On 6/27/2013 10:47 PM, sf wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:55:26 -0400, Cheryl >
> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I may have to retire the Casa Boner nym here soon. I like
>>> messing with Barabara, especially, but it really pains me to have to
>>> put up such as dimwitted charade as my Casa Boner identity. It;'s not
>>> like this one is going to earn me an Oscar.
>>>
>> I don't know, I'm kind of enjoying the laughs.
>
> Yeah, yeah, yeah. Big HAHA.
>
> 1. How do you know Steve Wertz is not lying to you the same way he
> lies to everyone else? Are you that ignorant or do you feel *that*
> insulated?
>
> 2. He claims he "frogged" Casa Bona which means he stole CB's
> identity and posted as CB. Why? Because I ignored him when he nym
> shifted. Yes, he IS that needy. If you still think it's funny, then
> I will wonder why - because I thought you were smarter than that.
>
> So, the reality is that if "Steve Wertz" (if you think that's his real
> name, then shame on you) is the behind Casa Bona - then he had to play
> nice just to get me to respond to him.... so who is the real puppet
> master? I say I am. If he has to play nice just to get me to respond
> when he's not playing the nyn shifting game... then TADA!
>
> I be da queen and he can kiss my ass.
>

Lol, well you just raised his blood pressure by a few millibars!

On 6/27/2013 11:36 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:47:36 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:55:26 -0400, Cheryl >
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, I may have to retire the Casa Boner nym here soon. I like
>>>> messing with Barabara, especially, but it really pains me to have to
>>>> put up such as dimwitted charade as my Casa Boner identity. It;'s not
>>>> like this one is going to earn me an Oscar.
>>>>
>>> I don't know, I'm kind of enjoying the laughs.
>>
>> Yeah, yeah, yeah. Big HAHA.
>>
>> 1. How do you know Steve Wertz is not lying to you the same way he
>> lies to everyone else? Are you that ignorant or do you feel *that*
>> insulated?
>>
>> 2. He claims he "frogged" Casa Bona which means he stole CB's
>> identity and posted as CB. Why? Because I ignored him when he nym
>> shifted. Yes, he IS that needy. If you still think it's funny, then
>> I will wonder why - because I thought you were smarter than that.
>>
>> So, the reality is that if "Steve Wertz" (if you think that's his real
>> name, then shame on you) is the behind Casa Bona - then he had to play
>> nice just to get me to respond to him.... so who is the real puppet
>> master? I say I am. If he has to play nice just to get me to respond
>> when he's not playing the nyn shifting game... then TADA!
>>
>> I be da queen and he can kiss my ass.
>
> Eeeek, so much unnecessary drama.

But that's just you Steve, er Spin, and everyone here knows it now.


> She's the one who accused me of
> being Casa Boner then blows a mental gasket when I admit it. What a
> psycho <snork>. Who needs puppets when you can just press buttons
> these days?
>
> Gotta go now. Jerry Springer is on.
>
> -sw
>

You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:26:14 -0600, casa bona > wrote:

>
> > She's the one who accused me of
> > being Casa Boner then blows a mental gasket when I admit it. What a
> > psycho <snork>. Who needs puppets when you can just press buttons
> > these days?
> >
> > Gotta go now. Jerry Springer is on.
> >
> > -sw
> >
>
> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.

He thinks if he repeats something often enough, it will come true.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 6/28/2013 11:16 AM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:26:14 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>>
>>> She's the one who accused me of
>>> being Casa Boner then blows a mental gasket when I admit it. What a
>>> psycho <snork>. Who needs puppets when you can just press buttons
>>> these days?
>>>
>>> Gotta go now. Jerry Springer is on.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>>
>>
>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>
> He thinks if he repeats something often enough, it will come true.
>
I believe that is the definition of insanity, yes.

casa bona wrote:
>
> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.

LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh

Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@

G.

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:21:46 -0600, casa bona > wrote:

> On 6/28/2013 11:16 AM, sf wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:26:14 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> She's the one who accused me of
> >>> being Casa Boner then blows a mental gasket when I admit it. What a
> >>> psycho <snork>. Who needs puppets when you can just press buttons
> >>> these days?
> >>>
> >>> Gotta go now. Jerry Springer is on.
> >>>
> >>> -sw
> >>>
> >>
> >> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
> >> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
> >
> > He thinks if he repeats something often enough, it will come true.
> >
> I believe that is the definition of insanity, yes.

It's certainly delusional thinking.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 6/28/2013 11:28 AM, Gary wrote:
> casa bona wrote:
>>
>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>
> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
> Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh
>
> Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@
>
> G.

Amusing as this may seem, would you feel equally gratified if two known
trolls and group killers were trying to hasten your departure from this
forum?

Make no mistake, Steve takes nice pics and Marty knows barbecue, but
there is a malevolent and unfortunate side to both of them.

I'll say again, granting them safe harbor here is a mistake as they have
consistently ruined the very groups they chose to reside in over the years.

The public record is archived and irrefutable.

On 6/28/2013 11:36 AM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:21:46 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 11:16 AM, sf wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:26:14 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> She's the one who accused me of
>>>>> being Casa Boner then blows a mental gasket when I admit it. What a
>>>>> psycho <snork>. Who needs puppets when you can just press buttons
>>>>> these days?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gotta go now. Jerry Springer is on.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>
>>> He thinks if he repeats something often enough, it will come true.
>>>
>> I believe that is the definition of insanity, yes.
>
> It's certainly delusional thinking.
>
And how unfortunate that more than a few here find it either amusing or
not a problem.

What these two do elsewhere almost certainly will be something they'll
do here, just wait and see.

Gary wrote:
>casa bona wrote:
>>
>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>
>LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.

You have no concept of what a whacko he is... ask sqwirtz to show you
the artificial vagina he fabricated with a cornish game hen hide.

On 6/28/2013 12:18 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 11:28 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>
>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>> Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh
>>>
>>> Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@
>>>
>>> G.
>>
>> Amusing as this may seem, would you feel equally gratified if two known
>> trolls and group killers were trying to hasten your departure from this
>> forum?
>>
>> Make no mistake, Steve takes nice pics and Marty knows barbecue, but
>> there is a malevolent and unfortunate side to both of them.
>>
>> I'll say again, granting them safe harbor here is a mistake as they have
>> consistently ruined the very groups they chose to reside in over the years.
>>
>> The public record is archived and irrefutable.
>
> It's impossible to force anyone to post or not in an
> unmoderated usenet group. Let alone kill a group.

Welcome back troll, you who have spent years stalking "brother Ray" in
afab and regularly doing your own part to diminish participation in groups.

That's how you alt.usenet.kooks regulars work, you increase the noise
level and off topic posts to the point a group becomes unusable by its
regulars, then you losers revel in the discord.

Why that amuses you and Steve and Marty is yet to be determined, but it
has been documented and described.

> Exactly what is it that S&M "do" that's got your panties so
> tightly bunched?

Understand Cap'n that your reputation as a troll is longstanding and any
support you might wish to lend to those two does nothing but strengthen
my case.

You haven't the slightest interest in any regular dialog on food, now do
run along and spread your troll-ramens elsewhere.

On 6/28/2013 12:18 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>> casa bona wrote:
>>>
>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>
>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>
> You have no concept of what a whacko he is... ask sqwirtz to show you
> the artificial vagina he fabricated with a cornish game hen hide.
>
That may be the closest he gets to the real thing in this life...

On 6/28/2013 12:28 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> Brooklyn1 > wrote:
>
>> Gary wrote:
>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>
>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>
>> You have no concept of what a whacko he is... ask sqwirtz to show you
>> the artificial vagina he fabricated with a cornish game hen hide.
>
> I gotta see that too.
>
> But it can't be any more wacko than presuming to ban
> subscribers from rfc.
>
You keep repeating that myth, as if doing so would make it come true.

In so many ways you'd be the reason to even consider it.

On 6/28/2013 12:35 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 12:18 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2013 11:28 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>>>
>>>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>>>> Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh
>>>>>
>>>>> Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@
>>>>>
>>>>> G.
>>>>
>>>> Amusing as this may seem, would you feel equally gratified if two known
>>>> trolls and group killers were trying to hasten your departure from this
>>>> forum?
>>>>
>>>> Make no mistake, Steve takes nice pics and Marty knows barbecue, but
>>>> there is a malevolent and unfortunate side to both of them.
>>>>
>>>> I'll say again, granting them safe harbor here is a mistake as they have
>>>> consistently ruined the very groups they chose to reside in over the years.
>>>>
>>>> The public record is archived and irrefutable.
>>>
>>> It's impossible to force anyone to post or not in an
>>> unmoderated usenet group. Let alone kill a group.
>>
>> Welcome back troll, you who have spent years stalking "brother Ray" in
>> afab and regularly doing your own part to diminish participation in groups.
>
> So you think bRay and Jerry are sensible people who have the
> right to never be mocked or ridiculed.

I think the world is chock full on people who are not sensible.

Spending all your free time mocking said causes me to question your own
sensibilities.

How can that possibly be nourishing to you?

>> That's how you alt.usenet.kooks regulars work, you increase the noise
>> level and off topic posts to the point a group becomes unusable by its
>> regulars, then you losers revel in the discord.
>>
>> Why that amuses you and Steve and Marty is yet to be determined, but it
>> has been documented and described.
>
> Possibly poking fun at humor-impaired dweebazoids who take
> themselves waaaaaaaaaaaay too seriously?

As a virtual and unrelenting lifestyle, day in and day out?

You're getting some needs met there, and not healthy ones.

>>> Exactly what is it that S&M "do" that's got your panties so
>>> tightly bunched?
>
> <crickets>

I've already, and at some length, disclosed their campaign to chase me
off these food groups.

Repeating it for your trollish amusement would be somewhat pointless,
now wouldn't it Cap'n?

On 6/28/2013 1:00 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 12:35 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2013 12:18 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/28/2013 11:28 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>>>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>>>>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>>>>>> Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> G.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amusing as this may seem, would you feel equally gratified if two known
>>>>>> trolls and group killers were trying to hasten your departure from this
>>>>>> forum?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Make no mistake, Steve takes nice pics and Marty knows barbecue, but
>>>>>> there is a malevolent and unfortunate side to both of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll say again, granting them safe harbor here is a mistake as they have
>>>>>> consistently ruined the very groups they chose to reside in over the years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The public record is archived and irrefutable.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's impossible to force anyone to post or not in an
>>>>> unmoderated usenet group. Let alone kill a group.
>>>>
>>>> Welcome back troll, you who have spent years stalking "brother Ray" in
>>>> afab and regularly doing your own part to diminish participation in groups.
>>>
>>> So you think bRay and Jerry are sensible people who have the
>>> right to never be mocked or ridiculed.
>>
>> I think the world is chock full on people who are not sensible.
>>
>> Spending all your free time mocking said causes me to question your own
>> sensibilities.
>
> Says the guy who posts 500 articles a week, mostly whining
> about S&M.
>
>> How can that possibly be nourishing to you?
>
> If you don't understand the concept of entertainment,
> there's no point in explaining it.
>
>>>> That's how you alt.usenet.kooks regulars work, you increase the noise
>>>> level and off topic posts to the point a group becomes unusable by its
>>>> regulars, then you losers revel in the discord.
>>>>
>>>> Why that amuses you and Steve and Marty is yet to be determined, but it
>>>> has been documented and described.
>>>
>>> Possibly poking fun at humor-impaired dweebazoids who take
>>> themselves waaaaaaaaaaaay too seriously?
>>
>> As a virtual and unrelenting lifestyle, day in and day out?
>
> Says the guy who posts 500 articles a week, mostly whining
> about S&M.

Trying to justify your own odd posting preferences by pointing to my
defense of myself is not a winning strategy.

Spin and Marty came after me, not the other way around.

So what do you get out of trolling anyway?

<crickets>


>>>>> Exactly what is it that S&M "do" that's got your panties so
>>>>> tightly bunched?
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>>
>> I've already, and at some length, disclosed their campaign to chase me
>> off these food groups.
>
> All i've seen from you are vague nebulous assertions that
> they are "group killers".

Then you're managed to ignore the evidence I have posted thereof.

In part that is due to the fact you support them in their efforts and
have for many years, dating back to your time as Capn TrVth, done the
same thing they do.

> I'm not going to wade through
> your thousands of rambling incoherent posts to find
> something specific. Got a MID?

No, I have nothing for a disingenuous troll like yourself.

> The presumption is that you've been the subject of severe
> ridicule, for reasons that are obvious to everyone but you,
> and now your pussy hurts so you're out for revenge.

The observation is that there a number of men in these forums who like
to disparage and dislike women.

I suspect the three of you will be bachelors for life, unless I miss my
guess ;-)

On 6/28/2013 1:04 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 12:28 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> Brooklyn1 > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>>>
>>>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>>>
>>>> You have no concept of what a whacko he is... ask sqwirtz to show you
>>>> the artificial vagina he fabricated with a cornish game hen hide.
>>>
>>> I gotta see that too.
>>>
>>> But it can't be any more wacko than presuming to ban
>>> subscribers from rfc.
>>>
>> You keep repeating that myth, as if doing so would make it come true.
>
> You told me to stop posting in rfc.

You equate that with a "ban"?

I'll tell you again, stop trolling here.

>> In so many ways you'd be the reason to even consider it.
>
> SYNTAX ERROR: Unable to parse.

Oh I think you can parse the meaning there quite well.

Now take your usenet-toxin and spread it elsewhere, please.

On 6/28/2013 1:28 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 1:00 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2013 12:35 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/28/2013 12:18 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>>>>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/28/2013 11:28 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>>>>>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>>>>>>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>>>>>>>> Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> G.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amusing as this may seem, would you feel equally gratified if two known
>>>>>>>> trolls and group killers were trying to hasten your departure from this
>>>>>>>> forum?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Make no mistake, Steve takes nice pics and Marty knows barbecue, but
>>>>>>>> there is a malevolent and unfortunate side to both of them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll say again, granting them safe harbor here is a mistake as they have
>>>>>>>> consistently ruined the very groups they chose to reside in over the years.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The public record is archived and irrefutable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's impossible to force anyone to post or not in an
>>>>>>> unmoderated usenet group. Let alone kill a group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Welcome back troll, you who have spent years stalking "brother Ray" in
>>>>>> afab and regularly doing your own part to diminish participation in groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you think bRay and Jerry are sensible people who have the
>>>>> right to never be mocked or ridiculed.
>>>>
>>>> I think the world is chock full on people who are not sensible.
>>>>
>>>> Spending all your free time mocking said causes me to question your own
>>>> sensibilities.
>>>
>>> Says the guy who posts 500 articles a week, mostly whining
>>> about S&M.
>>>
>>>> How can that possibly be nourishing to you?
>>>
>>> If you don't understand the concept of entertainment,
>>> there's no point in explaining it.
>>>
>>>>>> That's how you alt.usenet.kooks regulars work, you increase the noise
>>>>>> level and off topic posts to the point a group becomes unusable by its
>>>>>> regulars, then you losers revel in the discord.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why that amuses you and Steve and Marty is yet to be determined, but it
>>>>>> has been documented and described.
>>>>>
>>>>> Possibly poking fun at humor-impaired dweebazoids who take
>>>>> themselves waaaaaaaaaaaay too seriously?
>>>>
>>>> As a virtual and unrelenting lifestyle, day in and day out?
>>>
>>> Says the guy who posts 500 articles a week, mostly whining
>>> about S&M.
>>
>> Trying to justify your own odd posting preferences by pointing to my
>> defense of myself is not a winning strategy.
>>
>> Spin and Marty came after me, not the other way around.
>
> Sure.

It's a fact, you need only read back to my first posts here to verify as
much.

>>
>> So what do you get out of trolling anyway?
>
> Trolling, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

Iow, crickets, as predicted.

>
>>>>>>> Exactly what is it that S&M "do" that's got your panties so
>>>>>>> tightly bunched?
>>>>>
>>>>> <crickets>
>>>>
>>>> I've already, and at some length, disclosed their campaign to chase me
>>>> off these food groups.
>>>
>>> All i've seen from you are vague nebulous assertions that
>>> they are "group killers".
>>
>> Then you're managed to ignore the evidence I have posted thereof.
>
> What doesn't exist can be safely ignored.

It exists, regardless of your trollish denials.

>>> I'm not going to wade through
>>> your thousands of rambling incoherent posts to find
>>> something specific. Got a MID?
>>
>> No, I have nothing for a disingenuous troll like yourself.
>
> See?

I see your neediness and choose not to reward it.

>>
>>> The presumption is that you've been the subject of severe
>>> ridicule, for reasons that are obvious to everyone but you,
>>> and now your pussy hurts so you're out for revenge.
>>
>> The observation is that there a number of men in these forums who like
>> to disparage and dislike women.
>
> Oh, you're a girl? Fine... your peepe was whacked, so
> you're out for revenge.

Oh, you're going to demonstrate my accuracy with a little more venom and
spite?

Fine.

>>
>> I suspect the three of you will be bachelors for life, unless I miss my
>> guess ;-)
>
> Honey, get a life and get laid once in a while.

Confine your terms of endearment to those animals which may be able to
tolerate your presence.

On 6/28/2013 1:32 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 1:04 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2013 12:28 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>>>> Brooklyn1 > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>> casa bona wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>>>>>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>>>>>>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no concept of what a whacko he is... ask sqwirtz to show you
>>>>>> the artificial vagina he fabricated with a cornish game hen hide.
>>>>>
>>>>> I gotta see that too.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it can't be any more wacko than presuming to ban
>>>>> subscribers from rfc.
>>>>>
>>>> You keep repeating that myth, as if doing so would make it come true.
>>>
>>> You told me to stop posting in rfc.
>>
>> You equate that with a "ban"?
>
> So you tried to ban me. E for Effort.

How would simply telling you anything equate to a "ban"?

Are you still here trolling?

Yes.

Try again.

>>
>> I'll tell you again, stop trolling here.
>
> Request DENIED.

Oh, so now it's a "request" and not a "ban"?

Do make up your pea-sized mind.

>>
>>>> In so many ways you'd be the reason to even consider it.
>>>
>>> SYNTAX ERROR: Unable to parse.
>>
>> Oh I think you can parse the meaning there quite well.
>>
>> Now take your usenet-toxin and spread it elsewhere, please.
>
> Request DENIED.

Pity, but as part of Spin and Marty's legacy here you may serve as a
reminder to readers of the toxicity of their "friends".

> Usenet toxin will continue to be spread until you are FORCED
> to resock.

Thanks for admitting who and what you are.

On 6/28/2013 2:08 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:

> Make up your mind, you silly ****.

Irrigate your own until the neurotoxins abate, you unpleasant troll.

On 6/28/2013 1:58 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> sf > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:03:33 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/27/2013 12:22 AM, sf wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:19:50 -0400, Cheryl >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/26/2013 1:42 PM, sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 03:45:24 -0400, Cheryl >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/26/2013 2:30 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:59:40 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because I think it might be a good sauce. Why are you getting all
>>>>>>>> snotty with me Barbie?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I must have missed something. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Spin is Casa Bona now too?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe. I'm so far behind in reading this group I have no idea WTF is
>>>>> going on.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you can clear up what a nanner, nanner type comment sometime
>>>> afterward was supposed to mean. It contained the work frogging or
>>>> frogged (something like that). WTF is frogging? I know what frogging
>>>> means when people talk about needlework, but have no idea what it is
>>>> supposed to mean as usenet terminology.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's intentionally impersonating someone to disrupt their posting.
>>>
>> Thanks.
>
> She is, once again, clueless.
>

Spare us the rationalizations, troll.

http://www.food.com/recipe/garlic-frogs-legs-14089

Servings:4

16 large frog's legs or 32 small frog's legs
all-purpose flour
2 tablespoons butter
2 teaspoons corn oil
4 teaspoons garlic butter
salt
pepper
1 lemon, juice of
flat leaf parsley
lemon slice (to garnish dish)

On 6/28/2013 2:31 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> Hey, casa bonehead.... did Willy Chan give you permission to
> use the chi.net domain?

Nothing better to do with your time than harass folks, eh Cap'n?

Grow up.

On 6/28/2013 2:58 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 2:31 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> Hey, casa bonehead.... did Willy Chan give you permission to
>>> use the chi.net domain?
>>
>> Nothing better to do with your time than harass folks, eh Cap'n?
>>
>> Grow up.
>
> Me? Harassing? You were clearly forging.
>
> Just trying to save you legal issues. You're welcome!
>
> You did change your From: address as advised.
> Good girl... there is hope for you yet!
>
> Now you're merely frogging, which is legal, tho you whined
> and stamped your feet when someone allegedly did it to you.
>
Have you made yourself those garlic frog legs yet?

You really should. You've got two for the pan as we speak.

On 6/28/2013 3:23 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 2:58 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2013 2:31 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>>>> Hey, casa bonehead.... did Willy Chan give you permission to
>>>>> use the chi.net domain?
>>>>
>>>> Nothing better to do with your time than harass folks, eh Cap'n?
>>>>
>>>> Grow up.
>>>
>>> Me? Harassing? You were clearly forging.
>>>
>>> Just trying to save you legal issues. You're welcome!
>>>
>>> You did change your From: address as advised.
>>> Good girl... there is hope for you yet!
>>>
>>> Now you're merely frogging, which is legal, tho you whined
>>> and stamped your feet when someone allegedly did it to you.
>>>
>> Have you made yourself those garlic frog legs yet?
>>
>> You really should. You've got two for the pan as we speak.
>
> Wellll.... you DID at least tacitly admit the error of your
> ways, and you took steps toward your repentance. So... ok,
> i'll do the frog legs. But i'm gonna include a package of
> top ramen. And you have to unban me from rfc.
>
> Deal?
>
I can't rescind a ban I never issued and which you never intended to
obey, sorry.

On 6/28/2013 2:02 PM, casa bona wrote:

> Have you made yourself those garlic frog legs yet?
>

Finally, a post of yours that mentions food. What kinds of side dishes
do you usually have with your frog legs?

On 6/29/2013 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:28:13 -0400, Gary wrote:
>
>> casa bona wrote:
>>>
>>> You're a mentally damaged person Steve, why you insist on demonstrating
>>> that here time and again is an oddity not yet explained.
>>
>> LMAO! Steve, what's going on with you here lately?
>> It's amusing but I'm starting to worry about you.
>> Is this total boredom? Or are you just having a ton of fun. heheh
>>
>> Go make a cool sandwich and send us a picture. I command you!@
>
> I'm not really Casa Boner. Or... am I? I'm sure Barbara and Bryan
> are comparing notes VIA email.
>
> -sw
>
You're not really able to help yourself when it comes to trolling, are
you Spin?

On 6/29/2013 8:24 AM, Does it really matter? wrote:
> On 6/28/2013 2:02 PM, casa bona wrote:
>
>> Have you made yourself those garlic frog legs yet?
>>
>
> Finally, a post of yours that mentions food. What kinds of side dishes
> do you usually have with your frog legs?
>

There's no "finally" about it troll, go back and enjoy some watermelon
limeade and see if that cools your ardor for misrepresentation.

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:19:40 -0600, casa bona > wrote:

> On 6/28/2013 1:58 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
> > sf > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:03:33 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 6/27/2013 12:22 AM, sf wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:19:50 -0400, Cheryl >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 6/26/2013 1:42 PM, sf wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 03:45:24 -0400, Cheryl >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 6/26/2013 2:30 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:59:40 -0700, sf wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Why?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because I think it might be a good sauce. Why are you getting all
> >>>>>>>> snotty with me Barbie?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I must have missed something. LOL
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So Spin is Casa Bona now too?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe. I'm so far behind in reading this group I have no idea WTF is
> >>>>> going on.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe you can clear up what a nanner, nanner type comment sometime
> >>>> afterward was supposed to mean. It contained the work frogging or
> >>>> frogged (something like that). WTF is frogging? I know what frogging
> >>>> means when people talk about needlework, but have no idea what it is
> >>>> supposed to mean as usenet terminology.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's intentionally impersonating someone to disrupt their posting.
> >>>
> >> Thanks.
> >
> > She is, once again, clueless.
> >
>
> Spare us the rationalizations, troll.
>

LOL! He's so immature, I often wonder why his mother lets him use a
computer.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 6/29/2013 10:42 AM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:19:40 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/2013 1:58 PM, Mirror of TRVTH wrote:
>>> sf > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:03:33 -0600, casa bona > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/27/2013 12:22 AM, sf wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:19:50 -0400, Cheryl >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/26/2013 1:42 PM, sf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 03:45:24 -0400, Cheryl >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/26/2013 2:30 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:59:40 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it might be a good sauce. Why are you getting all
>>>>>>>>>> snotty with me Barbie?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I must have missed something. LOL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So Spin is Casa Bona now too?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe. I'm so far behind in reading this group I have no idea WTF is
>>>>>>> going on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe you can clear up what a nanner, nanner type comment sometime
>>>>>> afterward was supposed to mean. It contained the work frogging or
>>>>>> frogged (something like that). WTF is frogging? I know what frogging
>>>>>> means when people talk about needlework, but have no idea what it is
>>>>>> supposed to mean as usenet terminology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's intentionally impersonating someone to disrupt their posting.
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> She is, once again, clueless.
>>>
>>
>> Spare us the rationalizations, troll.
>>
>
> LOL! He's so immature, I often wonder why his mother lets him use a
> computer.
>

She's probably passed on now and he's gotten full run of the house, not
just the basement...

In article >, says...
>
>On 6/29/2013 8:24 AM, Does it really matter? wrote:
>> On 6/28/2013 2:02 PM, casa bona wrote:
>>
>>> Have you made yourself those garlic frog legs yet?
>>>
>>
>> Finally, a post of yours that mentions food. What kinds of side dishes
>> do you usually have with your frog legs?
>>
>
>There's no "finally" about it troll, go back and enjoy some watermelon
>limeade and see if that cools your ardor for misrepresentation.

huh?

--


GIT-R-DONE !

In article >,
says...

"you are the ones who are responsible for the way me and others are
assholes"

On 6/30/2013 9:21 PM, Bill wrote:
> In article >, says...
>>
>> On 6/29/2013 8:24 AM, Does it really matter? wrote:
>>> On 6/28/2013 2:02 PM, casa bona wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have you made yourself those garlic frog legs yet?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Finally, a post of yours that mentions food. What kinds of side dishes
>>> do you usually have with your frog legs?
>>>
>>
>> There's no "finally" about it troll, go back and enjoy some watermelon
>> limeade and see if that cools your ardor for misrepresentation.
>
> huh?
>
Oh come on, a soothing and cool drink might lower some hot heads...

On 7/1/2013 12:38 AM, Thorny Crucifixi. wrote:
> Gary Burnore > wrote in:
> >
>> In alt.usenet.kooks Mirror wrote:
>>> casa bona > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/27/2013 12:22 AM, sf wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Maybe you can clear up what a nanner, nanner type comment sometime
>>>>> afterward was supposed to mean. It contained the work frogging or
>>>>> frogged (something like that). WTF is frogging? I know what frogging
>>>>> means when people talk about needlework, but have no idea what it is
>>>>> supposed to mean as usenet terminology.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's intentionally impersonating someone to disrupt their posting.
>>>
>>> Hey, casa bonehead.... did Willy Chan give you permission to
>>> use the chi.net domain?
>>> Does he know you're forging his domain?
>>> Does eternal-september know?
>>>
>>> Better change your From: email address, bonehead.
>>>
>>> Registrant:
>>> Willy Chan email @willy.net +852.22022288 +852.22022288
> //
>>> nameWilly Chan)
>>> mailemail @willy.net) +852.22022288
>>> +852.22022288
>>> Willy Chan
>>>
>>> Registration Service Provider:
>>> name:
>>> tel: +852 2202 2288
>>> fax: +852 2202 2288
>>> web:http://
>>
>> Betting not.
>
> the same Chan of MA fame... a likely bet?
>
> "fooku... my hand of steel carve you new Xface, roundeye!"
>
>
> /giggles
>
Make that 7 auk'rs, all thanks to Spin and Marty...

So how many of you who supported them are enamored of what they bring to
the table now?