Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is.
I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. ![]() Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones from scratch. Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I do though I find it hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. Question: Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a bit overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few weeks...in ziplock bags with air squeezed out. G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. ![]() .... YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary wrote:
> Question: Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a > bit overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few > weeks...in ziplock bags with air squeezed out. They never last long enough here to find out. Although I do make them from scratch sometimes, the easiest is TJ's frozen. And if only one person wants, we make "cookie bread" by putting a couple of cookie's worth of the dough into a small soup bowl and microwaving it. -S- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 5:15*am, Gary > wrote:
> I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. * ![]() > > Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. > Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones from > scratch. > > Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat > them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. *Once I do though I find it > hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. > > Question: *Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a bit > overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few weeks...in > ziplock bags with air squeezed out. > > G. What? There's an island of cookies? Where? ;-) I freeze extras every time I make them - like you say, in a Ziploc vacuum bag - BUT, don't let them "dry," whatever you mean by that - just cool to room temp and seal them up. They last a long time with no bad effects. Just don't vacuum the air out to the point of mashing them all together. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 6:35*am, John Kuthe > wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. * ![]() > > ... > > YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or > decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! > > The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. > Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. > > John Kuthe... My recipe is better than the bag one: Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies ˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm 1 stick butter, melted and cooled to lukewarm 1 C. light brown sugar ˝ C. white sugar 1 extra large or jumbo egg, plus 1 egg yolk 2 tsp. vanilla (I used a scant T.) 2 C. plus 2 T. flour (white, bleached, all-purpose) ˝ tsp. salt ˝ tsp. soda 1 12-oz. bag semi-sweet chocolate chips, regular or “mega.” Put the melted shortening and the sugars in a mixing bowl. Mix until thoroughly blended. Add the egg, egg yolk, and vanilla and mix thoroughly. Put the flour, salt and soda in a bowl and whisk or sift once. Add the dry ingredients to the sugar mixture and mix thoroughly. Stir in chips by hand. Line cookie sheets with baking parchment. Drop cookie dough on cookie sheets. Cover unbaked dough with plastic wrap so it doesn't dry out. Bake at 340 deg. for 13 minutes (check at 11 minutes). Cookies should be slightly brown on the peaks and edges, and light colored and soft in the center. (Convection oven - 325 deg. for about 13 minutes. Remove from oven, leave on cookie sheets and cool. Do not put new batches on hot cookie sheets; make sure sheets have cooled before reusing. This recipe makes about 3 doz. cookies. I usually double it and add more chocolate chips, because my family likes them chocolatey. Store in airtight container with waxed paper between layers; (I just use the parchment that the cookies were baked on). The baked cookies can be frozen if sealed tightly, like in a vacuum bag. The raw dough can be frozen in an airtight container for up to two weeks. Thaw it in the refrigerator. Thaw baked cookies at room temperature. The baked cookies that are not frozen are best eaten within two days. Variations: Instead of chocolate chips, use chunks of white chocolate (6 oz.) and macadamia nuts (about 3/4 cup, cut into coarse bits) (or use proportions of chocolate and nuts to taste). For the choc. chips, you can substitute 1 C. quick-cooking oatmeal and 1 C. raisins, plumped 5 minutes in boiling water. You can also substitute 1 ˝ pkg. (about 18 oz.) of brickle bits and 3/4 C. coarsely chopped pecans for the choc. chips. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't care much for choc chip cookies but there is definitely a broad
spectrum in the product. Commercially, I tried WhoNu? choc chip cookies (the hard version is better than the soft and chewy version) which offer a marvelous fiber laxative effect :-) and tasted pretty good too. Those I would buy again just for the fiber alternative. Beats broccoli any day lol. A customer brings us choc chip cookies that would win awards I suspect. She looks norwegian, and her choc chip cookies are an art form. She has the whitest baked dough I have ever seen in a choc chip cookie. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:26:54 AM UTC-6, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jan 19, 6:35*am, John Kuthe > wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote: > > > >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > > > >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > > > >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO.. * ![]() > > > > > > ... > > > > > > YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or > > > decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! > > > > > > The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. > > > Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. > > > > > > John Kuthe... > > > > My recipe is better than the bag one: > > > > Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > > > ˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > N. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 4:35*am, John Kuthe > wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. * ![]() > > ... > > YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or > decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! > > The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. > Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. > > John Kuthe... as opposed to unreal ubsalted butter? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 8:35*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:26:54 AM UTC-6, Nancy2 wrote: > > On Jan 19, 6:35*am, John Kuthe > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote: > > > > >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > > > > >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > > > > >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. * ![]() > > > > ... > > > > YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or > > > > decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! > > > > The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. > > > > Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. > > > > John Kuthe... > > > My recipe is better than the bag one: > > > Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > > ˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > > > > N. > > --Bryan Anyone named Nancy. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Gary > wrote:
> I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. ![]() > > Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. > Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones from > scratch. > > Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat > them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I do though I find it > hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. > > Question: Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a bit > overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few weeks...in > ziplock bags with air squeezed out. > > G. Yep, cooled cookies will freeze well. I prefer fresh baked cookies so I just bake a few and freeze the rest of the dough in balls. Then when I want more cookies I just pull out a few cookie dough balls and bake them up. Either way works when you don't want several dozen cookies at a time. marcella |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:22:34 -0800 (PST), Chemo
> wrote: >On Jan 19, 4:35*am, John Kuthe > wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote: >> >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. >> >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very >> >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. * ![]() >> >> ... >> >> YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or >> decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! >> >> The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. >> Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. >> >> John Kuthe... > >as opposed to unreal ubsalted butter? As opposed to salted anything, and all non-butters. John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 10:35*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:26:54 AM UTC-6, Nancy2 wrote: > > On Jan 19, 6:35*am, John Kuthe > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:15:34 -0500, Gary > wrote: > > > > >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. > > > > >I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very > > > > >weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. * ![]() > > > > ... > > > > YUP!! Factory made processed chemically treated against breakdown or > > > > decay faux chocolate chip cookies, loaded with CRAP! > > > > The recipe on the bag of chocolate chips is the one I always use. > > > > Perfection, only I use 100% real ubsalted butter. > > > > John Kuthe... > > > My recipe is better than the bag one: > > > Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > > ˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > > > > N. > > --Bryan This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. It's a small amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate chip cookies exclusively. It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, just softer than crisp). YMMV, dolt. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/19/2013 6:35 AM, Bryan wrote:
> > What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > --Bryan > The reason you'd use stick margarine these days is because you don't want to use butter, shortening, or that 50% water emulsion material in your cooking or baking. I used to use Nucoa margarine for frying and baking because, back in the old days, butter was bad for your health. I suspect that one day it's gonna be bad for people once again. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 6:15:34 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> > > but the best are the homemade ones from > > scratch. You could safely engrave this in stone, relative to ANYthing edible, just about. Sure, you can freeze in small batches, but let me warn you - they won't be rock hard and need much thawing. I have tried this with brownies and we still managed to polish off a dozen in less than 24 hours. Just think of the money you've saved, tho, as you indulge. l you I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat > > them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I do though I find it > > hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. > > > > Question: Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a bit > > overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few weeks...in > > ziplock bags with air squeezed out. > > > > G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it >is. > I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! > Very > weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. > ![]() > > Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. > Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones > from > scratch. > > Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat > them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I do though I find > it > hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. > > Question: Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a bit > overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few weeks...in > ziplock bags with air squeezed out. > > G. Most cookies can be safely frozen. Not sure I would freeze frosted ones though. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies >> > >>> > >˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm >> > >> >What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? >> > >> > >> > >>> > >N. >> > >> >--Bryan > This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. It's a small > amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate > chip cookies exclusively. It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, > just softer than crisp). YMMV, dolt. > > N. But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to tell you how wrong it is. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 7:16*am, jmcquown > wrote:
> On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > >>> > >˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > >> >What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > >>> > >N. > > >> >--Bryan > > This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. *It's a small > > amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate > > chip cookies exclusively. *It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, > > just softer than crisp). *YMMV, dolt. > > > N. > > But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? > LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to > tell you how wrong it is. > > Jill i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a fryer..... N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:16:19 AM UTC-6, jmcquown wrote:
> On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: > > >>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > >> > > > >>> > >˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > >> > > > >> >What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> > >N. > > >> > > > >> >--Bryan > > > This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. It's a small > > > amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate > > > chip cookies exclusively. It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, > > > just softer than crisp). YMMV, dolt. > Using partially hydrogenated fats in food is stupid. There's no shame in *having been* wrong, but if you persist, you deserve to be insulted. > > > N. > > > > But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? > > LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to > > tell you how wrong it is. > "...there is likely no safe level of trans fat and that people should eat as little as possible." source-- http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Gettin...63_Article.jsp > > Jill --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:53:51 AM UTC-6, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jan 20, 7:16*am, jmcquown > wrote: > > > On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > > > > > >>> > >˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > > > > > >> >What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > > > > > >>> > >N. > > > > > > >> >--Bryan > > > > This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. *It's a small > > > > amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate > > > > chip cookies exclusively. *It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, > > > > just softer than crisp). *YMMV, dolt. > > > > > > > N. > > > > > > But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? > > > LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to > > > tell you how wrong it is. > > > > > > Jill > > > > i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a > > fryer..... > I *DID NOT* recommend using olive oil in a fryer. Your reading skills are as poor as your knowledge of dietary fats. In a thread about reusing fryer oil, I wrote, "Polyunsaturates are awful. They go rancid inside the body. You left out the best choice, monounsaturates. Olive oil is high in monounsaturated fatty acids and low in polyunsaturated. High oleic sunflower is even better." This was in response to someone who had written, "[Polyunsaturates] are much less harmful for your cardiovascular system." Hey, but what's to be expected from a woman who is so stupid that she uses stick margarine in 2013? > > N. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/20/2013 9:53 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jan 20, 7:16 am, jmcquown > wrote: >> On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies >> >>>>>>> ˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm >> >>>>> What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? >> >>>>>>> N. >> >>>>> --Bryan >>> This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. It's a small >>> amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate >>> chip cookies exclusively. It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, >>> just softer than crisp). YMMV, dolt. >> >>> N. >> >> But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? >> LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to >> tell you how wrong it is. >> >> Jill > > i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a > fryer..... > > N. > Yeah, there's that, too. Pan frying in a little olive oil is one thing. Deep frying in it? Nope. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/20/2013 10:45 AM, Bryan wrote:
>> i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a >> > >> >fryer..... >> > > I*DID NOT* recommend using olive oil in a fryer. Your reading skills are as poor as your knowledge of dietary fats. In a thread about reusing fryer oil, I wrote, "Polyunsaturates are awful. They go rancid inside the body. You left out the best choice, monounsaturates. Olive oil is high in monounsaturated fatty acids and low in polyunsaturated. High oleic sunflower is even better." And this in what way means you weren't recommending olive oil for the deep fryer? You're the one who brought up olive oil in the reusing oil for deep frying thread. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marcella Peek wrote:
> In article >, Gary > wrote: > >> I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. >> I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! Very >> weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. ![]() >> >> Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. >> Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones from >> scratch. >> >> Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat >> them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I do though I find it >> hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. >> >> Question: Do homemade cookies freeze well after cooling and drying a bit >> overnight? I'm thinking that they might at least for a few weeks...in >> ziplock bags with air squeezed out. >> >> G. > > Yep, cooled cookies will freeze well. > > I prefer fresh baked cookies so I just bake a few and freeze the rest of > the dough in balls. Then when I want more cookies I just pull out a few > cookie dough balls and bake them up. > > Either way works when you don't want several dozen cookies at a time. > > marcella Yup. I was going to suggest freezing the dough in balls or in short cones (as done by Judy Rosenberg* at a demonstration). * Judy Rosenberg of Rosie's Bakery, which has some following in the Boston area, has authored three cookbooks: Rosie's All-Butter Fresh Cream Sugar-Packed Baking Book; Rosie's Bakery Chocolate-Packed Jam-Filled Butter-Rich No-Holds-Barred Cookie Book; and The Rosie's Bakery All-Butter, Cream-Filled, Sugar-Packed Baking Book. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[quote='Julie Bove
I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it is. ![]() Well as a certified old widder lady choc chip cookie maker in a previous incarnation I speak with some authority here. Granny has never gone wrong using the Nestle Chips and following the recipe I give em which is wrote on the bag. The more one varies and gets cute..the farther off the true path they have strayed. Now they did manage to leave out the raisins. Anybody leaving out the raisins make old ladies want to give them a biotch slap. Kids too. PS..Ditch that oleo marjoram. That stuff kills folks..plust gives them the grease burps. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 9:33*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:16:19 AM UTC-6, jmcquown wrote: > > On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: > > > >>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > > >>> > >˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > > >> >What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > > >>> > >N. > > > >> >--Bryan > > > > This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. *It's a small > > > > amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate > > > > chip cookies exclusively. *It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, > > > > just softer than crisp). *YMMV, dolt. > > Using partially hydrogenated fats in food is stupid. *There's no shame in > *having been* wrong, but if you persist, you deserve to be insulted. > > > > N. > > > But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? > > > LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to > > > tell you how wrong it is. > > "...there is likely no safe level of trans fat and that people should eat as little as possible." > * * *source--http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/GettingHealthy/FatsAndOils/Fats101/A-Hi... > > > > > Jill > > --Bryan Really. If that's the worst thing anyone does (eating 1/36th of 8 oz. of baking oleo about 6 times a year), then that person will likely live a long life. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 9:45*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:53:51 AM UTC-6, Nancy2 wrote: > > On Jan 20, 7:16*am, jmcquown > wrote: > > > > On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: > > > > >>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies > > > > >>> > >˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm > > > > >> >What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? > > > > >>> > >N. > > > > >> >--Bryan > > > > > This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. *It's a small > > > > > amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate > > > > > chip cookies exclusively. *It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, > > > > > just softer than crisp). *YMMV, dolt. > > > > > N. > > > > But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? > > > > LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to > > > > tell you how wrong it is. > > > > Jill > > > i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a > > > fryer..... > > I *DID NOT* recommend using olive oil in a fryer. *Your reading skills are as poor as your knowledge of dietary fats. *In a thread about reusing fryer oil, I wrote, "Polyunsaturates are awful. *They go rancid inside the body. *You left out the best choice, monounsaturates. *Olive oil is high in monounsaturated fatty acids and low in polyunsaturated. *High oleic sunflower is even better." > > This was in response to someone who had written, "[Polyunsaturates] are much less harmful for your cardiovascular system." *Hey, but what's to be expected from a woman who is so stupid that she uses stick margarine in 2013? > > > > > N. > > --Bryan You mentioned olive oil as an example of healthy oil. The thread was about fryers. If you didn't want to imply olive oil was a viable choice, you shouldn't have mentioned it. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 2:50*pm, bigwheel >
wrote: > 'Julie Bove > I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it > is. ![]() > > > > > Well as a certified old widder lady choc chip cookie maker in a previous > > incarnation I speak with some authority here. Granny has never gone > > wrong using the Nestle Chips and following the recipe I give em which is > > wrote on the bag. The more one varies and gets cute..the farther off the > > true path they have strayed. Now they did manage to leave out the > > raisins. Anybody leaving out the raisins make old ladies want to give > > them a biotch slap. Kids too. PS..Ditch that oleo marjoram. That stuff > > kills folks..plust gives them the grease burps. > > -- > bigwheel My cookies are still better (and easier) than the Nestle recipe. If you don't want to use oleo, don't. Siimple. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:32:09 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
> wrote: > Really. If that's the worst thing anyone does (eating 1/36th of 8 oz. > of baking oleo about 6 times a year), then that person will likely > live a long life. Last year, I bought margarine for the very first time since I was a kid going to the grocery store with a shopping list I had to stick to. Someone here told me it was the secret to the type of cookie I like and it was! That said, I still have two sticks left... maybe three. If it cuts my life by 10 minutes or a week, I won't care. I'll be dead, but I'll be happy. ![]() -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 20, 2:50*pm, bigwheel >
wrote: > 'Julie Bove > I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it > is. ![]() > > > > > Well as a certified old widder lady choc chip cookie maker in a previous > > incarnation I speak with some authority here. Granny has never gone > > wrong using the Nestle Chips and following the recipe I give em which is > > wrote on the bag. The more one varies and gets cute..the farther off the > > true path they have strayed. Now they did manage to leave out the > > raisins. Anybody leaving out the raisins make old ladies want to give > > them a biotch slap. Kids too. PS..Ditch that oleo marjoram. That stuff > > kills folks..plust gives them the grease burps. > > -- > bigwheel You would have to eat a pretty big volume of oleo to kill yourself, and all grease, I would guess, will give you "grease burps." It isn't the grease, anyway, it's the fat. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:52:31 AM UTC-6, jmcquown wrote:
> On 1/20/2013 10:45 AM, Bryan wrote: > > >> i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a > > >> > > > >> >fryer..... > > >> > > > > I*DID NOT* recommend using olive oil in a fryer. Your reading skills are as poor as your knowledge of dietary fats. In a thread about reusing fryer oil, I wrote, "Polyunsaturates are awful. They go rancid inside the body. You left out the best choice, monounsaturates. Olive oil is high in monounsaturated fatty acids and low in polyunsaturated. High oleic sunflower is even better." > > > > And this in what way means you weren't recommending olive oil for the > > deep fryer? You're the one who brought up olive oil in the reusing oil > > for deep frying thread. > Context, Jill, context. No one who had read what I wrote with any care or comprehension would conclude that I was suggesting filling a deep fryer with olive oil. I was obviously commenting merely on the fatty acid composition, saying that high oleic sunflower oil compared favorably with olive oil. Just because it was in a threat with the subject being deep frying, doesn't mean you can make such an assumption. > > Jill --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy2 wrote:
> My cookies are still better (and easier) than the Nestle recipe. Huh. Why should we believe that claim? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it >is. > I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! > Very > weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. > ![]() > > Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. > Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones > from > scratch. > > Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat > them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I do though I find > it > hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. Sometimes I roll them in cinnamon. Those are called wookie cookies. (1 part cinnamon to 3 parts sugar). Have to use half milk chocolate chips and half semi-sweet chips so you don't overpower the cinnamon though. Sometimes I substitute 1/4 cup of milk for an egg, and substitute some of the butter with shortening. I think that's the original Toll House cookie recipe.They're crispier, and more sugary. And, of course, they have a longer shelf life. W. Pooh (AKA Winnie P.) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/22/2013 12:33 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jan 20, 9:45 am, Bryan > wrote: >> On Sunday, January 20, 2013 8:53:51 AM UTC-6, Nancy2 wrote: >>> On Jan 20, 7:16 am, jmcquown > wrote: >> >>>> On 1/19/2013 2:48 PM, Nancy2 wrote: >> >>>>>>> Big Soft Chocolate Chip Cookies >> >>>>>>>>> ˝ stick oleo, melted and cooled to lukewarm >> >>>>>>> What kind of an imbecile uses "stick oleo" in 2013? >> >>>>>>>>> N. >> >>>>>>> --Bryan >> >>>>> This one - there is a Blue Bonnet one just for baking. It's a small >> >>>>> amount, relatively, in one's overall diet, unless you eat chocolate >> >>>>> chip cookies exclusively. It helps keep the cookies soft (not chewy, >> >>>>> just softer than crisp). YMMV, dolt. >> >>>>> N. >> >>>> But, but... don't you realize Bryan is watching out for your health? >> >>>> LOL Trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils and whatnot... he's sure to >> >>>> tell you how wrong it is. >> >>>> Jill >> >>> i shouldn't bother to respond to someone who recommends olive oil in a >> >>> fryer..... >> >> I *DID NOT* recommend using olive oil in a fryer. Your reading skills are as poor as your knowledge of dietary fats. In a thread about reusing fryer oil, I wrote, "Polyunsaturates are awful. They go rancid inside the body. You left out the best choice, monounsaturates. Olive oil is high in monounsaturated fatty acids and low in polyunsaturated. High oleic sunflower is even better." >> >> This was in response to someone who had written, "[Polyunsaturates] are much less harmful for your cardiovascular system." Hey, but what's to be expected from a woman who is so stupid that she uses stick margarine in 2013? >> >> >> >>> N. >> >> --Bryan > > You mentioned olive oil as an example of healthy oil. The thread was > about fryers. If you didn't want to imply olive oil was a viable > choice, you shouldn't have mentioned it. > > N. > Exactly! Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 12:43*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Nancy2 wrote: > > My cookies are still better (and easier) than the Nestle recipe. > > Huh. Why should we believe that claim? Make my recipe and get back to me ;-). But I'll give myself an out and say everyone has their favorite chocolate chip cookie and mine might not be yours. For example, Martha Stewart likes them medium brown and very flat. That isn't the way I like them. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 12:51*pm, The Other Guy > wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:43:11 -0500, George M. Middius > > > wrote: > >Nancy2 wrote: > > >> My cookies are still better (and easier) than the Nestle recipe. > > >Huh. Why should we believe that claim? > > Exactly! *SEND us some, and let US judge!! > > To reply by email, lose the Ks... Sure, I'll fax you some. LOL. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 1:13*pm, "Christopher M." > wrote:
> "Gary" > wrote in .... > >I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies but it > >is. > > I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon and....yuk! > > Very > > weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," IMO. > > ![]() > > > Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so good. > > Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the homemade ones > > from > > scratch. > > > Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I won't eat > > them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. *Once I do though I find > > it > > hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. > > Sometimes I roll them in cinnamon. Those are called wookie cookies. (1 part > cinnamon to 3 parts sugar). Have to use half milk chocolate chips and half > semi-sweet chips so *you don't overpower the cinnamon though. > > Sometimes I substitute 1/4 cup of milk for an egg, and substitute some of > the butter with shortening. I think that's the original Toll House cookie > recipe.They're crispier, and more sugary. And, of course, they have a longer > shelf life. > > W. Pooh (AKA Winnie P.) Uh-oh, now you will experience the wrath of Mr. Negative, who thinks we will die sooner if we eat "shortening" once in a while. (In my cookie experience, oleo makes them softer, all butter makes them crispier.) N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dsi1 wrote: >The reason you'd use stick margarine > these days is because you don't want to > use butter, shortening, or that 50% > water emulsion material in your cooking > or baking. I used to use Nucoa > margarine for frying and baking > because, back in the old days, butter > was bad for your health. I suspect that > one day it's gonna be bad for people > once again. Many moons ago, I also used Nucoa margarine for baking and cooking, but then I switched to I Can't Believe It's Not Butter, and find I liked it better. However, for chocolate chip cookies, I do NOT like them made with all butter, as I find they spread out too thin, and are harder and crispier, which I don't find appetizing. I want my cookies to be in mounds and more of a "chewy" texture, so I use the recipe on the Nestle's chocolate chip package and use ALL shortening, or sometimes use half real (salted) butter and the other half shortening. Many have complimented me on the cookies and exclaim that they are better than their's and yet they use the same recipe, so are perplexed. They never last around our house long enough to ever freeze any...they eat them warm right off the sheets even! Sometimes if I'm lazy, I spread them into 15x10 inch sheet pan and make bars. Judy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sf wrote: >Maybe I'm asking too much. I want them > to be so flat the chocolate chips look > like little black hills and still remain soft > & chewy. LOL it sounds to me like you want the best of both worlds! I don't think it would be possible to achieve that wish. I've never cared for flat (thin) chocolate chip cookies, as want them in little round uniform mounds of baked golden brown dough that are chewy in texture, but yet tender at the same time. With using all butter, it just doesn't give me the perfect cookies. The "original" recipe called for 1/4 tsp. cold water, which I could never understand the purpose of, and on the Nestle's chips package, it hasn't listed water in the ingredients for a very long time. However, my favorite M&M Cookie recipe does, and it also calls for ALL shortening, and they are the best cookies in the world, of that type. My favorite peanut butter cookie recipe also calls for all shortening and they are also wonderful, as are my Oatmeal-Raisin, using shortening. Butter isn't necessary to make delicious cookies, although for some types, such as shortbread, spritz, cut out sugar cookies, and many others I make for the holidays, need ALL butter to make them taste good, and a person just can't substitute with margarine, or shortening. Judy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cant speak for all old fat guys by any means but have noted bad indigestion producers for me are canola oil..cotton seed oil..and oleo margarine. I can eat lard..butter..peanut oil..olive oyl and bacon grease without issues. I am convinced canola is also deadly. You need to watch Dr. Becker on TV. He is very smart about that kind of stuff. Now as you say doubt a person not notice it in a bi annual pan of cookies. Where it will give a person vapor lock is mostly on fried food..gravies..rouxs etc. Them crazy cajones sometimes make roux with oleo. You start burping them greasy old firey burps about midnight..you will wish you had chosen the Chinese food instead.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy2 wrote:
> On Jan 22, 1:13 pm, "Christopher M." > wrote: >> "Gary" > wrote in >> ... >>> I didn't think it was possible to screw up chocolate chip cookies >>> but it is. >>> I bought a bag of "Chips Ahoy - Chewy" yesterday afternoon >>> and....yuk! Very >>> weird tasting. They should be labeled, "Processed Cookie Product," >>> IMO. ![]() >> >>> Actually most of the CC cookies found in the cookie isle are not so >>> good. Only the bakery has acceptable ones but the best are the >>> homemade ones from >>> scratch. >> >>> Guess I'll just make my own from now on. Another plus is that I >>> won't eat them often as I'm usually too lazy to make them. Once I >>> do though I find it >>> hard to stop and, since I live alone now, I eat them up too fast. >> >> Sometimes I roll them in cinnamon. Those are called wookie cookies. >> (1 part cinnamon to 3 parts sugar). Have to use half milk chocolate >> chips and half semi-sweet chips so you don't overpower the cinnamon >> though. >> >> Sometimes I substitute 1/4 cup of milk for an egg, and substitute >> some of the butter with shortening. I think that's the original Toll >> House cookie recipe.They're crispier, and more sugary. And, of >> course, they have a longer shelf life. >> >> W. Pooh (AKA Winnie P.) > > Uh-oh, now you will experience the wrath of Mr. Negative, I blocked that dude years ago. > who thinks > we will die sooner if we eat "shortening" once in a while. Yeah, I think I'd have to eat a lot of whoopie pies to get shortening poisoning. > (In my > cookie experience, oleo makes them softer, all butter makes them > crispier.) > > N. I haven't done much experimenting with different types of fats. If I want to make them softer I guess I'd decrease the temperature by 25 degrees (F) and cook them an extra five minutes. W. Pooh (AKA Winnie P.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chocolate chip cookies | General Cooking | |||
Chocolate Chip Cookies | General Cooking | |||
Chocolate Malt Chocolate Chip Cookies | Baking | |||
Chocolate Chip Cookies | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Chocolate chip cookies | Recipes |