Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There have been other threads about the adulteration of olive oil.
Here is an article from someone I trust about the subject and his recommendations as to how to find the 'real' thing. http://www.marksdailyapple.com/is-yo...#axzz23Y41ACaI |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Has anyone tried Olevano EVO? About 35 bucks a liter. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2012 8:05 PM, Kalmia wrote:
> > > Has anyone tried Olevano EVO? About 35 bucks a liter. > No olive oil can be worth such a price! -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not" in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Silverton wrote:
> > Has anyone tried Olevano EVO? About 35 bucks a liter. > > > No olive oil can be worth such a price! True varietal EVOO is quite different from mass-market. Your comment is tantamount to saying no wine could be worth $500 because "regular" wine costs a small fraction of that. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 14, 8:40*pm, James Silverton > wrote:
> No olive oil can be worth such a price! I agree, and I use EEVO all the time and have my entire life. I'm sure we'll be hearing opposing views from the likes of George Middius and the other wine expert guy whose name I momentarily forget because it's been awhile since I traded posts with him. But now that I think of it, $35 a liter is is roughly $8 for 8 ounces, which is kind of high but not bad if the taste is really good and used only for certain occasions ala Middius and the other guy with their expensive wines. In other words, at first I agreed with you and still do, but I can see that it's really not that high if it's heads and heels above others and is to be used only for uncooked dishes or maybe even some cooked ones that call for it. Hell, I once said (funny too, it was the same amount - $35.00 - that no "meal" on earth is worth that much money. Of course that was about 30 years ago. But I still believe to a point that some restaurant foods cost so much that no matter how good they're supposed to be, they don't make toilet paper expensive enough to justify the cost of the food. Thank you. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George M. Middius" > wrote in message ... > James Silverton wrote: > >> > Has anyone tried Olevano EVO? About 35 bucks a liter. >> > >> No olive oil can be worth such a price! > > True varietal EVOO is quite different from mass-market. Your comment > is tantamount to saying no wine could be worth $500 because "regular" > wine costs a small fraction of that. I buy cheap stuff at home. But if I were to be using it to dip bread into, I would get the really good stuff. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:41:29 -0700 (PDT), Tommy Joe
> wrote: >On Aug 14, 8:40*pm, James Silverton > wrote: > > > >> No olive oil can be worth such a price! > > > I agree, and I use EEVO all the time and have my entire life. I'm >sure we'll be hearing opposing views from the likes of George Middius >and the other wine expert guy whose name I momentarily forget because >it's been awhile since I traded posts with him. But now that I think >of it, $35 a liter is is roughly $8 for 8 ounces, which is kind of >high but not bad if the taste is really good and used only for certain >occasions ala Middius and the other guy with their expensive wines. >In other words, at first I agreed with you and still do, but I can see >that it's really not that high if it's heads and heels above others >and is to be used only for uncooked dishes or maybe even some cooked >ones that call for it. Hell, I once said (funny too, it was the same >amount - $35.00 - that no "meal" on earth is worth that much money. >Of course that was about 30 years ago. But I still believe to a point >that some restaurant foods cost so much that no matter how good >they're supposed to be, they don't make toilet paper expensive enough >to justify the cost of the food. Thank you. > >TJ I've paid a lot more than $35 for a liter of olive oil and didn't even like it, it smelled like stinky cheese... many of the estate oils can be very pricey and all are a crap shoot. I once bought my brother a tiny bottle of 50 year old Balsamico for Christmas, found out later he poured the entire bottle into his bagged mixed greens salad, with generic salad oil... he phoned and told me he thought that vinegar had spoiled so he tossed that salad in the trash... that's when I told him that vinegar cost a hundred bucks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For anybody wondering who's qualified to be an arbiter of taste, it's
OK to cross Sh-sh-shelley off the list. > I've paid a lot more than $35 for a liter of olive oil and didn't even > like it, it smelled like stinky cheese. Poor widdle Shewwey. The best stuff in life always disappoints him. Boo-hoo-hoo. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/08/2012 3:06 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:41:29 -0700 (PDT), Tommy Joe > > wrote: > >> On Aug 14, 8:40 pm, James Silverton > wrote: >> >> >> >>> No olive oil can be worth such a price! >> >> >> I agree, and I use EEVO all the time and have my entire life. I'm >> sure we'll be hearing opposing views from the likes of George Middius >> and the other wine expert guy whose name I momentarily forget because >> it's been awhile since I traded posts with him. But now that I think >> of it, $35 a liter is is roughly $8 for 8 ounces, which is kind of >> high but not bad if the taste is really good and used only for certain >> occasions ala Middius and the other guy with their expensive wines. >> In other words, at first I agreed with you and still do, but I can see >> that it's really not that high if it's heads and heels above others >> and is to be used only for uncooked dishes or maybe even some cooked >> ones that call for it. Hell, I once said (funny too, it was the same >> amount - $35.00 - that no "meal" on earth is worth that much money. >> Of course that was about 30 years ago. But I still believe to a point >> that some restaurant foods cost so much that no matter how good >> they're supposed to be, they don't make toilet paper expensive enough >> to justify the cost of the food. Thank you. >> >> TJ > > I've paid a lot more than $35 for a liter of olive oil and didn't even > like it, it smelled like stinky cheese... many of the estate oils can > be very pricey and all are a crap shoot. I once bought my brother a > tiny bottle of 50 year old Balsamico for Christmas, found out later he > poured the entire bottle into his bagged mixed greens salad, with > generic salad oil... he phoned and told me he thought that vinegar had > spoiled so he tossed that salad in the trash... that's when I told him > that vinegar cost a hundred bucks. > I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and an aged one? I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the $100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. Seemed the same to me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
injipoint wrote:
> I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 > years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and > an aged one? I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the > $100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. Seemed > the same to me. Value is in the esteem of the purchaser. Your idea of "better" or "more valuable" is your own, based on your needs and expectations. Do you believe a Lamborghini could be "worth" $1.5 million? How about $50,000 for a set of luggage that doesn't "get the job done" any better than $200 set? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 8:58*am, injipoint > wrote:
> On 15/08/2012 3:06 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:41:29 -0700 (PDT), Tommy Joe > > > wrote: > > >> On Aug 14, 8:40 pm, James Silverton > wrote: > > >>> No olive oil can be worth such a price! > > >> * * I agree, and I use EEVO all the time and have my entire life. *I'm > >> sure we'll be hearing opposing views from the likes of George Middius > >> and the other wine expert guy whose name I momentarily forget because > >> it's been awhile since I traded posts with him. *But now that I think > >> of it, $35 a liter is is roughly $8 for 8 ounces, which is kind of > >> high but not bad if the taste is really good and used only for certain > >> occasions ala Middius and the other guy with their expensive wines. > >> In other words, at first I agreed with you and still do, but I can see > >> that it's really not that high if it's heads and heels above others > >> and is to be used only for uncooked dishes or maybe even some cooked > >> ones that call for it. *Hell, I once said (funny too, it was the same > >> amount - $35.00 - that no "meal" on earth is worth that much money. > >> Of course that was about 30 years ago. *But I still believe to a point > >> that some restaurant foods cost so much that no matter how good > >> they're supposed to be, they don't make toilet paper expensive enough > >> to justify the cost of the food. *Thank you. > > >> TJ > > > I've paid a lot more than $35 for a liter of olive oil and didn't even > > like it, it smelled like stinky cheese... many of the estate oils can > > be very pricey and all are a crap shoot. *I once bought my brother a > > tiny bottle of 50 year old Balsamico for Christmas, found out later he > > poured the entire bottle into his bagged mixed greens salad, with > > generic salad oil... he phoned and told me he thought that vinegar had > > spoiled so he tossed that salad in the trash... that's when I told him > > that vinegar cost a hundred bucks. > > I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 > years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and > an aged one? *I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the > $100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. *Seemed > the same to me. I bought a bottle of the good stuff when we were in Italy last year, and it is incredible. It is super thick & syrupy. I bought the most expensive bottle I could find at the tiny store in the village we were staying in- think I paid 14 Euros for it... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 8:58*am, injipoint > wrote:
> > I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 > years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and > an aged one? *I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the > $100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. *Seemed > the same to me. Ignorance is bliss. There is an enormous difference between "normal" and long aged balsamic vinegar that becomes noticeable at around 10 years. At this age the vinegar starts to lose its acidity and develop very complex flavors. As the age increase the acidity reduces and the flavor becomes incredible. The older vinegar is not for use in salad dressing but for addition to other food items where only a small amount is needed to add a special quality. If you have an opportunity to taste balsamic vinegar aged 25 years or more you will be amazed. http://www.richardfisher.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/15/2012 1:52 PM, Helpful person wrote:
> On Aug 15, 8:58 am, injipoint > wrote: >> >> I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 >> years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and >> an aged one? I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the >> $100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. Seemed >> the same to me. > > Ignorance is bliss. > > There is an enormous difference between "normal" and long aged > balsamic vinegar that becomes noticeable at around 10 years. At this > age the vinegar starts to lose its acidity and develop very complex > flavors. As the age increase the acidity reduces and the flavor > becomes incredible. > > The older vinegar is not for use in salad dressing but for addition to > other food items where only a small amount is needed to add a special > quality. If you have an opportunity to taste balsamic vinegar aged 25 > years or more you will be amazed. > > http://www.richardfisher.com > This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not" in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 11:41*am, James Silverton >
> > This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where > long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? > > -- > Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) > > Extraneous "not" in Reply To. Unfortunately I can't afford the price so the following are just from my imagination. They will not work with the ordinary stuff. Slice hard boiled eggs and add a drop (or maybe two) on the yolk. The flavors should mix extremely well For a caprese salad (sliced tomato, mozzarella and basil) put a small amount on each piece of mozzarella. The salad should be lightly dressed with low acidity so as not to spoil the balsamic vinegar. Blanch some green beans, chill in ice water and drain well. Add some olive oil to a heated (medium) fry pan, add the beans and toss to coat. Add raw slivered almonds. Turn out into a serving dish once the beans are heated (be careful not to burn the almonds) and drizzle with the balsamic vinegar. (By the way long aged is just my term because I cannot remember how long "normal" balsamic vinegar is aged.) http://www.richardfisher.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 14, 5:40*pm, James Silverton > wrote:
> > No olive oil can be worth such a price! > > -- > Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) > Yes it can. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 11:41*am, James Silverton >
wrote: > On 8/15/2012 1:52 PM, Helpful person wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Aug 15, 8:58 am, injipoint > wrote: > > >> I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 > >> years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and > >> an aged one? *I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the > >> $100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. *Seemed > >> the same to me. > > > Ignorance is bliss. > > > There is an enormous difference between "normal" and long aged > > balsamic vinegar that becomes noticeable at around 10 years. *At this > > age the vinegar starts to lose its acidity and develop very complex > > flavors. *As the age increase the acidity reduces and the flavor > > becomes incredible. > > > The older vinegar is not for use in salad dressing but for addition to > > other food items where only a small amount is needed to add a special > > quality. *If you have an opportunity to taste balsamic vinegar aged 25 > > years or more you will be amazed. > > >http://www.richardfisher.com > > This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where > long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? > > -- > Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) > > Extraneous "not" in Reply To. On a nice piece of Parmesan cheese- just a drop or 2... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George M. Middius" wrote:
> > For anybody wondering who's qualified to be an arbiter of taste, it's > OK to cross Sh-sh-shelley off the list. > > > I've paid a lot more than $35 for a liter of olive oil and didn't even > > like it, it smelled like stinky cheese. > > Poor widdle Shewwey. The best stuff in life always disappoints him. > Boo-hoo-hoo. Back around 1975 or so, I had a party and we were all drinking the cheap champagne...Andre champagne. It was only about 2-3 dollars a bottle then but we liked it. One of my friends was a richie-rich kid and he swiped a bottle of Dom Perignon from his dad's wine cellar and brought it over. We were all excited to try the "good stuff." Funny how every one of us liked the cheap Andre stuff better. heheh Gary |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Silverton wrote:
> > The older vinegar is not for use in salad dressing but for addition to > > other food items where only a small amount is needed to add a special > > quality. If you have an opportunity to taste balsamic vinegar aged 25 > > years or more you will be amazed. > This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where > long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? Mario demonstrated one use on his show. He had a small bottle of the rare aged balsamico, and he used it to "anoint" shavings of parmesan. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:37:22 PM UTC-4, George M. Middius wrote:
> James Silverton wrote: > > > > > > Has anyone tried Olevano EVO? About 35 bucks a liter. > > > > > > > No olive oil can be worth such a price! > > > > True varietal EVOO is quite different from mass-market. Your comment > > is tantamount to saying no wine could be worth $500 because "regular" > > wine costs a small fraction of that. ****ing idiot. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary wrote:
> Back around 1975 or so, I had a party and we were all drinking the cheap > champagne...Andre champagne. It was only about 2-3 dollars a bottle then > but we liked it. One of my friends was a richie-rich kid and he swiped a > bottle of Dom Perignon from his dad's wine cellar and brought it over. We > were all excited to try the "good stuff." Funny how every one of us liked > the cheap Andre stuff better. heheh Well, you were still children, so you indulged your sweet tooths. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tommy Joe > wrote:
>On Aug 14, 8:40*pm, James Silverton > wrote: >> No olive oil can be worth such a price! > I agree, and I use EEVO all the time and have my entire life. I'm >sure we'll be hearing opposing views from the likes of George Middius >and the other wine expert guy whose name I momentarily forget because >it's been awhile since I traded posts with him. Probably me. I tend to keep an olive oil that is $40/500 ml on hand. It is not a huge fraction of my food ingredient costs because I only buy two or three of these per year. But if on a tighter budget, there are plenty of almost-as-good olive oils in the $10/liter range. The problem is more the need to sift through the bad ones, than the good ones not being worth it. There are some amazingly bad olive oils out there in all price ranges. I suppose many of these are faked. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
injipoint > wrote:
>I understand why they charge for something they've held onto for 50 >years but can you tell the difference between an ordinary Balsamic and >an aged one? I've tried, but I admit I haven't experimented up in the >$100 range, only in the "this is $3 and that costs $15" range. Seemed >the same to me. Balsamic vinegar has sort-of collapsed into a two-pronged market. There is the DOP product, all of which is very similar, very syrup-y, very concentrated, and pretty much all the same (super high) price. Then there is lesser product, most of which is not very good at all. This poses a problem because there seems to be no more mid-priced, non-syrupy, somewhat acidic, good somewhat concentrated Balsamic vinegar anymore. The consortium, in this case, may have ruined the availaibility of good product. Some restaurants have taken to mixing one part DOP with five parts random Balsamic vinegar to place on the table. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 10:06*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> I've paid a lot more than $35 for a liter of olive oil and didn't even > like it, it smelled like stinky cheese... many of the estate oils can > be very pricey and all are a crap shoot. *I once bought my brother a > tiny bottle of 50 year old Balsamico for Christmas, found out later he > poured the entire bottle into his bagged mixed greens salad, with > generic salad oil... he phoned and told me he thought that vinegar had > spoiled so he tossed that salad in the trash... that's when I told him > that vinegar cost a hundred bucks. It was in L.A. at the Pacific Dining Car with my uncle and a few of his friends. The steak cost $35. I told my uncle that they don't make toilet paper expensive enough to justify that cost. He said it was excellent steak. Ok, so it was, but it wasn't worth $35 - especially for me as I don't like fine dining anyway - the table cloth, the waiter constantly stopping by to pour water into everyone's glasses with the ice tinkling in the pitcher and everyone having to lean back to make room for the "server". I felt like I was the server by the time we got through. Now, as for pricey vinegars and olive oils, I'm sure some are good and some are not - but I'd love to conduct an experiment on that issue. Suppose for instance you were to take some average olive oil and place it in an expensive bottle and then seal it back up to make it appear that it was never opened. I wonder how many would notice. Some would I'm sure. But most would not. However, go the other way - take some really expensive olive oil and pour and reseal it into a cheap bottle, and I'll bet most of the experts would notice more readily - because they're more prepared to taste the cheapness because the bottle is cheap. We've been through this before - the experts and I - and I know there's no end to the debate - but I really would love to spring a surprise on some of those people. Put the good in a cheap bottle, their taste buds will be looking for cheap. Put it in an expensive bottle, their buds will be looking for quality. If the difference in quality of oils is drastic, of course they might tell. Who wouldn't? But using just an average olive oil and placing that same oil into cheap resealed bottled and also expensive resealed ones, I think it would throw most into a tizzy - one I'd like to be there to see. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 12:02*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Value is in the esteem of the purchaser. Your idea of "better" or > "more valuable" is your own, based on your needs and expectations. Expectations is a good word here. I have an example I think is funny but also appropriate. I was raised on plain yogurt, it was always in the fridge, homemade, and I liked it. One day when I was living in Hollywood I walked a block from where I lived down to the Blvd and was passing an ice-cream shop when I peered inside and saw a guy licking a huge vanilla cone and it made me want some. I walked in and the counter guy asked what I'd like. I said, "I'll have what he's having", pointing to the guy I'd seen through the window, still inside licking away. He made me one and I was off. I didn't take a lick till I got out the door, and when I did I nearly puked. It was yogurt. This was back in the 70s when frozen yogurt was sort of a new thing and still tasted more like yogurt than ice-cream. Now, as I said before, I like plain yogurt and had eaten it all my life - but I was not expecting it on a cone. I thought it was ice cream. I didn't think to ask. My expectations slammed me in the face. Had I known it was yogurt it might have been a different story, but expecting ice cream and getting the plain yogurt taste was an unpleasant shock. Which is fine, because the memory of that day's misfired expectations has more value than the cone did at the time. I expect you to answer this, TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 2:23*am, (Steve Pope) wrote:
> Probably me. > > I tend to keep an olive oil that is $40/500 ml on hand. *It is not > a huge fraction of my food ingredient costs because I only buy two > or three of these per year. *But if on a tighter budget, there are > plenty of almost-as-good olive oils in the $10/liter range. > > The problem is more the need to sift through the bad ones, than the > good ones not being worth it. *There are some amazingly bad olive > oils out there in all price ranges. *I suppose many of these are faked. It was not you. I'd remember an expert named "POPE". I know who it was and could even go back and look it up, but I'm too lazy. I'm also cheap. Not really, I just don't have the cash to experiment with pricey foods. I do know the difference between ordinary EVOO and the better stuff because I can smell it as soon as I open the bottle. I can put on a blindfold and tell if the olive oil is regular or if it's EVOO. Sometimes the cheaper EVOOs don't have the extra virgin aroma. So I agree there are some bad ones out there, but I also do not agree across the board with the old adage, "You get what you pay for", because it's simply not always true - not by a long shot in my opinion. What started my exchanges with Middius (Mi Dios - oh my Lord!), and the other guy (I apologize to him for not remembering his monicker), were some comments I made about wanting to conduct blindfold tests on the so-called experts. I'm not saying there aren't people with time and money who can sit around comparing the taste and aroma of this and that and do a good job of it, but I am saying that I'd like to be the one conducting the test and I'd like Middius and some of the others to be involved in the test - and I'd like to do it for money. Let's put up the cash and get down. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 2:49*am, (Steve Pope) wrote:
> Some restaurants have taken to mixing one part DOP with five parts > random Balsamic vinegar to place on the table. There are probably exceptions as always, but I have always preferred lemon and olive oil to vinegar and olive oil, and I don't care what kind of vinegar it is. I actually have trouble understanding how people can prefer vinegar over lemon for a salad dressing. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helpful person > wrote:
> There is an enormous difference between "normal" and long aged > balsamic vinegar that becomes noticeable at around 10 years. At this > age the vinegar starts to lose its acidity and develop very complex > flavors. As the age increase the acidity reduces and the flavor > becomes incredible. Except that real traditional "balsamic vinegar" is not vinegar at all. "Aceto", as in "Aceto Balsamico Tradizionale" is a total misnomer - it is really an aged reduction of grape must - a completely different thing. Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il 15/08/2012 22:29, merryb ha scritto:
>> This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where >> long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? > On a nice piece of Parmesan cheese- just a drop or 2... I second that! And some drops over a cup of cold strawberries, or on a dollop of ice cream, or on a grated steak, or on a 3mm thick slice of warm mortadella, or on a dish of risotto al parmigiano reggiano. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il 16/08/2012 22:09, Victor Sack ha scritto:
>> There is an enormous difference between "normal" and long aged >> balsamic vinegar that becomes noticeable at around 10 years. At this >> age the vinegar starts to lose its acidity and develop very complex >> flavors. As the age increase the acidity reduces and the flavor >> becomes incredible. > Except that real traditional "balsamic vinegar" is not vinegar at all. > "Aceto", as in "Aceto Balsamico Tradizionale" is a total misnomer - it > is really an aged reduction of grape must - a completely different > thing. What's this nonsense? ABT is called Aceto for its acetic acid content produced by acetobacter and that's what makes it a vinegar: Alcohol + oxigen = acetic acid + water. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il 16/08/2012 08:49, Steve Pope ha scritto:
> Some restaurants have taken to mixing one part DOP with five parts > random Balsamic vinegar to place on the table. That's sheer folly: if youmix the DOP with the crap you can no more have it in the DOP bottle, so you're serving a very expensive product hidden under 4/5 of crap. Restaurant owners just buy that "mid-priced" thing you were taling about: condimento- There is an endless range of products falling in theis cathegory, from 3 o 20 euros. No one would ever serve DOP ABT hidden under the cheap crap, they just buy these condimento like the ones from many acetaie near here, Cavalieri and Terra del Tuono come to mind. In the 10 euros range they sell wonderful products. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:05:51 +0200, ViLco > wrote:
>Il 15/08/2012 22:29, merryb ha scritto: > >>> This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where >>> long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? > >> On a nice piece of Parmesan cheese- just a drop or 2... > >I second that! And some drops over a cup of cold strawberries, or on a >dollop of ice cream, or on a grated steak, or on a 3mm thick slice of >warm mortadella, or on a dish of risotto al parmigiano reggiano. Or on Sofia Loren's turgid nipples. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:05:51 +0200, ViLco > wrote: > > >Il 15/08/2012 22:29, merryb ha scritto: > > > >>> This is only for interest but would you give an example or two where > >>> long aged balsamic vinegar makes a great difference? > > > >> On a nice piece of Parmesan cheese- just a drop or 2... > > > >I second that! And some drops over a cup of cold strawberries, or on a > >dollop of ice cream, or on a grated steak, or on a 3mm thick slice of > >warm mortadella, or on a dish of risotto al parmigiano reggiano. > > Or on Sofia Loren's turgid nipples. You wouldn't want her nipples now, Sheldon. ;-0 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Il 18/08/2012 17:16, Gary ha scritto:
>>> I second that! And some drops over a cup of cold strawberries, or on a >>> dollop of ice cream, or on a grated steak, or on a 3mm thick slice of >>> warm mortadella, or on a dish of risotto al parmigiano reggiano. >> Or on Sofia Loren's turgid nipples. > You wouldn't want her nipples now, Sheldon. ;-0 LOL, sad but true |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ViLco wrote:
>Gary ha scritto: > >>>> I second that! And some drops over a cup of cold strawberries, or on a >>>> dollop of ice cream, or on a grated steak, or on a 3mm thick slice of >>>> warm mortadella, or on a dish of risotto al parmigiano reggiano. > >>> Or on Sofia Loren's turgid nipples. > >> You wouldn't want her nipples now, Sheldon. ;-0 You wouldn't want to put money on that? >LOL, sad but true Vilco, what a sad excuse for an Italian you are... all that pot has rotted your brain, if you ever had one. I'd do her, I wouldn't need to think about it for a Noo Yawk minute. Forever hot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Loren There's no way Gary and Vilco ain't faggots, no ****in' way... I bet they'd do each other. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > I'd do her, I wouldn't need to think about it for a Noo Yawk minute. > Forever hot: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Loren > > There's no way Gary and Vilco ain't faggots, no ****in' way... I bet > they'd do each other. I'll skip doing Vilco and also Sophia. You want a 77 year old woman, there's hope for you yet. You old pervert. hehehe ![]() G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:30:09 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> I'd do her, I wouldn't need to think about it for a Noo Yawk minute. >> Forever hot: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Loren >> >> There's no way Gary and Vilco ain't faggots, no ****in' way... I bet >> they'd do each other. > >I'll skip doing Vilco and also Sophia. >You want a 77 year old woman, there's hope for you yet. >You old pervert. hehehe Sofia ain't just any 77 year old woman, she's a Goddess... and ladies bosoms don't develop right away so they are like 12-13 years younger... I'm almost 70 so I'd 'bout be robbing the cradle... it's all in how you think about it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:30:09 -0400, Gary > wrote: > > >Brooklyn1 wrote: > >> > >> I'd do her, I wouldn't need to think about it for a Noo Yawk minute. > >> Forever hot: > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Loren > >> > >> There's no way Gary and Vilco ain't faggots, no ****in' way... I bet > >> they'd do each other. > > > >I'll skip doing Vilco and also Sophia. > >You want a 77 year old woman, there's hope for you yet. > >You old pervert. hehehe > > Sofia ain't just any 77 year old woman, she's a Goddess... and ladies > bosoms don't develop right away so they are like 12-13 years > younger... I'm almost 70 so I'd 'bout be robbing the cradle... it's > all in how you think about it. Did you ever see Goldie Hawn's age 60 picture in AARP mag? Oh man! http://cdn.buzznet.com/assets/users1...0298185853.jpg Going by that, there's still hope for me. hehehe G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:11:01 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:30:09 -0400, Gary > wrote: >> >> >Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> >> >> I'd do her, I wouldn't need to think about it for a Noo Yawk minute. >> >> Forever hot: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Loren >> >> >> >> There's no way Gary and Vilco ain't faggots, no ****in' way... I bet >> >> they'd do each other. >> > >> >I'll skip doing Vilco and also Sophia. >> >You want a 77 year old woman, there's hope for you yet. >> >You old pervert. hehehe >> >> Sofia ain't just any 77 year old woman, she's a Goddess... and ladies >> bosoms don't develop right away so they are like 12-13 years >> younger... I'm almost 70 so I'd 'bout be robbing the cradle... it's >> all in how you think about it. > >Did you ever see Goldie Hawn's age 60 picture in AARP mag? Oh man! >http://cdn.buzznet.com/assets/users1...0298185853.jpg > >Going by that, there's still hope for me. hehehe Goldie Hawn never did anything for me, I don't think she ever outgrew a training bra. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 19, 11:30*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> Goldie Hawn never did anything for me, I don't think she ever outgrew > a training bra. I have a suspicion that guys who sit around comparing the looks of movie stars who are really not much above average in appearance and would not stand out in a crowd of college girls coming out of a bar are guys who never had much first hand experience with women, so to make up for it they sit around all day talking about this starlet or that one when in reality if you go to any beach you'll see tons of women who can stack up and beyond any of the over-rated and often anorexic movie people. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ImStillMags" > wrote in message ... > There have been other threads about the adulteration of olive oil. > Here is an article from someone I trust about the subject and his > recommendations as to how to find the 'real' thing. > > http://www.marksdailyapple.com/is-yo...#axzz23Y41ACaI That was an interesting article which then led me to <http://www.choice.com.au/reviews-and-tests/food-and-health/food-and-drink/groceries/extra-virgin-olive-oil-2010-review.aspx> and being Australian based has given me something to look at. I would never have expected the supermarkets own brand to score as high as they did but I will be willing to give them a try when next I shop. Mike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gourmandia - Real Food Website for Real People | General Cooking | |||
Sinai Exporter for Olive & Extra Virgin Olive Oil | General Cooking | |||
Sinai Exporter for Olive & Extra Virgin Olive Oil | Marketplace | |||
FS: Real Bicycle Seats for Real People! | Marketplace | |||
Importers/Consumers - Real extra virgin olive oil | Marketplace |