Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney
> wrote: >Heya all, > >Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and cast >iron, I thought this article was good. >http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ > >Christine A very worthwhile read. Thanks for the link. Ross. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:32:18 -0400, Ross@home wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney > wrote: > >>Heya all, >> >>Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and cast >>iron, I thought this article was good. >>http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ >> >>Christine > >A very worthwhile read. Thanks for the link. Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention that cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast aluminum. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:32:05 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:32:18 -0400, Ross@home wrote: > >>On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney > wrote: >> >>>Heya all, >>> >>>Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and cast >>>iron, I thought this article was good. >>>http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ >>> >>>Christine >> >>A very worthwhile read. Thanks for the link. > >Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention that >cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one >wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast >aluminum. Listen to Mr "It was all better back in the olde daze!" ROFL!!! John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 16, 2012 7:32:05 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > >On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney > > wrote: > > > >>Heya all, > >> > >>Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and cast > >>iron, I thought this article was good. > >>http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ > > > Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention that > cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one > wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast > aluminum. > > True, it does not like acidic foods such as tomatoes nor long soaks in dish water but it's my 'go to' pan for cornbread and melting butter for a browned butter sauce. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote: >On Monday, April 16, 2012 7:32:05 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> >> >On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney >> > wrote: >> > >> >>Heya all, >> >> >> >>Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and cast >> >>iron, I thought this article was good. >> >>http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ >> >> >> Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention that >> cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one >> wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast >> aluminum. >> >> >True, it does not like acidic foods such as tomatoes nor long soaks in dish water but it's my 'go to' pan for cornbread and melting butter for a browned butter sauce. For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with ease, and needs no special care. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:00:32 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
.... >For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless >steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is >naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with >ease, and needs no special care. What is this majic coating that "only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with ease, and needs no special care."? Is it made from Unobtainium? ;-) John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Kuthe wrote:
> >For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless > >steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is > >naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with > >ease, and needs no special care. > > What is this majic coating that "only needs to be seasoned once, > seasoning can't come off, is naturally non reactive, withstands > highest cooking temperatures with ease, and needs no special care."? > > Is it made from Unobtainium? Sheldon reminds me of a fairy tale -- the golden goose. (I just watched Puss in Boots.) He produces nuggets of crap like the goose produced nuggets of gold. It's involuntary. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 3:49*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote: > > >For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless > > >steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is > > >naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with > > >ease, and needs no special care. > > > What is this majic coating that "only needs to be seasoned once, > > seasoning can't come off, is naturally non reactive, withstands > > highest cooking temperatures with ease, and needs no special care."? > > > Is it made from Unobtainium? > > Sheldon reminds me of a fairy tale -- the golden goose. (I just > watched Puss in Boots.) He produces nuggets of crap like the goose > produced nuggets of gold. It's involuntary. And he thinks the crap is gold. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Kuthe wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: > >>For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless >>steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is >>naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with >>ease, and needs no special care. > >What is this majic coating I never said it's a coating... it's a treatment that's commonly used for many applications to make metal [relatively] non stick. The process has been described here in detail several times previously. Just because you don't know something doesn't make it magic, it makes you ignorant. You'll have to hunt and peck some but you may learn something: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_metalworking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_(metalworking) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_...Plateau_finish http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfinishing You have lots to learn, this is just a beginning: http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/showthread.php?t=26134 Something between a #4 & #5 finish is a goal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_finishing Read and note the background image of this web page: http://www.precisiongrinding.com/Pla...ound_plate.htm It's actually easy to make a ss pan non stick but most folks haven't the cojones to remove the shiney/mirror factory finish. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:28:49 -0400, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>John Kuthe wrote: >>Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >>>For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless >>>steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is >>>naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with >>>ease, and needs no special care. >> >>What is this majic coating > >I never said it's a coating... it's a treatment that's commonly used >for many applications to make metal [relatively] non stick. The >process has been described here in detail several times previously. >Just because you don't know something doesn't make it magic, it makes >you ignorant. You'll have to hunt and peck some but you may learn >something: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_metalworking >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_(metalworking) >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_...Plateau_finish >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfinishing >You have lots to learn, this is just a beginning: >http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/showthread.php?t=26134 >Something between a #4 & #5 finish is a goal: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_finishing >Read and note the background image of this web page: >http://www.precisiongrinding.com/Pla...ound_plate.htm > >It's actually easy to make a ss pan non stick but most folks haven't >the cojones to remove the shiney/mirror factory finish. And did you buy these majic nonstick SS pans pre-surface finished or did you produce this wonderful majic surface finishing texture with your majic honing stone and lots of "elbow grease" (and long exercised stroking muscles, if you know what I mean! ;-) ) John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 2:28*pm, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote: > >Brooklyn1 wrote: > > >>For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless > >>steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is > >>naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with > >>ease, and needs no special care. > > >What is this majic coating > > I never said it's a coating... it's a treatment that's commonly used > for many applications to make metal [relatively] non stick. *The > process has been described here in detail several times previously. > Just because you don't know something doesn't make it magic, it makes > you ignorant. *You'll have to hunt and peck some but you may learn > something:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_...Superfinishing > You have lots to learn, this is just a beginning:http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/showthread.php?t=26134 > Something between a #4 & #5 finish is a goal:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_finishing > Read and note the background image of this web page:http://www.precisiongrinding.com/Pla...ound_plate.htm > > It's actually easy to make a ss pan non stick but most folks haven't > the cojones to remove the shiney/mirror factory finish. All these parts will be lubricated in practice, so what does this have to do with "non-stick"? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888
> wrote: .... > >All these parts will be lubricated in practice, so what does this have >to do with "non-stick"? Ah spamtrap!! you missed what the great BSer Sheldon said: "to make metal [relatively] non stick"!!! Hee hee! John Kuthe.... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
spermtrap1888 wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: >> John Kuthe wrote: >> >Brooklyn wrote: >> >> >>For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless >> >>steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is >> >>naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with >> >>ease, and needs no special care. >> >> >What is this majic coating >> >> I never said it's a coating... it's a treatment that's commonly used >> for many applications to make metal [relatively] non stick. *The >> process has been described here in detail several times previously. >> Just because you don't know something doesn't make it magic, it makes >> you ignorant. *You'll have to hunt and peck some but you may learn >> something:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_...Superfinishing >> You have lots to learn, this is just a beginning:http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/showthread.php?t=26134 >> Something between a #4 & #5 finish is a goal:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_finishing >> Read and note the background image of this web page:http://www.precisiongrinding.com/Pla...ound_plate.htm >> >> It's actually easy to make a ss pan non stick but most folks haven't >> the cojones to remove the shiney/mirror factory finish. > >All these parts will be lubricated in practice, so what does this have >to do with "non-stick"? So far with George I count three (3) uneducated queer *******s. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message ... > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT), " > > wrote: > >>On Monday, April 16, 2012 7:32:05 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> >>> >>> >On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >>Heya all, >>> >> >>> >>Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and cast >>> >>iron, I thought this article was good. >>> >>http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention that >>> cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one >>> wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast >>> aluminum. >>> >>> >>True, it does not like acidic foods such as tomatoes nor long soaks in >>dish water but it's my 'go to' pan for cornbread and melting butter for a >>browned butter sauce. > > For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless > steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is > naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with > ease, and needs no special care. > But you can't bake a real good skillet of cornbread in stainless... even if the stainless pan did have a handle that wouldn't melt ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "J. Clarke" > wrote in message n.local... > In article >, > says... >> >> "Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message >> ... >> > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT), " >> > > wrote: >> > >> >>On Monday, April 16, 2012 7:32:05 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >>Heya all, >> >>> >> >> >>> >>Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and >> >>> >>cast >> >>> >>iron, I thought this article was good. >> >>> >>http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention >> >>> that >> >>> cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one >> >>> wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast >> >>> aluminum. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>True, it does not like acidic foods such as tomatoes nor long soaks in >> >>dish water but it's my 'go to' pan for cornbread and melting butter for >> >>a >> >>browned butter sauce. >> > >> > For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless >> > steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is >> > naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with >> > ease, and needs no special care. >> > >> >> But you can't bake a real good skillet of cornbread in stainless... even >> if >> the stainless pan did have a handle that wouldn't melt ![]() > > ???? All my stainless has stainless handles. > Mine are Revere ware... with plastic (and on the 1950's stuff, possibly bakelite) handles. Definitely not oven safe. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jmcquown" > wrote:
> "J. Clarke" > wrote in message > n.local... >> In article >, >> says... >>> >>> "Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:57:59 -0700 (PDT), " >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Monday, April 16, 2012 7:32:05 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:09 -0700, Christine Dabney >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heya all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since we often have discussions about the merits of cookware, and >> >>> >>cast >>>>>>>> iron, I thought this article was good. >>>>>>>> http://www.cookingissues.com/2010/02...-iron-cooking/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately much is misleading... not even once does it mention >> >>> that >>>>>> cast iron is highly reactive. Cast iron cookware is archiac, if one >>>>>> wants its attributes carbon steel is far superior, as is cast >>>>>> aluminum. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> True, it does not like acidic foods such as tomatoes nor long soaks in >>>>> dish water but it's my 'go to' pan for cornbread and melting butter for >> >>a >>>>> browned butter sauce. >>>> >>>> For non-stick cookware nothing beats properly seasoned stainless >>>> steel... only needs to be seasoned once, seasoning can't come off, is >>>> naturally non reactive, withstands highest cooking temperatures with >>>> ease, and needs no special care. >>>> >>> >>> But you can't bake a real good skillet of cornbread in stainless... even >> if >>> the stainless pan did have a handle that wouldn't melt ![]() >> >> ???? All my stainless has stainless handles. >> > Mine are Revere ware... with plastic (and on the 1950's stuff, possibly > bakelite) handles. Definitely not oven safe. > > Jill I got corning ware with removable handles. Doesn't everyone ? I ordered some extra stuff recently off ebay. I have to try cornbread. Greg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Porcelain coated iron vs. cast iron skillet | General Cooking | |||
Porcelain coated iron vs. cast iron skillet | Cooking Equipment | |||
Porcelain coated iron vs. cast iron skillet | General Cooking | |||
Porcelain coated iron vs. cast iron skillet | Cooking Equipment | |||
Pizelle Iron - Cast Iron or Non-stick? | Baking |