On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:55:22 AM UTC-5, Kicking Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 04:28:08 -0700 (PDT), Gip
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> >> IO will eat your shit for free.
> >
> >What if they had all being wearing ballistic armor from top to bottom,
> >armed with a shot gun, a glock and an assault pistol just like the
> >shooter?

How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets, possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?

How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> wrote:

>
> How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets, possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?

Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
don't like it when that happens.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On Jul 26, 8:42*am, sf > wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
>
> > wrote:
>
> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets, possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> Better watch out. *Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> don't like it when that happens.
>

Don't feed the trolls.

sf wrote:

> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> don't like it when that happens.

The Fox "News" monkeys have been shushing anybody who tries to talk
about gun laws. "This is not the time," they say, reaching new heights
of phony sanctimony.

sf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets, possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
> >
> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> don't like it when that happens.

Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
trying to comment on the operation of one.

On Jul 26, 9:36*am, "Pete C." > wrote:
> sf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> > > wrote:
>
> > > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets, possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> > > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> > Better watch out. *Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> > don't like it when that happens.
>
> Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> trying to comment on the operation of one.

Ignorance of guns is a virtue for anti-gun activists. AGAs also take
the view that guns have magical mind-influencing powers:
"What's for dinner honey?"
- Meatloaf and green beans.
"Not again" Blammo!

Andy wrote:
>
> I was held up by a man with a knife just outside of work. He pointed it at
> me asking for money. I reached into my back pocket and pulled out a shining
> nickel plated Sig Sauer .45 ACP pistol and pointed it at his chest. "Drop
> the knife!" He did and ran off. I kept the knife for years.
>
> As the saying goes, "Never bring a knife to a gun fight!"
>
> Andy

By now everyone has seen the attempted robbery of the FL Internet cafe
which was foiled by a CHL holder. In just the last few days there were
two home invasion events in FL and CT, both of which were successfully
defended by the homeowners with firearms.

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:07:13 -0400, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
>> don't like it when that happens.
>
>The Fox "News" monkeys have been shushing anybody who tries to talk
>about gun laws. "This is not the time," they say, reaching new heights
>of phony sanctimony.

Your bigotry omitted Walmart, they sell guns and ammo.

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888
> wrote:

>On Jul 26, 9:36*am, "Pete C." > wrote:
>> sf wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets, possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>>
>> > > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>>
>> > Better watch out. *Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
>> > don't like it when that happens.
>>
>> Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
>> anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
>> It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
>> trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
>Ignorance of guns is a virtue for anti-gun activists. AGAs also take
>the view that guns have magical mind-influencing powers:
>"What's for dinner honey?"
>- Meatloaf and green beans.
> "Not again" Blammo!

When I was into trap n' skeet I had more ammo stockpiled than the
local cops, like many serious shooters I reloaded.

"Pete C." > wrote in message
.com...
>
> sf wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
>> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>> >
>> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
>> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>>
>> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
>> don't like it when that happens.
>
> Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> trying to comment on the operation of one.

If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price for
their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?

graham wrote:
>
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
> .com...
> >
> > sf wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
> >> >
> >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
> >>
> >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> >> don't like it when that happens.
> >
> > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
> If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price for
> their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?

Very easy to accept when the majority of those dead are criminals who
have been killed by other criminals, police or civilians. Dead criminals
are always a good thing.

Jim Elbrecht wrote:
>
> "Pete C." > wrote:
>
> >
> >graham wrote:
>
> -snip-
> >>
> >> If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price for
> >> their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
> >
> >Very easy to accept when the majority of those dead are criminals who
> >have been killed by other criminals, police or civilians. Dead criminals
> >are always a good thing.
>
> I think the majority is suicide-- then the overwhelming majority of
> the remainder is criminals shooting each other.
>
> That said-- there is only one other topic that draws out as many
> nut-jobs on both sides of the argument. It is sad that *no*
> sensible discussion of gun ownership can ever exist in a public forum.
>
> Jim

Suicides need not be counted since if a gun isn't available the suicidal
person will just use other means, quite like the mass murderer who
spends months or years planning. Those simply have no relevance to guns.

Gary wrote:
>
> Andy wrote:
> >
> > I was held up by a man with a knife just outside of work. He pointed it at
> > me asking for money. I reached into my back pocket and pulled out a shining
> > nickel plated Sig Sauer .45 ACP pistol and pointed it at his chest. "Drop
> > the knife!" He did and ran off. I kept the knife for years.
> >
> > As the saying goes, "Never bring a knife to a gun fight!"
> >
> > Andy
>
> I believe your story.

Probably true. I know a number of other defense without having to fire a
shot stories that are indeed true. That's part of the problem, those
cases rarely get documented.

On Jul 26, 12:04*pm, "graham" > wrote:
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
>
> .com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > sf wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> >> Better watch out. *Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> >> don't like it when that happens.
>
> > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
> If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price for
> their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?

Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.

On 26/07/2012 5:08 PM, Pete C. wrote:

>> I believe your story.
>
> Probably true. I know a number of other defense without having to fire a
> shot stories that are indeed true. That's part of the problem, those
> cases rarely get documented.
>


Heard a noise outside.... grabbed my shotgun went outside and racked a
shell into the chamber.... defended myself with my gun. Never mind that
it was a raccoon in the garbage.

"spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
...
On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
>
> .com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > sf wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> >> don't like it when that happens.
>
> > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
> If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
> for
> their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?

Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.
------------------------------------------------------
So why do you need a gun?

Dave Smith wrote:
>
> On 26/07/2012 5:08 PM, Pete C. wrote:
>
> >> I believe your story.
> >
> > Probably true. I know a number of other defense without having to fire a
> > shot stories that are indeed true. That's part of the problem, those
> > cases rarely get documented.
> >
>
> Heard a noise outside.... grabbed my shotgun went outside and racked a
> shell into the chamber.... defended myself with my gun. Never mind that
> it was a raccoon in the garbage.

Heard shattering glass from the other end of the house at about 2 am...
Grabbed 9mm and flashlight... Found the glass globe from the garage
ceiling fixture had apparently vibrated loose and dropped, shattering on
the concrete floor. Went back to bed.

graham wrote:
>
> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
> > "Pete C." > wrote in message
> >
> > .com...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > sf wrote:
> >
> > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> > >> > wrote:
> >
> > >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> > >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
> >
> > >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> > >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
> >
> > >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> > >> don't like it when that happens.
> >
> > > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> > > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> > > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> > > trying to comment on the operation of one.
> >
> > If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
> > for
> > their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
>
> Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
> of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
> take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.

Criminals killing other criminals is always a good thing.

> ------------------------------------------------------
> So why do you need a gun?

Recreation and safety, and of course exercising my constitutional right.

For those who think my constitutional right should be infringed because
my hobbies make you nervous, how about we require an expensive license,
class and background check for you to be able to exercise your first
amendment rights to more than 10 persons at a time? How about we require
you to exercise that free speech with only one person allowed in the
room at a time?

On Jul 26, 7:26*pm, "graham" > wrote:
> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Pete C." > wrote in message
>
> s.com...
>
> > > sf wrote:
>
> > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> > >> > wrote:
>
> > >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> > >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> > >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> > >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> > >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> > >> don't like it when that happens.
>
> > > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> > > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> > > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> > > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
> > If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
> > for
> > their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
>
> Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
> of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
> take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.
> ------------------------------------------------------
> So why do you need a gun?

I don't need anything, except for a chunk of wood for a pillow.
Everything I own is something I liked or wanted.

On Jul 26, 7:50*pm, "Pete C." > wrote:
> graham wrote:
>
> > "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
> > > "Pete C." > wrote in message
>
> > s.com...
>
> > > > sf wrote:
>
> > > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> > > >> > wrote:
>
> > > >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> > > >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> > > >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> > > >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray bullets?
>
> > > >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> > > >> don't like it when that happens.
>
> > > > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> > > > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge..
> > > > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> > > > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
> > > If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
> > > for
> > > their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
>
> > Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
> > of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
> > take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.
>
> Criminals killing other criminals is always a good thing.
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > So why do you need a gun?
>
> Recreation and safety, and of course exercising my constitutional right.
>
> For those who think my constitutional right should be infringed because
> my hobbies make you nervous, how about we require an expensive license,
> class and background check for you to be able to exercise your first
> amendment rights to more than 10 persons at a time? How about we require
> you to exercise that free speech with only one person allowed in the
> room at a time?

They don't have constitutional rights in Canada. What they have
instead is single-payer health care, and a VAT.

"Pete C." > wrote in message
.com...
>
> graham wrote:
>>
>> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
>> > "Pete C." > wrote in message
>> >
>> > .com...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > sf wrote:
>> >
>> > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
>> > >> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
>> > >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>> >
>> > >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
>> > >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray
>> > >> > bullets?
>> >
>> > >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
>> > >> don't like it when that happens.
>> >
>> > > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
>> > > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
>> > > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
>> > > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>> >
>> > If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
>> > for
>> > their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
>>
>> Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
>> of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
>> take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.
>
> Criminals killing other criminals is always a good thing.
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> So why do you need a gun?
>
> Recreation and safety,

So you are in the drug trade?

>and of course exercising my constitutional right.

Only if you use muzzle-loaders!
>

graham wrote:
>
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
> .com...
> >
> > graham wrote:
> >>
> >> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
> >> > "Pete C." > wrote in message
> >> >
> >> > .com...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > sf wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> >> > >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
> >> >
> >> > >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> >> > >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray
> >> > >> > bullets?
> >> >
> >> > >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> >> > >> don't like it when that happens.
> >> >
> >> > > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> >> > > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> >> > > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> >> > > trying to comment on the operation of one.
> >> >
> >> > If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
> >> > for
> >> > their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
> >>
> >> Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
> >> of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
> >> take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.
> >
> > Criminals killing other criminals is always a good thing.
> >
> >> ------------------------------------------------------
> >> So why do you need a gun?
> >
> > Recreation and safety,
>
> So you are in the drug trade?

No, I'm not in the drug trade as most anti-gun folks seem to be. Pretty
sad how they want to take away my constitutional rights, but they think
it's ok for them to use illegal drugs. Unlike them, I've never used any
illegal drugs in my entire life. Safe relaxing time at the shooting
range or out hunting is my drug of choice, well, that and good coffee.

>
> >and of course exercising my constitutional right.
>
> Only if you use muzzle-loaders!

There were far more arms than muzzleloaders available when the second
amendment was written and there were *no* restrictions placed on the
type of arms the citizens could have. It is abundantly clear that this
was the intention, not an oversight.

On Jul 27, 8:18*am, "graham" > wrote:
> "Pete C." > wrote in message
>
> .com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > graham wrote:
>
> >> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
> ....
> >> On Jul 26, 12:04 pm, "graham" > wrote:
> >> > "Pete C." > wrote in message
>
> >> s.com...
>
> >> > > sf wrote:
>
> >> > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT), Robert Miles
> >> > >> > wrote:
>
> >> > >> > How many of the other 80% would have been hit by stray bullets,
> >> > >> > possibly after they had gone through the original shooter?
>
> >> > >> > How many of the 20% would know when to stop shooting, rather than
> >> > >> > starting to shoot at each other, and causing even more stray
> >> > >> > bullets?
>
> >> > >> Better watch out. Logic is raising its ugly head and the gun nuts
> >> > >> don't like it when that happens.
>
> >> > > Logic has nothing to do with any of the absurd babble coming from the
> >> > > anti-gun crowd, it's all emotion based on lack of firearm knowledge.
> >> > > It's rather akin to someone who has never even sat in an automobile
> >> > > trying to comment on the operation of one.
>
> >> > If Americans accept ~20,000 gun deaths per annum as an acceptable price
> >> > for
> >> > their right to bear arms, who are we to judge?
>
> >> Homicides are down to 11,500 a year, and most of those are by-product
> >> of the illegal drug trade. I neither buy drugs nor sell them, nor do I
> >> take them, so I don't feel responsible for drug industry deaths.
>
> > Criminals killing other criminals is always a good thing.
>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------
> >> So why do you need a gun?
>
> > Recreation and safety,
>
> So you are in the drug trade?
>
> >and of course exercising my constitutional right.
>
> Only if you use muzzle-loaders!
>
>

Get off the computer -- your freedom of speech is limited by the
carrying power of your voice, and your freedom of the press is limited
to a hand-cranked letter press.

Andy wrote:
> I was held up by a man with a knife just outside of work. He pointed it at
> me asking for money. I reached into my back pocket and pulled out a shining
> nickel plated Sig Sauer .45 ACP pistol and pointed it at his chest. "Drop
> the knife!" He did and ran off. I kept the knife for years.
>
> As the saying goes, "Never bring a knife to a gun fight!"
>
> Andy
>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KvO-8IvoCI

The fat guy that kind of looks like Cap'n Kirk? That's me. ;D

--
Bob

On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:20:16 -0500, zxcvbob >
wrote:

>Andy wrote:
>> I was held up by a man with a knife just outside of work. He pointed it at
>> me asking for money. I reached into my back pocket and pulled out a shining
>> nickel plated Sig Sauer .45 ACP pistol and pointed it at his chest. "Drop
>> the knife!" He did and ran off. I kept the knife for years.
>>
>> As the saying goes, "Never bring a knife to a gun fight!"
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KvO-8IvoCI
>
>The fat guy that kind of looks like Cap'n Kirk? That's me. ;D

Great clip-- I think he shot somebody else that season, too. I
love that guy and every character he ever played-- *almost* enough
to go to NY to see him on Broadway.

Jim