On 12/20/2012 6:08 PM, Christine Dabney wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> Well..maybe this will not degenerate into name calling, flaming,
> etc...
>
> Earlier this week, I was getting the urge for roasted pork of some
> type. So, I went shopping in my freezer and pulled out one of the
> pork shoulders I got on sale this last summer for $0.89/pound. It
> wasn't boneless, but I figured I could bone it out if need be. Which
> I did.
>
> It had a lovely thick rind on it..and I ended up fixing it one of my
> favorite ways: Mock Porchetta.
>
> The recipe I use is from the Zuni Cafe Cookbook, which is a marvelous
> cookbook..for anyone interested.
>
> The recipe is also he
> http://labellecuisine.com/archives/p...%20Cafe%29.htm
>
> The roast, just before I put it into the oven:
> http://i50.tinypic.com/axyw40.jpg
>
> As it finally came out of the oven (after roasting for about 5 hours
> or so):
> http://i49.tinypic.com/16bm136.jpg
> The recipe calls for a smaller roast, but I had a 6 pound roast,
> before it was boned.
>
> Plated:
> http://i48.tinypic.com/35hl64y.jpg
>
> The vegetables I roasted along with it, were turnips, onions,
> parsnips, carrots, and rutabagas. This was the first time I had ever
> roasted rutabagas, and I was doing it as an experiment, as I haven't
> really liked rutabagas as they were cooked when I was growing up. I
> found out that I really like them this way... So a very nice surprise.
> Next up..Cubano sandwiches from the leftover roast pork. I so love
> those sandwiches and I have all the ingredients here.
>
> Christine
>
Looks absolutely wonderful, Chris! I might have to try roasting
rutabagas some time. I never cared for them before, either.

Jill

On 12/20/2012 6:23 PM, jmcquown wrote:

> Looks absolutely wonderful, Chris! I might have to try roasting
> rutabagas some time. I never cared for them before, either.

I was thinking about trying them too! I started poking around on a site
I found about what produce is in season when, and this made it look
interesting enough to try:

http://www.worldcommunitycookbook.or...rutabagas.html

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 12/20/2012 6:08 PM, Christine Dabney wrote:
>> Heya all,
>>
>> Well..maybe this will not degenerate into name calling, flaming,
>> etc...
>>
>> Earlier this week, I was getting the urge for roasted pork of some
>> type. So, I went shopping in my freezer and pulled out one of the
>> pork shoulders I got on sale this last summer for $0.89/pound. It
>> wasn't boneless, but I figured I could bone it out if need be. Which
>> I did.
>>
>> It had a lovely thick rind on it..and I ended up fixing it one of my
>> favorite ways: Mock Porchetta.
>>
>> The recipe I use is from the Zuni Cafe Cookbook, which is a marvelous
>> cookbook..for anyone interested.
>>
>> The recipe is also he
>> http://labellecuisine.com/archives/p...%20Cafe%29.htm
>>
>> The roast, just before I put it into the oven:
>> http://i50.tinypic.com/axyw40.jpg
>>
>> As it finally came out of the oven (after roasting for about 5 hours
>> or so):
>> http://i49.tinypic.com/16bm136.jpg
>> The recipe calls for a smaller roast, but I had a 6 pound roast,
>> before it was boned.
>>
>> Plated:
>> http://i48.tinypic.com/35hl64y.jpg
>>
>> The vegetables I roasted along with it, were turnips, onions,
>> parsnips, carrots, and rutabagas. This was the first time I had ever
>> roasted rutabagas, and I was doing it as an experiment, as I haven't
>> really liked rutabagas as they were cooked when I was growing up. I
>> found out that I really like them this way... So a very nice surprise.
>> Next up..Cubano sandwiches from the leftover roast pork. I so love
>> those sandwiches and I have all the ingredients here.
>>
>> Christine
>>
> Looks absolutely wonderful, Chris! I might have to try roasting rutabagas
> some time. I never cared for them before, either.

We like them mashed with butter.
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:

> We like them mashed with butter.

Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
nice creaminess.

nb

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>
>> We like them mashed with butter.
>
> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
> nice creaminess.

I haven't had them roasted but I might try that.
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>
>> We like them mashed with butter.
>
> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
> nice creaminess.
>
> nb
>
Tatties & neeps

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>
>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>
>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>> nice creaminess.
>>
>> nb
>>
> Tatties & neeps

Yayyyyyyyyyy)) Just a point though ... the neeps referred to (ie turnips)
are actually swedes (rutabagas) )
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On 12/21/2012 8:26 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>
>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>
>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>> nice creaminess.
>>
>> nb
>>
> Tatties & neeps
>
Aye.

On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message

>> Tatties & neeps
>
> Yayyyyyyyyyy)) Just a point though ... the neeps referred to (ie turnips)
> are actually swedes (rutabagas) )

Yikes! I didn't realize it was a national sport.

You UKs crack me up with yer food dish names. Tatties n' neeps,
bangers n' mash, toad-in-the-hole, spotted dick. Whatta hoot. I love
it!

nb

On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>
>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>
>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>>> nice creaminess.
>>>
>> Tatties & neeps
>>
> <purist intervention>
>
> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed separately.
>
True.

"S Viemeister" > wrote in message
...
> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>>
>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>>>> nice creaminess.
>>>>
>>> Tatties & neeps
>>>
>> <purist intervention>
>>
>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed separately.
>>
> True.

Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>
>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>
>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>>> nice creaminess.
>>>
>>> nb
>>>
>> Tatties & neeps
>>
> <purist intervention>
>
> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed separately.
>
> Janet UK
>
>
And I do believe I said once I wouldn't be serving haggis

Jill

On 12/21/2012 10:10 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "S Viemeister" > wrote
>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>> says...
>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>>>>> nice creaminess.
>>>>>
>>>> Tatties & neeps
>>>>
>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>> separately.
>>>
>> True.
>
> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>
It appears that notbob suggested mashing them together.

On 2012-12-21, S Viemeister > wrote:

> It appears that notbob suggested mashing them together.

I tried it with taters plus rutabagus or turnips --I forget which--
mashed together. It was great.

Never tried lone neeps. A few nips, maybe.

nb

"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, lid
> says...
>>
>> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>> >> In article >,
>> >> says...
>> >>>
>> >>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>> >>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds
>> >>>> a
>> >>>> nice creaminess.
>> >>>>
>> >>> Tatties & neeps
>> >>>
>> >> <purist intervention>
>> >>
>> >> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>> >> separately.
>> >>
>> > True.
>>
>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>
> Jill did,in the post which you re-quoted above.

Jill, who had a Scottish Grandmother was just talking about 'tatties and
neeps' which she knows very well are the Scottish way of describing them.
She said nothing about 'mashing them' together, because she knows VERY
well, the Scots don't do that!

Jill?
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, lid
> says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >, lid
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>> >> >> In article >,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> says...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>> >> >>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>> >> >>>> Proveds
>> >> >>>> a
>> >> >>>> nice creaminess.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>> Tatties & neeps
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> <purist intervention>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>> >> >> separately.
>> >> >>
>> >> > True.
>> >>
>> >> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>> >
>> > Jill did,in the post which you re-quoted above.
>>
>> Jill, who had a Scottish Grandmother was just talking about 'tatties and
>> neeps' which she knows very well are the Scottish way of describing them.
>> She said nothing about 'mashing them' together, because she knows VERY
>> well, the Scots don't do that!
>>
>> Jill?
>
> Sigh. You asked "did anyone suggest mashing tatties and neeps
> otherwise "(than separately).
>
> You have repeatedly reposted and requoted (from notbob, speaking of
> neeps)" "A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes" and Jills
> response "tatties and neeps!"

<smile> You are wasting your time <g>
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On 12/21/2012 12:33 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >, lid
>> says...
>>>
>>> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>> >> In article >,
>>> >> says...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>> >>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds
>>> >>>> a
>>> >>>> nice creaminess.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> Tatties & neeps
>>> >>>
>>> >> <purist intervention>
>>> >>
>>> >> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>> >> separately.
>>> >>
>>> > True.
>>>
>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>
>> Jill did,in the post which you re-quoted above.
>
> Jill, who had a Scottish Grandmother was just talking about 'tatties and
> neeps' which she knows very well are the Scottish way of describing them.
> She said nothing about 'mashing them' together, because she knows VERY
> well, the Scots don't do that!
>
> Jill?

I definitely know that! I also know neeps are rutabegas, not turnips.

Jill

On 12/21/2012 2:06 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, lid
> says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> In article >, lid
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>>>>> In article >,
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> nice creaminess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tatties & neeps
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <purist intervention>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>>>>> separately.
>>>>>>
>>>>> True.
>>>>
>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>
>>> Jill did,in the post which you re-quoted above.
>>
>> Jill, who had a Scottish Grandmother was just talking about 'tatties and
>> neeps' which she knows very well are the Scottish way of describing them.
>> She said nothing about 'mashing them' together, because she knows VERY
>> well, the Scots don't do that!
>>
>> Jill?
>
> Sigh. You asked "did anyone suggest mashing tatties and neeps
> otherwise "(than separately).
>
> You have repeatedly reposted and requoted (from notbob, speaking of
> neeps)" "A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes" and Jills
> response "tatties and neeps!"
>
> See above.
>
> Janet
>
Some things just don't translate well in type. I didn't mean to suggest
they be mashed *together*.

Jill

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>>>>> nice creaminess.
>>>>>
>>>> Tatties & neeps
>>>>
>>> <purist intervention>
>>>
>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>> separately.
>>>
>> True.
>
> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?

Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>>> In article >,
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes. Proveds a
>>>>>> nice creaminess.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Tatties & neeps
>>>>>
>>>> <purist intervention>
>>>>
>>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>>> separately.
>>>>
>>> True.
>>
>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>
> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.

*smile* You also are wasting your time
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "Farm1" > wrote in message

>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>
>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>
> *smile* You also are wasting your time

I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and white I
mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't be too hard
for you to find.

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>
>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>
>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>
>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>
> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and white
> I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't be too
> hard for you to find.

*smile* keep dancing))

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>
>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>
>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and white
>> I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't be too
>> hard for you to find.
>
> *smile* keep dancing))

Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering days
was obviously a sham.

You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension or
your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The former
can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.

..

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>
>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>
>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>
>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>
> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and white
> I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't be too
> hard for you to find.

*smile* Keep dancing

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>
>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>
>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't
>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>
>> *smile* keep dancing))
>
> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
> days was obviously a sham.
>
> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension or
> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The former
> can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.

You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>
>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>
>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't
>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>
>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>
>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>> days was obviously a sham.
>>
>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension or
>> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>
> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...

Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately rude.

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>
>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't
>>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>>
>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>
>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>
>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension
>>> or your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>
>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>
> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately
> rude.

*smile* I repeat, you are wasting your time so.. keep dancing - but I won't
be watching

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That
>>>>>> shouldn't be too hard for you to find.
>>>>>
>>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>>
>>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>>
>>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension
>>>> or your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>>
>>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>>
>> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately
>> rude.
>
> *smile* I repeat, you are wasting your time so.. keep dancing - but I
> won't be watching

As I said, boorish, rude and a sham.

"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, lid
> says...
>>
>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> >> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>> >>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>> >>>> In article >,
>> >>>> says...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>> >>>>>> Proveds a
>> >>>>>> nice creaminess.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> Tatties & neeps
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> <purist intervention>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>> >>>> separately.
>> >>>>
>> >>> True.
>> >>
>> >> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>> >
>> > Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>
>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>
> And was Sheila, who also said the same thing to you, also wasting her
> time?

Keep dancing, Janet )
--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On 12/22/2012 6:28 AM, Farm1 wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>
>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That shouldn't
>>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>>
>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>
>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>
>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension or
>>> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>
>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>
> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately rude.
>
>
It was notbob who suggested mashing them together. (All I said was
"tatties & neeps", with no mention of how to prepare them.)

Jill

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> In article >, lid
>> says...
>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> >> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>>> >>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>> >>>> In article >,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> says...
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>> >>>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>> >>>>>> Proveds a
>>> >>>>>> nice creaminess.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>> Tatties & neeps
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> <purist intervention>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>> >>>> separately.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> True.
>>> >>
>>> >> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>> >
>>> > Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>
>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>
>> And was Sheila, who also said the same thing to you, also wasting her
>> time?
>
> Keep dancing, Janet )

More boorishness.

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>>> In article >, lid
>>> says...
>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>> > "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> >> "S Viemeister" > wrote in message
>>>> >>> On 12/21/2012 9:20 AM, Janet wrote:
>>>> >>>> In article >,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> says...
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On 12/21/2012 6:14 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>> >>>>>> On 2012-12-21, Ophelia > wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> We like them mashed with butter.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>> >>>>>> Proveds a
>>>> >>>>>> nice creaminess.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Tatties & neeps
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> <purist intervention>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> When serving haggis the tatties and neeps should be mashed
>>>> >>>> separately.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>> True.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>
>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>
>>> And was Sheila, who also said the same thing to you, also wasting her
>>> time?
>>
>> Keep dancing, Janet )
>
> More boorishness.

lol

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
> On 12/22/2012 6:28 AM, Farm1 wrote:
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That
>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>>>
>>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>>
>>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>>
>>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension
>>>> or
>>>> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>>
>>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>>
>> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately
>> rude.
>>
>>
> It was notbob who suggested mashing them together. (All I said was
> "tatties & neeps", with no mention of how to prepare them.)

I know it was notbob who suggested it as you will see if you reread my
posts. I also know you didn't mention how you prepared them.

If Ophelia is going to be consistent rather than just aiming to impress with
her words, you too will also be told to keep dancing for pointing out that
someone did indeed say it. You won't be though.

"Farm1" > wrote in message
...
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> On 12/22/2012 6:28 AM, Farm1 wrote:
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be otherwise?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That
>>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>>>
>>>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to pre-bickering
>>>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>>>
>>>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for comprehension
>>>>> or
>>>>> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>>>
>>>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>>>
>>> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately
>>> rude.
>>>
>>>
>> It was notbob who suggested mashing them together. (All I said was
>> "tatties & neeps", with no mention of how to prepare them.)
>
> I know it was notbob who suggested it as you will see if you reread my
> posts. I also know you didn't mention how you prepared them.*

> If Ophelia is going to be consistent rather than just aiming to impress
> with her words, you too will also be told to keep dancing for pointing out
> that someone did indeed say it. You won't be though.

* which is why she doesn't need to dance)))

Now Farm ... keep dancing

--
--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
> "Farm1" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> On 12/22/2012 6:28 AM, Farm1 wrote:
>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> "Farm1" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. A good intro is to cook and mash them WITH potatoes.
>>>>>>>>>>> Did anyone suggest the tatties and neeps here would be
>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they did. It's there in black and white for you to read.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *smile* You also are wasting your time
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've made it very simple for you. It's now there in that black and
>>>>>>>> white I mentioned in the very first line in this post. That
>>>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>>>> be too hard for you to find.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *smile* keep dancing))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your agreement with Christine's post about going back to
>>>>>> pre-bickering
>>>>>> days was obviously a sham.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You either made a genuine mistake and failed to read for
>>>>>> comprehension or
>>>>>> your did what you so freuently do by just taking aim at Janet. The
>>>>>> former can be excused but the latter is just deliberately boorish.
>>>>>
>>>>> You know, this dance is becoming very boring ...
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, it is. You should apologise for being wrong and deliberately
>>>> rude.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It was notbob who suggested mashing them together. (All I said was
>>> "tatties & neeps", with no mention of how to prepare them.)
>>
>> I know it was notbob who suggested it as you will see if you reread my
>> posts. I also know you didn't mention how you prepared them.*
>
>> If Ophelia is going to be consistent rather than just aiming to impress
>> >> with her words, you too will also be told to keep dancing for pointing
>> out that someone did indeed say it. You won't be though.
>
> * which is why she doesn't need to dance)))

Which of course makes no sense. but then your references to dancing also
make no sense. A dim Irish broad used to say the same thing. Not mush
originality around these days. No wonder that 'legal things' seems to be a
catching virus.

> Now Farm ... keep dancing

Now Patricia what was it you said about how you weren't reading any more of
my posts?