http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_-Zoom9Uc

On 8/19/2013 7:47 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_-Zoom9Uc
>
I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
her cool.

Jill

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:47:37 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_-Zoom9Uc

If you've ever watched Shark Tank or Dragon's Den, Kevin O'Leary makes
it quite clear that he's ONLY interested in is "making muuuuneyy!"
He probably has tons of his "muuuneyy" invested in Monsanto.
It was great to see him trumped at every move by a 14 YO young lady,
and she didn't even have to resort to name calling and insults like
O'Leary usually does.
Way to go Rachel, keep up the good work.

Ross.
Southern Ontario, Canada

jmcquown wrote:
> Sharp young woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She
> didn't lose her cool.
WEBTV!!! ROFL!!!!

Bla bla bla, you're so clever. NOT! ROFL! And the webtv reference....
seriously? *You're* making fun of *me* with webtv? Do you not realize that
you have just validated everyone who has laughed at you for it?

One note... you can't lay off the crossdressing stuff in your lame attempt
at humor. You got caught on it already, and we all know about it, and "I
know you are but what am I" doesn't fix it.

Now **** off and die, you phony little pussy, and next time you decide to
start flinging shit at people outside your own back yard, try to prepare
your freeble little mind for the fact that you need to be willing to take
what you dish out, because someone may do the same thing back at you. If
you're going to keep being a pussy who wants to give shit but screams like a
sissy baby when you get it back, you'll just spend your sad little life
going through episodes like this where your true nature is revealed to all.

I'm done with you now, shithead. That is, unless you want more.

And unless you decide to resume making personal attacks on people who are
trying to discuss reasonable things. A little good natured banter between
rivals is fine, but you cannot seem to understand why it's offensive to
invade other forums and turn on a tirade of hateful personal attacks on
individuals. So if you go that route again, I'll be back on your ass, with
Goatboy, Ronald, and a bunch more tasty morsels. And go ahead and post all
the stupid shit you want in the Chiefs forums... you're not getting any
action because they are too smart to take your juvenile bait.... and
besides, yuou're just not funny.

Now please refrain from being an asshole and I will do the same.... or not,
your choice.

Besides, I can be a much bigger asshole than you when provoked, so do the
smart thing while you have this one opportunity at a truce.

MBKC

Ross@home wrote:
> Way to go Rachel, keep up the good work.
WEBTV!!! ROFL!!!!

Bla bla bla, you're so clever. NOT! ROFL! And the webtv reference....
seriously? *You're* making fun of *me* with webtv? Do you not realize that
you have just validated everyone who has laughed at you for it?

One note... you can't lay off the crossdressing stuff in your lame attempt
at humor. You got caught on it already, and we all know about it, and "I
know you are but what am I" doesn't fix it.

Now **** off and die, you phony little pussy, and next time you decide to
start flinging shit at people outside your own back yard, try to prepare
your freeble little mind for the fact that you need to be willing to take
what you dish out, because someone may do the same thing back at you. If
you're going to keep being a pussy who wants to give shit but screams like a
sissy baby when you get it back, you'll just spend your sad little life
going through episodes like this where your true nature is revealed to all.

I'm done with you now, shithead. That is, unless you want more.

And unless you decide to resume making personal attacks on people who are
trying to discuss reasonable things. A little good natured banter between
rivals is fine, but you cannot seem to understand why it's offensive to
invade other forums and turn on a tirade of hateful personal attacks on
individuals. So if you go that route again, I'll be back on your ass, with
Goatboy, Ronald, and a bunch more tasty morsels. And go ahead and post all
the stupid shit you want in the Chiefs forums... you're not getting any
action because they are too smart to take your juvenile bait.... and
besides, yuou're just not funny.

Now please refrain from being an asshole and I will do the same.... or not,
your choice.

Besides, I can be a much bigger asshole than you when provoked, so do the
smart thing while you have this one opportunity at a truce.

MBKC

On 2013-08-20, jmcquown > wrote:

> I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
> woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
> her cool.

Agree. Plus, this Kevin twit uses specious arguments to no avail. So
what if 50K ppl die. Too damn many ppl on this tiny orb, anyway. We
need to lose about 5 billion. Everybody else tests so Monsanto
doesn't need to? Who is this asshat? I've had my run, so no sweat
off my brow, but it's a losing game and there's a good chance GMOs
will be a key player in man's demise. Bottom line, it's not nice to
fool mother nature and to add insult to injury, Monsanto is doing it
out of pure greed. They don't give a rat's ass how many ppl die as
long as they make a profit.

nb

On 8/20/2013 9:31 AM, notbob wrote:
> On 2013-08-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>
>> I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
>> woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
>> her cool.
>
> Agree. Plus, this Kevin twit uses specious arguments to no avail. So
> what if 50K ppl die. Too damn many ppl on this tiny orb, anyway. We
> need to lose about 5 billion. Everybody else tests so Monsanto
> doesn't need to? Who is this asshat? I've had my run, so no sweat
> off my brow, but it's a losing game and there's a good chance GMOs
> will be a key player in man's demise. Bottom line, it's not nice to
> fool mother nature and to add insult to injury, Monsanto is doing it
> out of pure greed. They don't give a rat's ass how many ppl die as
> long as they make a profit.
>
> nb
>
What got me the GMO rice with Vitamin A. She researched it, said
the hypothetical kid would have to eat 37 bowls of rice a DAY. He was
like, so what? Uh, dude, if the kid had could get his hands on
30-something bowls of rice a day he would most likely have access to
other food, too. It was a ridiculous point for him to try to press.

Jill

notbob wrote:
> They don't give a rat's ass how many ppl die as
> long as they make a profit.
>
> nb
WEBTV!!! ROFL!!!!

Bla bla bla, you're so clever. NOT! ROFL! And the webtv reference....
seriously? *You're* making fun of *me* with webtv? Do you not realize that
you have just validated everyone who has laughed at you for it?

One note... you can't lay off the crossdressing stuff in your lame attempt
at humor. You got caught on it already, and we all know about it, and "I
know you are but what am I" doesn't fix it.

Now **** off and die, you phony little pussy, and next time you decide to
start flinging shit at people outside your own back yard, try to prepare
your freeble little mind for the fact that you need to be willing to take
what you dish out, because someone may do the same thing back at you. If
you're going to keep being a pussy who wants to give shit but screams like a
sissy baby when you get it back, you'll just spend your sad little life
going through episodes like this where your true nature is revealed to all.

I'm done with you now, shithead. That is, unless you want more.

And unless you decide to resume making personal attacks on people who are
trying to discuss reasonable things. A little good natured banter between
rivals is fine, but you cannot seem to understand why it's offensive to
invade other forums and turn on a tirade of hateful personal attacks on
individuals. So if you go that route again, I'll be back on your ass, with
Goatboy, Ronald, and a bunch more tasty morsels. And go ahead and post all
the stupid shit you want in the Chiefs forums... you're not getting any
action because they are too smart to take your juvenile bait.... and
besides, yuou're just not funny.

Now please refrain from being an asshole and I will do the same.... or not,
your choice.

Besides, I can be a much bigger asshole than you when provoked, so do the
smart thing while you have this one opportunity at a truce.

MBKC

On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:33:22 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 8/19/2013 7:47 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_-Zoom9Uc
>>
>I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
>woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
>her cool.

She did a superb job, given her age. The guy was just another Rush
Limbaugh type IMO and made an ass of himself.

Myself, I thought she conclusively won... but then I already agreed
with her before I even saw the video...

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:31:55 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 8/20/2013 9:31 AM, notbob wrote:
>> On 2013-08-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
>>> woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
>>> her cool.
>>
>> Agree. Plus, this Kevin twit uses specious arguments to no avail. So
>> what if 50K ppl die. Too damn many ppl on this tiny orb, anyway. We
>> need to lose about 5 billion. Everybody else tests so Monsanto
>> doesn't need to? Who is this asshat? I've had my run, so no sweat
>> off my brow, but it's a losing game and there's a good chance GMOs
>> will be a key player in man's demise. Bottom line, it's not nice to
>> fool mother nature and to add insult to injury, Monsanto is doing it
>> out of pure greed. They don't give a rat's ass how many ppl die as
>> long as they make a profit.
>>
>> nb
>>
>What got me the GMO rice with Vitamin A. She researched it, said
>the hypothetical kid would have to eat 37 bowls of rice a DAY. He was
>like, so what? Uh, dude, if the kid had could get his hands on
>30-something bowls of rice a day he would most likely have access to
>other food, too. It was a ridiculous point for him to try to press.

Yeah, that was an particularly stupid argument.

On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:57:48 -0400, Ross@home wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:47:37 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_-Zoom9Uc
>
>If you've ever watched Shark Tank or Dragon's Den, Kevin O'Leary makes
>it quite clear that he's ONLY interested in is "making muuuuneyy!"
>He probably has tons of his "muuuneyy" invested in Monsanto.
>It was great to see him trumped at every move by a 14 YO young lady,
>and she didn't even have to resort to name calling and insults like
>O'Leary usually does.
>Way to go Rachel, keep up the good work.

Yep, imagine what she could do in the future - a very intelligent,
switched on young lady.

On 8/20/2013 6:16 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:31:55 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/20/2013 9:31 AM, notbob wrote:
>>> On 2013-08-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
>>>> woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
>>>> her cool.
>>>
>>> Agree. Plus, this Kevin twit uses specious arguments to no avail. So
>>> what if 50K ppl die. Too damn many ppl on this tiny orb, anyway. We
>>> need to lose about 5 billion. Everybody else tests so Monsanto
>>> doesn't need to? Who is this asshat? I've had my run, so no sweat
>>> off my brow, but it's a losing game and there's a good chance GMOs
>>> will be a key player in man's demise. Bottom line, it's not nice to
>>> fool mother nature and to add insult to injury, Monsanto is doing it
>>> out of pure greed. They don't give a rat's ass how many ppl die as
>>> long as they make a profit.
>>>
>>> nb
>>>
>> What got me the GMO rice with Vitamin A. She researched it, said
>> the hypothetical kid would have to eat 37 bowls of rice a DAY. He was
>> like, so what? Uh, dude, if the kid had could get his hands on
>> 30-something bowls of rice a day he would most likely have access to
>> other food, too. It was a ridiculous point for him to try to press.
>
> Yeah, that was an particularly stupid argument.
>
I'm correcting myself, she said *27* bowls of rice a day. But still...
what a stupid thing for him to say! He tried to "guilt" her by saying
other kids aren't as lucky as she is... does that somehow change the
facts? Not in my book.

Jill

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:21:25 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 8/20/2013 6:16 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:31:55 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/20/2013 9:31 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>> On 2013-08-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if she "won", but she got a point across. Sharp young
>>>>> woman. The guy seemed to try to brow-beat her a bit. She didn't lose
>>>>> her cool.
>>>>
>>>> Agree. Plus, this Kevin twit uses specious arguments to no avail. So
>>>> what if 50K ppl die. Too damn many ppl on this tiny orb, anyway. We
>>>> need to lose about 5 billion. Everybody else tests so Monsanto
>>>> doesn't need to? Who is this asshat? I've had my run, so no sweat
>>>> off my brow, but it's a losing game and there's a good chance GMOs
>>>> will be a key player in man's demise. Bottom line, it's not nice to
>>>> fool mother nature and to add insult to injury, Monsanto is doing it
>>>> out of pure greed. They don't give a rat's ass how many ppl die as
>>>> long as they make a profit.
>>>>
>>>> nb
>>>>
>>> What got me the GMO rice with Vitamin A. She researched it, said
>>> the hypothetical kid would have to eat 37 bowls of rice a DAY. He was
>>> like, so what? Uh, dude, if the kid had could get his hands on
>>> 30-something bowls of rice a day he would most likely have access to
>>> other food, too. It was a ridiculous point for him to try to press.
>>
>> Yeah, that was an particularly stupid argument.
>>
>I'm correcting myself, she said *27* bowls of rice a day. But still...
>what a stupid thing for him to say! He tried to "guilt" her by saying
>other kids aren't as lucky as she is... does that somehow change the
>facts? Not in my book.

No, it certainly doesn't change any of the facts.