for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is

http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5

--
Jean B.

"Jean B." > wrote in message
...
> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> --
> Jean B.


Thank you for posting this, Jean.

Jill

> "Jean B." > wrote in message
> ...

>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>
>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>

I can't explain it because I haven't been on this group as long as most
of you but I was in tears reading every page.

jmcquown wrote:
>
> "Jean B." > wrote in message
> ...
>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>
>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>
>> --
>> Jean B.
>
>
> Thank you for posting this, Jean.
>
> Jill

You're welcome. I posted it because I was blanking on our page.
:-( Ended up finding it via Victor's periodic posts re the FAQ.

--
Jean B.

In article >, "Jean B." >
wrote:

> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5

Nice pickle hats.
Thanks, Jean.
--
Barb,
http://web.me.com/barbschaller September 5, 2011

On 05/31/2012 11:36 PM, Cheryl wrote:
>
>> "Jean B." > wrote in message
>> ...
>
>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>
>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>
>
> I can't explain it because I haven't been on this group as long as most
> of you but I was in tears reading every page.

I know exactly what you mean. It's times like this when I realize why
it's worth keeping the RFC site up and running... Hopefully, when I'm no
longer able to do so (for any reason), somebody else will take it over.

May Lou (and many other r.f.c.-ers that are no longer with us) RIP.

--
Cheers
ChattyCathy

"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
...
> On 05/31/2012 11:36 PM, Cheryl wrote:
>>
>>> "Jean B." > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>
>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>
>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>>
>>
>> I can't explain it because I haven't been on this group as long as most
>> of you but I was in tears reading every page.
>
> I know exactly what you mean. It's times like this when I realize why it's
> worth keeping the RFC site up and running... Hopefully, when I'm no longer
> able to do so (for any reason), somebody else will take it over.
>
> May Lou (and many other r.f.c.-ers that are no longer with us) RIP.

Indeed! Not forgetting our recent loss, Blake.
--
--

http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:11:50 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:

> jmcquown wrote:
> >
> > "Jean B." > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
> >>
> >> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean B.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for posting this, Jean.
> >
> > Jill
>
> You're welcome. I posted it because I was blanking on our page.
> :-( Ended up finding it via Victor's periodic posts re the FAQ.

I googled it easily.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 05/31/2012 11:36 PM, Cheryl wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jean B." > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I can't explain it because I haven't been on this group as long as most
>>> of you but I was in tears reading every page.
>>
>> I know exactly what you mean. It's times like this when I realize why
>> it's
>> worth keeping the RFC site up and running... Hopefully, when I'm no
>> longer
>> able to do so (for any reason), somebody else will take it over.
>>
>> May Lou (and many other r.f.c.-ers that are no longer with us) RIP.
>
> Indeed! Not forgetting our recent loss, Blake.

I think of him a fair amount, both because of his wit and because
we used to talk about Asian cuisines and cookbooks.

--
Jean B.

sf wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:11:50 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> "Jean B." > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>
>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean B.
>>>
>>> Thank you for posting this, Jean.
>>>
>>> Jill
>> You're welcome. I posted it because I was blanking on our page.
>> :-( Ended up finding it via Victor's periodic posts re the FAQ.
>
> I googled it easily.
>
Yeah, I bet. I just thought of the FAQ first.

--
Jean B.

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>
>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>
>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> mighty and powerful censors.
>
> So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> and more.
>
> -sw

Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has
that capability here.

--
Jean B.

On 6/3/2012 10:15 PM, Jean B. wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>>
>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>
>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>
>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
>> mighty and powerful censors.
>>
>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>>
>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
>> and more.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has that
> capability here.
>
I saw it here and on Facebook. No problem other than being saddened by
yet another long-time, gentle, poster passing away.

--
Janet Wilder
Way-the-heck-south Texas
Spelling doesn't count. Cooking does.

Janet Wilder wrote:
> On 6/3/2012 10:15 PM, Jean B. wrote:
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>>>
>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>
>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>
>>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
>>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
>>> mighty and powerful censors.
>>>
>>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>>>
>>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
>>> and more.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has that
>> capability here.
>>
> I saw it here and on Facebook. No problem other than being saddened by
> yet another long-time, gentle, poster passing away.
>
I guess all signs of it here are gone.

--
Jean B.

On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 23:15:53 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
> >
> >> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
> >>
> >> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
> >
> > So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> > Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> > mighty and powerful censors.
> >
> > So WTF was her problem this time?
> >
> > And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> > and more.
> >
> > -sw
>
> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has
> that capability here.

I haven't heard of Cheryl doing that on FB rfc, but I know that two
posters you'd never think of as being anything other than totally
polite got into a "debate" that the moderators squashed before it got
out of hand. I thought they were being too sensitive, but it was
their call. Play by the rules or play somewhere else. Steve's just
mad that he can't pull the same BS he pulls here over there on FB rfc.
It's NOT usenet and you can't play by your own rules if you want to
participate in rfc-FB.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 06/04/2012 08:41 PM, sf wrote:

>
> I haven't heard of Cheryl doing that on FB rfc, but I know that two
> posters you'd never think of as being anything other than totally
> polite got into a "debate" that the moderators squashed before it got
> out of hand. I thought they were being too sensitive, but it was
> their call. Play by the rules or play somewhere else. Steve's just
> mad that he can't pull the same BS he pulls here over there on FB rfc.
> It's NOT usenet and you can't play by your own rules if you want to
> participate in rfc-FB.
>

Sounds like a fun group to join - not. I also seem to recall you getting
into a few, erm, 'debates' with other posters right here on r.f.c. over
the last 5 or 6 years... So yeah, good job this group is not moderated
or your 'ass woulda been grass' too - several times over.

BTW there was something on one of our local news sites about FB thinking
about "opening up FB to under thirteen year olds" - Heh. As if millions
of them haven't already [illegally] got FB accounts... Why does this
whole Farcebook saga remind me of that old cartoon 'Pinky and the
Brain'? <snork>
--
Cheers
ChattyCathy

On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:40:58 +0200, ChattyCathy
> wrote:

>
> Sounds like a fun group to join - not. I also seem to recall you getting
> into a few, erm, 'debates' with other posters right here on r.f.c. over
> the last 5 or 6 years... So yeah, good job this group is not moderated
> or your 'ass woulda been grass' too - several times over.

Have I been complaining about rfc on FB? I don't let myself be
bullied here by the supreme assholes here, if that's your issue.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:26:00 -0500, Janet Wilder wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/2012 10:15 PM, Jean B. wrote:
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>>
>>>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
>>>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
>>>> mighty and powerful censors.
>>>>
>>>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>>>>
>>>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
>>>> and more.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has that
>>> capability here.
>>>
>> I saw it here and on Facebook. No problem other than being saddened by
>> yet another long-time, gentle, poster passing away.
>
> Sheryl, the class act that she is, used Facebook (not Usenet) to
> communicate how she felt about Lou. Coward that she is waited until
> he died to tell him how she felt.
>
> -sw

She's always been a class act. Heh.

Jill

On 06/05/2012 06:26 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:40:58 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> BTW there was something on one of our local news sites about FB thinking
>> about "opening up FB to under thirteen year olds" - Heh. As if millions
>> of them haven't already [illegally] got FB accounts...
>
> I misunderstood your post. This is probably what you saw:
>
> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9227719/Facebook_may_be_working_to_bring_in_users_under_13 ?source=rss_keyword_edpicks>
>

Yeah, something along those lines.... said much the same thing.


> Get 'em while they're young! Scary shit, IMO.


Quite so.


> The media and
> advertises want your kids even before they come out of the birth
> canal.


Sure looks like it...

>
> Consumer Reports said that 7.5 million US users are already under 13
> years old anyway.


Why am I not surprised?

--
Cheers
ChattyCathy

On Jun 4, 9:09*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:40:58 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> > BTW there was something on one of our local news sites about FB thinking
> > about "opening up FB to under thirteen year olds" - Heh. As if millions
> > of them haven't already [illegally] got FB accounts... Why does this
> > whole Farcebook saga remind me of that old cartoon 'Pinky and the
> > Brain'? *<snork>
>
> AFAIK, it's always been 13+. *And that's what their terms say right
> now.
>
> Interesting note is that parents cannot now lawfully gain access to
> their teenagers accounts. *They can only report them and have their
> accounts closed if they are under 13.
>
> "We appreciate your concern for your child's use of our website, but
> unfortunately we cannot give you access to the account or take any
> action on the account at your request. We are generally forbidden by
> privacy laws against giving unauthorized access to someone who is not
> an account holder. Please note that all users ages 13 and older are
> considered authorized account holders and are included in the scope of
> this policy."
>
> To me that sounds like "We own your kids". *Since children under the
> age of 18 can't enter into contracts, how can they abide by the
> Facebook terms and conditions except with a parent as a co-signer?

Kids under the age of 18 can certainly enter into contracts. But with
few exceptions they get to repudiate them at any time. Except for
necessities, (and I still think Facebook isn't one) contracts with
minors bind the other party, not the minor. Minors can repudiate these
contracts even after they become of age, provided that they don't do
anything to ratify them.

Bob Dylan could have broken the contract he made with Columbia Records
when he was a young lad of 20, but they argued he affirmed the
contract when he continued to record in their studio.

>*It
> would seem to me that parents and can and should be able to have
> Facebook forbid them access.

You're no fun.

> It also seems to me that Facebook has a lot of rules that wouldn't
> stand up in court and are ripe for litigation.

Don't like FB's rules; don't sign up.

On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:25:35 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888
> wrote:

> On Jun 4, 9:09*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:40:58 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:
> > > BTW there was something on one of our local news sites about FB thinking
> > > about "opening up FB to under thirteen year olds" - Heh. As if millions
> > > of them haven't already [illegally] got FB accounts... Why does this
> > > whole Farcebook saga remind me of that old cartoon 'Pinky and the
> > > Brain'? *<snork>
> >
> > AFAIK, it's always been 13+. *And that's what their terms say right
> > now.
> >
> > Interesting note is that parents cannot now lawfully gain access to
> > their teenagers accounts. *They can only report them and have their
> > accounts closed if they are under 13.
> >
> > "We appreciate your concern for your child's use of our website, but
> > unfortunately we cannot give you access to the account or take any
> > action on the account at your request. We are generally forbidden by
> > privacy laws against giving unauthorized access to someone who is not
> > an account holder. Please note that all users ages 13 and older are
> > considered authorized account holders and are included in the scope of
> > this policy."
> >
> > To me that sounds like "We own your kids". *Since children under the
> > age of 18 can't enter into contracts, how can they abide by the
> > Facebook terms and conditions except with a parent as a co-signer?
>
> Kids under the age of 18 can certainly enter into contracts. But with
> few exceptions they get to repudiate them at any time. Except for
> necessities, (and I still think Facebook isn't one) contracts with
> minors bind the other party, not the minor. Minors can repudiate these
> contracts even after they become of age, provided that they don't do
> anything to ratify them.
>
> Bob Dylan could have broken the contract he made with Columbia Records
> when he was a young lad of 20, but they argued he affirmed the
> contract when he continued to record in their studio.
>
> >*It
> > would seem to me that parents and can and should be able to have
> > Facebook forbid them access.
>
> You're no fun.
>
> > It also seems to me that Facebook has a lot of rules that wouldn't
> > stand up in court and are ripe for litigation.
>
> Don't like FB's rules; don't sign up.

He did anyway.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

In article >, ost
says...

> Yeah - I'm mad because I can't get ******** here.

Oh yes you can...

Janet

On Jun 4, 10:03*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:26:00 -0500, Janet Wilder wrote:
> > On 6/3/2012 10:15 PM, Jean B. wrote:
> >> Sqwertz wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>
> >>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> >>>>http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> >>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> >>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> >>> mighty and powerful censors.
>
> >>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> >>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> >>> and more.
>
> >>> -sw
>
> >> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has that
> >> capability here.
>
> > I saw it here and on Facebook. *No problem other than being saddened by
> > yet another long-time, gentle, poster passing away.
>
> Sheryl, the class act that she is, used Facebook (not Usenet) to
> communicate how she felt aboutLou. *Coward that she is waited until
> he died to tell him how she felt.
>
> -sw- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well if he's dead, how can I tell him? I told the others. He was a
real asshole to me. And it's all archived on Google Groups for
everyone to read.
I couldn't stand the hypocrisy, everyone talking about what a saint he
was. I told the truth. I hadn't thought about the piece of shit in
years. But they brought him up. And it opened old wounds. And I told
the truth about him. And I got censored.
Whatever.

On Jun 5, 10:52*am, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:26:00 -0500, Janet Wilder wrote:
>
> >> On 6/3/2012 10:15 PM, Jean B. wrote:
> >>> Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>
> >>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> >>>>>http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> >>>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> >>>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> >>>> mighty and powerful censors.
>
> >>>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> >>>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> >>>> and more.
>
> >>>> -sw
>
> >>> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has that
> >>> capability here.
>
> >> I saw it here and on Facebook. *No problem other than being saddened by
> >> yet another long-time, gentle, poster passing away.
>
> > Sheryl, the class act that she is, used Facebook (not Usenet) to
> > communicate how she felt aboutLou. *Coward that she is waited until
> > he died to tell him how she felt.
>
> > -sw
>
> She's always been a class act. *Heh.
>
> Jill- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Pot.Kettle.Black

On Jun 5, 4:55*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:52:15 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
> > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> Sheryl, the class act that she is, used Facebook (not Usenet) to
> >> communicate how she felt aboutLou. *Coward that she is waited until
> >> he died to tell him how she felt.
>
> > She's always been a class act. *Heh.
>
> I think I lived in South Carolina at the time, so I never had a chance
> to pick on her at her peak of ripeness. *But a few people that I trust
> their judgment (other than Morrow andLou) and are generally respected
> here told me how much of lunatic she became. *So I missed out on the
> juicy stuff.
>
> For some reason she lumped me in with Morrow even though I never said
> boo to her. *But I suspected she was ~patches~ and if so, then that
> would explain why she hates me even though we never exchanged words -
> or even posted during the same period.
>
> -sw

You're delusional, Sqwertz. I don't even see you on FB, I have you
blocked so you don't even exist to me. (except that the old Google
Alert I had set up years ago with my name sent me a message that
you're trash-talking me today). So don't flatter yourself. I never
wasted a moment's thought on you. EVER.

I mentioned Lou, Morrow and Blake. Yeah, the other sainted dead rfc-
er. Morrow started it and Blake and Lou egged him on, that's how it
always went.

But I love how my so-called friends over there on RFC-FB saw fit to
delete my comments, but continue to discuss what I said with people
who didn't see it. Nice. Talk about "classy".

I didn't go ape, I simply told the truth about him. One other person
concurred with me but didn't make their feelings public and that's
fine. I stand behind what I said because it's the truth. He was cruel
and viscious to me and I simply reminded people of that. And the nice
folks at Google Groups have it all archived for your entertainment.

On Jun 3, 9:37*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
> > for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> >http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> Lou. *I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> mighty and powerful censors.
>
> So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> and more.
>
> -sw

Nice to know my so-called friends on FB deleted my comments but sent
secret messages out to everyone who didn't see them so they could
discuss it. Hypocrits.

On Jun 4, 2:41*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 23:15:53 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>
> > >> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> > >>http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> > > So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> > > Lou. *I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> > > mighty and powerful censors.
>
> > > So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> > > And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> > > and more.
>
> > > -sw
>
> > Was that on Facebook or something? *I don't know that anyone has
> > that capability here.
>
> I haven't heard of Cheryl doing that on FB rfc, but I know that two
> posters you'd never think of as being anything other than totally
> polite got into a "debate" that the moderators squashed before it got
> out of hand. *I thought they were being too sensitive, but it was
> their call. *Play by the rules or play somewhere else. *Steve's just
> mad that he can't pull the same BS he pulls here over there on FB rfc.
> It's NOT usenet and you can't play by your own rules if you want to
> participate in rfc-FB.
>
> --
> Food is an important part of a balanced diet.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

of course you didn't see it, Barbara. We have each other blocked on
Facebook. It's a beautiful thing, isn't it?

On 06/06/2012 9:33 AM, -- wrote:

>
> Nice to know my so-called friends on FB deleted my comments but sent
> secret messages out to everyone who didn't see them so they could
> discuss it. Hypocrits.

At least they were talking about someone who is alive and able to defend
herself. I thought it was a pretty good guy. I have refrained from
speaking ill of the dead in this forum, but when kick the bucket I will
feel free to make an exception.

On Jun 6, 8:33*am, -- > wrote:
> On Jun 3, 9:37*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
> > > for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> > >http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> > So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> > Lou. *I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> > mighty and powerful censors.
>
> > So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> > And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> > and more.
>
> > -sw
>
> Nice to know my so-called friends on FB deleted my comments but sent
> secret messages out to everyone who didn't see them so they could
> discuss it. Hypocrits.

I don't know exactly what you are talking about here Sheryl. There
was a discussion between the moderators regarding your multiple
outbursts and the course of action we wanted to take. We are the only
people allowed to delete threads and I doubt any of us are sending
"secret" messages out so we can discuss you. As far as I know, other
than the original discussion regarding the outbursts, there has been
no discussion regarding you between the moderators at all. Hope that
clears it up for you in that regard. What other people are doing is
unknown to me and quite frankly it is none of my business what
messages people send around in their private mail and messaging. And
Sheryl, this is precisely the the type of thread that is not tolerated
on the FB group.

On Jun 6, 12:45*pm, Dog3 > wrote:
> On Jun 6, 8:33*am, -- > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 9:37*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
> > > > for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> > > >http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> > > So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> > > Lou. *I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> > > mighty and powerful censors.
>
> > > So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> > > And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> > > and more.
>
> > > -sw
>
> > Nice to know my so-called friends on FB deleted my comments but sent
> > secret messages out to everyone who didn't see them so they could
> > discuss it. Hypocrits.
>
> I don't know exactly what you are talking about here Sheryl. *There
> was a discussion between the moderators regarding your multiple
> outbursts and the course of action we wanted to take. *We are the only
> people allowed to delete threads and I doubt any of us are sending
> "secret" messages out so we can discuss you. As far as I know, other
> than the original discussion regarding the outbursts, there has been
> no discussion regarding you between the moderators at all. *Hope that
> clears it up for you in that regard. *What other people are doing is
> unknown to me and quite frankly it is none of my business what
> messages people send around in their private mail and messaging. * And
> Sheryl, this is precisely the the type of thread that is not tolerated
> on the FB group.

Well someone told Squertz because he couldn't wait to post about it
here. And someone lied to him that I mentioned him. And don't say he
saw it... I have him blocked on FB so he and I do not exist to one
another on FB. Which is how I like it. So someone is telling tales
and lying about me.

Squertz has a lot of nerve insinuating that I lack class when he
couldn't wait to run off to usenet and blab all about what he heard
(2nd hand, at least) I said on Facebook. And what's the big deal? I
simply told the truth about someone who was viscious to me while he
was alive. I hadn't thought about that POS Curt (Lou, Gar, whatever
the **** he wanted to call himself) in years. THey brought him up, I
told the truth.

The last time I posted here was when your sainted Lou was making
horrible comments about a picture that was linked here somehow from
Facebook of me and my dying cat-- and that was In defense of myself.
And here I am again, posting only to defend myself against Squertz.
What is it with you people? Don't you have anything better to do than
to hunt down shit about me to talk about?? "Lou" and Blake are dead, 2
of the 3 biggest offenders. And for all I know the third one is dead
too. So now Squertz has to come out of the woodwork and pick up where
they left off??

I just don't have time or energy to have to deal with two-faced lying
bitches who are all huggy-huggy/friendly friendly on Facebook and then
talk about me behind my back. SOMEONE did. I don't know who. I don't
care. The only way Squertz could know about a thread I started on the
FB RFC is if someone told him about it.

I take a lot of adversity in real life--from people I care about, from
work, life in general. And I handle it with grace and composure. The
one place I WILL NOT TAKE SHIT FROM PEOPLE is on the internet. Yeah,
I'll defend myself. But why the hell do you people have to put me in a
position to have to????

JUST LEAVE ME ALONE! I don't want your attention, I don't want your
lying, I don't want your two-faced bitchiness. Please, forget I ever
posted here.

On 06/06/2012 5:14 PM, barbie gee wrote:

>>
>
> so where is the FB group????
>
>

In FaceBook.

On Jun 6, 3:17*pm, -- > wrote:
> On Jun 6, 12:45*pm, Dog3 > wrote:
>

De mortuis nil nisi bonum - Diogenes

>
>
> > On Jun 6, 8:33*am, -- > wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 3, 9:37*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>
> > > > On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
> > > > > for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> > > > >http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> > > > So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> > > > Lou. *I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> > > > mighty and powerful censors.
>
> > > > So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> > > > And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> > > > and more.
>
> > > > -sw
>
> > > Nice to know my so-called friends on FB deleted my comments but sent
> > > secret messages out to everyone who didn't see them so they could
> > > discuss it. Hypocrits.

Very likely those who deleted your apparently hateful remarks were not
the ones urging rfc'ers' to "Gettaloada this."

>
> > I don't know exactly what you are talking about here Sheryl. *There
> > was a discussion between the moderators regarding your multiple
> > outbursts and the course of action we wanted to take. *We are the only
> > people allowed to delete threads and I doubt any of us are sending
> > "secret" messages out so we can discuss you. As far as I know, other
> > than the original discussion regarding the outbursts, there has been
> > no discussion regarding you between the moderators at all. *Hope that
> > clears it up for you in that regard. *What other people are doing is
> > unknown to me and quite frankly it is none of my business what
> > messages people send around in their private mail and messaging. * And
> > Sheryl, this is precisely the the type of thread that is not tolerated
> > on the FB group.
>
> Well someone told Squertz because he couldn't wait to post about it
> here. And someone lied to him that I mentioned him. And don't say he
> saw it... I have him blocked on FB so he and I do not exist to one
> another on FB. Which is how I like it. *So someone is telling tales
> and lying about me.
>
> Squertz has a lot of nerve insinuating that I lack class when he
> couldn't wait to run off to usenet and blab all about what he heard
> (2nd hand, at least) I said on Facebook. And what's the big deal? I
> simply told the truth about someone who was viscious to me while he
> was alive. I hadn't thought about that POS Curt (Lou, Gar, whatever
> the **** he wanted to call himself) in years. *THey brought him up, I
> told the truth.

Right, because whenever someone dies, it's important to publicly
discuss your areas of conflict. Nothing I love so much as reading
criticism of the deceased.

(IMHO, once death has occurred, helpful feedback is no longer so
helpful as when the recipient is alive.)

>
> The last time I posted here was when your sainted Lou was making
> horrible comments about a picture that was linked here somehow from
> Facebook of me and my dying cat-- and that was In defense of myself.
> And here I am again, posting only to defend myself against Squertz.
> What is it with you people? Don't you have anything better to do than
> to hunt down shit about me to talk about?? "Lou" and Blake are dead, 2
> of the 3 biggest offenders. And for all I know the third one is dead
> too. *So now Squertz has to come out of the woodwork and pick up where
> they left off??
>
> I just don't have time or energy to have to deal with two-faced lying
> bitches who are all huggy-huggy/friendly friendly on Facebook and then
> talk about me behind my back. SOMEONE did. *I don't know who. I don't
> care. *The only way Squertz could know about a thread I started on the
> FB RFC is if someone told him about it.

Why? Is sqwertz banned from Facebook?

The only way he could know about a thread you started on FB is for you
to post there. If you choose to post your thoughts in a public space,
be prepared for the public to respond.

> I take a lot of adversity in real life--from people I care about, from
> work, life in general. And I handle it with grace and composure. The
> one place I WILL NOT TAKE SHIT FROM PEOPLE is on the internet. Yeah,
> I'll defend myself. But why the hell do you people have to put me in a
> position to have to????
>

No use outlining your problems with "Lou" -- he's dead and can no
longer modify his behavior. Doesn't matter if it's Facebook, Usenet,
or elsewhere.

sf wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 23:15:53 -0400, "Jean B." > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>>>
>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>
>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
>>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
>>> mighty and powerful censors.
>>>
>>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>>>
>>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
>>> and more.
>>>
>>> -sw
>> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has
>> that capability here.
>
> I haven't heard of Cheryl doing that on FB rfc, but I know that two
> posters you'd never think of as being anything other than totally
> polite got into a "debate" that the moderators squashed before it got
> out of hand. I thought they were being too sensitive, but it was
> their call. Play by the rules or play somewhere else. Steve's just
> mad that he can't pull the same BS he pulls here over there on FB rfc.
> It's NOT usenet and you can't play by your own rules if you want to
> participate in rfc-FB.
>
I also see that I can't read. :-( It said "Facebook".

--
Jean B.

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:26:00 -0500, Janet Wilder wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/2012 10:15 PM, Jean B. wrote:
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>>>> So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
>>>> Lou. I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
>>>> mighty and powerful censors.
>>>>
>>>> So WTF was her problem this time?
>>>>
>>>> And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
>>>> and more.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>> Was that on Facebook or something? I don't know that anyone has that
>>> capability here.
>>>
>> I saw it here and on Facebook. No problem other than being saddened by
>> yet another long-time, gentle, poster passing away.
>
> Sheryl, the class act that she is, used Facebook (not Usenet) to
> communicate how she felt about Lou. Coward that she is waited until
> he died to tell him how she felt.
>
> -sw

Oh dear. That's shabby.

--
Jean B.

On 6/6/2012 10:47 PM, Sqwertz wrote:

> And that is getting more aggressive - like not taking me to my feeds
> until I answer their questions or bow to their demands (or I can
> temporarily skip them). I mean, who would be stupid enough to give
> Facebook access to their external personal email account so they slurp
> that up all that juicy stuff from your email accounts?

What browser do you use?

On 6/6/2012 11:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:

> I saw it. Do you really think I wouldn't have an incognito account on
> Facebook? Question is, which one of the other 209 members am I? Even
> you only recognize maybe 40-50 of the names there (which would be just
> slightly less than I recognize).

So which one did you use to friend me? Oh wait, you haven't.

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 23:45:17 -0400, Cheryl >
wrote:

> On 6/6/2012 11:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>
> > I saw it. Do you really think I wouldn't have an incognito account on
> > Facebook? Question is, which one of the other 209 members am I? Even
> > you only recognize maybe 40-50 of the names there (which would be just
> > slightly less than I recognize).
>
> So which one did you use to friend me? Oh wait, you haven't.

What an asshole. He's not the only one who uses a fake name on
RFC-FB, but he *is* the only one who does it specifically to slip past
being blocked by others.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On Jun 6, 12:45*pm, Dog3 > wrote:
> On Jun 6, 8:33*am, -- > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 9:37*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:16 -0400, Jean B. wrote:
> > > > for the cook-in that was hosted by Gar and Snot, it is
>
> > > >http://www.recfoodcooking.org/cookins/show.html?id=5
>
> > > So I heard that Sheryl Rosen went ape and made an ass out of herself
> > > Lou. *I didn't get to see the thread and it was deleted by the all
> > > mighty and powerful censors.
>
> > > So WTF was her problem this time?
>
> > > And every time hear about a censor kicking in I hate RFC Facebook more
> > > and more.
>
> > > -sw
>
> > Nice to know my so-called friends on FB deleted my comments but sent
> > secret messages out to everyone who didn't see them so they could
> > discuss it. Hypocrits.
>
> I don't know exactly what you are talking about here Sheryl. *There
> was a discussion between the moderators regarding your multiple
> outbursts and the course of action we wanted to take. *We are the only
> people allowed to delete threads and I doubt any of us are sending
> "secret" messages out so we can discuss you. As far as I know, other
> than the original discussion regarding the outbursts, there has been
> no discussion regarding you between the moderators at all. *Hope that
> clears it up for you in that regard. *What other people are doing is
> unknown to me and quite frankly it is none of my business what
> messages people send around in their private mail and messaging. * And
> Sheryl, this is precisely the the type of thread that is not tolerated
> on the FB group.

I thought you were dead, cockbreath.

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> My newsreader is set to ignore all threads started by a Google-poster
> until such time as a non-Googler replies. That gets rid of 98% of the
> spam-ads and trolls.

You use Xnews, right? Is there one for Windows? I currently read with
XPN and you just described the one type of filtering I can't do with XPN
that I want to. I've tried filtering out all Google posters but it's
too much. Same with webtv. Marking the ones that start new threads
would work very well.

On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:48:55 -0500, Pan Dulce >
wrote:

> If you don't want to be heard or seen, then don't post.

You obviously care that I blocked you or you wouldn't morph in FB and
you'll be kicked out if you ever try pulling the kind of crap you get
away with pulling here. Whine away about censors, but they're keeping
you under control - asshole.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:41:25 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:26:52 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:48:55 -0500, Pan Dulce >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> If you don't want to be heard or seen, then don't post.
> >
> >You obviously care that I blocked you or you wouldn't morph in FB and
> >you'll be kicked out if you ever try pulling the kind of crap you get
> >away with pulling here. Whine away about censors, but they're keeping
> >you under control - asshole.
>
> He hasn't morphed in FB.
>
He claims that he has.


--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.