"Somebody" > wrote in message
...
> WTF? Now people are setting fires and shooting firefighters that respond.
> Jesus.
>
> volunteer firefighters.
> http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012...-to-blaze?lite
I expect the NRA will demand that machine gun turrets be built on
firetrucks!

"J. Clarke" > wrote in
in.local:


>
> Why would the NRA "demand that machine gun turrets be built on
> firetrucks" when a simpler solution would just be to executed
> murderers. If he had been executed the first time he killed somebody
> he would never have killed anybody else.
>
> But no, we can't have that.


I totally agree with you JC.



--
Peter
Brisbane
Australia

To be a warrior is not a simple matter of wishing to be one.
It is rather and endless struggle
that will go on to the very last moment of our lives.
Nobody is born a warrior,in exactly the same way that
nobody is born an average man.
We have to make ourselves into one or the other.
A warrior must only take care that his spirit is not broken.

On Dec 26, 10:23*pm, "I'm back" > wrote:
> "J. Clarke" > wrote main.local:
>
>
>
> > Why would the NRA "demand that machine gun turrets be built on
> > firetrucks" when a simpler solution would just be to executed
> > murderers. *If he had been executed the first time he killed somebody
> > he would never have killed anybody else.
>
> > But no, we can't have that.
>
> I totally agree with you JC.
>

A prohibited person (convicted felon)
acquired a banned weapon (assault weapon with high capacity magazine,
both were banned in NYS since 1994, when the killer was still in
prison)
in a state which requires background checks on all sales at gun shows.

"spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
...
On Dec 26, 10:23 pm, "I'm back" > wrote:
> "J. Clarke" > wrote
> main.local:
>
>
>
> > Why would the NRA "demand that machine gun turrets be built on
> > firetrucks" when a simpler solution would just be to executed
> > murderers. If he had been executed the first time he killed somebody
> > he would never have killed anybody else.
>
> > But no, we can't have that.
>
> I totally agree with you JC.
>

A prohibited person (convicted felon)
acquired a banned weapon (assault weapon with high capacity magazine,
both were banned in NYS since 1994, when the killer was still in
prison)
in a state which requires background checks on all sales at gun shows.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
But has NYS got an impenetrable fence around it?

On Dec 27, 7:28*am, "graham" > wrote:
> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Dec 26, 10:23 pm, "I'm back" > wrote:
>
> > "J. Clarke" > wrote
> > main.local:
>
> > > Why would the NRA "demand that machine gun turrets be built on
> > > firetrucks" when a simpler solution would just be to executed
> > > murderers. If he had been executed the first time he killed somebody
> > > he would never have killed anybody else.
>
> > > But no, we can't have that.
>
> > I totally agree with you JC.
>
> A prohibited person (convicted felon)
> acquired a banned weapon (assault weapon with high capacity magazine,
> both were banned in NYS since 1994, when the killer was still in
> prison)
> in a state which requires background checks on all sales at gun shows.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> But has NYS got an impenetrable fence around it?

So what? The only way the NYS shooter could have gotten that rifle is
by breaking the law.

"spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 7:28 am, "graham" > wrote:
> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Dec 26, 10:23 pm, "I'm back" > wrote:
>
> > "J. Clarke" > wrote
> > main.local:
>
> > > Why would the NRA "demand that machine gun turrets be built on
> > > firetrucks" when a simpler solution would just be to executed
> > > murderers. If he had been executed the first time he killed somebody
> > > he would never have killed anybody else.
>
> > > But no, we can't have that.
>
> > I totally agree with you JC.
>
> A prohibited person (convicted felon)
> acquired a banned weapon (assault weapon with high capacity magazine,
> both were banned in NYS since 1994, when the killer was still in
> prison)
> in a state which requires background checks on all sales at gun shows.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> But has NYS got an impenetrable fence around it?

So what? The only way the NYS shooter could have gotten that rifle is
by breaking the law.
_______________________________________________

Are you really that dense?

On Dec 27, 11:55*am, "graham" > wrote:
> "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
>
> ....
> On Dec 27, 7:28 am, "graham" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "spamtrap1888" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> > On Dec 26, 10:23 pm, "I'm back" > wrote:
>
> > > "J. Clarke" > wrote
> > > main.local:
>
> > > > Why would the NRA "demand that machine gun turrets be built on
> > > > firetrucks" when a simpler solution would just be to executed
> > > > murderers. If he had been executed the first time he killed somebody
> > > > he would never have killed anybody else.
>
> > > > But no, we can't have that.
>
> > > I totally agree with you JC.
>
> > A prohibited person (convicted felon)
> > acquired a banned weapon (assault weapon with high capacity magazine,
> > both were banned in NYS since 1994, when the killer was still in
> > prison)
> > in a state which requires background checks on all sales at gun shows.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > But has NYS got an impenetrable fence around it?
>
> So what? The only way the NYS shooter could have gotten that rifle is
> by breaking the law.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Are you really that dense?

All that gun control is, is laws with penalties attached. If you're
planning to take out the local fire dept. before you kill yourself,
you might decide you can disobey these other laws.

On 27/12/2012 5:57 PM, spamtrap1888 wrote:

>>> A prohibited person (convicted felon)
>>> acquired a banned weapon (assault weapon with high capacity magazine,
>>> both were banned in NYS since 1994, when the killer was still in
>>> prison)
>>> in a state which requires background checks on all sales at gun shows.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> But has NYS got an impenetrable fence around it?
>>
>> So what? The only way the NYS shooter could have gotten that rifle is
>> by breaking the law.
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Are you really that dense?
>
> All that gun control is, is laws with penalties attached. If you're
> planning to take out the local fire dept. before you kill yourself,
> you might decide you can disobey these other laws.
>


Not to mention that they shooter was nuts, and that he was not supposed
to have firearms at all. Banning them from sane and law abiding people
does not mean that nut cases and criminals won't still get their hands
on them.... unless they are in jail or in mental hospitals where they
belong.

Dave Smith wrote:
> spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
>> All that gun control is, is laws with penalties attached. If you're
>> planning to take out the local fire dept. before you kill yourself,
>> you might decide you can disobey these other laws.
>
> Not to mention that they shooter was nuts, and that he was not supposed
> to have firearms at all. Banning them from sane and law abiding people
> does not mean that nut cases and criminals won't still get their hands
> on them.... unless they are in jail or in mental hospitals where they
> belong.

Which is why it's a mental health issue not a gun control issue. Gun
control laws would have had no effect on this situation therefore anyone
who reacts by suggesting tighter gun controls is not using reason. They
are using ghoul reactions to feed on the dead to push their gun
confiscation agendas. As such they are to be opposed at all fronts.

The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
least as far back as Reagan.

On Friday, December 28, 2012 1:01:36 PM UTC-5, Doug Freyburger wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
> > spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> All that gun control is, is laws with penalties attached. If you're
>
> >> planning to take out the local fire dept. before you kill yourself,
>
> >> you might decide you can disobey these other laws.
>
> >
>
> > Not to mention that they shooter was nuts, and that he was not supposed
>
> > to have firearms at all. Banning them from sane and law abiding people
>
> > does not mean that nut cases and criminals won't still get their hands
>
> > on them.... unless they are in jail or in mental hospitals where they
>
> > belong.
>
>
>
> Which is why it's a mental health issue not a gun control issue. Gun
>
> control laws would have had no effect on this situation therefore anyone
>
> who reacts by suggesting tighter gun controls is not using reason. They
>
> are using ghoul reactions to feed on the dead to push their gun
>
> confiscation agendas. As such they are to be opposed at all fronts.
>
>
>
> The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
>
> least as far back as Reagan.

**** off. Since Eisenhower and Nixon ****ed god into everyones lives. Exterminate the christian medical mafia. Beat a psychologist to death. Bring the war home to destroy the Zionists.

Doug Freyburger > wrote in news:kbkmq0$9mf$1@dont-
email.me:

> Dave Smith wrote:
>> spamtrap1888 wrote:
>>
>>> All that gun control is, is laws with penalties attached. If you're
>>> planning to take out the local fire dept. before you kill yourself,
>>> you might decide you can disobey these other laws.
>>
>> Not to mention that they shooter was nuts, and that he was not
supposed
>> to have firearms at all. Banning them from sane and law abiding
people
>> does not mean that nut cases and criminals won't still get their
hands
>> on them.... unless they are in jail or in mental hospitals where they
>> belong.



> Which is why it's a mental health issue not a gun control issue. Gun
> control laws would have had no effect on this situation therefore
anyone
> who reacts by suggesting tighter gun controls is not using reason.
They
> are using ghoul reactions to feed on the dead to push their gun
> confiscation agendas. As such they are to be opposed at all fronts.
>
> The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since
at
> least as far back as Reagan.
>


Bud-a-bing!!!

You hit the nail right on the damn head!!!

--
Peter
Brisbane
Australia

To be a warrior is not a simple matter of wishing to be one.
It is rather and endless struggle
that will go on to the very last moment of our lives.
Nobody is born a warrior,in exactly the same way that
nobody is born an average man.
We have to make ourselves into one or the other.
A warrior must only take care that his spirit is not broken.

On 2012-12-28 18:01:36 +0000, Doug Freyburger said:

> Dave Smith wrote:
>> spamtrap1888 wrote:
>>
>>> All that gun control is, is laws with penalties attached. If you're
>>> planning to take out the local fire dept. before you kill yourself,
>>> you might decide you can disobey these other laws.
>>
>> Not to mention that they shooter was nuts, and that he was not supposed
>> to have firearms at all. Banning them from sane and law abiding people
>> does not mean that nut cases and criminals won't still get their hands
>> on them.... unless they are in jail or in mental hospitals where they
>> belong.
>
> Which is why it's a mental health issue not a gun control issue. Gun
> control laws would have had no effect on this situation therefore anyone
> who reacts by suggesting tighter gun controls is not using reason. They
> are using ghoul reactions to feed on the dead to push their gun
> confiscation agendas. As such they are to be opposed at all fronts.
>
> The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
> least as far back as Reagan.

One of the worst things about mental health is out we're too crazy to
make owning and operating a gun as sensible as owning and operating a
car. Or cataloging guns themselves to find out where they came from
when the turn up at a crime scene.

But the law is clear: Everybody has the "liberty" to kill as many
people as they like, and then the government has to right to try them
for 5 or 6 hundred k and then put them on death row for 5 or 10 million
dollars.
--
-- Beware the delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets.

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:01:36 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger
> wrote:



>
>The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
>least as far back as Reagan.

The ACLU said the mentally ill have rights and we can't do anything to
them. No forced medications or treatments. You see the results.

On 2012-12-29 03:53:44 +0000, Ed Pawlowski said:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:01:36 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger
> > wrote:
>
>> The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
>> least as far back as Reagan.
>
> The ACLU said the mentally ill have rights and we can't do anything to
> them. No forced medications or treatments. You see the results.

That goddamn constitution has screwed us again!

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:01:36 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger
> > wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
>>least as far back as Reagan.
>
> The ACLU said the mentally ill have rights and we can't do anything to
> them. No forced medications or treatments. You see the results.


Have you seen the Frances Farmer story "Frances"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJzj8dRRmbk

On Friday, December 28, 2012 10:53:44 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:01:36 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger
>
> > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >The mental heath situation in the US is a travesty and has been since at
>
> >least as far back as Reagan.
>
>
>
> The ACLU said the mentally ill have rights and we can't do anything to
>
> them. No forced medications or treatments. You see the results.

You need your capitalist head bashed in. Bring the mother ****ing war home.

Catfood Chef wrote:
>
> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >
> > The ACLU said the mentally ill have rights and we can't do anything to
> > them. No forced medications or treatments. You see the results.
>
> You need your capitalist head bashed in. Bring the mother ****ing war home.

LOL, Catfood Chef-head!
Since you continously post about "bring the _____ war home," you must be a
supporter of right to own guns. That war at home wouldn't last long if you
take guns away from the honest citizens.

Note: I noticed the other day on, I think, an NRA website that about half of
USA homes have at least one gun. No comment about that....just what I read.

G.