Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The only earthly reason to clarify butter is for pan-frying. If you're making a sauce or a dip, try emulsifying the butter. You'll need some acid, such as lemon juice or vinegar or wine. What you do is reduce the acid with the flavorings, then beat in the butter gradually. The French have done this for centuries and they got it exactly right. For artichokes: straight-up lemon butter. For fish: beurre blanc or beurre noisette. For meat: garlic butter based on white wine. Now stop all that pointless clarifying and do some proper cooking! BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, and you succeed in raising the smoke point. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"l, not -l" wrote:
> > On 29-Aug-2012, George M. Middius > wrote: > > > BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half > > butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, > > and you succeed in raising the smoke point. > > And the flavor of browned butter is pretty tasty; one of my favorite pasta > dishes is spaghetti with browned butter and grated cheese. Whenever I cooked fried eggs, I use a small amount of butter in the frying pan. I will carefully watch the heating. Once it just starts to brown, I add in the eggs. Seems to give the flavor a slight kick. Gary |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "l, not -l" > wrote in message ... > > On 29-Aug-2012, George M. Middius > wrote: > >> BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half >> butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, >> and you succeed in raising the smoke point. > > And the flavor of browned butter is pretty tasty; one of my favorite pasta > dishes is spaghetti with browned butter and grated cheese. Do they do that in Italian cuisine, or is that more German? W. Pooh (AKA Winnie P.) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher M. wrote:
> >> BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half > >> butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, > >> and you succeed in raising the smoke point. > > > > And the flavor of browned butter is pretty tasty; one of my favorite pasta > > dishes is spaghetti with browned butter and grated cheese. > > Do they do that in Italian cuisine, or is that more German? If you were allowed in the kitchen, you could do it yourself. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 29, 8:56*am, George M. Middius > wrote:
> The only earthly reason to clarify butter is for pan-frying. If you're > making a sauce or a dip, try emulsifying the butter. You'll need some > acid, such as lemon juice or vinegar or wine. What you do is reduce > the acid with the flavorings, then beat in the butter gradually. The > French have done this for centuries and they got it exactly right. > > For artichokes: straight-up lemon butter. For fish: beurre blanc or > beurre noisette. For meat: garlic butter based on white wine. > > Now stop all that pointless clarifying and do some proper cooking! > > BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half > butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, > and you succeed in raising the smoke point. well......there's a difference in plain clarified butter and ghee. I make ghee. The slow cooking process results in a lightly nutty flavor which I like a lot. I use ghee for some things and regular butter for everything else. I agree with you that the French methodology works best for a lot of things but I still like ghee for Indian dishes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ImStillMags wrote:
> > The only earthly reason to clarify butter is for pan-frying. If you're > > making a sauce or a dip, try emulsifying the butter. You'll need some > > acid, such as lemon juice or vinegar or wine. What you do is reduce > > the acid with the flavorings, then beat in the butter gradually. The > > French have done this for centuries and they got it exactly right. > > > > For artichokes: straight-up lemon butter. For fish: beurre blanc or > > beurre noisette. For meat: garlic butter based on white wine. > > > > Now stop all that pointless clarifying and do some proper cooking! > > > > BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half > > butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, > > and you succeed in raising the smoke point. > > well......there's a difference in plain clarified butter and ghee. > I make ghee. The slow cooking process results in a lightly nutty > flavor which I like a lot. I use ghee for some things and regular > butter for everything else. > > I agree with you that the French methodology works best for a lot of > things but I still like ghee for Indian dishes. Where do you keep your yak? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2012-08-29 23:20:59 +0000, ImStillMags said:
> well......there's a difference in plain clarified butter and ghee. > I make ghee. The slow cooking process results in a lightly nutty > flavor which I like a lot. I use ghee for some things and regular > butter for everything else. > > I agree with you that the French methodology works best for a lot of > things but I still like ghee for Indian dishes. Perhaps my experiene with ghee and clarified butter isn't diverse enough. Particularly when using ghee in Indian dishes, where many other seasonings can have significant impact on the flavor profile, I'm feel quite sure I couldn't tell the difference. My understanding with both is that it has to do with cooking hotter than you can with butter. But between ghee and clarified butter and butter, I've never found a significant different. Tasting the material right in the pan prior to its use in cooking something else, I'm think I could tell the difference. But whenever you "brown" something, here with clarified butter to produce ghee, it also depends on how brown you consider brown. I had a girlfriend that regularly burned pork chops and this was what she called "browning". |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gtr wrote:
> But whenever you "brown" something, here > with clarified butter to produce ghee, it also depends on how brown you > consider brown. I had a girlfriend that regularly burned pork chops > and this was what she called "browning". How dreadful. Is that why you traded her to sqwishy? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/29/2012 11:56 AM, George M. Middius wrote:
> > > > The only earthly reason to clarify butter is for pan-frying. If you're > making a sauce or a dip, try emulsifying the butter. You'll need some > acid, such as lemon juice or vinegar or wine. What you do is reduce > the acid with the flavorings, then beat in the butter gradually. The > French have done this for centuries and they got it exactly right. > > For artichokes: straight-up lemon butter. For fish: beurre blanc or > beurre noisette. For meat: garlic butter based on white wine. > > Now stop all that pointless clarifying and do some proper cooking! > > BTW, I never bother clarifying butter for pan-frying. I just mix half > butter and half oil. You get more butter flavor than from clarified, > and you succeed in raising the smoke point. > > I cook with butter and olive oil like that often. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stop acting like your little AR-15 is going to stop tyranny. | General Cooking | |||
maybe i didnt stir my wineexpert island mist long enought for clarifying?? | Winemaking | |||
Clarifying | Winemaking | |||
Clarifying Wine | Winemaking | |||
Rack again while clarifying brewking riesling? | Winemaking |