General Cooking | |||
More green beans | Preserving | |||
Green beans | Preserving |