With a samurai sword.

http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ood-restaurant

Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_. They'll report that an assailant
is White or hispanic (or latino), but they'll rarely say if they're
black anymore.

Is it because they figure we're just to automatically assume that
they're black unless it's otherwise noted? Or is because they'll call
the media outlets racist for always featuring stories about black
people committing crimes?

"Somebody" > wrote in message
...
> With a samurai sword.
>
> http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ood-restaurant
>
> Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
> reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_. They'll report that an assailant
> is White or hispanic (or latino), but they'll rarely say if they're
> black anymore.
>
> Is it because they figure we're just to automatically assume that
> they're black unless it's otherwise noted? Or is because they'll call
> the media outlets racist for always featuring stories about black
> people committing crimes?


Bad Doppelganger!-- crossposting is bad etiquette.

On Oct 24, 9:00*pm, Somebody > wrote:
> With a samurai sword.
>
> http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ord-robs-fast-...
>
> Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
> reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_. *They'll report that an assailant
> is White or hispanic (or latino), but they'll rarely say if they're
> black anymore.
>
> Is it because they figure we're just to automatically assume that
> they're black unless it's otherwise noted? *Or is because they'll call
> the media outlets racist for always featuring stories about black
> people committing crimes?


They're not really expending much effort catching the guy because in
that neighborhood, they figure the money will end up back in the
Church's Chicken till sooner or later anyway.

On Oct 25, 1:54*am, Christopher Helms > wrote:
> On Oct 24, 9:00*pm, Somebody > wrote:
>
> > With a samurai sword.
>
> >http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ord-robs-fast-...
>
> > Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
> > reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_. *They'll report that an assailant
> > is White or hispanic (or latino), but they'll rarely say if they're
> > black anymore.
>
> > Is it because they figure we're just to automatically assume that
> > they're black unless it's otherwise noted? *Or is because they'll call
> > the media outlets racist for always featuring stories about black
> > people committing crimes?
>
> They're not really expending much effort catching the guy because in
> that neighborhood, they figure the money will end up back in the
> Church's Chicken till sooner or later anyway.


He probably spent some of the loot at another Church's Chicken, and
its at least even money that before the end of the week he'll get
caught when an employee recognizes him when he tries to spend some
more of it in the same Church's Chicken he robbed because he got tired
of driving all the way out to the other Church's Chicken.

[snip]

Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
oil.

Hey, anyone else see this?

http://eater.com/archives/2011/03/25...r-was-fake.php

--Bryan

"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
>
> [snip]
>
> Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
> oil.
>
> Hey, anyone else see this?
>
> http://eater.com/archives/2011/03/25...r-was-fake.php
>
> --Bryan


Are there any good recipes inside?

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:59:58 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> wrote:

> Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
> oil.

Too bad, but it's probably also the secret to why their chicken is so
good. McDonald's fries were never the same after they switched from
beef fat. Beef flavoring just isn't the same.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On Oct 25, 9:16*am, sf > wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:59:58 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
>
> > wrote:
> > Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
> > oil.
>
> Too bad, but it's probably also the secret to why their chicken is so
> good. *McDonald's fries were never the same after they switched from
> beef fat. *Beef flavoring just isn't the same.
>
Their chicken isn't very good. Their appeal is cheaper prices and
larger pieces than the better chains.

Only a really stupid person would prefer that their chicken were fried
in trans fat, or their French fries in tallow.

--Bryan

"Bryan" > wrote in message
...
>
> [snip]
>
> Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
> oil.
>
> Hey, anyone else see this?
>
> http://eater.com/archives/2011/03/25...r-was-fake.php
>
> --Bryan

What are the other chain's that do? Are there any in Wisconsin?

On Oct 25, 4:31*pm, "Jerry Sauk" > wrote:
> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > [snip]
>
> > Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
> > oil.
>
> > Hey, anyone else see this?
>
> >http://eater.com/archives/2011/03/25...ael-ray-cannib...
>
> > --Bryan
>
> What are the other chain's that do? *Are there any in Wisconsin?

I don't think they have it in their fryers like Church's, but White
Castle has lots of trans fatty items.

--Bryan

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
news
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:31:06 -0600, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> "Bryan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Church's is one of the last fast food chains to still fry in trans fat
>>> oil.
>>
>> What are the other chain's that do? Are there any in Wisconsin?
>
> Jerry here thinks trans-fats oil are good (it's not lard, Jerry).
> That's why he wants to know where else he can get transfats - because
> he doesn't eat chicken with bones. Too much work for him, eating
> around the bones.
>
> -sw.

Well whatever it is, it's a hell of al lot better then the vegetable oil
mcdonald's currently use.

On Oct 24, 7:00*pm, Somebody > wrote:
> With a samurai sword.
>
> http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ord-robs-fast-...
>
> Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
> reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_. *They'll report that an assailant
> is White or hispanic (or latino), but they'll rarely say if they're
> black anymore.

Was he black? Between the reported height and the hoodie, I figured he
was a hobbit.

>
> Is it because they figure we're just to automatically assume that
> they're black unless it's otherwise noted? *Or is because they'll call
> the media outlets racist for always featuring stories about black
> people committing crimes?

Dude, this is TELEVISION, a visual medium. Most people would play the
video, to see what had happened. Why explain the obvious?

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT), spamsambo1888
> wrote:

>On Oct 24, 7:00*pm, Somesambo > wrote:
>> With a samurai sword.
>>
>> http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ord-robs-fast-...
>>
>> Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
>> reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_. *They'll report that an assailant
>> is White or hispanic (or latino), but they'll rarely say if they're
>> black anymore.
>
>Was he black? Between the reported height and the hoodie, I figured he
>was a *** hobbit.

Careful there, Sambo... big dark *** meat gets Bwrrrryan HOT!

"spamtrap1888" wrote in message
...

On Oct 24, 7:00 pm, Somebody > wrote:
> With a samurai sword.
>
> http://www.fox19.com/story/19899955/...ord-robs-fast-...
>
> Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
> reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_.

(snipped cross posting)

Dude, this is TELEVISION, a visual medium. Most people would play the
video, to see what had happened. Why explain the obvious?


Not that I really care, but a samurai sword, really? That's the weapon of
choice for robbers these days? Does he intend to cut up a chicken with it
afterwards?

Jill

Somebody > wrote:


> Has anybody else noticed that the media seems to be shying away from
> reporting that a suspect IS _BLACK_.

> Is it because they figure we're just to automatically assume that
> they're black unless it's otherwise noted?


I remember when some states made it illegal for newspapers to
expose a suspect's race. In answer to your second question, I think
it's because it gives the reporters more fun in trying to expose the
person's race without being allowed to say it. They have to resort to
trickery. Some call it journalism. For example, the suspect's name
might be Robert Jones (could be anybody), but the reporters go out of
their way to write that when he left home he told everyone he was on
his way to his sister Tamiqua's place to spend the night and listen to
some new hip hop CDs he just bought. Bad example from me there, but
you get the idea. Personally, the black/white thing bores me - but
I'll jump in just for old time's sake when I tended to look at things
in a black and white way. No more. Now I am wise beyond my years and
getting wiser all the time. Kill me soon before I explode.

TJ