Chester wrote:

>> I never had much against the guy except he promoted crappy cooking.
>> He ran a website with seriously awful recipes. I'll look at his
>> "interesting food to tantalize taste buds" with a fairly clean slate,
>> but his track record for claiming healthfulness has been astoundingly
>> poor. In spite of that, I stuck up for him when he was accused of
>> being a pervert, based on nothing he ever posted. I legitimately
>> pounced on him for crappy recipes on his stupid website, but
>> Terwilliger consistently accused him of being a child molester.
>> Stu, if you're reading this, you really *should have* sued his ass for
>> libel. Calling someone a shitty excuse for a cook is free speech.
>> Branding a person as a child molester with zero evidence is libel.
>
> You'll never really know just exactually what happened ...I won't
> tell and Bob's known for being a liar.

True, nobody here knows what happened. As far as I can tell, *nothing*
happened, except you being shown up as a pompous pussy. What *didn't*
happen was any retraction or apology on my part, or any legal action on
your part. As far as lies go, I'm pretty well known for being a stickler
for integrity -- of course you, with your site full of plagiarized
shit-recipes, wouldn't know anything about that, would you, Chester?

So let's see... you started "traveling" after the Christmas break, and
you just got back: Has the community watch program died down, and are
the Ottawa schoolkids on an Easter break? Is that why you had to rush
back, so you didn't miss an opportunity?

Bob