On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:33:53 +0000, VBH > wrote:

>>>Beav wrote:
>>>
>>>> "jkil" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>Moral Values; that's what decided this election. Bush certainly has his
>>>>>faults but most Americans like to think that they are a moral and and
>>>>>somewhat pious (Christian) people.
>>>>>
>>>>>Moral values. That's the reason that Bill Clinton can never again win
>>>>>an
>>>>>election. That's the reason Kerry lost; folks perceived him as a coward,
>>>>>a
>>>>>traitor, a gigolo, and an effete lover of "old Europe" and what Europe
>>>>>thinks and does. I think this election emphatically presents the END in
>>>>>our nation of this worshiping and continuously protecting Europe while
>>>>>they
>>>>>continuously try to appear superior to real Americans !!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to false Americans? Knobhead
>>>>
>>>>>God Bless America ! Within weeks we will be returned to a moral nation
>>>>>with a moral leader. Those who don't like it can leave.
>>>>>We can help them leave.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You THINK you could, your coursts on the other hand would think differently.
>>>> Like I said, Knobhead.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>No freebies for anyone and there will be no funds for welfare and
>>>>>entitlements. We will win our great Crusades.
>>>>>
>>>>>Let them begin at home as we stop the baby murder by the wiles of the new
>>>>>Supreme Court Justices who will be placed in order.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Get some fresh drugs, the ones you're using now are doing some serious work
>>>> on you. Knobhead
>>>>
>>>> Beav
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Just a footnote to sleepy, don't bother crossposting this to every NG
>>>you can think of.

Not very observant of you. It is only X posted back to the original
NGs that beav sent it to from ASD, minus ASD and MHD, and adding
ASDUK, so his countrymen, being intelligent enough to see what he is
doing, might try to reign him in. Unfortunately it seems like an
overreach on my part.

>I have read it once already thanks and you have
>>>already convinced everyone in those NGs that you are a waster with too
>>>much time on your hands. Job done.
>>>
>>>Pity cos when you post your own material it has a habit of being
>>>interesting. Shame you do not do much of that anymore.
>>>
>>>p.s. regarding the post, Beav's right - the poster's head is a phallus

Agreed on that. Odd as it may seem, I often agree with the content of
beav's X posts. I just see no reason to add the Lutherans and Baptists
to the coterie of madmen we have on our hands at the time.


>>>--------------------
>>>VBH
>>>T2/UK/A1c 5.8/ 1000Met/Dx Oct-03

Why don't you tell your pal beav to stop X posting out of this NG,
ASD, which does nothing but draw his replies back here. I am not going
to lose any sleep about the other crackpot NGs your bud usually X
posts to, having a poor opinion of me. Lots of people here do too! So
what? Sorry if that bothers you. When your mate stops X posting from
here, I will stop sending his messages back and including ASDUK. Too
many times I have read in ASDUK, that ASD is filled with nothing but
crossposting, spamming Americans, with beav often leading the chorus.
and all agreeing what a waste of time it is posting or reading this
NG. Very hypocritical being from one of those most responsible for
filling this NG with X posted rubbish. Makes me begin to think that it
is deliberate sabotage, as he rarely posts anything of value. So lets
make it simple. He X posts his bullshit out of this NG, its coming
right back at ya. Hope you enjoy chung and mu and all his cronies plus
the added joy of all the fundie groups. Ta Ta!

Sleepy

-------------------------------------
Religion is the opiate of the masses.

Karl Marx
-------------------------------------

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 01:29:55 GMT, Richard Periut
> wrote:

> We took out a dictator that eventually was going to contribute to our
> harm. Are you that naive, or does your IQ vacillate in the 20's.

"Eventually" is the operative term. Would you cut off your
arm if it could "eventually" become broken???

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 01:29:55 GMT, Richard Periut
> wrote:

> We took out a dictator that eventually was going to contribute to our
> harm. Are you that naive, or does your IQ vacillate in the 20's.

"Eventually" is the operative term. Would you cut off your
arm if it could "eventually" become broken???

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 01:29:55 GMT, Richard Periut
> wrote:

> We took out a dictator that eventually was going to contribute to our
> harm. Are you that naive, or does your IQ vacillate in the 20's.

"Eventually" is the operative term. Would you cut off your
arm if it could "eventually" become broken???

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

Richard Periut > wrote in
:

>> Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
>> will have better luck next time.
>>
> They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
> the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
> good ole'e USA way.

And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).

> Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
> met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
> force.

Spoken like a true Nazi.

--

"It is easier for a rich man to enter heaven seated
comfortably on the back of a camel, than it is for
a poor man to pass through the eye of a needle."

Supply Side Jesus

Michel Boucher > wrote:

> Richard Periut > wrote in
> :
>
> >> Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
> >> will have better luck next time.
> >>
> > They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
> > the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
> > good ole'e USA way.
>
> And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
> fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
> their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).
>
> > Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
> > met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
> > force.
>
> Spoken like a true Nazi.

I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
impact.

The Wolf wrote:

> rous species like ours, has to be
> > > met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
> > > force.
> >
> > Spoken like a true Nazi.
>
> I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
> impact.

Have you tested any of them near one of your big cities to make sure that
they are safe?

Dave Smith > wrote:

> The Wolf wrote:
>
> > rous species like ours, has to be
> > > > met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
> > > > force.
> > >
> > > Spoken like a true Nazi.
> >
> > I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
> > impact.
>
> Have you tested any of them near one of your big cities to make sure that
> they are safe?

When it comes to Falouja, why not get as many civilians out of the city
as possible and turn it into a sheet of glass?

Why are we putting our boys at risk?

Videotape it force Al Jazeera to put it on the air with the caption: You
cut off heads of the eldery innocents, we melt your cities.

The ball is in your court akhmed, where do you want to take it from here

Michel Boucher wrote:
> Richard Periut > wrote in
> :
>
>
>>>Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
>>>will have better luck next time.
>>>
>>
>>They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
>>the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
>>good ole'e USA way.
>
>
> And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
> fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
> their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).
>
>
>>Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
>>met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
>>force.
>
>
> Spoken like a true Nazi.
>
No, spoken like a true realist. You and many others don't get it do you?
Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in which nuclear
weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive genocide? It wont
be long before India and Pakistan will go at it. The concentrated hatred
between them is going to fuel it.

Our species dropped from the trees so recently, that we think more with
our primitive brain (emotions,) than with our cortex (intellect.) So a
massive nuclear exchange is bound to take place, if these powers are
left in place.

Al Quaeda had its main operation in Afghanistan. We went in, and at
least crippled their agenda. Saddam was a trouble maker, and we are
better off without him (and so is the rest of the world.)

And if these governments are going to control and manipulate us with
their oil; then it's a good thing we have control over one of the worlds
largest reserves. Besides, the French and other countries were going to
benefit (as they were, and more will be made evident,) from being
"friends" with Saddam.

Better us than them!

Rich

--
"Dum Spiro, Spero."

As long as I breath, I hope.

Cicero (Ancient Rome)





ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤° `°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸. ><((((º> ·´¯`·. , .·´¯`·.. ><((((º>

Let there be fish!!!

Michel Boucher wrote:
> Richard Periut > wrote in
> :
>
>
>>>Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
>>>will have better luck next time.
>>>
>>
>>They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
>>the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
>>good ole'e USA way.
>
>
> And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
> fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
> their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).
>
>
>>Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
>>met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
>>force.
>
>
> Spoken like a true Nazi.
>
No, spoken like a true realist. You and many others don't get it do you?
Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in which nuclear
weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive genocide? It wont
be long before India and Pakistan will go at it. The concentrated hatred
between them is going to fuel it.

Our species dropped from the trees so recently, that we think more with
our primitive brain (emotions,) than with our cortex (intellect.) So a
massive nuclear exchange is bound to take place, if these powers are
left in place.

Al Quaeda had its main operation in Afghanistan. We went in, and at
least crippled their agenda. Saddam was a trouble maker, and we are
better off without him (and so is the rest of the world.)

And if these governments are going to control and manipulate us with
their oil; then it's a good thing we have control over one of the worlds
largest reserves. Besides, the French and other countries were going to
benefit (as they were, and more will be made evident,) from being
"friends" with Saddam.

Better us than them!

Rich

--
"Dum Spiro, Spero."

As long as I breath, I hope.

Cicero (Ancient Rome)





ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤° `°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸. ><((((º> ·´¯`·. , .·´¯`·.. ><((((º>

Let there be fish!!!

In article >, The Wolf
> wrote:

> Michel Boucher > wrote:
>
> > Richard Periut > wrote in
> > :
> >
> > >> Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
> > >> will have better luck next time.
> > >>
> > > They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
> > > the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
> > > good ole'e USA way.
> >
> > And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
> > fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
> > their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).
> >
> > > Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
> > > met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
> > > force.
> >
> > Spoken like a true Nazi.
>
> I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
> impact.

A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb, that
was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary people. It
either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.

Stark > wrote:

> In article >, The Wolf
> > wrote:
>
> > Michel Boucher > wrote:
> >
> > > Richard Periut > wrote in
> > > :
> > >
> > > >> Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
> > > >> will have better luck next time.
> > > >>
> > > > They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
> > > > the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
> > > > good ole'e USA way.
> > >
> > > And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
> > > fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
> > > their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).
> > >
> > > > Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
> > > > met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
> > > > force.
> > >
> > > Spoken like a true Nazi.
> >
> > I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
> > impact.
>
> A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb, that
> was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary people. It
> either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.

I think we have it.

Peter Aitken > wrote:

>
> > Al Quaeda had its main operation in Afghanistan. We went in, and at
> > least crippled their agenda.
>
> And then instead of finishing the job and removing bin Laden from

The election is over you can knock off the moveon.org parroting now? ok?

Michel Boucher wrote:

> Richard Periut > wrote in
> :
>
> >> Spoken like a true Nazi.
> >>
> > No, spoken like a true realist.
>
> Sorry. I disagree. You're speaking like a Nazi. A realist would
> know what caused the problem. You obviously don't know what caused
> the problem, or you choose to remain blind to it.
>
> > You and many others don't get it
> > do you? Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in
> > which nuclear weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive
> > genocide? It wont be long before India and Pakistan will go at it.
> > The concentrated hatred between them is going to fuel it.
>
> What about the concentrated hatred you bear against innocent muslims?
> If you're reading what The is going on about, he would think it
> justified to use nuclear weapons against unarmed populations as long
> as they didn't vote for George W. Bush. You don't think you're one
> of those threats, those "wrong hands"? Think again.


Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should build
a bomb shelter?

Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch or
Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.

I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went on
in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
me.

--
Best
Greg

Gregory Morrow > wrote:

> Michel Boucher wrote:
>
> > Richard Periut > wrote in
> > :
> >
> > >> Spoken like a true Nazi.
> > >>
> > > No, spoken like a true realist.
> >
> > Sorry. I disagree. You're speaking like a Nazi. A realist would
> > know what caused the problem. You obviously don't know what caused
> > the problem, or you choose to remain blind to it.
> >
> > > You and many others don't get it
> > > do you? Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in
> > > which nuclear weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive
> > > genocide? It wont be long before India and Pakistan will go at it.
> > > The concentrated hatred between them is going to fuel it.
> >
> > What about the concentrated hatred you bear against innocent muslims?
> > If you're reading what The is going on about, he would think it
> > justified to use nuclear weapons against unarmed populations as long
> > as they didn't vote for George W. Bush. You don't think you're one
> > of those threats, those "wrong hands"? Think again.
>
>
> Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should build
> a bomb shelter?
>
> Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
> secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch or
> Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.
>
> I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went on
> in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
> me.

Funny there only seems to be fraud when the demo loses.......

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 21:24:50 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should build
>a bomb shelter?
>
>Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
>secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch or
>Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.
>
>I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went on
>in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
>me.

You live in Chicago, and you complain about voter fraud?

You Dems lose, so it must be dishonest.
Pan Ohco

"Gregory Morrow" >
wrote in link.net:

> Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron
> states to secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with
> Canadians or Dutch or Australians than I do with the morons who
> "voted" for Bush.

I imagine The and Richypoo will have choice words on that topic. But
fear not. Canada has accepted many in the past (native refugees during
the Seven Years War, the Loyalists after 1774, and again after 1812,
black slaves coming up the Underground Railroad, draft dodgers during
Vietnam) and many stayed and became Canadians. We are prepared to
include the Kerry states within Confederation, as you can see by the
following proposal:

http://civicspacelabs.org/node/view/1210

--

"It is easier for a rich man to enter heaven seated
comfortably on the back of a camel, than it is for
a poor man to pass through the eye of a needle."

Supply Side Jesus

Michel Boucher wrote:

> "Gregory Morrow" >
> wrote in link.net:
>
> > Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron
> > states to secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with
> > Canadians or Dutch or Australians than I do with the morons who
> > "voted" for Bush.
>
> I imagine The and Richypoo will have choice words on that topic. But
> fear not. Canada has accepted many in the past (native refugees during
> the Seven Years War, the Loyalists after 1774, and again after 1812,
> black slaves coming up the Underground Railroad, draft dodgers during
> Vietnam) and many stayed and became Canadians. We are prepared to
> include the Kerry states within Confederation, as you can see by the
> following proposal:
>
> http://civicspacelabs.org/node/view/1210


Looks good to me...it'd be a great country.

See my "Red State/Blue State" post...

--
Best
Greg

Michel Boucher wrote:

> "Gregory Morrow" >
> wrote in link.net:
>
>
>>Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron
>>states to secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with
>>Canadians or Dutch or Australians than I do with the morons who
>>"voted" for Bush.
>
>
> I imagine The and Richypoo will have choice words on that topic. But
> fear not. Canada has accepted many in the past (native refugees during
> the Seven Years War, the Loyalists after 1774, and again after 1812,
> black slaves coming up the Underground Railroad, draft dodgers during
> Vietnam) and many stayed and became Canadians. We are prepared to
> include the Kerry states within Confederation, as you can see by the
> following proposal:
>
> http://civicspacelabs.org/node/view/1210
>
By all means; they are more than welcome to bring their fanatic
liberalism to your country.

BTW, think we should return the statue of liberty back to the French;
cause I think she's had enough of back stabbers.

Rich

--
"Dum Spiro, Spero."

As long as I breath, I hope.

Cicero (Ancient Rome)





ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤° `°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸. ><((((º> ·´¯`·. , .·´¯`·.. ><((((º>

Let there be fish!!!

<< Funny there only seems to be fraud when the demo loses.......
>>

Ain't it tho. Maybe because it's true?

Richard Periut > wrote in
:

> OK Michel, I didn't know you had so much hatred in your heart.

Read it anyway you want. It doesn't change anything.

--

"It is easier for a rich man to enter heaven seated
comfortably on the back of a camel, than it is for
a poor man to pass through the eye of a needle."

Supply Side Jesus

In article .net>,
Gregory Morrow > wrote:

> Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should build
> a bomb shelter?
>
> Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
> secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch or
> Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.
>
> I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went on
> in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
> me.

Ouch! That hurts, but as a once-born and bred Southrener I understand
your concerns ..and your fears. But I don't think we're guilty of
massive fraud. I believe it's *small* fraud. Sort of like the Shell
Game. We've long been victims of ADD or Concept Reflux Disease. We
lock onto one issue, terrorism, God, guns or gays, and commit to
it--all else be damned. And of course we don't understand the issue.

Take the Death Tax for example. There's not a soul in my trailer park
who's for a Death Tax. It just doesn't seem fair to tax the dead.
Unless he was killed by gunshot and he fired first. See, these issues
get complicated and confusing.

In article .net>,
Gregory Morrow > wrote:

> Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should build
> a bomb shelter?
>
> Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
> secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch or
> Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.
>
> I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went on
> in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
> me.

Ouch! That hurts, but as a once-born and bred Southrener I understand
your concerns ..and your fears. But I don't think we're guilty of
massive fraud. I believe it's *small* fraud. Sort of like the Shell
Game. We've long been victims of ADD or Concept Reflux Disease. We
lock onto one issue, terrorism, God, guns or gays, and commit to
it--all else be damned. And of course we don't understand the issue.

Take the Death Tax for example. There's not a soul in my trailer park
who's for a Death Tax. It just doesn't seem fair to tax the dead.
Unless he was killed by gunshot and he fired first. See, these issues
get complicated and confusing.

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in
message link.net...
>
> Michel Boucher wrote:
>
> > Richard Periut > wrote in
> > :
> >
> > >> Spoken like a true Nazi.
> > >>
> > > No, spoken like a true realist.
> >
> > Sorry. I disagree. You're speaking like a Nazi. A realist would
> > know what caused the problem. You obviously don't know what caused
> > the problem, or you choose to remain blind to it.
> >
> > > You and many others don't get it
> > > do you? Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in
> > > which nuclear weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive
> > > genocide? It wont be long before India and Pakistan will go at it.
> > > The concentrated hatred between them is going to fuel it.
> >
> > What about the concentrated hatred you bear against innocent muslims?
> > If you're reading what The is going on about, he would think it
> > justified to use nuclear weapons against unarmed populations as long
> > as they didn't vote for George W. Bush. You don't think you're one
> > of those threats, those "wrong hands"? Think again.
>
>
> Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should
build
> a bomb shelter?
>
> Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
> secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch
or
> Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.
>
> I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went
on
> in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
> me.
>

I don't buy the fraud claims. The Dems were very alert to the possibilioty
and had huge numbers of lawyers and other observers watching and checking
and ready to pounce on any irregularities. There may have been isolated
incidents, but anything substantive would surely have gotten more publicity
by now, and there has been essentially none from credible sources.

I believe the Bush people would engage in fraud if they thought they could
get away with it, but that doesn't mean thay actually did so.

Let's face it, unpleasant as it is. 51% of voters want a dishonest
incompetent president.
--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Peter Aitken > wrote:

> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in
> message link.net...
> >
> > Michel Boucher wrote:
> >
> > > Richard Periut > wrote in
> > > :
> > >
> > > >> Spoken like a true Nazi.
> > > >>
> > > > No, spoken like a true realist.
> > >
> > > Sorry. I disagree. You're speaking like a Nazi. A realist would
> > > know what caused the problem. You obviously don't know what caused
> > > the problem, or you choose to remain blind to it.
> > >
> > > > You and many others don't get it
> > > > do you? Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in
> > > > which nuclear weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive
> > > > genocide? It wont be long before India and Pakistan will go at it.
> > > > The concentrated hatred between them is going to fuel it.
> > >
> > > What about the concentrated hatred you bear against innocent muslims?
> > > If you're reading what The is going on about, he would think it
> > > justified to use nuclear weapons against unarmed populations as long
> > > as they didn't vote for George W. Bush. You don't think you're one
> > > of those threats, those "wrong hands"? Think again.
> >
> >
> > Hmmm...I live in Chicago (a "blue" city and state), wonder if I should
> build
> > a bomb shelter?
> >
> > Honestly, if there were a way to force the red, e.g. Southron states to
> > secede, I'd be all for it. I have more in common with Canadians or Dutch
> or
> > Australians than I do with the morons who "voted" for Bush.
> >
> > I put "voted" in parentheses because I believe that *massive* fraud went
> on
> > in this election, specifically in Ohio and Florida. It's *very* scary to
> > me.
> >
>
> I don't buy the fraud claims. The Dems were very alert to the possibilioty
> and had huge numbers of lawyers and other observers watching and checking
> and ready to pounce on any irregularities. There may have been isolated
> incidents, but anything substantive would surely have gotten more publicity
> by now, and there has been essentially none from credible sources.
>
> I believe the Bush people would engage in fraud if they thought they could
> get away with it, but that doesn't mean thay actually did so.
>
> Let's face it, unpleasant as it is. 51% of voters want a dishonest
> incompetent president.

It's 53% moron, why don't you post your résumé so we can all decide how
honest and competent you are?

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:00:46 GMT, Stark > wrote:

>In article >, The Wolf
> wrote:

>> I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
>> impact.
>
>A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb, that
>was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary people. It
>either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.

i think you have it backwards. the neutron bomb was supposed to kill
people but not destroy buildings. who wants to take over a parking
lot?

your pal,
blake

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:00:46 GMT, Stark > wrote:

>In article >, The Wolf
> wrote:

>> I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
>> impact.
>
>A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb, that
>was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary people. It
>either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.

i think you have it backwards. the neutron bomb was supposed to kill
people but not destroy buildings. who wants to take over a parking
lot?

your pal,
blake

In article >, blake murphy
> wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:00:46 GMT, Stark > wrote:
>
> >In article >, The Wolf
> > wrote:
>
> >> I understand we have nuclear weapons now that cause minimul enviromental
> >> impact.
> >
> >A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb, that
> >was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary people. It
> >either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.
>
> i think you have it backwards. the neutron bomb was supposed to kill
> people but not destroy buildings. who wants to take over a parking
> lot?
>
> your pal,
> blake

Duh! You're right. My memory is having lapses; I'm working on the last
four years.

"Draft young Republicans"
www.WhiteHouse.org

"Draft young Republicans"
www.WhiteHouse.org

blake murphy > wrote in
:

> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:00:46 GMT, Stark > wrote:
>
>>A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb,
>>that was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary
>>people. It either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.
>
> i think you have it backwards. the neutron bomb was supposed to
> kill people but not destroy buildings. who wants to take over a
> parking lot?

Alexei Sayle has a joke about the government (the British government)
developing a weapon of mass destruction that kills people in
horrible, painful ways but leaves buildings intact. It's called a
mortgage.

Bwahaha!!!!

--

"It is easier for a rich man to enter heaven seated
comfortably on the back of a camel, than it is for
a poor man to pass through the eye of a needle."

Supply Side Jesus

blake murphy > wrote in
:

> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:00:46 GMT, Stark > wrote:
>
>>A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb,
>>that was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary
>>people. It either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.
>
> i think you have it backwards. the neutron bomb was supposed to
> kill people but not destroy buildings. who wants to take over a
> parking lot?

Alexei Sayle has a joke about the government (the British government)
developing a weapon of mass destruction that kills people in
horrible, painful ways but leaves buildings intact. It's called a
mortgage.

Bwahaha!!!!

--

"It is easier for a rich man to enter heaven seated
comfortably on the back of a camel, than it is for
a poor man to pass through the eye of a needle."

Supply Side Jesus

Michel Boucher > wrote:

> blake murphy > wrote in
> :
>
> > On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:00:46 GMT, Stark > wrote:
> >
> >>A few years back there was some weapon, maybe the Neutron Bomb,
> >>that was supposed to destroy property but not kill ancillary
> >>people. It either didn't work as promised or Congress killed it.
> >
> > i think you have it backwards. the neutron bomb was supposed to
> > kill people but not destroy buildings. who wants to take over a
> > parking lot?
>
> Alexei Sayle has a joke about the government (the British government)
> developing a weapon of mass destruction that kills people in
> horrible, painful ways but leaves buildings intact. It's called a
> mortgage.
>
> Bwahaha!!!!

You one funny monkey boy........