I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if anyone
agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not" in Reply To.

"James Silverton" > wrote in message
...
> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if anyone
> agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?

In diameter, not in depth. I have never been a Wolferman's fan,
but Thomas' is a national treasure.

pavane

On 11/4/2012 1:41 PM, pavane wrote:
>
>
> "James Silverton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if
>> anyone agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
>
> In diameter, not in depth. I have never been a Wolferman's fan,
> but Thomas' is a national treasure.
>
> pavane

I guess I'd better be specific :-) If the diameter were increased by an
inch, it would almost do what I'd like. Don't require me to measure my
muffins, I've eaten the last one :-(

--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not" in Reply To.

On Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:10:41 -0500, James Silverton
> wrote:

> On 11/4/2012 1:41 PM, pavane wrote:
> >
> >
> > "James Silverton" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if
> >> anyone agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
> >
> > In diameter, not in depth. I have never been a Wolferman's fan,
> > but Thomas' is a national treasure.
> >
> > pavane
>
> I guess I'd better be specific :-) If the diameter were increased by an
> inch, it would almost do what I'd like. Don't require me to measure my
> muffins, I've eaten the last one :-(

Okay, I can go along with that... I know they used to make a "sandwich
size" but apparently don't anymore.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

James Silverton wrote:
>
> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if anyone
> agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
> --
> Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)
>
> Extraneous "not" in Reply To.

Thomas' are crap. Get the Bay's in the refrigerated section, they are
much more authentic.

Pete C. wrote:

> Thomas' are crap. Get the Bay's in the refrigerated section, they are
> much more authentic.

The difference is easy to taste, but it depends what you're using them
in. To make a sandwich with a savory filling, Bay's (or, even better,
Wolferman's) are my preference. But butter and jam, I prefer Thomas's.

On Nov 4, 10:25*am, James Silverton >
wrote:
> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if anyone
> agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?
I agree they could have a larger diameter, that's why I make my own.
Easy peasy, stove-top.
....Picky

On 11/4/12 1:26 PM, James Silverton wrote:
> I had toasted Thomas' English Muffins with breakfast. I wonder if anyone
> agrees with me to wish they were about twice the size?

Do you have a bread machine? Loaves of English muffin bread are really
easy to make, and taste great. Plus you get nooks and crannies on *both*
sides!

-- Larry