"James Silverton" > wrote in message
...
> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if anyone
> agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?

In diameter, not in depth. I have never been a Wolferman's fan,
but Thomas' is a national treasure.

pavane

On 11/4/2012 1:41 PM, pavane wrote:
>
>
> "James Silverton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if
>> anyone agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
>
> In diameter, not in depth. I have never been a Wolferman's fan,
> but Thomas' is a national treasure.
>
> pavane

I guess I'd better be specific :-) If the diameter were increased by an
inch, it would almost do what I'd like. Don't require me to measure my
muffins, I've eaten the last one :-(

--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not" in Reply To.

On Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:10:41 -0500, James Silverton
> wrote:

> On 11/4/2012 1:41 PM, pavane wrote:
> >
> >
> > "James Silverton" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if
> >> anyone agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
> >
> > In diameter, not in depth. I have never been a Wolferman's fan,
> > but Thomas' is a national treasure.
> >
> > pavane
>
> I guess I'd better be specific :-) If the diameter were increased by an
> inch, it would almost do what I'd like. Don't require me to measure my
> muffins, I've eaten the last one :-(

Okay, I can go along with that... I know they used to make a "sandwich
size" but apparently don't anymore.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.