"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Hey! To each his own!!!

Yep. Every few months I get this cockamamie notion that I want some White
Castles. Those are tiny little hamburgers or cheeseburgers that are steamed
in their buns. Very little meat to them and they have a few wilted chopped
onions. We do not have the fast food place here so I can only get the
frozen ones. I then attempt to eat them and say to myself... Why did I do
this again? Now I could see it if they were cheap. But they're not really.
Except for the few times I've been able to use a coupon for them. They're
not exactly expensive either. But what they are not, is good! Now why I
keep thinking I want them, I'll never know.

Oh and the other day I ate probably one of the most tasteless things ever!
They are snack sticks intended for kids. Actually they are spelled Snack
Stix. Here's the website.

I figured that they would be good because people told me that the
uncrustables were good. But nope! Whatever the "bread" portion is, it's
not really bread. It's more like pie crust. Really *bad* pie crust. Like
that kind that I make. Tough and unpleasant. And the only real taste that
you get from them is sickly sweet. I got the strawberry ones. They don't
taste of strawberry or peanut butter! I thought they would be good for a
quick snack on my way out the door on those days when my meal would be
delayed. But, nope. I couldn't finish the one I defrosted. Not beyond one
bite. Not good at all.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:24:28 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> But most likely I wouldn't be able to make or or just wouldn't make
>>>> it. Most meatballs require a binder like egg and I can't use that.
>>>> I did once make porcupine meatballs and they came out fine but
>>>> Angela doesn't like meatballs. My husband doesn't seem to like them
>>>> much and I can live without them.
>>>
>>> Why? You like meatloaf and hamburger on a plate.
>>
>> Meatballs are a PITA to make. I wouldn't bother unless someone really
>> liked them. Plus there is the fact that they need egg to hold them
>> together. I can't have egg. When I tried to make them without, they
>> didn't work. And IMO, meatballs are not the same as a hamburger patty or
>> meatloaf. They are almost always served in some kind of sauce. I do not
>> much like pasta any more. Am getting sick of it. The same goes for the
>> rest of my family. Never really liked meatball sandwiches. I didn't grow
>> up eating meatballs so they are not something I would miss.
>
> Neither did I, but I love them now I make my own They are a spin off
> from the meat loaf I learned to make here. I realised I liked the outside
> of it better. So, remembering what Sheila said about miniature ones I
> tried making them in patty tins. I still preferred the tops so in the end
> I went the whole hog and cooked them on a baking tin

My meatloaf stays rather soft, perhaps because I put so many vegetables in
them. So they are really nothing like the meatballs I have had. I should
add that I have never made a successful meatball except for those porcupine
ones. My first attempt was with ground turkey. We could have played tennis
with them. The next time I used coconut flour with the ground beef. The
end result was tasty but they wouldn't stay in the ball shape.

Ophelia wrote:
>
> "Julie Bove" wrote:
> > ... And if he <talking about me> thinks those are
> > quite good, then we are at opposite ends of the spectrum as to what is
> > good. I was forced to eat TV dinners on Friday nights more times than I
> > can remember. No thank you!
>
> Hey! To each his own!!!

As stated, I seem to have extreme TIAD but it works for me. Because I like
just about everything, I do have more choices of food than others here,
especially Julie.

I liked all the school lunches when I was growing up. I even like most
frozen dinners...even the cheapest ones. Sometimes it's nice to heat up a
quick dinner in 5 minutes in the microwave vs cooking a slightly better
version and spending an hour to do it.

When I was raising my daughter here I always cooked homemade meals every
night. I didn't want to cheat her by using the frozen premade. But now that
she is married and gone, I'm happy with the quick cheap meals often.

I DO cook good stuff when I get time but I have no problem with the quick
and easy occasionally.

I stopped by the grocery store this morning and in honor of "sf" I bought a
Banquet Salisbury Steak frozen dinner. heheh I do like them. Salisbury
steak in gravy with mashed potatoes and corn. It's a nice quicky meal and
only $1.00. Add two slices of fresh buttered bread for a feast.

G.

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "Julie Bove" wrote:
>> > ... And if he <talking about me> thinks those are
>> > quite good, then we are at opposite ends of the spectrum as to what is
>> > good. I was forced to eat TV dinners on Friday nights more times than I
>> > can remember. No thank you!
>>
>> Hey! To each his own!!!
>
> As stated, I seem to have extreme TIAD but it works for me. Because I
> like
> just about everything, I do have more choices of food than others here,
> especially Julie.
>
> I liked all the school lunches when I was growing up. I even like most
> frozen dinners...even the cheapest ones. Sometimes it's nice to heat up a
> quick dinner in 5 minutes in the microwave vs cooking a slightly better
> version and spending an hour to do it.
>
> When I was raising my daughter here I always cooked homemade meals every
> night. I didn't want to cheat her by using the frozen premade. But now
> that
> she is married and gone, I'm happy with the quick cheap meals often.
>
> I DO cook good stuff when I get time but I have no problem with the quick
> and easy occasionally.
>
> I stopped by the grocery store this morning and in honor of "sf" I bought
> a
> Banquet Salisbury Steak frozen dinner. heheh I do like them. Salisbury
> steak in gravy with mashed potatoes and corn. It's a nice quicky meal and
> only $1.00. Add two slices of fresh buttered bread for a feast.

Well I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is but I am please you enjoyed
yours
--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "Julie Bove" wrote:
>> > ... And if he <talking about me> thinks those are
>> > quite good, then we are at opposite ends of the spectrum as to what is
>> > good. I was forced to eat TV dinners on Friday nights more times than I
>> > can remember. No thank you!
>>
>> Hey! To each his own!!!
>
> As stated, I seem to have extreme TIAD but it works for me. Because I
> like
> just about everything, I do have more choices of food than others here,
> especially Julie.
>
> I liked all the school lunches when I was growing up. I even like most
> frozen dinners...even the cheapest ones. Sometimes it's nice to heat up a
> quick dinner in 5 minutes in the microwave vs cooking a slightly better
> version and spending an hour to do it.
>
> When I was raising my daughter here I always cooked homemade meals every
> night. I didn't want to cheat her by using the frozen premade. But now
> that
> she is married and gone, I'm happy with the quick cheap meals often.
>
> I DO cook good stuff when I get time but I have no problem with the quick
> and easy occasionally.
>
> I stopped by the grocery store this morning and in honor of "sf" I bought
> a
> Banquet Salisbury Steak frozen dinner. heheh I do like them. Salisbury
> steak in gravy with mashed potatoes and corn. It's a nice quicky meal and
> only $1.00. Add two slices of fresh buttered bread for a feast.

When we lived on Cape Cod, I would sometimes resort to the Mexican type
frozen dinners. They weren't very good but then neither was the Mexican
food we could get there. I couldn't even make much in the way of good
Mexican food at home because the ingredients weren't available to me

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:47:15 +0100, "Ophelia"
> wrote:

> I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is

It looks like something that belongs in the toilet.
http://img.foodnetwork.com/FOOD/2008...y_Steak_lg.jpg

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:47:15 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is
>
> It looks like something that belongs in the toilet.
> http://img.foodnetwork.com/FOOD/2008...y_Steak_lg.jpg

I wish you hasn't said that .....

--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Ophelia wrote:

> Well I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is but I am please you
> enjoyed yours


Pan-fried beef patty (with a little onion, egg, and breadcrumbs mixed
in), smothered in a brown mushroom gravy. The gravy is like condensed
Cream of Mushroom soup diluted with beef broth.

Or something very close to that :-)

Bob

"zxcvbob" > wrote in message
...
> Ophelia wrote:
>
>> Well I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is but I am please you
>> enjoyed yours
>
>
> Pan-fried beef patty (with a little onion, egg, and breadcrumbs mixed in),
> smothered in a brown mushroom gravy. The gravy is like condensed Cream of
> Mushroom soup diluted with beef broth.
>
> Or something very close to that :-)

Thanks, Bob It sounded ok till you got to the gravy ...


--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 6/18/2013 10:00 AM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:47:15 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is
>
> It looks like something that belongs in the toilet.
> http://img.foodnetwork.com/FOOD/2008...y_Steak_lg.jpg
>

LOL!

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Well I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is but I am please you
> enjoyed yours

It's basically a hamburger patty with bread crumbs and milk or egg in it.
Usually made into an oval shaped patty and served with gravy over it. Did
have it in a restaurant once with no filler. They served it with quickly
sautéed green pepper and onion on top.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:47:15 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is
>
> It looks like something that belongs in the toilet.
> http://img.foodnetwork.com/FOOD/2008...y_Steak_lg.jpg

No it doesn't!

On 6/17/2013 6:30 PM, jmcquown wrote:

>> I used to buy a bag of frozen meatballs at Sam's Club and keep them in
>> the freezer. A roll, some doctored up jarred sauce and some mozzarella
>> cheese and you could have a Meatball Sandwich in no time at all.
>>
>> I'm sure some will turn their noses up at that, but it was good, cheap
>> eats.
>>
>> George L
>
> That's pretty much what I did when my dad wanted a meatball sub and the
> Subway sandwich shop wasn't open.
>
> Jill

We have been married 7 years and George makes delicious home made
meatballs, he must have purchased store bought meatballs in another
life. ;-)

Becca

On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:

>>
>>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>>
>>>
>>
>> Hey, mind the language please.
>
> Who in the **** are you?!?

I of course am ME and you are merely you.

> I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.

Iow, never.

> And as for you - gargle my balls whore.

Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:54:59 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > Well I have no idea what a 'Salisbury' steak is but I am please you
>
> > enjoyed yours
>
>
>
> It's basically a hamburger patty with bread crumbs and milk or egg in it.
>
> Usually made into an oval shaped patty and served with gravy over it. Did
>
> have it in a restaurant once with no filler. They served it with quickly
>
> sautéed green pepper and onion on top.

Well, no it isn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salisbury_steak

On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:35:38 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
> >>
>
> >>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>
> >>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> Hey, mind the language please.
>
> >
>
> > Who in the **** are you?!?
>
>
>
> I of course am ME and you are merely you.
>
>
>
> > I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.
>
>
>
> Iow, never.
>
>
>
> > And as for you - gargle my balls whore.
>
>
>
> Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?

Believe me, I'd LOVE to say it to your face. Julie constantly posts to threads saying "I don't like/am allergic to/am intolerant to", depending on which hair testing lab she's using at the time. You are apparently too slow-witted to see that. My invincible keyboard doesn't stop my language, just like yours doesn't stop your mouth-breather replies.

On 6/20/2013 4:53 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:35:38 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Hey, mind the language please.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Who in the **** are you?!?
>>
>>
>>
>> I of course am ME and you are merely you.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Iow, never.
>>
>>
>>
>>> And as for you - gargle my balls whore.
>>
>>
>>
>> Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?
>
> Believe me, I'd LOVE to say it to your face.

Why?

> Julie constantly posts to threads saying "I don't like/am allergic to/am intolerant to", depending on which hair testing lab she's using at the time.

So she has some allergies, or not; now what's the big problem there?

> You are apparently too slow-witted to see that. My invincible keyboard doesn't stop my language, just like yours doesn't stop your mouth-breather replies.

Oddly enough my replies tend to be a measure more well-written than your
leaden rhetoric.

Perhaps that's what peeves you.

On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:01:03 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 4:53 PM, wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:35:38 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>
> >> On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> Hey, mind the language please.
>
> >>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >>> Who in the **** are you?!?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> I of course am ME and you are merely you.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>> I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Iow, never.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>> And as for you - gargle my balls whore.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?
>
> >
>
> > Believe me, I'd LOVE to say it to your face.
>
>
>
> Why?
>
>
>
> > Julie constantly posts to threads saying "I don't like/am allergic to/am intolerant to", depending on which hair testing lab she's using at the time.
>
>
>
> So she has some allergies, or not; now what's the big problem there?
>
>
>
> > You are apparently too slow-witted to see that. My invincible keyboard doesn't stop my language, just like yours doesn't stop your mouth-breather replies.
>
>
>
> Oddly enough my replies tend to be a measure more well-written than your
>
> leaden rhetoric.
>
>
>
> Perhaps that's what peeves you.

You're not really familiar with Julie are you?

As for my "leaden rhetoric", whatever makes you feel superior, chief! After all, it is usenet. I know I save my best prose for this dump. Homo.

On 6/20/2013 5:05 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:01:03 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/20/2013 4:53 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:35:38 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>>
>>>> On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Hey, mind the language please.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Who in the **** are you?!?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> I of course am ME and you are merely you.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Iow, never.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> And as for you - gargle my balls whore.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Believe me, I'd LOVE to say it to your face.
>>
>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Julie constantly posts to threads saying "I don't like/am allergic to/am intolerant to", depending on which hair testing lab she's using at the time.
>>
>>
>>
>> So she has some allergies, or not; now what's the big problem there?
>>
>>
>>
>>> You are apparently too slow-witted to see that. My invincible keyboard doesn't stop my language, just like yours doesn't stop your mouth-breather replies.
>>
>>
>>
>> Oddly enough my replies tend to be a measure more well-written than your
>>
>> leaden rhetoric.
>>
>>
>>
>> Perhaps that's what peeves you.
>
> You're not really familiar with Julie are you?

I am relatively new to this group, yes.

> As for my "leaden rhetoric", whatever makes you feel superior, chief! After all, it is usenet. I know I save my best prose for this dump. Homo.

Honestly it begs imagination to even consider that you might have some
"best prose" in you.

James Joyce you're not.

On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:10:36 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 5:05 PM, wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:01:03 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>
> >> On 6/20/2013 4:53 PM, wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:35:38 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>> On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>> Hey, mind the language please.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> Who in the **** are you?!?
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> I of course am ME and you are merely you.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> Iow, never.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> And as for you - gargle my balls whore.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?
>
> >>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >>> Believe me, I'd LOVE to say it to your face.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Why?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>> Julie constantly posts to threads saying "I don't like/am allergic to/am intolerant to", depending on which hair testing lab she's using at the time.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> So she has some allergies, or not; now what's the big problem there?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>> You are apparently too slow-witted to see that. My invincible keyboard doesn't stop my language, just like yours doesn't stop your mouth-breather replies.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Oddly enough my replies tend to be a measure more well-written than your
>
> >>
>
> >> leaden rhetoric.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Perhaps that's what peeves you.
>
> >
>
> > You're not really familiar with Julie are you?
>
>
>
> I am relatively new to this group, yes.
>

Then you'd best not comment on Julie's posts or the replies to them. She's pretty universally reviled. As you will be soon. Unexpressed thoughts - check into the concept.

>
>
> > As for my "leaden rhetoric", whatever makes you feel superior, chief! After all, it is usenet. I know I save my best prose for this dump. Homo.
>
>
>
> Honestly it begs imagination to even consider that you might have some
>
> "best prose" in you.
>
>
>
> James Joyce you're not.

Where the **** do you think you are?

On 6/20/2013 5:19 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:10:36 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/20/2013 5:05 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:01:03 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>>
>>>> On 6/20/2013 4:53 PM, wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:35:38 PM UTC-4, casa bona wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> On 6/17/2013 5:49 PM, wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>> Then why are you posting to a thread about...MEATBALLS...you stupid ****.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>> Hey, mind the language please.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> Who in the **** are you?!?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> I of course am ME and you are merely you.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> I'll mind my language when idiotic ****s like Julie stop posting.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Iow, never.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> And as for you - gargle my balls whore.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Such a mouth through the invincible keyboard, eh?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Believe me, I'd LOVE to say it to your face.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Why?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Julie constantly posts to threads saying "I don't like/am allergic to/am intolerant to", depending on which hair testing lab she's using at the time.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> So she has some allergies, or not; now what's the big problem there?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> You are apparently too slow-witted to see that. My invincible keyboard doesn't stop my language, just like yours doesn't stop your mouth-breather replies.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Oddly enough my replies tend to be a measure more well-written than your
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> leaden rhetoric.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Perhaps that's what peeves you.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> You're not really familiar with Julie are you?
>>
>>
>>
>> I am relatively new to this group, yes.
>>
>
> Then you'd best not comment on Julie's posts or the replies to them. She's pretty universally reviled. As you will be soon. Unexpressed thoughts - check into the concept.
>
>>
>>
>>> As for my "leaden rhetoric", whatever makes you feel superior, chief! After all, it is usenet. I know I save my best prose for this dump. Homo.
>>
>>
>>
>> Honestly it begs imagination to even consider that you might have some
>>
>> "best prose" in you.
>>
>>
>>
>> James Joyce you're not.
>
> Where the **** do you think you are?
>

My living room, and you?

On 6/20/2013 8:04 PM, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 5:19 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Where the **** do you think you are?
>>
>
> My living room, and you?

Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.

Jill

On 6/20/2013 6:22 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 8:04 PM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/20/2013 5:19 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Where the **** do you think you are?
>>>
>>
>> My living room, and you?
>
> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>
> Jill

That's the second time you've slammed me Jill, perhaps you enjoy the
Spin and Marty show on its own "merits"...

On 6/20/2013 8:32 PM, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 6:22 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 6/20/2013 8:04 PM, casa bona wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2013 5:19 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Where the **** do you think you are?
>>>>
>>>
>>> My living room, and you?
>>
>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>
>> Jill
>
> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill, perhaps you enjoy the
> Spin and Marty show on its own "merits"...

I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
see most of these posts until you reply to them.

Jill

On 6/20/2013 7:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 8:32 PM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/20/2013 6:22 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2013 8:04 PM, casa bona wrote:
>>>> On 6/20/2013 5:19 PM, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Where the **** do you think you are?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My living room, and you?
>>>
>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill, perhaps you enjoy the
>> Spin and Marty show on its own "merits"...
>
> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>
> Jill

OK, slam, shame, either way works.

I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who these
two are and what they're about.

If I say it in my words there is a percentage out there who'll just deny
the obvious and continue on rolling with these trolls.

My intention in demonstrating what they do in other groups by relaying a
few posts here is to cement the hard facts as to who and what they are.

I just think it's wrong for them to expect safe harbor here or in the
bbq group while they simultaneously destroy other groups.

Just my .02c on the matter, thanks for listening.

casa boner wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>> casa boner wrote:
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>
>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>
>> Jill
>
>I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what they're about.

And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.

On 6/21/2013 7:19 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> casa boner wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>>
>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what they're about.
>
> And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.
>
Oh shoot, I forgot to apply for Marty's permission, didn't it?

My bad.

On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 6/20/2013 11:41 PM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/20/2013 7:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2013 8:32 PM, casa bona wrote:
>>>> On 6/20/2013 6:22 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 6/20/2013 8:04 PM, casa bona wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/20/2013 5:19 PM, wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where the **** do you think you are?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My living room, and you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill, perhaps you enjoy the
>>>> Spin and Marty show on its own "merits"...
>>>
>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> OK, slam, shame, either way works.
>>
>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who these
>> two are and what they're about.
>>
> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>
> Jill

If true, why the safe harbor here then?

On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who these
>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>
>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>
>> Jill
>
> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
(snipped)

Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time.
Some of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even
attemped to "kill" this newsgroup. You don't like the posters?
Killfile them. What you're doing is instigating. This ng has done
pretty well for decades without your playing cybercop.

You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who these
>>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>>
>>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
> (snipped)
>
> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time. Some
> of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even attemped to
> "kill" this newsgroup. You don't like the posters? Killfile them. What
> you're doing is instigating. This ng has done pretty well for decades
> without your playing cybercop.
>
> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.

Amen!

--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 6/21/2013 11:32 AM, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 7:19 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> casa boner wrote:
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
>>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what
>>> they're about.
>>
>> And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.
>>
> Oh shoot, I forgot to apply for Marty's permission, didn't it?
>
> My bad.

You don't get it, do you? It's only your opinion that they blew up some
other newsgroup(s). alt-kooks, really? Who gives a rats ass? Fast
food newsgroup. Uh huh.

Killfiles are easy and people with backbone will drive off trolls by
simply ingnoring them. Harping on and on about it/them doesn't stop it.
I had hoped you were one of the smarter ones.

Jill

On 6/21/2013 10:18 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who these
>>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>>
>>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
> (snipped)
>
> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time.
> Some of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even
> attemped to "kill" this newsgroup.

I agree.

The use it like bin Laden did Afghanistan.

> You don't like the posters?

I like their respective 'talents wrt to bbq and food photography.

I think it'd be peachy if they stuck to that.

> Killfile them.

I've never been much on the head in sand method.

> What you're doing is instigating.

Actually Marty followed ME over here from afb and initiated, not the
other way round.

Sycophantic Spin was all too happy to join in.

> This ng has done pretty well
> for decades without your playing cybercop.

And some others have died for the ministrations of Spin and Marty.

> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.
>
> Jill

It's funny you mention that, give FB has almost administered the death
knell to usenet.

For a while the moderated yahoo groups seemed to be the replacement, but
I think they've tapered off a bit too.

If you harbor group-killers you as much as legitimize their actions.

There's no way I see you as intending to do that given your posts.

On 6/21/2013 10:19 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
>>> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who
>>>>> these
>>>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>>>
>>>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
>> (snipped)
>>
>> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time.
>> Some of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even
>> attemped to "kill" this newsgroup. You don't like the posters?
>> Killfile them. What you're doing is instigating. This ng has done
>> pretty well for decades without your playing cybercop.
>>
>> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.
>
> Amen!
>

Sadly so many have, leaving usenet a bit of a ghost town these days.

On 6/21/2013 10:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 11:32 AM, casa bona wrote:
>> On 6/21/2013 7:19 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I don't
>>>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what
>>>> they're about.
>>>
>>> And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.
>>>
>> Oh shoot, I forgot to apply for Marty's permission, didn't it?
>>
>> My bad.
>
> You don't get it, do you? It's only your opinion that they blew up some
> other newsgroup(s).

No, it's a proven fact.

> alt-kooks, really? Who gives a rats ass? Fast
> food newsgroup. Uh huh.

Yes, they used the trolls from the former to blot out the latter, really.

> Killfiles are easy and people with backbone will drive off trolls by
> simply ingnoring them. Harping on and on about it/them doesn't stop it.
> I had hoped you were one of the smarter ones.
>
> Jill

So the basic question is, why are you still replying to them?

No killfile?

Or you find value in what they do?

"casa bona" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/21/2013 10:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 6/21/2013 11:32 AM, casa bona wrote:
>>> On 6/21/2013 7:19 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what
>>>>> they're about.
>>>>
>>>> And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.
>>>>
>>> Oh shoot, I forgot to apply for Marty's permission, didn't it?
>>>
>>> My bad.
>>
>> You don't get it, do you? It's only your opinion that they blew up some
>> other newsgroup(s).
>
> No, it's a proven fact.
>
>> alt-kooks, really? Who gives a rats ass? Fast
>> food newsgroup. Uh huh.
>
> Yes, they used the trolls from the former to blot out the latter, really.
>
>> Killfiles are easy and people with backbone will drive off trolls by
>> simply ingnoring them. Harping on and on about it/them doesn't stop it.
>> I had hoped you were one of the smarter ones.
>>
>> Jill
>
> So the basic question is, why are you still replying to them?
>
> No killfile?
>
> Or you find value in what they do?

Quite frankly what we do or don't do is not your business.
--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 6/21/2013 11:22 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "casa bona" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 6/21/2013 10:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 6/21/2013 11:32 AM, casa bona wrote:
>>>> On 6/21/2013 7:19 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what
>>>>>> they're about.
>>>>>
>>>>> And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh shoot, I forgot to apply for Marty's permission, didn't it?
>>>>
>>>> My bad.
>>>
>>> You don't get it, do you? It's only your opinion that they blew up some
>>> other newsgroup(s).
>>
>> No, it's a proven fact.
>>
>>> alt-kooks, really? Who gives a rats ass? Fast
>>> food newsgroup. Uh huh.
>>
>> Yes, they used the trolls from the former to blot out the latter, really.
>>
>>> Killfiles are easy and people with backbone will drive off trolls by
>>> simply ingnoring them. Harping on and on about it/them doesn't stop it.
>>> I had hoped you were one of the smarter ones.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> So the basic question is, why are you still replying to them?
>>
>> No killfile?
>>
>> Or you find value in what they do?
>
> Quite frankly what we do or don't do is not your business.

Ah but it is a public forum, so inquiries are to be expected.

"casa bona" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/21/2013 11:22 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "casa bona" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 6/21/2013 10:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 6/21/2013 11:32 AM, casa bona wrote:
>>>>> On 6/21/2013 7:19 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>> casa boner wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please killfile the troll rather than encouraging this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's the second time you've slammed me Jill.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not shaming you. I'm asking that you don't encourage it. I
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> see most of these posts until you reply to them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like the rest of this group to know who these two are and what
>>>>>>> they're about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And WTF put you in charge, douchebag.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh shoot, I forgot to apply for Marty's permission, didn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> My bad.
>>>>
>>>> You don't get it, do you? It's only your opinion that they blew up
>>>> some
>>>> other newsgroup(s).
>>>
>>> No, it's a proven fact.
>>>
>>>> alt-kooks, really? Who gives a rats ass? Fast
>>>> food newsgroup. Uh huh.
>>>
>>> Yes, they used the trolls from the former to blot out the latter,
>>> really.
>>>
>>>> Killfiles are easy and people with backbone will drive off trolls by
>>>> simply ingnoring them. Harping on and on about it/them doesn't stop
>>>> it.
>>>> I had hoped you were one of the smarter ones.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> So the basic question is, why are you still replying to them?
>>>
>>> No killfile?
>>>
>>> Or you find value in what they do?
>>
>> Quite frankly what we do or don't do is not your business.
>
> Ah but it is a public forum, so inquiries are to be expected.

They may be expected but responses are not necessarily forthcoming!

You need to understand that bullying everyone will not accomplish what you
are trying to achieve. You are just alienating the posters here. I will
leave you to think about that.


--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 6/21/2013 1:15 PM, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 10:19 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
>>>> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
>>> (snipped)
>>>
>>> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time.
>>> Some of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even
>>> attemped to "kill" this newsgroup. You don't like the posters?
>>> Killfile them. What you're doing is instigating. This ng has done
>>> pretty well for decades without your playing cybercop.
>>>
>>> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.
>>
>> Amen!
>>
>
> Sadly so many have, leaving usenet a bit of a ghost town these days.

YOU ARE NOT HELPING! (yes, I know it's rude to shout, I'm not some
friggin newbie). Please just STFU about them.

OB Food: Anyone got a good recipe for cream of broccoli soup? It's been
a while since I made any.

Jill

On 6/21/2013 1:15 PM, casa bona wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 10:18 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 6/21/2013 11:35 AM, casa bona wrote:
>>> On 6/21/2013 7:32 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I get your point, but I'd like the rest of this group to know who
>>>>> these
>>>>> two are and what they're about.
>>>>>
>>>> I'm sure we can figure it out on our own.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> If true, why the safe harbor here then?
>> (snipped)
>>
>> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time.
>> Some of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even
>> attemped to "kill" this newsgroup.
>
> I agree.
>
> The use it like bin Laden did Afghanistan.
>
>> You don't like the posters?
>
> I like their respective 'talents wrt to bbq and food photography.
>
> I think it'd be peachy if they stuck to that.
>
>> Killfile them.
>
> I've never been much on the head in sand method.
>
>> What you're doing is instigating.
>
> Actually Marty followed ME over here from afb and initiated, not the
> other way round.
>
Uh, I knew about "marty" and have read his posts for years before I ever
heard of you. Who died and made you the ****ing sheriff of RFC?

>> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.
>>
>> Jill
>
> It's funny you mention that, give FB has almost administered the death
> knell to usenet.
>
I've been hearing the death knell of usenet since the 90's. So sorry
we're still here! I bid you adieu. You've just joined the bozos on
that bus.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...

> Safe harbor? WTF? I've been on this newsgroup for a very long time. Some
> of the people you are talking about haven't managed or even attemped to
> "kill" this newsgroup. You don't like the posters? Killfile them. What
> you're doing is instigating. This ng has done pretty well for decades
> without your playing cybercop.
>
> You want safe? Go to a moderated forum. Flee to Facebook.
>
> Jill


PLUS ONE!

Cheri