Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see
that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to go that route. I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And not just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times (if that) so I feel that it should have held up better. So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > About 4". Tramintina aluminum pan bought at Wal Mart at least 15 years ago. Doubles as a roasting pan too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > About 4". Tramintina aluminum pan bought at Wal Mart at least 15 > years ago. Doubles as a roasting pan too. Same as mine: 10 cm, or 4". It's non-stick aluminum and I use it for almost everything I bake: roast with potatoes, pasta al forno, lasagne, zucchini pie, erbazzone... -- "Un pasto senza vino e' come un giorno senza sole" Anthelme Brillat Savarin |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > > > >> >>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >> > > About 4". Tramintina aluminum pan bought at Wal Mart at least 15 > years ago. Doubles as a roasting pan too. Thanks! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ViLco" > wrote in message ... > Ed Pawlowski wrote: > >>> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > >> About 4". Tramintina aluminum pan bought at Wal Mart at least 15 >> years ago. Doubles as a roasting pan too. > > Same as mine: 10 cm, or 4". It's non-stick aluminum and I use it for > almost everything I bake: roast with potatoes, pasta al forno, lasagne, > zucchini pie, erbazzone... Thanks! I do have a deep roasting pan. Just never thought to do lasagna in it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> > So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? Try searching Pinerest for lasagna, Julie. LOL! I'm *JUST* kidding! ![]() I absolutely *love* lasagna and you would think I'd make it more often than once a year or so. I'm planning to make it soon. I only do so when I have my homemade spaghetti sauce and I made a large batch several weeks ago. (I hope I still have enough left to make lasagna). Whenever I make lasagna, I use two pans every time. The first pan used is a 9 X 13 Pyrex baking dish (it's about 2.5 inches deep). After filling that up to the top, I still have lots of leftover filling and pasta. So I then fill up a Pyrex bread pan with the leftovers and they do fill it right up too. I will cover and freeze the 9 x 13 pan, then I will cook the bread pan of it. This one will give me 3 generous meals (for one). I'll eat those and be happy, then later on I'll cook the frozen 9 x 13 pan full for another multi-day lasagna feast. Of course, once I bake that, I can store meal-sized portions in the freezer using my ancient tupperware bowls with the lids that still provide a good seal after all these years. G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: >I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see >that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last >time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I >just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to >go that route. > >I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And not >just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times (if >that) so I feel that it should have held up better. > >So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: >I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see >that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last >time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I >just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to >go that route. > >I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And not >just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times (if >that) so I feel that it should have held up better. > >So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/25/13 5:31 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? Four inches plus. I'm with you -- I like extra depth so I can get at least four layers in there. -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: >I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see >that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last >time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I >just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to >go that route. Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a serious accident waiting to happen. And what price range are you talking? I don't believe in pricey designer label cookware, for instance I'd never consider an All-Crap pan. >So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? I have several non-stick roasting pans that are suitable for lasagna, several sizes, my largest is non-stick coated carbon steel 19" X 13" X 3 1/2" deep and barely fits in my oven, cost less than $20 more than 20 years ago. I like my SS Farberware roasting pans a lot, I have all three sizes. This one should work well and the price is right: http://www.amazon.com/Nordic-Ware-La...pd_sim_sbs_k_1 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:01:30 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. What on earth for? -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:05:43 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two > non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and > leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. > Janet US Great idea! I'd only use one though. Making lasagna isn't so hard that I'd want to freeze it. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/25/2013 10:22 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see >> that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >> only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last >> time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >> reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I >> just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to >> go that route. > > Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a > serious accident waiting to happen. I'm not sure what she's making if she doesn't put cheese in lasagna. IMHO the foil pans are for something like taking to a pot-luck, where you don't care if you never get the pan/dish back. I wouldn't use them to cook dinner for friends and family. Then again, she also loves paper plates so maybe disposable foil pans are just the ticket. ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see > that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are > only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last > time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only > reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I > just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to > go that route. > > I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and > loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. > They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And not > just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times (if > that) so I feel that it should have held up better. > > So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > > Normal pyrex dish (probably Anchor-Hocking brand), except mine is a 15x10 instead of 13x9 (holds 4 liters) I can /just/ fit a pound of noodles in it, plus all the meat and cheese and other goodies. An extra-deep 13x9 would be better. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Julie Bove wrote: >> >> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > > Try searching Pinerest for lasagna, Julie. > > LOL! I'm *JUST* kidding! ![]() > > I absolutely *love* lasagna and you would think I'd make it more often > than > once a year or so. I'm planning to make it soon. I only do so when I > have > my homemade spaghetti sauce and I made a large batch several weeks ago. (I > hope I still have enough left to make lasagna). > > Whenever I make lasagna, I use two pans every time. The first pan used is > a > 9 X 13 Pyrex baking dish (it's about 2.5 inches deep). After filling that > up > to the top, I still have lots of leftover filling and pasta. So I then > fill > up a Pyrex bread pan with the leftovers and they do fill it right up too. > > I will cover and freeze the 9 x 13 pan, then I will cook the bread pan of > it. This one will give me 3 generous meals (for one). I'll eat those and > be > happy, then later on I'll cook the frozen 9 x 13 pan full for another > multi-day lasagna feast. Of course, once I bake that, I can store > meal-sized portions in the freezer using my ancient tupperware bowls with > the lids that still provide a good seal after all these years. I have used those two pans too. I just want to get rid of my Pyrex! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message news ![]() > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >>I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>see >>that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>Last >>time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often >>I >>just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>to >>go that route. >> >>I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >>loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >>They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And >>not >>just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times >>(if >>that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >> >>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >> > > Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. > Janet US I know. And the Rachael Ray ones are prone to breaking too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:01:30 -0600, Janet Bostwick > > wrote: > >> Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. > > What on earth for? They break in the oven. Seems that many are doing that and it's not just the Pyrex. I was looking at Kohl's. I can't remember the name now but it sounded Spanish. They had a brown and a black pan. Looked the same other than color. The black one got good reviews. Most of the ones who bought the brown one said it either arrived broken or broke during use within the first 6 uses. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >>I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>see >>that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>Last >>time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often >>I >>just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>to >>go that route. >> >>I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >>loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >>They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And >>not >>just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times >>(if >>that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >> >>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >> > > What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two > non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and > leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. > Janet US I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of leftover ingredients. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pltrgyst" > wrote in message ... > On 7/25/13 5:31 AM, Julie Bove wrote: > >> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > > Four inches plus. I'm with you -- I like extra depth so I can get at least > four layers in there. That's my thinking. I have bought an assortment of lasagna pans over the years and none were deep enough. My MIL had some great ones! Also some really huge pie plates. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >>I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>see >>that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>Last >>time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often >>I >>just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>to >>go that route. > > Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a > serious accident waiting to happen. And what price range are you > talking? I don't believe in pricey designer label cookware, for > instance I'd never consider an All-Crap pan. Agree with you there. I have to put them on a cookie sheet. I am hoping to find one for $35 or less. Might go as high as $40. But it seems like the ones that are deep enough are more like $80 and up. I'd just as soon make do with what I have than pay that. > >>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > > I have several non-stick roasting pans that are suitable for lasagna, > several sizes, my largest is non-stick coated carbon steel 19" X 13" X > 3 1/2" deep and barely fits in my oven, cost less than $20 more than > 20 years ago. I like my SS Farberware roasting pans a lot, I have all > three sizes. This one should work well and the price is right: > http://www.amazon.com/Nordic-Ware-La...pd_sim_sbs_k_1 That is a little deeper. But this looks better still! http://www.onestopplus.com/Product.a...:referralID=NA I was hoping to avoid a metal pan because it doesn't work so well to store leftovers in metal when they contain tomato. But I might just get that one. Never would have thought to look there for it! I do have a two big roasters. One being the old fashioned speckled finish. It's huge and lidded. The other is similar in design to these lasagna pans but it has issues. It tends to warp slightly when in use in the oven and then for some weird reason it's super slippery on the bottom. Like it has been greased. When I open the oven door, I have to stand there with mitts in hand waiting to catch it because once in a while it will come shooting out at me. Once it even landed on the floor! Thankfully that time it wasn't over full. I was roasting some kind of vegetables in it. Can't remember what now. By some miracle nothing spilled and no damage to the flooring. It did only cost me something like $10 and I have had it for years so I guess I can't complain too much. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 7/25/2013 10:22 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>> see >>> that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>> only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>> Last >>> time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>> reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. >>> Often I >>> just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>> to >>> go that route. >> >> Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a >> serious accident waiting to happen. > > I'm not sure what she's making if she doesn't put cheese in lasagna. I did post of my lasagna when I made it. I got the idea from Chirstina Pirello who is a vegan chef. She said not to put tofu in lasagna as it doesn't belong there and that you can in fact make it with no cheese at all. She said if any of your guests really do want cheese, to just put it on the top of their portion. She had these really cool, deep, individual dishes that she used. Mine was not vegan. I did put meat in my sauce and I put a layer of zucchini in the middle like I always do. I cut it in squares to serve and put some mozzarella and parmesan on my husband's portion, nuking it just long enough to melt the cheese. No complaints from him. > > IMHO the foil pans are for something like taking to a pot-luck, where you > don't care if you never get the pan/dish back. I wouldn't use them to > cook dinner for friends and family. Then again, she also loves paper > plates so maybe disposable foil pans are just the ticket. ![]() That is what I used to use them for. Because the way I would normally make it, with cheese, makes such a huge amount, I would generally only make it for a potluck. However... Potlucks seem to be a thing of the past, at least in this area so I'm not likely to be doing that any time soon. I am thinking of making a chicken lasagna for Angela using the lasagna noodles, chicken and chicken gravy. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:12 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:01:30 -0600, Janet Bostwick > > > wrote: > > > >> Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. > > > > What on earth for? > > They break in the oven. Seems that many are doing that and it's not just > the Pyrex. I was looking at Kohl's. I can't remember the name now but it > sounded Spanish. They had a brown and a black pan. Looked the same other > than color. The black one got good reviews. Most of the ones who bought > the brown one said it either arrived broken or broke during use within the > first 6 uses. > Oh, man... that's not good! -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pltrgyst wrote:
> > I'm with you -- I like extra depth. > > Larrrwy Another Larrrwy!!! hehehe |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:41:45 -0500, zxcvbob >
wrote: >Julie Bove wrote: >> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see >> that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >> only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last >> time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >> reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I >> just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to >> go that route. >> >> I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >> loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >> They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And not >> just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times (if >> that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >> >> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >> >> > > >Normal pyrex dish (probably Anchor-Hocking brand), except mine is a >15x10 instead of 13x9 (holds 4 liters) I can /just/ fit a pound of >noodles in it, plus all the meat and cheese and other goodies. > >An extra-deep 13x9 would be better. I wouldn't do lasagna in glass. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:54 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message .. . >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>>I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>>see >>>that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>>only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>>Last >>>time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>>reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often >>>I >>>just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>>to >>>go that route. >>> >>>I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >>>loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >>>They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And >>>not >>>just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times >>>(if >>>that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >>> >>>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >>> >> >> What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two >> non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and >> leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. >> Janet US > >I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of leftover >ingredients. > No, you just make(use) enough for one bread pan. Mozz comes in small amounts, you can get small jars of marinar sauce, you can get small amounts of sausage or ground beef. Or, if you must get larger amounts, the two bread pans will use a full recipe of lasagna, or all the other ingredients freeze well. Or, you can just try to figure out something else. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Brooklyn1 wrote: > > Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a > serious accident waiting to happen. Foil pans work just fine provided you have the sense to place them on a baking sheet to provide support. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:16:33 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:54 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > > > > >"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message > .. . > >>> > >> > >> What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two > >> non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and > >> leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. > >> Janet US > > > >I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of leftover > >ingredients. > > > No, you just make(use) enough for one bread pan. Mozz comes in small > amounts, you can get small jars of marinar sauce, you can get small > amounts of sausage or ground beef. Or, if you must get larger > amounts, the two bread pans will use a full recipe of lasagna, or all > the other ingredients freeze well. Or, you can just try to figure out > something else. But, but, but... it's all about why it won't work. Never mind that she could make her husband a pan of lasagna with cheese in it. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:25:57 -0500, "Pete C." >
wrote: > > Brooklyn1 wrote: > > > > Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a > > serious accident waiting to happen. > > Foil pans work just fine provided you have the sense to place them on a > baking sheet to provide support. That's too easy. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> On 7/25/2013 10:22 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I see >>> that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>> only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! Last >>> time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>> reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. Often I >>> just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not to >>> go that route. >> >> Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a >> serious accident waiting to happen. > > I'm not sure what she's making if she doesn't put cheese in lasagna. I think as long as you're using lasagna you can call it lasagna. Same goes for ziti. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > wrote in message ... > Julie Bove wrote: >> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >> see that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) >> are only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep >> enough! Last time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I >> think the only reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese >> in there. Often I just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. >> But I prefer not to go that route. >> >> I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had and >> loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from Walmart. >> They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And >> not just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 >> times (if that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >> >> So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? > > > Normal pyrex dish (probably Anchor-Hocking brand), except mine is a 15x10 > instead of 13x9 (holds 4 liters) I can /just/ fit a pound of noodles in > it, plus all the meat and cheese and other goodies. > > An extra-deep 13x9 would be better. Yes, it's a perfect size that way. Just wish it were deeper. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:30:20 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:16:33 -0600, Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:54 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message >> .. . >> >>> >> >> >> >> What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two >> >> non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and >> >> leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. >> >> Janet US >> > >> >I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of leftover >> >ingredients. >> > >> No, you just make(use) enough for one bread pan. Mozz comes in small >> amounts, you can get small jars of marinar sauce, you can get small >> amounts of sausage or ground beef. Or, if you must get larger >> amounts, the two bread pans will use a full recipe of lasagna, or all >> the other ingredients freeze well. Or, you can just try to figure out >> something else. > >But, but, but... it's all about why it won't work. Never mind that >she could make her husband a pan of lasagna with cheese in it. Yes. I had thought that she could make a regular lasagna for her husband or family and one that meets her needs. But I couldn't see that going over. I suspect strongly that I will now have to make a lasagna soon to kill a sudden craving. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:12 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:01:30 -0600, Janet Bostwick >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. >> > >> > What on earth for? >> >> They break in the oven. Seems that many are doing that and it's not just >> the Pyrex. I was looking at Kohl's. I can't remember the name now but >> it >> sounded Spanish. They had a brown and a black pan. Looked the same >> other >> than color. The black one got good reviews. Most of the ones who bought >> the brown one said it either arrived broken or broke during use within >> the >> first 6 uses. >> > Oh, man... that's not good! That's why I am frightened to buy one. I think I will go with the metal one from One Stop Plus. Might be able to replace my slippery roaster and kill two birds with one stone! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:54 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >> >>"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message . .. >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" >>> > wrote: >>> >>>>I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>>>see >>>>that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>>>only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>>>Last >>>>time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>>>reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. >>>>Often >>>>I >>>>just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>>>to >>>>go that route. >>>> >>>>I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had >>>>and >>>>loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from >>>>Walmart. >>>>They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And >>>>not >>>>just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times >>>>(if >>>>that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >>>> >>>>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >>>> >>> >>> What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two >>> non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and >>> leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. >>> Janet US >> >>I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of leftover >>ingredients. >> > No, you just make(use) enough for one bread pan. Mozz comes in small > amounts, you can get small jars of marinar sauce, you can get small > amounts of sausage or ground beef. Or, if you must get larger > amounts, the two bread pans will use a full recipe of lasagna, or all > the other ingredients freeze well. Or, you can just try to figure out > something else. > Janet US I don't use jarred sauce. And it's the Ricotta that I always have leftover. When I make it with cheese that is. Plus there are leftover noodles. Just seems to me to be a lot of work for a small amount. The way I make mine, a full recipe would fill four bread pans at least. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:16:33 -0600, Janet Bostwick > > wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:54 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message >> .. . >> >>> >> >> >> >> What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two >> >> non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and >> >> leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. >> >> Janet US >> > >> >I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of >> >leftover >> >ingredients. >> > >> No, you just make(use) enough for one bread pan. Mozz comes in small >> amounts, you can get small jars of marinar sauce, you can get small >> amounts of sausage or ground beef. Or, if you must get larger >> amounts, the two bread pans will use a full recipe of lasagna, or all >> the other ingredients freeze well. Or, you can just try to figure out >> something else. > > But, but, but... it's all about why it won't work. Never mind that > she could make her husband a pan of lasagna with cheese in it. I doubt that I would do that. He is not the lasagna lover in this house. He would rather eat a cheeseburger or a frozen pizza! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete C." > wrote in message ... > > Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a >> serious accident waiting to happen. > > Foil pans work just fine provided you have the sense to place them on a > baking sheet to provide support. That's what I do. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/25/2013 3:21 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:12 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> "sf" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:01:30 -0600, Janet Bostwick >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Don't get a Giada deLaurentis pan -- they are on recall. >>>> >>>> What on earth for? >>> >>> They break in the oven. Seems that many are doing that and it's not just >>> the Pyrex. I was looking at Kohl's. I can't remember the name now but >>> it >>> sounded Spanish. They had a brown and a black pan. Looked the same >>> other >>> than color. The black one got good reviews. Most of the ones who bought >>> the brown one said it either arrived broken or broke during use within >>> the >>> first 6 uses. >>> >> Oh, man... that's not good! > > That's why I am frightened to buy one. I think I will go with the metal one > from One Stop Plus. Might be able to replace my slippery roaster and kill > two birds with one stone! > > A nice ceramic baker would do the trick and provide the thermal mass. http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/prod...p?SKU=40519821 Le Creuset® 3-Quart Rectangular Dish - Marseille $54.99 ea. Pricey...yes...but you only need buy it once. I love Le Creuset's stuff. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tert in seattle" > wrote in message ... > jmcquown wrote: >> On 7/25/2013 10:22 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans >>>> I see >>>> that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) >>>> are >>>> only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>>> Last >>>> time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>>> reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. >>>> Often I >>>> just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer >>>> not to >>>> go that route. >>> >>> Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a >>> serious accident waiting to happen. >> >> I'm not sure what she's making if she doesn't put cheese in lasagna. > > I think as long as you're using lasagna you can call it lasagna. Same > goes for ziti. Same goes for any pasta. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> > I have used those two pans too. I just want to get rid of my Pyrex! Why is that? G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:23:03 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message .. . >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:46:54 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>> >>>"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message ... >>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:31:00 -0700, "Julie Bove" >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>>I am in the market for a new baking dish, but most of the lasagna pans I >>>>>see >>>>>that are in my price range (and are not the ones known for breaking) are >>>>>only 2" or thereabouts, deep. I just don't think that is deep enough! >>>>>Last >>>>>time I made lasagna, I used my 9 x 13 Pyrex baker and I think the only >>>>>reason that worked was that I didn't put layers of cheese in there. >>>>>Often >>>>>I >>>>>just buy the foil pans because they are nice and deep. But I prefer not >>>>>to >>>>>go that route. >>>>> >>>>>I would use this dish for more than just lasagna. The pan that I had >>>>>and >>>>>loved (until it got a huge chip in it) was a Paula Deen one from >>>>>Walmart. >>>>>They no longer carry it and I wouldn't get that kind again anyway. And >>>>>not >>>>>just because her name was on it. I probably used the dish maybe 6 times >>>>>(if >>>>>that) so I feel that it should have held up better. >>>>> >>>>>So... How deep is the pan that you normally use for lasagna? >>>>> >>>> >>>> What I do, since it is just the two of us, is that I make it in two >>>> non-stick, 9x5 bread loaf pans. One pan full provides a meal and >>>> leftovers and the second pan gets frozen for another meal. >>>> Janet US >>> >>>I guess that would work but... That would leave me with a lot of leftover >>>ingredients. >>> >> No, you just make(use) enough for one bread pan. Mozz comes in small >> amounts, you can get small jars of marinar sauce, you can get small >> amounts of sausage or ground beef. Or, if you must get larger >> amounts, the two bread pans will use a full recipe of lasagna, or all >> the other ingredients freeze well. Or, you can just try to figure out >> something else. >> Janet US > >I don't use jarred sauce. And it's the Ricotta that I always have leftover. >When I make it with cheese that is. Plus there are leftover noodles. Just >seems to me to be a lot of work for a small amount. The way I make mine, a >full recipe would fill four bread pans at least. > You don't cook more noodles than you need. Figure how many layers you want and how many noodles for each layer. Simple. Ricotta freezes perfectly for the next batch. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete C." wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote: >> >> Foil pans are too flimsy for something heavy and wet like lasagna, a >> serious accident waiting to happen. > >Foil pans work just fine provided you have the sense to place them on a >baking sheet to provide support. I knew someone who doesn't know how to cook would say that... placed on a pan it's tantamount to a double boiler and won't bake properly. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"...An American palate that’s influenced by sweetness and fruit rather than complexity and depth." | Wine | |||
Kenmore Elite counter depth refrigerator | Cooking Equipment |