Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently bought an egg steamer that would do 7 eggs at a time. The water
requirements for the eggs show less water to be used for the most eggs being cooked. I know I am dyslexic in my old age, but is this right? Anyone have one of these? I've only used it for breakfast eggs, two at a time....thanks a bunch....Sharon in Canada |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:21:05 -0400, biig wrote: > >> I recently bought an egg steamer that would do 7 eggs at a time. The >> water >> requirements for the eggs show less water to be used for the most eggs >> being >> cooked. I know I am dyslexic in my old age, but is this right? Anyone >> have >> one of these? I've only used it for breakfast eggs, two at a >> time....thanks >> a bunch....Sharon in Canada > > There would be less volume in the cooker and less steam would needed > to surround the eggs. Excess steam with no place to go will just > condense and fall back into the reservoir - to create more steam. > > I can't imagine the difference being that much, but yes, that sounds > correct. > > Did it come with do-hickey that punches a small hole in the egg? > > -sw Yes, it's built into the tray. It said to pick the pointy end of the egg, but I had egg coming out of the hole, and read somewhere that someone picks the large end. I did that the last couple of times and no egg came out. The difference is that there is a flatish spot on the end. No prob with that though. It doesn't take much water no matter how many eggs you put in. I usually do two for breakfast. Thanks....Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 10:18*am, "biig" > wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:21:05 -0400, biig wrote: > > >> I recently bought an egg steamer that would do 7 eggs at a time. *The > >> water > >> requirements for the eggs show less water to be used for the most eggs > >> being > >> cooked. *I know I am dyslexic in my old age, but is this right? *Anyone > >> have > >> one of these? *I've only used it for breakfast eggs, two at a > >> time....thanks > >> a bunch....Sharon in Canada > > > There would be less volume in the cooker and less steam would needed > > to surround the eggs. *Excess steam with no place to go will just > > condense and fall back into the reservoir - to create more steam. > > > I can't imagine the difference being that much, but yes, that sounds > > correct. > > > Did it come with do-hickey that punches a small hole in the egg? > > > -sw > > * *Yes, it's built into the tray. *It said to pick the pointy end of the > egg, but I had egg coming out of the hole, and read somewhere that someone > picks the large end. *I did that the last couple of times and no egg came > out. *The difference is that there is a flatish spot on the end. *No prob > with that though. *It doesn't take much water no matter how many eggs you > put in. *I usually do two for breakfast. * Thanks....Sharon I have a Sunbeam cooker - quite old now - it does 8 at a time, which I appreciate when I'm making potato salad or deviled eggs for a large group. I know the newer ones I've seen only do 7; don't know why, except that would make a slightly smaller appliance, thus keeping the price about the same only getting less product for the money. My directions say to poke the pinhole in the large end, and then put the eggs in the holder that end up. It's wonderful. ;-) N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy2" > wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 10:18 am, "biig" > wrote: > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:21:05 -0400, biig wrote: > > >> I recently bought an egg steamer that would do 7 eggs at a time. The > >> water > >> requirements for the eggs show less water to be used for the most eggs > >> being > >> cooked. I know I am dyslexic in my old age, but is this right? Anyone > >> have > >> one of these? I've only used it for breakfast eggs, two at a > >> time....thanks > >> a bunch....Sharon in Canada > > > There would be less volume in the cooker and less steam would needed > > to surround the eggs. Excess steam with no place to go will just > > condense and fall back into the reservoir - to create more steam. > > > I can't imagine the difference being that much, but yes, that sounds > > correct. > > > Did it come with do-hickey that punches a small hole in the egg? > > > -sw > > Yes, it's built into the tray. It said to pick the pointy end of the > egg, but I had egg coming out of the hole, and read somewhere that someone > picks the large end. I did that the last couple of times and no egg came > out. The difference is that there is a flatish spot on the end. No prob > with that though. It doesn't take much water no matter how many eggs you > put in. I usually do two for breakfast. Thanks....Sharon I have a Sunbeam cooker - quite old now - it does 8 at a time, which I appreciate when I'm making potato salad or deviled eggs for a large group. I know the newer ones I've seen only do 7; don't know why, except that would make a slightly smaller appliance, thus keeping the price about the same only getting less product for the money. My directions say to poke the pinhole in the large end, and then put the eggs in the holder that end up. It's wonderful. ;-) N. I really like mine too. It's EggGenie brand, no idea what company actually made it. I just finished making 6 eggs for devilled eggs and it worked perfectly. It does say to pick the pointy end, and put the pointy end up, but obviously it works better the other way. It calls for distilled water. I don't know why I resisted buying one so long.....Sharon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/2012 9:21 AM, biig wrote:
> I recently bought an egg steamer that would do 7 eggs at a time. The water > requirements for the eggs show less water to be used for the most eggs being > cooked. I know I am dyslexic in my old age, but is this right? Anyone have > one of these? I've only used it for breakfast eggs, two at a time....thanks > a bunch....Sharon in Canada If what you are doing is working, I would not change it. Nancy said that steamed eggs peel easy, and she was right. I do not have a steamer, so I just cover the bottom of the pot with water, turn on the heat, add the eggs and the lid. I usually steam an entire carton, and they are gone in a couple of days. I will put a couple of eggs in a salad, make deviled eggs out of some of them. Becca |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:25:52 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote: > > I have a Sunbeam cooker - quite old now - it does 8 at a time, which I > appreciate when I'm making potato salad or deviled eggs for a large > group. I know the newer ones I've seen only do 7; don't know why, > except that would make a slightly smaller appliance, thus keeping the > price about the same only getting less product for the money. My > directions say to poke the pinhole in the large end, and then put the > eggs in the holder that end up. It's wonderful. ;-) I've just steamed eggs using my collapsible vegetable steamer, I don't prick an end, most of them cook on their sides and they cook just fine. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 12:38*pm, Ema Nymton > wrote:
> On 4/23/2012 9:21 AM, biig wrote: > > > I recently bought an egg steamer that would do 7 eggs at a time. *The water > > requirements for the eggs show less water to be used for the most eggs being > > cooked. *I know I am dyslexic in my old age, but is this right? *Anyone have > > one of these? *I've only used it for breakfast eggs, two at a time.....thanks > > a bunch....Sharon in Canada > > If what you are doing is working, I would not change it. > > Nancy said that steamed eggs peel easy, and she was right. I do not have > a steamer, so I just cover the bottom of the pot with water, turn on the > heat, add the eggs and the lid. *I usually steam an entire carton, and > they are gone in a couple of days. *I will put a couple of eggs in a > salad, make deviled eggs out of some of them. > > Becca How deep is the water? Are eggs lying in the water or on a rack? How long are they steamed? Let em cool or plunge in ice water? No more questions - whew. I want to learn this method. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Steamer clams | General Cooking | |||
New steamer | Preserving | |||
New juice steamer | Preserving | |||
I need a good steamer. | General Cooking | |||
vegetables steamer, which one to buy? | General Cooking |